Compassion & Choices

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Compassion & Choices
Motto Expanding choice and improving care at the end of life
Type Legal and legislative advocacy, counseling
Headquarters Denver, Colorado
Location
Key people Barbara Coombs Lee
Website www.compassionandchoices.org

Compassion & Choices is a nonprofit organization in the United States working to improve patient rights and choice at the end of life. Its primary function is advocating for and ensuring access to end-of-life options.[1][2]

With over 40,000 supporters and 25 active chapters, it is the largest organization of its kind in the United States.

Terminally ill patient services[edit]

Compassion & Choices operates the End-of-Life Resource Center, which provides consultants for terminally ill patients and their families at no cost. Professional consultants and trained volunteers work by phone or in person to offer assistance in completing advance directives, also referred to as living wills; referrals to local services including hospice and illness-specific support groups, advice on adequate pain and symptom management, and information on safe, effective and legal methods for aid in dying.

The organization's work is highlighted in the documentary film How to Die in Oregon which won the 2011 Grand Jury Prize[3] at the Sundance Film Festival.

Legal work[edit]

Compassion & Choices litigates patient cases related to ensuring adequate end-of-life care and choice, represented 16 terminally ill patient-plaintiffs at the U.S. Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Oregon, defeating the Bush administration's challenge to Oregon's Death with Dignity Act in January 2006.

Through litigation, Compassion & Choices works for terminally ill patients' rights to receive pain and symptom management, to voluntarily stop life-sustaining treatments, to request and receive palliative sedation, and to choose aid in dying under state and federal constitutional protections.

Other important legal cases where Compassion & Choices was a leading advocate have included Vacco v. Quill, Washington v. Glucksberg, Sampson v. Alaska, and more recently, Morris v. New Mexico[4] and Pennsylvania v. Mancini.[5]

History and organization[edit]

Compassion & Choices is the successor to the Hemlock Society,[6] and Compassion In Dying Federation; the organizations were merged in 2007.

Compassion & Choices Action Network is the legislative advocacy arm of Compassion & Choices. The Action Network seeks to pass Oregon-style aid-in-dying legislation throughout the United States, laws that strengthen advance directives, and laws that mandate palliative care training for healthcare providers.

Controversy[edit]

The organization's work is at odds with the views of certain religious groups, notably the Roman Catholic Church, as well as many disability rights organizations such as Not Dead Yet. Fabian Bruskewitz, former Bishop of Lincoln, Nebraska, pointed out in 1996 that members of the organization incur automatic excommunication,[7][8] a judgment that was appealed to, and upheld by, the Vatican.[9][10] During a 2008 ballot initiative campaign that would legalize doctor-assisted suicide in Washington state, Compassion & Choices was accused by Seattle Post-Intelligencer columnist John Connelly of engaging in "Catholic-baiting."[11] Despite all of this, 47% of Catholic voters in Washington voted to approve the Death With Dignity Act.[12]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]