Priesthood Correlation Program
||This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2009)|
In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the Priesthood Correlation Program (also called the Correlation Program or simply Correlation) is a program designed to provide a systematic approach to provide consistency and implement uniform coordinated changes to its ordinances, doctrines, organizations, meetings, materials, and other programs and activities. The LDS Church is organized according to priesthood function, and correlation provides support to priesthood quorums, thereby improving communication and leadership, and keeping unorthodox information, doctrines and other undesired concepts from being introduced or revived.
Background and history
In the LDS Church, all organizations and activities are intended to complement the mission of the church and are considered subject to the priesthood, helping to complete its responsibilities.
Before the correlation movement, the various organizations and auxiliaries of the church, including the Relief Society, Primary, Sunday School, welfare program, genealogy programs, and the Young Men and Young Women organizations were largely under the direction of the stake or ward, and curriculum could vary from ward to ward. Formal organization of a Correlation Committee occurred in 1908. As part of the correlation program, these organizations were elevated to a general church level, under the direction of the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles.
Further reorganization occurred during the early 1960s, and in 1972 the Correlation Department was established, adding responsibility for all printed materials and programs.
Doctrines and structure
Between the 1920s and early 1960s, there was an increase in printed material available to LDS Church members, much of which contained opinions or quotes of church leaders that contradicted the evolving official positions and doctrines of the church. In addition, historical documents surfaced, were made available or printed from early members diaries which did not support the official church history. To counter this, the Correlation Committee, under the direction of the First Presidency, began to print materials and other curriculum to clarify and standardize what the church hierarchy considered to be official doctrine and history.
Another result is the block program, which standardized Sunday as the official day to hold most public church meetings. Prior to the 1980s, meetings were held throughout the week. For example, in a local ward, the Relief Society may have met on Monday mornings, Primary and choir practice on Tuesday, Young Women and Young Men on Thursday, ward activities and events on Friday, and service projects on Saturday. Because of the church's focus on families, the Correlation Committee recommended a three-hour block of meetings on Sunday that would include a sacrament meeting, Sunday School, priesthood and Relief Society meetings, and Primary, Young Men and Young Women classes. This would allow families to spend more time together, and for parents and children to be more involved with their communities.
In addition, due to a more centralized structure, local building funds and ward budgets were centralized by the church, easing the contributions of local members for such funds, and allowing for a more equitable distribution of funds. Prior to this, church areas with more wealthy members tended to have better-funded buildings and activities than poorer areas.
Results and curriculum
Because of the correlation program, the church generally operates the same in structure, practice and doctrine globally. For example, members in Germany, Kenya and Utah all generally study the same lessons and attend the same type of meetings in any given week.
Currently there are two curriculum tracks for members; one for areas where the church is fully established in wards and stakes, and another for areas where the church is growing and is smaller in number. The doctrines taught are the same; however, the emphasis on principles, church structure and church culture is more emphasized in fledgling areas, while emphasis in established areas focus more on application of the principles taught.
- History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- Strengthening Church Members Committee
- Women and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- Allen, James B.; Leonard, Glen M. (1992), "Correlating the Worldwide Church, 1960-1973", The Story of the Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, ISBN 0-87579-565-X.
- Cleverly, J. Michael (Summer 1996), "Mormonism on the Big Mac Standard", Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 29 (2): 69–75.
- Duffy, John-Charles (September 2005), "The New Missionary Discussions and the Future of Correlation", Sunstone (138): 28–46.
- Duke, James T., ed. (1998), Latter-day Saint Social Life: Social Research on the LDS Church and its Members, Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, ISBN 1-57008-396-7.
- Ludlow, Daniel H. (2000), "Correlation", in Garr; Cowan; Cannon, Encyclopedia of Latter-day Saint History, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, ISBN 1-57345-822-8.
- May, Frank O., Jr. (1992), "Correlation of the Church, Administration", in Daniel H. Ludlow, Encyclopedia of Mormonism 1, New York: Macmillan, pp. 323–25.
- Mouritsen, Dale C. (August 1968), The Relationship of the Priesthood Correlation Program to the Latter-day Saint Concept of Zion, Master's thesis, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.
- Prince, Gregory A.; Wright, Wm. Robert (2005), "Correlation and Church Administration", David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 139–158, ISBN 0-87480-822-7.
- Rose, Jerry (May 1973), The Correlation Program of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints During the Twentieth Century, Master's thesis, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.
- Smith, Daymon Mickel (2007), The Last Shall Be First and the First Shall Be Last: Discourse and Mormon History, Ph.D. dissertation, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.