Comparison of embedded computer systems on board the Mars rovers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The embedded computer systems on board the Mars rovers sent by NASA must withstand the high radiation levels and large temperature changes in space. For this reason their computational resources are limited compared to systems commonly used on Earth.[1]

In operation[edit]

Direct teleoperation of a Mars rover is impractical, since the round trip communication time between Earth and Mars ranges from 8 to 42 minutes and the Deep Space Network system is only available a few times during each Martian day (sol).[1] Therefore a rover command team plans, then sends, a sol of operational commands to the rover at one time.[1]

A rover uses autonomy software to make decisions based on observations from its sensors.[1] Each pair of images for stereo the Sojourner rover could generate 20 navigation 3D points (with the initial software version the craft landed with). The MER rovers can generate 15,000 (nominal) to 40,000 (survey mode) 3D points.[1]

Performance comparisons[edit]

As a rule, all Mars rovers have had 3 redundant computers. However, with Curiosity this is not the case. Currently it is operating on its redundant CPU, while the primary CPU is being investigated for the reasons why it started to fail.

Comparison of embedded computer systems on board the Mars rovers
Rover (mission, organization, year) CPUs RAM Flash EEPROM Operating system CPU time available for the autonomy software
Sojourner Rover (Pathfinder, NASA, 1997)[1][2][3][4] 2 MHz[5] Intel 80C85 512 KB 176 KB None Custom cyclic executive Not applicable to Cyclic Executives
Pathfinder Lander (NASA, 1997)[1]
(Base station for Sojourner rover)
20 MHz MFC (IBM RAD6000 Precursor) 128 MB None 6 MB VxWorks[6] (multitasking) less than 75%
Spirit and Opportunity (Mars Exploration Rover (MER), NASA, 2004)[1] 20 MHz BAE RAD6000 128 MB 256 MB 3 MB VxWorks (multitasking) less than 75%
Curiosity (Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), NASA, 2011)[7][1][8] 132 MHz BAE RAD750 256 MB GB 256 KB VxWorks (multitasking) less than 75%

Mars Rovers[edit]

Mars Exploration Rover (rear) vs Sojourner rover 
Mars Science Laboratory (R); Mars Exploration Rover (L) and Sojourner rover (centre) 
Mars Exploration Rover 

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Max Bajracharya, Mark W. Maimone, and Daniel Helmick (2008) (Jet Propulsion Laboratory and California Institute of Technology); Autonomy for Mars rovers: past, present, and future; published in: Computer, a journal of the IEEE Computer Society, December 2008, Volume 41, Number 12, page 45, ISSN 0018-9162.
  2. ^ "Mars Pathfinder Frequently Asked Questions: Sojourner Rover". NASA/JPL. April 10, 1997. Retrieved March 27, 2009. 
  3. ^ Donna L. Shirley and Jacob R. Matijevic (May 10, 1997). "Mars Rovers: Past, Present, & Future". NASA/JPL. Retrieved April 18, 2009. 
  4. ^ Larry Lange (February 18, 1998). "U.S. plays catch-up as robots crawl into new applications". EETimes.com. Retrieved April 18, 2009. 
  5. ^ http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/rover/faqs_sojourner.html#cpu
  6. ^ "Wind River Powers Mars Exploration Rovers—Continues Legacy as Technology Provider for NASA's Space Exploration". Wind River. June 6, 2003. Retrieved August 28, 2009. 
  7. ^ "Mars Science Laboratory: Mission: Rover: Brains". NASA/JPL. Retrieved March 27, 2009. 
  8. ^ "BAE SYSTEMS COMPUTERS TO MANAGE DATA PROCESSING AND COMMAND FOR UPCOMING SATELLITE MISSIONS". BAE Systems. June 17, 2008. Retrieved November 17, 2008. 

External links[edit]