Clarke's three laws
| This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2014) |
Clarke's Three Laws are three "laws" of prediction formulated by the British writer Arthur C. Clarke. They are:
- When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
- The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Contents
Origins[edit]
The first Clarke's Law was proposed by Arthur C. Clarke in the essay "Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination", in Profiles of the Future (1962).[1]
The second law is offered as a simple observation in the same essay. Status as Clarke's Second Law was conferred by others. In a 1973 revision of his compendium of essays, Profiles of the Future, Clarke acknowledged the Second Law and proposed the Third. "As three laws were good enough for Newton, I have modestly decided to stop there".
The Third Law is the best known and most widely cited. Also appearing in Clarke's Essay "Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination", it may be an echo of a statement in a 1942 story by Leigh Brackett: "Witchcraft to the ignorant, .... Simple science to the learned".[2] Even earlier examples of this sentiment may be found in Wild Talents by author Charles Fort where he makes the statement: "...a performance that may some day be considered understandable, but that, in these primitive times, so transcends what is said to be the known; that it is what I mean by magic."
In novels (The City and the Stars) and short stories ("The Sentinel" upon which 2001: A Space Odyssey was based), Clarke presents ultra-advanced technologies. In Against the Fall of Night, the human race regresses after a full billion years of civilization, and faces remnants of past glories such as roadways. Physical possibilities are inexplicable from their perspective.
A fourth law has been added to the canon, despite Sir Arthur Clarke's declared intention of not going one better than Sir Isaac Newton. Geoff Holder quotes: "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert" in his book 101 Things to Do with a Stone Circle (The History Press, 2009), and offers as his source, Arthur C. Clarke's Profiles of the Future (new edition, 1999).
Snowclones and variations of the third law[edit]
There exist a number of snowclones and variations of the third law
- Any sufficiently advanced act of benevolence is indistinguishable from malevolence.[3] (referring to artificial intelligence)
- Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. (Grey's law)
- Any sufficiently advanced troll is indistinguishable from a genuine kook. (Poe's law)
- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.[4]
and its contrapositive:
- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
The third law can be reversed in fictional universes involving magic:
The law can also be used to show similarities in contrasting instances, and vice versa (where 'ignorant' is unlearned, and 'stupid' is inability to learn):
- "Any sufficiently ignorant person is indistinguishable from stupid."[7]
The law can also refer to the lost advances of the past, unexplained archaeology and reconstructions of folk mysticism :
- "Any sufficiently ancient recovered wisdom or artifact is also indistinguishable from magic"
See also[edit]
- List of eponymous laws
- First contact (anthropology)
- Futures studies
- Niven's laws
- Search for extraterrestrial intelligence
- Three Laws of Robotics
- Scientism
References[edit]
- ^ "'Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination'" in the collection Profiles of the Future: An Enquiry into the Limits of the Possible (1962, rev. 1973), pp. 14, 21, 36.
- ^ "The Sorcerer of Rhiannon", Astounding February 1942, p. 39.
- ^ Rubin, Charles T. (5 November 2008). "What is the Good of Transhumanism?". In Chadwick, Ruth; Gordijn, Bert. Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity. Springer. p. 149. ISBN 9789048180059. Archived from the original on 16 October 2014. Retrieved 17 October 2014.
Rubin is referring to an earlier work of his:
Rubin, Charles T. (1996). "First contact: Copernican moment or nine day’s wonder?". In Kingsley, Stuart A.; Lemarchand, Guillermo A. The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) in the Optical Spectrum II: 31 January-1 February 1996, San Jose, California, Band 2704. Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering. Bellingham, WA: SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering. pp. 161–184. ISBN 9780819420787. - ^ http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/3418.html
- ^ http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/comic.php?date=20081205
- ^ http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SufficientlyAnalyzedMagic
- ^ http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/2dsqij/report_armed_men_attack_liberia_ebola_clinic/cjsty2b
External links[edit]
- The origins of the Three Laws
- "What's Your Law?" (lists some of the corollaries)
- "A Gadget Too Far" at Infinity Plus