Various letters have been used to write the click consonants of southern Africa. The current IPA letters were created by J. G. Krönlein, popularized by Karl Richard Lepsius, and continued by Wilhelm Bleek.
Individual languages have had various orthographies, usually based on either the Lepsius alphabet or more strictly on the Latin alphabet. Clicks written with Latin letters such as c q x ç have case forms; when written with Lepsius pipe letters such as ǀ ǃ ǁ ǂ they do not.
By the early 19th century, the otherwise unneeded letters c q x were used as the basis for writing clicks in Zulu by British and German missions. However, for general linguistics this was confusing, as each of these letters had other uses. There were various ad hoc attempts to create letters—often iconic symbols—for click consonants, with the most successful being that of Krönlein popularized by Lepsius. Doke later created a different system, based on an empirically informed conception of the nature of click consonants. The only other system that has seen wide use is Kirshenbaum, an ASCII substitute for the IPA, which has been used in transcribing Damin.
|Lepsius (1854)||ǀ ||ǀ̣||ǀǀ||ǀ́ |
|Lingvarium (ca. 2005)||пъ||цъ||къ||лъ||чъ|
Besides the difference in letter shape (variations on a pipe for Lepsius, modifications of Latin letters for Doke and Beach), there was a conceptual difference: Lepsius used one letter as the base for all click consonants of the same place of articulation (called the 'influx'), and added a second letter or diacritic for the manner of articulation (called the 'efflux'), treating them as two distinct sounds (the click proper and its accompaniment), whereas Doke used a separate letter for each tenuis, voiced, and nasal click, treating each as a distinct consonant, and thus following the example of the Latin alphabet, where the voiced and nasal occlusives also treated as distinct consonants (p b m, t d n, c j ñ, k g ŋ). Kirshenbaum differs from either in using a generic ⟨ǃ⟩ for all clicks, with a preceding letter to indicate both place and manner.
Doke's nasal-click letters were based on the letter ⟨n⟩, continuing the pattern of the pulmonic nasal consonants ⟨m ɱ n ɲ ɳ ŋ ɴ⟩. For example, the letter for the dental nasal click is ⟨ȵ⟩; the alveolar is similar but with the curl on the left leg, the lateral has a curl on both legs, and the retroflex and palatal are ɲ, ŋ with a curl on their free leg: . The voiced-click letters are more individuated, a couple were simply inverted versions of the tenuis-click letters. The tenuis–voiced pairs were ⟨ʇ ɣ⟩ (the latter if not needed for the voiced velar fricative), ⟨ʗ 𝒬⟩, ⟨ѱ ⋔⟩, similarly ⟨ↆ⟩ and its inverse, and lateral ⟨ʖ⟩ paired with a double loop (an inverted ꔛ): . A proposal to add Doke’s letters to Unicodeis not yet decided finally (as of October 2013, Unicode version 6.3).
Beach wrote on Khoekhoe and so had no need for letters for the voiced clicks; he created letters for nasal clicks by adding a curl to the bottom of the tenuis-click letters: double-barred ⟨ʆ⟩ for nasal ⟨⨎⟩, stretched ⟨ɕ⟩ for nasal ⟨ʗ⟩, turned ⟨ȶ⟩ for nasal ⟨ʇ⟩ (though with the curl on the bottom), and something like a topless ⟨ʓ⟩ for nasal ⟨ʖ⟩: .
Evolution of phonetic transcription
Doke had run "admirable" experiments establishing the nature of click consonants. Nonetheless, Bleek in his highly influential work on Bushman languages rejected Doke's orthography on theoretical grounds, arguing that Doke's letters stood for two sounds each, "a combination of the implosive sound with the sound made by the expulsion of the breath" (that is, influx plus efflux), and that using Doke's orthography it was impossible to write the clicks themselves, as "we cannot call [them] either unvoiced, voiced, or nasal." Bleek therefore used digraphs based on the Lepsius letters, as Lepsius himself had done for the same reason. Ironically, linguists have since taken the co-articulation to be inherent in the Lepsius (pipe) letters, since the 'influx' can never occur alone, and therefore use the simple letters for the tenuis clicks rather than for some abstract 'clickness' as Bleek had. However, since the Lepsius letters have become standard (and even when the Doke letters were official in the IPA, only the letters for the tenuis clicks had been adopted, being treated as conceptually equivalent to the Lepsius alphabet), today if linguists wish to reflect the dominant view, and to use the IPA, they must resort to diacritics that would not be used for non-click consonants.
Summarized below is the evolution of formal click transcription, from Bleek's digraphs reflecting co-articulated consonants, to ligatures intended to function as single letters, to full IPA with diacritics, along with an equivalent treatment of the tenuis, voiced, and nasal non-click occlusives [t d n] (*for illustrative purposes).
|This section requires expansion. (July 2012)|
Written languages with clicks generally use an alphabet either based on the Lepsius alphabet, with multigraphs based on the pipe letters for clicks, or on the Zulu alphabet, with multigraphs based on c q x for clicks. In the latter case, there have been several conventions for the palatal clicks. Some languages have had more than one orthography. For example, Khoekhoe has had at least the following, using palatal clicks as an example:
Local roman orthographies have been based on the following sets of letters:
There are two principal conventions for writing the manners of articulation (the 'effluxes'), which are used with both the Lepsius and Zulu orthographies. One uses g for voicing and x for affricate clicks; the other uses d for voicing and g for affricate clicks. Both use n for nasal clicks, but these letters may come either before or after the base letter. For simplicity, these will be illustrated across various orthographies using the lateral clicks only.
|Juǀʼhoansi||1975||ǁ||gǁ||nǁ||ǁ’||ǁh||ǁx, gǁx||ǁx’, gǁx’||ǁ’h||gǁh||nǁ’h|
|1987||x||dx||nx||x’||xh||xg, dxg||xg’, dxg’||x’h||dxh||nxh|
- Beach (1938), 288 ff
- C. R. Lepsius, 1855, Das allgemeine linguistische Alphabet: Grundsätze der Übertragung fremder Schriftsysteme und bisher noch ungeschriebener Sprachen in europäische Buchstaben. Berlin: Verlag von Wilhelm Hertz
- C. R. Lepsius, 1863, Standand Alphabet for Reducing Unwritten Languages and Foreign Graphic Systems to a Uniform Orthography in European Letters. 2nd edition, London/Berlin.
- A Comparative Grammar of South African Languages. London, Trübner & Co. (1862: Part I; 1869: Part II)
- Clement M. Doke, 1925, "An outline of the phonetics of the language of the ʗhũ: Bushman of the North-West Kalahari", Bantu Studies 2:129–166.
- Clement M Doke, 1926 (1969), The phonetics of the Zulu language. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press
- Douglas Martyn Beach, 1938, The phonetics of the Hottentot language. W. Heffer & Sons. Ltd., London
- The Norwegian mission to the Zulu used ⟨⚡⟩ (a z-like zig-zag) for c (perhaps related to the use of both z and c for dental affricates), a double ⚡ (a ξ-like zigzag) for x (perhaps not coincidentally, Greek ξ is transcribed x), and the same letter with an umlaut for q. (HPS Schreuder, 1850, Grammatik for Zulu-Sproget, Christiania)
- Katechismus (Catechism of the !Kora language), undated ms. Revision of 1815 edition, which did not have a coherent transcription for clicks.
- William Binnington Boyce, 1834, A grammar of the Kafir language, London
- The Lepsius letter is a short vertical pipe, with neither ascender nor descender—that is, the of the same height as the letter n. In Krönlein it has a short ascender, the height of the letter t, and moreover in Krönlein the four pipe letters are always inclined, like the letters in italic type.
- The double-barred pipe was proposed by the Rhenish Mission Conference in 1856 and quickly replaced Lepsius's pipe with acute accent. (Brugman, 2009, Segments, Tones and Distribution in Khoekhoe Prosody. PhD dissertation, Cornell.)
- Tindall (1858) A grammar and vocabulary of the Namaqua-Hottentot language
Tindall's full paradigm is,
- c ch ck cg ckh cn
- q qh qk qg qkh qn
- x xh xk xg xkh xn
- v vh vk vg vkh vn
- resembling a squat down arrow, here substituted by the old Roman numeral for 50, but slightly flared, the way ⟨≺⟩ differs from simple ⟨<⟩.
- J.A. Engelbrecht, 1928, Studies oor Korannataal. Annale van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch. Cape Town.
- already credited to Beach in Doke (1926)
- Although the IPA has no letter for retroflex clicks, ‼ and ⦀ (Cole 1966) have been used (the latter perhaps only in Cole).
- Linguasphere found the Khoisanist letters to be impractical for sorting and with their database, and so substituted them with p', c', q', l', t'. These occur with the usual accompaniments, for sequences such as L'xegwi, Nc'hu, C'qwi, and Q'xung.
- Lepsius explained his system as follows:
Essential to the [clicks] is the peculiarity of stopping in part, and even drawing back the breath, which appears to be most easily expressed by a simple bar ı. If we connect with this our common marks for the cerebral [i.e. retroflex: the sub-dot] or the palatal [the acute], a peculiar notation is wanted only for the lateral, which is the strongest sound. We propose to express it by two bars ıı. As the gutturals [i.e. posterior articulations] evidently do not unite with the clicks into one sound, but form a compound sound, we may make them simply to follow, as with the diphthongs. (Note: Lepsius used short bars which are not available with Unicode 6.3 and are approximatedly represented here by a dotless ı, but in fact are bars without serifs.)
- Michael Everson (2004-06-10). "Proposal to add phonetic click characters to the UCS" (PDF) (in English). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2, Document N2790. Retrieved 2013-10-07.
- Beach also wrote the affricate contour clicks with an x, ⟨ʇx ʗx ʖx ⨎x⟩.
- D. F. Bleek, 1923, "Note on Bushman Orthography", Bantu Studies, 2:1:71–74
- ⟨t̬⟩ may be seen for [d], but otherwise the click approaches are never used for non-click occlusives.
- reported from a few words
- a typewriter-friendly variant of the Juǀʼhoansi convention, which had been used earlier
- slack voiced
- and possible ⟨xk⟩, which is conflated with xg in the modern language