Colonization of Ceres
Ceres has been proposed[1][2] as one possible target for human colonization in the inner Solar System.
Contents |
Physical conditions [edit]
| Space colonization |
Ceres is a dwarf planet in the asteroid belt, comprising about one third of the mass of the whole belt and being the sixth largest body in the inner Solar System by mass and volume. It has a round planet-like shape, and a surface gravitational acceleration about 2.8% that of Earth. It has a surface area approximately 1.9% of Earth's dry land, slightly larger than the total land area of Argentina. Observations indicate that it contains large amounts of water ice,[3][4] about one-tenth of the total water in Earth's oceans. The solar irradiance of 150 W/m2 (at aphelion), which is one ninth that on Earth, is still high enough for solar-power facilities.[1] The Juno mission to Jupiter, for example, will be relying on solar power in a location further out from the Sun than Ceres.
Strategic location [edit]
Being the largest body in the asteroid belt, Ceres could become the main base and transport hub for future asteroid mining infrastructure,[1] allowing mineral resources to be transported to Mars, the Moon and Earth.
Its colonization also could become a step on the way to the colonization of the objects in the outer Solar System, such as the satellites of Jupiter. Because of its small escape velocity combined with large amounts of water ice, it also could serve as a source of water, fuel and oxygen supply for ships going through and beyond the asteroid belt.[1]
The establishment of a permanent colony on Ceres might precede colonization of the Moon or Mars since the far deeper gravity wells of those bodies add dramatically to the cost and risk of colonization. As a consequence of a greater semi-major axis, Ceres has much more frequent launch windows to/from Cislunar space than to/from Mars (the synodic period is 1 year 3.3 months compared to 2 years 1.6 months), and a Hohmann transfer takes 1 year and 3.5 months.[5] It is more energy-efficient to transport resources from the Moon or Mars to Ceres, than from Earth. In fact, transportation from Mars or the Moon to Ceres is more energy-efficient than even transportation from Earth to the Moon.[6]
Potential difficulties [edit]
|
|
This section is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. (February 2013) |
- A magnetic field has not been detected around Ceres.
- No atmosphere has been detected on Ceres.
- Significantly less sunlight than on Earth.
- Delta-v budget to/from cislunar space is rather higher than to Mars.[specify]
- Surface gravity is calculated to be only .028 g; some form of artificial gravity would therefore be necessary to combat known negative health effects of weightlessness.
See also [edit]
References [edit]
- ^ a b c d Zachary V. Whitten. Use of Ceres in the Development of the Solar System PDF (16.4 KB) (Google cache)
- ^ The Ceres plan
- ^ Bjorn Carey. Largest Asteroid Might Contain More Fresh Water than Earth
- ^ Thomas, P. C.; et al. (2005). "Differentiation of the asteroid Ceres as revealed by its shape". Nature 437 (7056): 224–226. Bibcode:2005Natur.437..224T. doi:10.1038/nature03938. PMID 16148926.
- ^ Atomic Rocket: Mission Table
- ^ Robert Zubrin. The Economic Viability of Mars Colonization PDF (146 KB)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
