Completing the square
In elementary algebra, completing the square is a technique for converting a quadratic polynomial of the form
to the form
In this context, "constant" means not depending on x. The expression inside the parenthesis is of the form (x − constant). Thus one converts ax2 + bx + c to
and one must find h and k.
Completing the square is used in
- solving quadratic equations,
- graphing quadratic functions,
- evaluating integrals in calculus,
- finding Laplace transforms.
In mathematics, completing the square is considered a basic algebraic operation, and is often applied without remark in any computation involving quadratic polynomials.
Contents |
[edit] Overview
[edit] Background
There is a simple formula in elementary algebra for computing the square of a binomial:
For example:
In any perfect square, the number p is always half the coefficient of x, and the constant term is equal to p2.
[edit] Basic example
Consider the following quadratic polynomial:
This quadratic is not a perfect square, since 28 is not the square of 5:
However, it is possible to write the original quadratic as the sum of this square and a constant:
This is called completing the square.
[edit] General description
Given any monic quadratic
it is possible to form a square that has the same first two terms:
This square differs from the original quadratic only in the value of the constant term. Therefore, we can write
where k is a constant. This operation is known as completing the square. For example:
[edit] Non-monic case
Given a quadratic polynomial of the form
it is possible to factor out the coefficient a, and then complete the square for the resulting monic polynomial.
Example:
This allows us to write any quadratic polynomial in the form
[edit] Formula
The result of completing the square may be written as a formula. For the general case:[1]
Specifically, when a=1:
The matrix case looks very similar:
[edit] Relation to the graph
In analytic geometry, the graph of any quadratic function is a parabola in the xy-plane. Given a quadratic polynomial of the form
the numbers h and k may be interpreted as the Cartesian coordinates of the vertex of the parabola. That is, h is the x-coordinate of the axis of symmetry, and k is the minimum value (or maximum value, if a < 0) of the quadratic function.
In other words, the graph of the function ƒ(x) = x2 is a parabola whose vertex is at the origin (0, 0). Therefore, the graph of the function ƒ(x − h) = (x − h)2 is a parabola shifted to the right by h whose vertex is at (h, 0), as shown in the top figure. In contrast, the graph of the function ƒ(x) + k = x2 + k is a parabola shifted upward by k whose vertex is at (0, k), as shown in the center figure. Combining both horizontal and vertical shifts yields ƒ(x − h) + k = (x − h)2 + k is a parabola shifted to the right by h and upward by k whose vertex is at (h, k), as shown in the bottom figure.
[edit] Solving quadratic equations
Completing the square may be used to solve any quadratic equation. For example:
The first step is to complete the square:
Next we solve for the squared term:
Then either
and therefore
This can be applied to any quadratic equation. When the x2 has a coefficient other than 1, the first step is to divide out the equation by this coefficient: for an example see the non-monic case below.
[edit] Irrational and complex roots
Unlike methods involving factoring the equation, which is only reliable if the roots are rational, completing the square will find the roots of a quadratic equation even when those roots are irrational or complex. For example, consider the equation
Completing the square gives
so
Then either
so
In terser language:
Equations with complex roots can be handled in the same way. For example:
[edit] Non-monic case
For an equation involving a non-monic quadratic, the first step to solving them is to divide through by the coefficient of x2. For example:
[edit] Other applications
[edit] Integration
Completing the square may be used to evaluate any integral of the form
using the basic integrals
For example, consider the integral
Completing the square in the denominator gives:
This can now be evaluated by using the substitution u = x + 3, which yields
[edit] Complex numbers
Consider the expression
where z and b are complex numbers, z* and b* are the complex conjugates of z and b, respectively, and c is a real number. Using the identity |u|2 = uu* we can rewrite this as
which is clearly a real quantity. This is because
As another example, the expression
where a, b, c, x, and y are real numbers, with a > 0 and b > 0, may be expressed in terms of the square of the absolute value of a complex number. Define
Then
so
[edit] Geometric perspective
Consider completing the square for the equation
Since x2 represents the area of a square with side of length x, and bx represents the area of a rectangle with sides b and x, the process of completing the square can be viewed as visual manipulation of rectangles.
Simple attempts to combine the x2 and the bx rectangles into a larger square result in a missing corner. The term (b/2)2 added to each side of the above equation is precisely the area of the missing corner, whence derives the terminology "completing the square". [1]
[edit] A variation on the technique
As conventionally taught, completing the square consists of adding the third term, v 2 to
to get a square. There are also cases in which one can add the middle term, either 2uv or −2uv, to
to get a square.
[edit] Example: the sum of a positive number and its reciprocal
By writing
we show that the sum of a positive number x and its reciprocal is always greater than or equal to 2. The square of a real expression is always greater than or equal to zero, which gives the stated bound; and here we achieve 2 just when x is 1, causing the square to vanish.
[edit] Example: factoring a simple quartic polynomial
Consider the problem of factoring the polynomial
This is
so the middle term is 2(x2)(18) = 36x2. Thus we get
(the last line being added merely to follow the convention of decreasing degrees of terms).
[edit] References
- ^ Narasimhan, Revathi (2008). Precalculus: Building Concepts and Connections. Cengage Learning. p. 133–134. ISBN 0-618-41301-4. http://books.google.com/books?id=hLZz3xcP0SAC., Section Formula for the Vertex of a Quadratic Function, page 133–134, figure 2.4.8
- Algebra 1, Glencoe, ISBN 0-07-825083-8, pages 539–544
- Algebra 2, Saxon, ISBN 0-939798-62-X, pages 214–214, 241–242, 256–257, 398–401




![\begin{alignat}{2}
(x+3)^2 \,&=\, x^2 + 6x + 9 && (p=3)\\[3pt]
(x-5)^2 \,&=\, x^2 - 10x + 25\qquad && (p=-5).
\end{alignat}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/1/4/6/146b17914932579724035c471f364829.png)






![\begin{alignat}{1}
x^2 + 6x + 11 \,&=\, (x+3)^2 + 2 \\[3pt]
x^2 + 14x + 30 \,&=\, (x+7)^2 - 19 \\[3pt]
x^2 - 2x + 7 \,&=\, (x-1)^2 + 6.
\end{alignat}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/4/0/a/40ae53053680564f116c71828dc0461c.png)

















![\begin{array}{c}
x^2 + 4x + 5 \,=\, 0 \\[6pt]
(x+2)^2 + 1 \,=\, 0 \\[6pt]
(x+2)^2 \,=\, -1 \\[6pt]
x+2 \,=\, \pm i \\[6pt]
x \,=\, -2 \pm i.
\end{array}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/c/1/8/c185a2c292b0f2c0f818df01a1e20164.png)
![\begin{array}{c}
2x^2 + 7x + 6 \,=\, 0 \\[6pt]
x^2 + \tfrac{7}{2}x + 3 \,=\, 0 \\[6pt]
\left(x+\tfrac{7}{4}\right)^2 - \tfrac{1}{16} \,=\, 0 \\[6pt]
\left(x+\tfrac{7}{4}\right)^2 \,=\, \tfrac{1}{16} \\[6pt]
x+\tfrac{7}{4} = \tfrac{1}{4} \quad\text{or}\quad x+\tfrac{7}{4} = -\tfrac{1}{4} \\[6pt]
x = -\tfrac{3}{2} \quad\text{or}\quad x = -2.
\end{array}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/math/4/9/8/498b8dae2e67b9bea6433a9cb156e835.png)


















