Chromothripsis is the phenomenon by which up to thousands of clustered chromosomal rearrangements occur in a single event in localised and confined genomic regions in one or a few chromosomes, and is known to be involved in both cancer and congenital diseases. It occurs through one massive genomic rearrangement during a single catastrophic event in the cell's history. It is believed that for the cell to be able to withstand such a destructive event, the occurrence of such an event must be the upper limit of what a cell can tolerate and survive. The chromothripsis phenomenon opposes the conventional theory that cancer is the gradual acquisition of genomic rearrangements and somatic mutations over time.
The simplest model as to how these rearrangements occur is through the simultaneous fragmentation of distinct chromosomal regions (breakpoints show a non-random distribution) and then subsequent imperfect reassembly by DNA repair pathways or aberrant DNA replication mechanisms. Chromothripsis occurs early in tumour development and leads to cellular transformation by loss of tumour suppressors and oncogene amplifications.
Chromothripsis is a neologism that comes from the Greek words chromo which means color (and represents chromosomes because they are strongly stained by particular dyes) and thripsis which means 'shattering into pieces'.
- 1 First observation
- 2 Characteristic features
- 3 Breakage and repair of chromosomes
- 4 Mechanism
- 5 Predispositions
- 6 Relationship to carcinogenesis
- 7 Prognostics and diagnostics
- 8 Criticism
- 9 See also
- 10 References
Chromothripsis was first observed in sequencing the genome of a chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Through paired end sequencing, 42 chromosomal rearrangements were found in the long arm of chromosome 4 and a significant number of rearrangements were found in regions of chromosomes 1, 12, and 15. Subsequent investigations using genome-wide paired-end sequencing and SNP array analysis have found similar patterns of chromothripsis in various human cancers, e.g., Melanomas, Sarcomas and colorectal, lung and thyroid cancers. In subsequent investigations, about 25% of studied bone cancers displayed evidence of chromothripsis. Chromothripsis has been seen in 2–3% of cancers across all subtypes.
- Large numbers of complex rearrangements in localised regions of single chromosomes or chromosome arms (showed by high density and clustered breakpoints) which suggests that chromosomes need to be condensed e.g. in mitosis for chromothripsis to occur.
- Low copy number states- alternation between 2 states (sometimes 3) suggesting that rearrangements occurred in a short period of time.
- In chromothriptic areas you get alternation of regions which retain heterozygosity-two copy (no loss or gain),with regions that have loss of heterozygosity- one copy (heterozygous deletion). This suggest that the rearrangements took place at a time that both parental copies of the chromosome were present and hence early on the development of the cancer cell. This also supports the fact that chromothripsis occurs as one catastrophic event in the cells history as once heterozygosity is lost it generally can't be regained and hence the 2 copy heterozygous state occurring in patches throughout the chromothriptic region is hard to explain.
- Recently, several additional criteria for the inference of chromothripsis events have been described: clustering of chromosomal breakpoints; prevalence of rearrangements affecting a single haplotype; randomness of fragment joins (that is an approximately equal distribution of tail-to-head, head-to-tail, head-to-head and tail-to-tail segmental connections occurring in conjunction with chromothripsis); and randomness of DNA fragment order along resultant derivative chromosome. Furthermore, if all DNA rearrangements in a region with chromothripsis are detectable, the relative order in which segments are joined can be reconstructed and chromothripsis events identified through "derivative chromosome walks".
Breakage and repair of chromosomes
The most widely accepted and straightforward model for chromothripsis is that within a single chromosome, distinct chromosomal regions become fragmented/shattered almost simultaneously and subsequently rejoined in an incorrect orientation. Deletion of certain fragments, including deletions that are a few hundred base pairs long, and hence gene segments is possible and consequently the production of double minute chromosomes. When multiple chromosomes are involved in chromothripsis, fragments of both chromosomes are joined together by paired end joining and the exchange of fragments between the original chromosomes.
Rejoining of fragments require very minimal or even no sequence homology and consequently suggesting that nonhomologous or microhomologous repair mechanisms such as non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated break induced repair (MMBIR) dominate double stranded break repair and are involved in modelling the chromothriptic landscape, opposed to homologous recombination which requires sequence homology. Joining of fragments and rearrangements have also been shown to take place on paternal chromosomes.
As well as in cancer cells, chromothripsis has also be reported in patients with developmental and cognitive defects, i.e. germ line cells. Using multiple molecular techniques of these germ line cells that have appeared to have undergone a chromothripsis like process, as well as inversions and translocations, duplications and triplications were also seen and hence increases in copy number. This can be attributed to replicative processes that involve the restoration of collapsed replication forks such as fork stalling and template switching model (FoSTeS) or microhomology mediated break induced replication (MMBIR). This makes it seem that it would be more appropriate to name the phenomenon 'chromoanasynthesis' which means chromosome reconstitution rather than chromothripsis. However most samples displaying chromothripsis that are analysed have low copy states and hence have paired end joining predominating repair mechanisms.
Further study of chromothripsis events and chromothriptic samples is required in order to understand the relative importance of paired end joining and replicative repair in chromothripsis.
One of the main characteristic features of chromothripsis is that large numbers of complex rearrangements in localised regions of single chromosomes. The ability to cause such confined damage suggests that chromosomes need to be condensed e.g. in mitosis, for chromothripsis and chromosome rearrangements to be initiated.
The mechanisms of chromothripsis are not well understood. There are multiple ideas of how chromothripsis occurs.
The Micronuclei model is the most accepted model as to how and when the breakage and repair in chromothripsis occurs. In cancer cells, fragmentation of chromosomes has been correlated with the presence of micronuclei. During the proliferation of cancer cell, whole or partial chromosome containing micronuclei are structures formed by mitotic errors in the transition from metaphase to anaphase- cells with defective chromosome segregation will form micronuclei which contain whole or fragments of chromosomes. The segregation of single chromosomes into individual micronuclei explains why DNA fragmentation is isolated to single chromosomes in chromothripsis.
These micronuclei undergo defective DNA replication which is slower than DNA replication in the main nucleus and causes a proximal DNA damage response (DDR) to be initiated however DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint checkpoint activation fail to follow  and consequently chromosomes that are not correctly replicated in micronuclei become crushed and broken up. The method by which the crushing and breaking up of the chromosome inside the micronuclei is not fully understood but is thought to be either caused by premature chromosome condensation which is entails semi-replicated chromosomes being compacted by cyclin-dependent kinase activity  or by aberrant DNA replication.These fragmented chromosomes segments can be joined together to give rise to rearranged chromosomes and can also subsequently be reincorporated into the main nucleus of a daughter cell and can exist for several generations of cell cycle and to continue the development of a cancer cell.
Ionising radiation during mitosis
Stress stimuli such as radiation, nutrient deprivation or oxygen deprivation which causes apoptosis will lead to fragmentation of chromatin and cause most cells to apoptose. However a small subset of cells will survive apoptosis. This cleaved DNA will require repair, and when this is done incorrectly, rearrangements will be introduced into the chromosome. There is currently speculation that chromothripsis might be driven by viruses such as γ-herpes viruses which cause cancer, possibly by the inhibition of apoptosis. However this speculation requires further investigation.
Telomeric double stranded breaks or telomeric dysfunction is generated by exogenous agents or replicative stress. Telomeric dysfunctions are known to promote chromosomal abnormalities associated with cancer cells. For example Telomeric double stranded breaks/ telomeric dysfunctions can cause sister chromatid/ end to end fusion and the formation of anaphase bridges resulting in dicentric chromosomes that can result in further rearrangements .This is a more plausible explanation as chromothripsis has been seen to mostly involve telomeric regions.
Mutations in the TP53 gene are important for the maintenance of genome stability has been seen to be a predisposing mutation for chromothripsis.
Through genome sequencing of a Sonic- Hedgehog medulloblastoma (SHH-MB) brain tumour, a significant link between TP53 mutations and chromothripsis in SHH-MBs has been found. Further studies on the association between TP53 and chromothripsis has signified a role for p53, a tumour suppressor protein, in the massive genomic rearrangement which take place which takes place in chromothripsis. Hence there is a strong association between p53 status and chromothripsis, giving an insight into why some cancers are more aggressive.
It has also been shown that TP53 mutation comprising cells show preference to low fidelity repair mechanisms such as non-homologous end joining. TP53 mutations have also been expressed in cells that exhibit shorter and are more end-end fusion prone. It is also hypothesized that TP53 mutations may be implicated in premature chromosome condensation. TP53 may also contribute to the ability of cells to survive the catastrophic event that normally would be considered to be too destructive to withstand.
Relationship to carcinogenesis
Chromosome segregation errors can lead to DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations such as aneuploidy which is linked to tumour development. The formation of micronuclei generally occurs concurrently with aneuploidy and aneuploidy cells are controlled by mechanisms involving p53. In order for micronuclei to progress through the cell cycle and induce chromosome damage, diminished levels of p53 have been seen to be needed. Through further investigation, chromothriptic tumours have been seen to occur in patients with p53 mutations.
Defects in DNA damage response can cause increased frequency of micronucleus formation and hence the occurrence of chromothripsis. There are numerous examples of how DDR pathways affect chromothripsis and hence cause tumour development and cancers.
- Bloom's syndrome: Mutations in BLM gene which encodes a family of RecQ DNA Helicases cause accumulation of micronuclei that give rise to Blooms syndrome which predisposes patients to cancer.
- Fanconi anaemia: Fanconi Anaemia is a disorder that predisposes patients to cancer due to its effect on DNA repair pathways. Mutations in FANCM gene cause increased micronucleus formation and hence extreme chromothripsis.
Prognostics and diagnostics
Research in patients with chromothripsis-associated cancers may provide some information about prognosis. TP53 mutations and chromothripsis have been linked in SHH medulloblastoma patients. Poor clinical outcome in neuroblastomas (such as those caused by deletion of the FANC gene in Fanconi Anaemia) has been linked to the frequent occurrence chromothripsis. Screening biopsy materials for chromothripsis in good prognosis estimates and better treatment of patients.
The experiments that underpin the single-event nature of chromothripsis, which is central to the theory, do not necessarily prove the existence of a single event. A single catastrophic event has not been observed experimentally. The hypothesis of chromothripsisis is based on compound statistics. Known models of progressive cancer development do not contradict the occurrence of complex rearrangement and there is no evidence that shows these arrangements would happen within a single cell cycle catastrophe. It has been suggested that there is no single traumatic event, but that repeated breakage-fusion-bridge cycles cause the complex genetic patterns.
- Maher CA, Wilson RK (2012). "Chromothripsis and Human Disease: Piecing Together the Shattering Process". Cell 148: 29–32. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.006.
- Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B 'et al.' (2011). "Massive Genomic Rearrangement Acquired in a Single Catastrophic Event during Cancer Development". Cell 144: 27–40. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055. PMC 3065307. PMID 21215367.
- Forment JV, Kaidi A, Jackson SP (2012). "Chromothripsis and cancer: causes and consequences of chromosome shattering". Nature Reviews Cancer 12: 663–670. doi:10.1038/nrc3352.
- Kloosterman WP, Hoogstraat M, Paling O 'et al.' (2011). "Chromothripsis is a common mechanism driving genomic reaarangements in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer". Genome Biology 12: R103. doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r103.
- Korbel JO, Campbell PJ (2013). "Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes". Cell 152: 1226–36. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.023.
- Liu P, Erez A, Nagamani SCS 'et al.' (2011). "Chromosome Catastrophes Involve Replication Mechanisms Generating Complex Genomic Rearrangements". Cell 146: 889–903. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.042.
- Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R, 'et al.' (2012). "DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis". Nature 482: 53–58. doi:10.1038/nature10802.
- Giunta S,Belotserkovskaya R, Jackson SP (2010). "DNA damage signalling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.". The Journal of Cell Biology 190: 197–207. doi:10.1083/jcb.200911156.
- Rao PN, Johnson RT (1972). "Premature Chromosome Condensation: A mechanism for the elimination of chromosomes in virus-fused cells". Journal of Cell Science 10: 495–513.
- Tubio JMC, Estavill X (2011). "Cancer: When catastrophe strikes a cell". Nature 470: 476–477. doi:10.1038/470476a.
- Rausch T, Jones DTW, Zaptka M 'et al.' (2012). "Genome Sequencing of Pediatric Medulloblastoma Links Catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 Mutations". Cell 1–2: 59–71. doi:10.1038/nature10802.
- Janssen A,Van der Burg M, Szuhai K 'et al.' (2011). "Chromosome Segregation Errors as a cause of DNA Damage and Structural Chromosome Aberrations". Science 333: 1895–1898. doi:10.1126/science.1210214.
- Thompson SL, Compton DA (2011). "Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism". The journal of general physiology 188: 369–381. doi:10.1083/jcb.200905057.
- Li M, Fang X, Baker DJ 'et al.' (2011). "The ATM-P53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 14188–14193. doi:10.1073/pnas.1005960107.
- Rosin MP, German J (1985). "Evidence for chromosome instability in vivo in bloom syndrome: Increased numbers of micronuclei in exfoliated cells". Human Genetics 71: 187–191. doi:10.1007/BF00284570.
- Tischkowitz MD, Hodgson SV (2003). "Fanconi anaemia". Journal of Medical Genetics 40: 1–10. doi:10.1136/jmg.40.1.1. PMC 1735271. PMID 12525534.
- Heddle JA, Lue CB, Sauders EF, Benz RD (1978). "Sensitivty to five mutagens in Fanconi's Anemia as measured by the micronucleus method". Cancer Research 38: 2983–29881.
- Molenaar JJ,Koster J, Zwijenburg DA 'et al.' (2012). "Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes". Nature 483 (7391): 589–593. doi:10.1038/nature10910.
- Righolt C and Mai S (November 2012). "Shattered and stitched chromosomes—chromothripsis and chromoanasynthesis—manifestations of a new chromosome crisis?". Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 51 (11): 975–981. doi:10.1002/gcc.21981. PMID 22811041.
- Sorzano CO, Pascual-Montano A, Sánchez de Diego A, Martínez-A C and van Wely KH (July 2013). "Chromothripsis: Breakage-fusion-bridge over and over again.". Cell Cycle 12 (13): 2016–2023. doi:10.4161/cc.25266. PMID 23759584.