Congenital disorder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Congenital anomalies)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about congenital disorders in humans. For animals, see Teratology.
Congenital disorders
Classification and external resources
MeSH D009358

A congenital disorder, or congenital disease, is a condition existing at birth and often before birth[citation needed], or that develops during the first month of life (neonatal disease), regardless of causation. Of these diseases, those characterized by structural deformities are termed "congenital anomalies" and involve defects in or damage to a developing fetus.

A congenital disorder may be the result of genetic abnormalities, the intrauterine (uterus) environment, errors of morphogenesis, infection, epigenetic modifications on a parental germline, or a chromosomal abnormality. The outcome of the disorder will depend on complex interactions between the pre-natal deficit and the post-natal environment.[1] Animal studies indicate that the mother's (and likely the father's) diet, vitamin intake, and glucose levels prior to ovulation and conception have long-term effects on fetal growth and adolescent and adult disease.[2] Recent animal studies have shown that paternal exposures prior to conception and during pregnancy result in increased risk of certain congenital disorders and cancers. This research suggests that paternal food deprivation, germ line mutations, alcohol use, chemical mutagens, age, smoking habits and epigenetic alterations can affect birth outcomes.[3][4][5][6] However, the correlations between offspring health and paternal exposures, age, and lifestyle are still relatively weak. This is likely due to the fact that paternal exposures and their effects on the fetus are studied far less extensively than maternal exposures.

Congenital disorders vary widely in causation and abnormalities. Any substance that causes birth defects is known as a teratogen. Some disorders can be detected before birth through prenatal diagnosis (screening).

The term "congenital"[7] disorder does not necessarily refer to a genetic disorder despite the similarity of the words.

Some congenital conditions are idiopathic, and sometimes the word "congenital" is used synonymously with "idiopathic"; but careful usage prefers to reserve the word "congenital" for conditions to which the literal sense of the word applies (that is, those whose pathophysiology has existed since the neonatal period).

Classification[edit]

Much of the language used for describing congenital conditions predates genomic mapping, and structural conditions are often considered separately from other congenital conditions. It is now known that many metabolic conditions may have subtle structural expression, and structural conditions often have genetic links. Still, congenital conditions are often classified in a structural basis, organized when possible by primary organ system affected.

Primarily structural[edit]

Structural congenital disorder
Classification and external resources
ICD-10 Chapter-Q
MeSH D000013

Several terms are used to describe congenital abnormalities. (Some of these are also used to describe noncongenital conditions, and more than one term may apply in an individual condition.)

Terminology[edit]

  • A congenital physical anomaly is an abnormality of the structure of a body part. An anomaly may or may not be perceived as a problem condition. Many, if not most, people have one or more minor physical anomalies if examined carefully. Examples of minor anomalies can include curvature of the 5th finger (clinodactyly), a third nipple, tiny indentations of the skin near the ears (preauricular pits), shortness of the 4th metacarpal or metatarsal bones, or dimples over the lower spine (sacral dimples). Some minor anomalies may be clues to more significant internal abnormalities.
  • Birth defect is a widely used term for a congenital malformation, i.e. a congenital, physical anomaly which is recognizable at birth, and which is significant enough to be considered a problem. According to the CDC, most birth defects are believed to be caused by a complex mix of factors including genetics, environment, and behaviors,[1] though many birth defects have no known cause. An example of a birth defect is cleft palate.
  • A congenital malformation is a congenital physical anomaly that is deleterious, i.e. a structural defect perceived as a problem. A typical combination of malformations affecting more than one body part is referred to as a malformation syndrome.
  • Some conditions are due to abnormal tissue development:
    • A malformation is associated with a disorder of tissue development.[8] Malformations often occur in the first trimester.
    • A dysplasia is a disorder at the organ level that is due to problems with tissue development.[8]
  • It is also possible for conditions to arise after tissue is formed:
    • A deformation is a condition arising from mechanical stress to normal tissue.[8] Deformations often occur in the second or third trimester, and can be due to oligohydramnios.
  • A disruption involves breakdown of normal tissues.[8]
  • When multiple effects occur in a specified order, it is known as a sequence. When the order is not known, it is a syndrome.

Examples of primarily structural congenital disorders[edit]

A limb anomaly is called a dysmelia. These include all forms of limbs anomalies, such as amelia, ectrodactyly, phocomelia, polymelia, polydactyly, syndactyly, polysyndactyly, oligodactyly, brachydactyly, achondroplasia, congenital aplasia or hypoplasia, amniotic band syndrome, and cleidocranial dysostosis.

Congenital anomalies of the heart include patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and tetralogy of fallot. Helen Taussig has been a major force in research on congenital anomalies of the heart.[9]

Congenital anomalies of the nervous system include neural tube defects such as spina bifida, meningocele, meningomyelocele, encephalocele and anencephaly. Other congenital anomalies of the nervous system include the Arnold-Chiari malformation, the Dandy-Walker malformation, hydrocephalus, microencephaly, megencephaly, lissencephaly, polymicrogyria, holoprosencephaly, and agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal system include numerous forms of stenosis and atresia, and perforation, such as gastroschisis..

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) include renal parenchyma, kidneys, and urinary collecting system.[10]

Defects can be bilateral or unilateral, and different defects often coexist in an individual child

Primarily metabolic[edit]

A congenital metabolic disease is also referred to as an inborn error of metabolism. Most of these are single gene defects, usually heritable. Many affect the structure of body parts but some simply affect the function.

Other[edit]

Other well defined genetic conditions may affect the production of hormones, receptors, structural proteins, and ion channels.

Causes[edit]

Fetal alcohol exposure[edit]

The mother's consumption of alcohol during pregnancy can cause a continuum of various permanent birth defects : cranofacial abnormalities,[11] brain damage,[12] intellectual disability,[13] heart disease, kidney abnormality, skeletal anomalies, ocular abnormalities.[14]

The prevalence of children affected is estimated at least 1 percent in U.S.[15] as well in Canada.

Very few studies have investigated the links between paternal alcohol use and offspring health.[4]

However, recent animal research has shown a correlation between paternal alcohol abuse and decreased offspring birth weight. Behavioral and cognitive disorders, including difficulties with learning and memory, hyperactivity, and lowered stress tolerance have been linked to paternal alcohol consumption. The compromised stress management skills of offspring of paternal alcohol users are similar to the exaggerated responses to stress that children with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome display because of maternal alcohol use. The birth defects and behavioral disorders observed in offspring of paternal alcohol users were found in cases of both long- and short-term paternal alcohol abuse.[16][3] In the same animal study, paternal alcohol use was correlated with a significant difference in organ size and the increased risk of the offspring displaying ventricular septal defects (VSD) at birth.[3] VSD has also been correlated with paternal alcohol abuse in humans.[17]

Toxic substances[edit]

Substances whose toxicity can cause congenital disorders are called "teratogens", and include certain pharmaceutical and recreational drugs in pregnancy as well as many environmental toxins in pregnancy.[citation needed]

A review published in 2010 identified 6 main teratogenic mechanisms associated with medication use: folate antagonism, neural crest cell disruption, endocrine disruption, oxidative stress, vascular disruption and specific receptor- or enzyme-mediated teratogenesis.[18]

It is estimated that 10% of all birth defects are caused by prenatal exposure to a teratogenic agent.[19] These exposures include, but are not limited to, medication or drug exposures, maternal infections and diseases, and environmental and occupational exposures. Paternal smoking use has also been linked to an increased risk of birth defects and childhood cancer for the offspring, where the paternal germ line undergoes oxidative damage due to cigarette use.[20][21] Teratogen-caused birth defects are potentially preventable. Studies have shown that nearly 50% of pregnant women have been exposed to at least one medication during gestation.[22] During pregnancy, a female can also be exposed to teratogens from the contaminated clothing or toxins within the seminal fluid of a partner.[6][16][23] An additional study found that of 200 individuals referred for genetic counseling for a teratogenic exposure, 52% were exposed to more than one potential teratogen.[24]

Isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic-acid; brand name Roaccutane), which is often used to treat severe acne, is such a strong teratogen that just a single dose taken by a pregnant woman may result in serious birth defects. Because of this effect, most countries have systems in place to ensure that it is not given to pregnant women, and that the patient is aware of how important it is to prevent pregnancy during and at least one month after treatment. Medical guidelines also suggest that pregnant women should limit vitamin A intake to about 700 μg/day, as it has teratogenic potential when consumed in excess.[25][26]

Drinking water is often a vessel through which harmful toxins travel. Studies have shown that heavy metals, elements, nitrates, nitrites, fluoride can be carried through water and cause congenital disorders.

Nitrate, which is found mostly in drinking water from ground sources, is a powerful teratogen. A case-control study in rural Australia that was conducted following frequent reports of prenatal mortality and congenital malformations found that those who drank the nitrate-infected groundwater, as opposed to rain water, ran the risk of giving birth to children with central nervous system disorders, muscoskeletal defects, and cardiac defects.[27]

Chlorinated and aromatic solvents such as benzene and trichloroethylene sometimes enter the water supply due to oversights in waste disposal. A case-control study on the area found that by 1986, leukemia was occurring in the children of Woburn Massachusetts at a rate that was four times the expected rate of incidence. Further investigation revealed a connection between the high occurrence of leukemia and an error in water distribution that delivered water to the town with significant contamination manufacturing waste containing trichloroethylene.[28]

Fluoride, when transmitted through water at high levels, can also act as a teratogen. Two reports on fluoride exposure from China, which were controlled to account for the education level of parents, found that children born to parents who were exposed to 4.12 PPM fluoride grew to have IQs that were, on average, seven points lower than their counterparts whose parents consumed water that contained 0.91 PPM fluoride. In studies conducted on rats, higher PPM fluoride in drinking water lead to increased acetylcholinesterase levels, which can alter prenatal brain development. The most significant effects were noted at a level of 5 PPM.[29]

The fetus is even more susceptible to damage from carbon monoxide intake, which can be harmful when inhaled during pregnancy, usually through first or second-hand tobacco smoke. The concentration of carbon monoxide in the infant born to a non-smoking mother is around 2%, and this concentration drastically increases to a range of 6%-9% if the mother smokes tobacco. Other possible sources of prenatal carbon monoxide intoxication are exhaust gas from combustion motors, use of dichloromethane (paint thinner, varnish removers) in enclosed areas, defective gas hot water heaters, indoor barbeques, open flames in poorly-ventilated areas, atmospheric exposure in highly-polluted areas. Exposure to carbon monoxide at toxic levels during the first two trimesters of pregnancy can lead to intrauterine growth restriction, leading to a baby that has stunted growth and is born smaller than 90% of other babies at the same gestational age. The effect of chronic exposure to carbon monoxide can depend on the stage of pregnancy in which the mother is exposed. Exposure during the embryonic stage can have neurological consequences, such as telencephalic dysgenesis, behavioral difficulties during infancy, and reduction of cerebellum volume. There are also possible skeletal defects that could result from exposure to carbon monoxide during the embryonic stage, such as hand and foot malformations, hip dysplasia, hip subluxation, agenisis of a limb, and inferior maxillary atresia with glossoptosis. Also, carbon monoxide exposure between days 35 and 40 of embryonic development can lead to an increased risk of the child developing a cleft palate. Exposure to carbon monoxide or polluted ozone exposure can also lead to cardiac defects of the ventrical septal, pulmonary artery and heart valves.[30] The effects of carbon monoxide exposure are decreased later in fetal development during the fetal stage, but they may still lead to anoxic encephalopathy.[31]

Industrial pollution can also lead to congenital defects. Over a period of 37 years, the Chisso Corporation, a petrochemical and plastics company, contaminated the waters of Minamata Bay with an estimated 27 tons of methylmercury, contaminating the local water supply. This lead to many people in the area developing what became known as the “Minamata Disease.” Because methylmercury is a teratogen, the mercury poisoning of those residing by the bay resulted in neurological defects in the offspring. Infants exposed to mercury poisoning in utero showed predispositions to cerebral palsy, ataxia, inhibited psychomotor development, and mental retardation.[32]

Landfill sites have been shown to have adverse effects on fetal development. Extensive research has been shown that landfills have several negative effects on babies born to mothers living near landfill sites: low birth weight, birth defects, spontaneous abortion, and fetal and infant mortality. Studies done around the Love Canal site near Niagara Falls and the Lipari Landfill in New Jersey have shown a higher proportion of low birth babies than communities farther away from landfills. A study done in California showed a positive correlation between time and quantity of dumping and low birth weights and neonatal deaths. A study in the United Kingdom showed a correspondence between pregnant women living near landfill sites and an increased risk of congenital disorders, such as neural tube defects, hypospadias, epispadia, and abdominal wall defects, such as gastroschisis and exomphalos. A study conducted on a Welsh community also showed an increase incidence of gastroschisis. Another study was done on twenty-one European hazardous waste sites and showed that those living within three kilometers had an increased risk of giving birth to infants with birth defects and that as distance from the land increased, the risk decreased. These birth defects included neural tube defects, malformations of the cardiac septa, anomalies of arteries and veins, and chromosomal anomalies.[33] Looking at communities that live near landfill sites brings up environmental justice. A vast majority of sites are located near poor, mostly black, communities. For example, between the early 1920s and 1978, about 25% of Houston’s population was black. However, over 80% of landfills and incinerators during this time were located in these black communities.[34]

Another issue regarding environmental justice is lead poisoning. If the fetus is exposed to lead during the pregnancy, this can result in learning difficulties and slowed growth. A lot of paints (before 1978) and pipes contain lead. Therefore, pregnant women who live in homes with lead paint will inhale the dust containing lead, leading to lead exposure in the fetus. When lead pipes are used for drinking water and cooking water, this water is ingested, along with the lead, exposing the fetus to this toxin. This issue is more prevalent in poorer communities. This is because more well off families are able to afford to have their homes repainted and pipes renovated.[35]

Paternal smoking[edit]

Paternal smoking prior to conception has been linked with the increased risk of congenital abnormalities in offspring.[4]

Smoking causes DNA mutations in the germ line of the father, which can be inherited by the offspring. Cigarette smoke acts as a chemical mutagen on germ cell DNA. The germ cells suffer oxidative damage, and the effects can be seen in altered mRNA production, infertility issues, and side effects in the embryonic and fetal stages of development. This oxidative damage may result in epigenetic or genetic modifications of the father's germ line. Research has shown that fetal lymphocytes have been damaged as a result of a father's smoking habits prior to conception.[6][21]

Correlations between paternal smoking and the increased risk of offspring developing childhood cancers (including acute leukemia, brain tumors, and lymphoma) before age five have been established. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings. Little is currently known about how paternal smoking damages the fetus, and what window of time in which the father smokes is most harmful to offspring.[21]

Infections[edit]

A vertically transmitted infection is an infection caused by bacteria, viruses or, in rare cases, parasites transmitted directly from the mother to an embryo, fetus or baby during pregnancy or childbirth. It can occur when the mother gets an infection as an intercurrent disease in pregnancy.

Congenital disorders were initially believed to be the result of only hereditary factors. However, in the early 1940s, Australian pediatric ophthalmologist Norman Gregg began recognizing a pattern in which the infants arriving at his surgery were developing congenital cataracts at a higher rate than those who developed it from hereditary factors. On October 15, 1941, Gregg delivered a paper which explained his findings-68 out of the 78 children who were afflicted with congenital cataracts had been exposed in utero due to an outbreak in Australian army camps. These findings confirmed, to Gregg, that there could, in fact, be environmental causes for congenital disorders.

Currently rubella is known to cause abnormalities of the eye, internal ear, heart, and sometimes the teeth. More specifically, fetal exposure to rubella during weeks five to ten of development (the sixth week particularly) can cause cataracts and microphthalmia in the eyes. If the mother is infected with rubella during the ninth week, a crucial week for internal ear development, there can be destruction of the organ of Corti, causing deafness. In the heart the ductus arteriosus can remain after birth, leading to hypertension. Rubella can also lead to atrial and ventricular septal defects in the heart. If exposed to rubella in the second trimester, the fetus can develop central nervous system malformations. However, because infections of rubella may remain undetected,misdiagnosed, or unrecognized in the mother, and/or some abnormalities are not evident until later in the child’s life, precise incidence of birth defects due to rubella are not entirely known. The timing of the mother’s infection during fetal development determines the risk and type of birth defect. As the embryo develops, the risk of abnormalities decreases. If exposed to the rubella virus during the first four weeks, the risk of malformations is 47 percent. Exposure during weeks five through eight creates a 22 percent chance, while weeks nine to twelve a seven percent chance exists, followed by a percentage of six if the exposure is during the thirteenth to sixteenth weeks. Exposure during the first eight weeks of development can also lead to prematurity and fetal death. These numbers are calculated from immediate inspection of the infant after birth. Therefore, mental defects are not accounted for in the percentages because they are not evident until later in the child’s life. If they were to be included, these numbers would be much higher.[36]

Other infectious agents include cytomegalovirus, the herpes simplex virus, hyperthermia, toxoplasmosis, and syphilis. Mother exposure to ctyomegalovirus can cause microcephaly, cerebral calcifications, blindess, chorioretinitis (which can cause blindness), hepatosplenomegaly, and meningoencephalitis in fetuses.[36] Microcephaly is a disorder in which the fetus has an atypically small head,[37] cerebral calcifications means certain areas of the brain have atypical calcium deposits,[38] and meningoencephalitis is the enlargement of the brain. All three disorders cause abnormal brain function or mental retardation. Hepatosplenomegaly is the enlargement of the liver and spleen which causes digestive problems.[39] It can also cause some kernicterus and petechiae. Kernicterus causes yellow pigmentation of the skin, brain damage, and deafness.[40] Petechaie is when the capillaries bleed resulting in red/purple spots on the skin.[41] However, ctyomegalovirus is often fatal in the embryo.

The herpes simplex virus can cause microcephaly, microphthalmus (abnormally small eyeballs),[42] retinal dysplasia, hepatosplenomegaly, and mental retardation.[36] Both microphthalmus and retinal dysplasia can cause blindness. However, the most common symptom in infants is an inflammatory response that develops during the first three weeks of life.[36] Hyperthermia causes anencephaly, which is when part of the brain and skull are absent in the infant.[36][43] Mother exposure to toxoplasmosis can cause cerebral calcification, hydrocephalus (causes mental disabilities),[44] and mental retardation in infants. Other birth abnormalities have been reported as well, such as chorioretinitis, microphthalmus, and ocular defects. Syphilis causes congenital deafness, mental retardation, and diffuse fibrosis in organs, such as the liver and lungs, if the embryo is exposed.[36]

Lack of nutrients[edit]

Further information: Nutrition in pregnancy

For example, a lack of folic acid, a vitamin B, in the diet of a mother can cause cellular neural tube deformities that result in spina bifida. Congenital disorders such as a neural tube deformity (NTD) can be prevented by 72% if the mother consumes 4 milligrams of folic acid before the conception and after 12 weeks of pregnancy.[45] Folic acid, or vitamin B12, aids the development of the foetal nervous system.[45]

Studies with mice have found that food deprivation of the male mouse prior to conception leads to the offspring displaying significantly lower blood glucose levels.[46]

Physical restraint[edit]

External physical shocks or constrainment due to growth in a restricted space, may result in unintended deformation or separation of cellular structures resulting in an abnormal final shape or damaged structures unable to function as expected. An example is Potter syndrome due to oligohydramnios. This finding is important for future understandings of how genetics may predispose individuals for diseases like obesity, diabetes, and cancer.

For multicellular organisms that develop in a womb, the physical interference or presence of other similarly developing organisms such as twins can result in the two cellular masses being integrated into a larger whole, with the combined cells attempting to continue to develop in a matter that satisfies the intended growth patterns of both cell masses. The two cellular masses can compete with each other, and may either duplicate or merge various structures. This results in conditions such as conjoined twins, and the resulting merged organism may die at birth when it must leave the life-sustaining environment of the womb and must attempt to sustain its biological processes independently.

Genetic causes[edit]

Main article: Genetic disorder

Genetic causes of congenital anomalies include inheritance of abnormal genes from the mother or the father, as well as new mutations in one of the germ cells that gave rise to the fetus. Male germ cells mutate at a much faster rate than female germ cells, and as the father ages, the DNA of the germ cells mutates quickly.[5][20] If an egg is fertilized with sperm that has damaged DNA, there is a possibility that the fetus could develop abnormally.[5][17]

Genetic disorders or diseases are all congenital, though they may not be expressed or recognized until later in life. Genetic diseases may be divided into single-gene defects, multiple-gene disorders, or chromosomal defects. Single-gene defects may arise from abnormalities of both copies of an autosomal gene (a recessive disorder) or of only one of the two copies (a dominant disorder). Some conditions result from deletions or abnormalities of a few genes located contiguously on a chromosome. Chromosomal disorders involve the loss or duplication of larger portions of a chromosome (or an entire chromosome) containing hundreds of genes. Large chromosomal abnormalities always produce effects on many different body parts and organ systems.

Socioeconomic Status[edit]

A low socioeconomic status in a deprived neighborhood may include exposure to “environmental stressors and risk factors.”[47] Socioeconomic inequalities are commonly measured by the Cartairs-Morris score, Index of Multiple Deprivation, Townsend deprivation index, and the Jarman score.[48] The Jarman score, for example, considers “unemployment, overcrowding, single parents, under-fives, elderly living alone, ethnicity, low social class and residential mobility.”[48] In Vos’ meta-analysis these indices are used to view the effect of low SES neighborhoods on maternal health. In the meta-analysis, data from individual studies were collected from 1985 up until 2008.[48] Vos concludes that a correlation exists between prenatal adversities and deprived neighborhoods.[48] Other studies have shown that low SES is closely associated with the development of the fetus in utero and growth retardation.[49] Studies also suggest that children born in low SES families are “likely to be born prematurely, at low birth weight, or with asphyxia, a birth defect, a disability, fetal alcohol syndrome, or AIDS.”[49] Bradley and Corwyn also suggest that congenital disorders arise from the mother’s lack of nutrition, a poor lifestyle, maternal substance abuse and “living in a neighborhood that contains hazards affecting fetal development (toxic waste dumps).”[49] In a meta-analysis that viewed how inequalities influenced maternal health, it was suggested that deprived neighborhoods often promoted behaviors such as smoking, drug and alcohol use.[47] After controlling for socioeconomic factors and ethnicity, several individual studies demonstrated an association with outcomes such as perinatal mortality and preterm birth.[47]

Role of radiation[edit]

For the survivors of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, who are known as the Hibakusha, no statistically demonstrable increase of birth defects/congenital malformations was found among their later conceived children, or found in the later conceived children of cancer survivors who had previously received radiotherapy.[50][51][52] [53] The surviving women of Hiroshima and Nagasaki who were able to conceive, though exposed to substantial amounts of radiation, went on and had children with no higher incidence of abnormalities/birth defects than in the Japanese population as a whole.[54][55]

Relatively few studies have researched the effects of paternal radiation exposure on offspring. Following the Chernobyl disaster, it was found that the germ line of irradiated fathers suffered minisatellite mutations in the DNA, which was inherited by descendants.[16][56] Animal studies have show that the X-ray irradiation of male mice resulted in birth defects of the offspring.[6]

In the 1980's, a relatively high prevalence of pediatric leukemia cases in children living near a nuclear processing plant in West Cumbria, UK, led researchers to investigate whether the cancer was a result of paternal radiation exposure. A significant association between paternal irradiation and offspring cancer was found, but further research in different areas of nuclear processing plants did not heed the same results.[6][16]

Paternal Age[edit]

Main article: Paternal age effect

The effects of paternal age on offspring are not yet well understood and are studied far less extensively than the effects of maternal age.[57] Fathers contribute proportionally more DNA mutations to their offspring via their germ cells than the mother, with the paternal age governing how many mutations are passed on. This is because, as humans age, male germ cells acquire mutations at a much faster rate than female germ cells.[5][6][20]

Around a 5% increase in the incidence of ventricular septal defects, atrial septal defects, and patent ductus arteriosus in offspring has been found to be correlated with advanced paternal age. Advanced paternal age has also been linked to increased risk of achondroplasia and Apert syndrome. Offspring born to fathers under the age of 20 show increased risk of being affected by patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defects, and the tetralogy of Fallot. It is hypothesized that this may be due to environmental exposures or lifestyle choices.[57]

Research has found that there is a correlation between advanced paternal age and risk of birth defects such as limb anomalies, syndromes involving multiple systems, and Down's syndrome.[5][20][58] Recent studies have concluded that 5-9% of Down's syndrome cases are due to paternal effects, but these findings are controversial.[5][17][20][59]

There is concrete evidence that advanced paternal age is associated with the increased likelihood that a mother will suffer from a miscarriage or that fetal death will occur.[5]

Unknown or multifactorial[edit]

Although significant progress has been made in identifying the etiology of some birth defects, approximately 65% have no known or identifiable cause.[19] These are referred to as sporadic, a term that implies an unknown cause, random occurrence regardless of maternal living conditions,[60] and a low recurrence risk for future children. For 20-25% of anomalies there seems to be a "multifactorial" cause, meaning a complex interaction of multiple minor genetic anomalies with environmental risk factors. Another 10-13% of anomalies have a purely environmental cause (e.g. infections, illness, or drug abuse in the mother). Only 12-25% of anomalies have a purely genetic cause. Of these, the majority are chromosomal anomalies.[61]

Epidemiology[edit]

Disability-adjusted life year for congenital anomalies per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.[62]
  no data
  less than 160
  160-240
  240-320
  320-400
  400-480
  480-560
  560-640
  640-720
  720-800
  800-900
  900-950
  more than 950

Congenital anomalies resulted in about 510,000 deaths globally in 2010.[63]

Many studies have found that the frequency of occurrence of certain congenital malformations depends on the sex of the child (table).[64][65][66][67][68] For example, pyloric stenosis occurs more often in males while congenital hip dislocation is four to five times more likely to occur in females. Among children with one kidney, there are approximately twice as many males, whereas among children with three kidneys there are approximately 2.5 times more females. The same pattern is observed among infants with excessive number of ribs, vertebrae, teeth and other organs which in a process of evolution have undergone reduction—among them there are more females. Contrarily, among the infants with their scarcity, there are more males. Anencephaly is shown to occur approximately twice as frequently in females.[69] The number of boys born with 6 fingers is two times higher than the number of girls.[70] Now various techniques are available to detect congenital anomalies in fetus before birth.[citation needed]

About 3% of newborns have a "major physical anomaly", meaning a physical anomaly that has cosmetic or functional significance.[71] Physical congenital abnormalities are the leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, accounting for more than 20% of all infant deaths. Seven to ten percent of all children[clarification needed] will require extensive medical care to diagnose or treat a birth defect.[72]

The sex ratio of patients with congenital malformations
Congenital anomaly Sex ratio, ♂♂:♀♀
Defects with female predominance
Congenital hip dislocation 1 : 5.2;[73] 1 : 5;[74] 1 : 8;[68] 1 : 3.7[75]
Cleft palate 1 : 3[74]
Anencephaly 1 : 1.9;[73] 1 : 2[69]
Craniocele 1 : 1.8[73]
Aplasia of lung 1 : 1.51[73]
Spinal herniation 1 : 1.4[73]
Diverticulum of the esophagus 1 : 1.4[73]
Stomach 1 : 1.4[73]
Neutral defects
Hypoplasia of the tibia and femur 1 : 1.2[73]
Spina bifida 1 : 1.2[75]
Atresia of small intestine 1 : 1[73]
Microcephaly 1.2 : 1[75]
Esophageal atresia 1.3 : 1;[73] 1.5 : 1[75]
Hydrocephalus 1.3 : 1[75]
Defects with male predominance
Diverticula of the colon 1.5 : 1[73]
Atresia of the rectum 1.5 : 1;[73] 2 : 1[75]
Unilateral renal agenesis 2 : 1;[73] 2.1 : 1[75]
Schistocystis 2 : 1[73]
Cleft lip and palate 2 : 1;[74] 1.47 : 1[75]
Bilateral renal agenesis 2.6 : 1[73]
Congenital anomalies of the genitourinary system 2.7 : 1[68]
Pyloric stenosis, congenital 5 : 1;[74] 5.4 : 1[68]
Meckel's diverticulum More common in boys[73]
Congenital megacolon More common in boys[73]
All defects 1.22 : 1;[76] 1.29 : 1[68]
  • Data[68] obtained on opposite-sex twins. ** — Data[75] were obtained in the period 1983-1994.

P. M. Rajewski and A. L. Sherman (1976) have analyzed the frequency of congenital anomalies in relation to the system of the organism. Prevalence of men was recorded for the anomalies of phylogenetically younger organs and systems.[73]

In respect of an etiology, sexual distinctions can be divided on appearing before and after differentiation of male's gonads in during embryonic development, which begins from eighteenth week. The testosterone level in male embryos thus raises considerably.[77] The subsequent hormonal and physiological distinctions of male and female embryos can explain some sexual differences in frequency of congenital defects. It is difficult to explain the observed differences in the frequency of birth defects between the sexes by the details of the reproductive functions or the influence of environmental and social factors.

US incidence[edit]

The CDC and National Birth Defect Project studied the incidence of birth defects in the US. Key findings include:

  • Down syndrome was the most common condition with an estimated prevalence of 14.47 per 10,000 live births, implying about 6,000 diagnoses each year.
  • About 7,000 babies are born with a cleft palate, cleft lip or both.
Adjusted National Prevalence Estimates and Estimated Number of Cases in the United States, 2004-2006[78]
Birth Defects Cases per Births Estimated Annual Number of Cases Estimated National Prevalence per 10,000 Live Births (Adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity)
Central nervous system defects
Anencephaly 1 in 4,859 859 2.06
Spina bifida without anencephaly 1 in 2,858 1460 3.50
Encephalocele 1 in 12,235 341 0.82
Eye defects
Anophthalmia/ microphthalmia 1 in 5,349 780 1.87
Cardiovascular defects
Common truncus 1 in 13,876 301 0.72
Transposition of great arteries 1 in 3,333 1252 3.00
Tetralogy of Fallot 1 in 2,518 1657 3.97
Atrioventricular septal defect 1 in 2,122 1966 4.71
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 1 in 4,344 960 2.30
Orofacial defects
Cleft palate without cleft lip 1 in 1,574 2651 6.35
Cleft lip with and without cleft palate 1 in 940 4437 10.63
Gastrointestinal defects
Esophageal atresia/tracheoeophageal fistula 1 in 4,608 905 2.17
Rectal and large intestinalatresia/stenosis 1 in 2,138 1952 4.68
Musculoskeletal defects
Reduction deformity, upper limbs 1 in 2,869 1454 3.49
Reduction deformity, lower limbs 1 in 5,949 701 1.68
Gastroschisis 1 in 2,229 1871 4.49
Omphalocele 1 in 5,386 775 1.86
Diaphragmatic hernia 1 in 3,836 1088 2.61
Chromosomal anomalies
Trisomy 13 1 in 7,906 528 1.26
Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) 1 in 691 6037 14.47
Trisomy 18 1 in 3,762 1109 2.66

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Birth Defects Research. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  2. ^ Gregory W. Rutecki (2010). "Pre-Prenatal Care: A Primary Care Primer on the Future". ConsultantLive.com. Retrieved 25 September 2010. 
  3. ^ a b c Abel, E. L. (2004). "Paternal contribution to fetal alcohol syndrome". Addiction Biology 9: 127–133. doi:10.1080/13556210410001716980. 
  4. ^ a b c De Santis, Marco; Cesari, Elena; Cavaliere, Annafranca; Ligato, Maria Serena; Nobili, Elena; Visconti, Daniela; Caruso, Alessandro (September 2008). "Paternal exposure and counselling: Experience of a Teratology Information Service". Reproductive Toxicology 26 (1): 42–46. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2008.06.003. 
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Sartorius, G. A.; Nieschlag, E. (20 August 2009). "Paternal age and reproduction". Human Reproduction Update 16 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp027. 
  6. ^ a b c d e f Anderson, Diana; Schmid, ThomasE; Baumgartner, Adolf (2014). "Male-mediated developmental toxicity". Asian Journal of Andrology 16 (1): 81. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.122342. 
  7. ^ Webster's Dictionary. 
  8. ^ a b c d Graham, John Whichello (2007). Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Deformation, 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Saunders. p. 3. ISBN 0-7216-1489-2. 
  9. ^ "Helen B. Taussig". Answers.com. Retrieved 28 October 2014. 
  10. ^ "Overview of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT)". UpToDate - Wolters Kluer Health. Retrieved 29 October 2012. 
  11. ^ Jones K, Smith D (1975). "The fetal alcohol syndrome". Teratology 12 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1002/tera.1420120102. PMID 1162620.
  12. ^ Clarren S, Alvord E, Sumi S, Streissguth A, Smith D (1978). "Brain malformations related to prenatal exposure to ethanol". J Pediatr 92 (1): 64–7. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80072-9. PMID 619080.
  13. ^ Lancet. 1986 Nov 22;2(8517):1222. PMID 2877359
  14. ^ Strömland K, Pinazo-Durán M (2002). "Ophthalmic involvement in the fetal alcohol syndrome: clinical and animal model studies". Alcohol Alcohol 37 (1): 2–8. doi:10.1093/alcalc/37.1.2. PMID 11825849.
  15. ^ May, PA.; Gossage, JP. (2001). "Estimating the prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome. A summary.". Alcohol Res Health 25 (3): 159–67. PMID 11810953.
  16. ^ a b c d Trasler, Jacquetta M.; Doerksen, Tonia (September 1999). "Teratogen update: paternal exposures?reproductive risks". Teratology 60 (3): 161–172. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199909)60:3<161::AID-TERA12>3.0.CO;2-A. 
  17. ^ a b c Savitz, David A.; Schwingl, Pamela J.; Keels, Martha Ann (October 1991). "Influence of paternal age, smoking, and alcohol consumption on congenital anomalies". Teratology 44 (4): 429–440. doi:10.1002/tera.1420440409. 
  18. ^ van Gelder MM, van Rooij IA, Miller RK, Zielhuis GA, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Roeleveld N (January 2010). "Teratogenic mechanisms of medical drugs". Hum Reprod Update 16 (4): 378–94. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp052. PMID 20061329. 
  19. ^ a b Ronan O'Rahilly, Fabiola Müller (2001). Human embryology & teratology. New York: Wiley-Liss. ISBN 0-471-38225-6. 
  20. ^ a b c d e Zhu, J. L. (15 July 2005). "Paternal age and congenital malformations". Human Reproduction 20 (11): 3173–3177. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei186. 
  21. ^ a b c Ji, B.-T.; Shu, X.-O.; Zheng, W.; Ying, D.-M.; Linet, M. S.; Wacholder, S.; Gao, Y.-T.; Jin, F. (5 February 1997). "Paternal Cigarette Smoking and the Risk of Childhood Cancer Among Offspring of Nonsmoking Mothers". JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 89 (3): 238–243. doi:10.1093/jnci/89.3.238. 
  22. ^ Bracken MB, Holford TR (1981). "Exposure to prescribed drugs in pregnancy and association with congenital malformations". Obstetrics and gynecology 58 (3): 336–44. PMID 7266953. 
  23. ^ Chia, S-E (1 March 2002). "Review of recent epidemiological studies on paternal occupations and birth defects". Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59 (3): 149–155. doi:10.1136/oem.59.3.149. 
  24. ^ King CR (1986). "Genetic counseling for teratogen exposure". Obstetrics and gynecology 67 (6): 843–6. doi:10.1097/00006250-198606000-00020. PMID 3703408. 
  25. ^ Hunt JR (1996). "Teratogenicity of high vitamin A intake". N. Engl. J. Med. 334 (18): 1197. doi:10.1056/NEJM199605023341814. PMID 8602195. 
  26. ^ Hartmann S, Brørs O, Bock J, et al. (2005). "Exposure to retinoic acids in non-pregnant women following high vitamin A intake with a liver meal". International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Vitamin- und Ernährungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition 75 (3): 187–94. doi:10.1024/0300-9831.75.3.187. PMID 16028634. 
  27. ^ Croen, Lisa; Todoroff, Karen; Shaw, Gary (2001). "Maternal Exposure to Nitrate from Drinking Water and Diet and Risk for Neural Tube Defects". American Journal of Epidemiology 153 (4): 325–31. doi:10.1093/aje/153.4.325. 
  28. ^ Costas, K.; Knorr, R.S.; Condon, S.K. (2002). "A case-control study of childhood leukemia in Woburn, Massachusetts: the relationship between leukemia incidence and exposure to public drinking water.". Science of the Total Environment 300: 23–35. 
  29. ^ "In Harm's Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development". May 2000. pp. 90–2. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  30. ^ Ritz, B.; Yu, F.; Fruin, S.; Chapa, G.; Shaw, G.; Harris, J. (2002). "Ambient Air Pollution and Risk of Birth Defects in Southern California". American Journal of Epidemiology 155 (1): 17–25. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  31. ^ Aubard, Yves; Magne, Isabelle (12 Aug 2005). "Carbon monoxide poisoning in pregnancy". British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 107 (7): 833–8. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11078.x. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  32. ^ Griesbauer, Laura. "Methylmercury Contamination in Fish and Shellfish". CSA. CSA 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  33. ^ Rushton, Lesley (2003). "Health hazards and waste management". British Medical Bulletin 68 (1): 183–97. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg034. 
  34. ^ Bullard, Robert. "Environmental Justice for All". National Humanities Center. Retrieved 9 December 2014. 
  35. ^ "Lead Poisoning". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 9 December 2014. 
  36. ^ a b c d e f Sadler, T.W. (1985). Langman's Medical Embryology (5th ed.). Baltimore: William & Wilkins. pp. 109–12. 
  37. ^ "Microcephaly". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  38. ^ "Cerebral calcification, nonarteriosclerotic". MedicineNet.com. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  39. ^ "Hepatosplenomegaly-Symptoms,Causes, Treatment". Symptoms and Treatment RSS. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  40. ^ "Kernicterus". MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  41. ^ "Petechiae". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  42. ^ "Microphthalmus". Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  43. ^ "Facts about Anencephaly". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  44. ^ "Hydrocephalus". Mayo Clinic. Retrieved 7 December 2014. 
  45. ^ a b Raats, Monique (1998). Changing Preconceptions. London: Health Education Authority. p. 11. ISBN 0752112317. Retrieved 30 November 2014. 
  46. ^ Anderson, Lucy M.; Riffle, Lisa; Wilson, Ralph; Travlos, Gregory S.; Lubomirski, Mariusz S.; Alvord, W. Gregory (March 2006). "Preconceptional fasting of fathers alters serum glucose in offspring of mice". Nutrition 22 (3): 327–331. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2005.09.006. 
  47. ^ a b c de Graaf, Johanna P.; Steegers, Eric A.P.; Bonsel, Gouke J. (April 2013). "Inequalities in perinatal and maternal health". Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 25 (2): 98–108. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835ec9b0. 
  48. ^ a b c d Vos, Amber A.; Posthumus, Anke G.; Bonsel, Gouke J.; Steegers, Eric A.P.; Denktaş, Semiha (August 2014). "Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 93 (8): 727–740. doi:10.1111/aogs.12430. 
  49. ^ a b c Bradley, Robert H.; Corwyn, Robert F. (February 2002). "S S C D". Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1): 371–399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233. 
  50. ^ "World Health Organization report". p. 23–24. 
  51. ^ "The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study". 1992.  No differences were found (in frequencies of birth defects, stillbirths, etc), thus allaying the immediate public concern that atomic radiation might spawn an epidemic of malformed children.
  52. ^ "Teratology in the Twentieth Century Plus Ten". p. 21. Retrieved 28 October 2014. 
  53. ^ "British Journal of Cancer - Sex ratio among offspring of childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy". Retrieved 28 October 2014. 
  54. ^ "Birth defects among the children of atomic-bomb survivors (1948-1954)". Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF). Formerly known as the (ABCC) Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission. 
  55. ^ "NUCLEAR CRISIS: Hiroshima and Nagasaki cast long shadows over radiation science -- Monday, April 11, 2011 -- www.eenews.net". Retrieved 28 October 2014. 
  56. ^ Dubrova, Yuri E.; Nesterov, Valeri N.; Krouchinsky, Nicolay G.; Ostapenko, Valdislav A.; Neumann, Rita; Neil, David L.; Jeffreys, Alec J. (25 April 1996). "Human minisatellite mutation rate after the Chernobyl accident". Nature 380 (6576): 683–686. doi:10.1038/380683a0. 
  57. ^ a b Olshan, Andrew F.; Schnitzer, Patricia G.; Baird, Patricia A. (July 1994). "Paternal age and the risk of congenital heart defects". Teratology 50 (1): 80–84. doi:10.1002/tera.1420500111. 
  58. ^ Yang, Q.; Wen, S.W.; Leader, A.; Chen, X.K.; Lipson, J.; Walker, M. (7 December 2006). "Paternal age and birth defects: how strong is the association?". Human Reproduction 22 (3): 696–701. doi:10.1093/humrep/del453. 
  59. ^ Wiener-Megnazi, Zofnat; Auslender, Ron; Dirnfeld, Martha (12 December 2011). "Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome". Asian Journal of Andrology 14 (1): 69–76. doi:10.1038/aja.2011.69. 
  60. ^ Bezerra Guimarães MJ, Marques NM, Melo Filho DA (2000). "[Infant mortality rate and social disparity at Recife, the metropolis of the North-East of Brazil]". Sante (in French) 10 (2): 117–21. PMID 10960809. 
  61. ^ Kumar, Abbas and Fausto, eds., Robbins and Cotran's Pathologic Basis of Disease, 7th edition, p.473.
  62. ^ "WHO Disease and injury country estimates". World Health Organization. 2009. Retrieved Nov 11, 2009. 
  63. ^ Lozano, R (Dec 15, 2012). "Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.". Lancet 380 (9859): 2095–128. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. PMID 23245604. 
  64. ^ Gittelsohn A., Milham S. (1964) Statistical study of twins—methods. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health 54 p. 286–294.
  65. ^ Fernando J., Arena P., Smith D. W. (1978) Sex liability to single structural defects. Am. J. Dis. Child 132 p. 970 –972.
  66. ^ Lubinsky M. S. (1997) Classifying sex biased congenital anomalies. Am. J. Med. Genet. 69 p. 225–228.
  67. ^ Lary J. M., Paulozzi L. J. (2001) Sex differences in the prevalence of human birth defects: a population-based study. Teratology 64 p. 237–251.
  68. ^ a b c d e f Wei Cui, Chang-Xing Ma, Yiwei Tang, e. a. (2005) Sex Differences in Birth Defects: A Study of Opposite-Sex Twins. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 73 p. 876–880.
  69. ^ a b World Health Organization reports). "Congenital malformations", Geneve, 1966, p. 128.
  70. ^ Darwin C. (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London, John Murray, 1st ed.
  71. ^ Kumar, Abbas and Fausto, eds., Robbins and Cotran's Pathologic Basis of Disease, 7th edition, p.470.
  72. ^ Dicke JM (1989). "Teratology: principles and practice". Med. Clin. North Am. 73 (3): 567–82. PMID 2468064. 
  73. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Rajewski P. M., Sherman A. L. (1976) The importance of gender in the epidemiology of malignant tumors (systemic-evolutionary approach). In: Mathematical treatment of medical-biological information. M., Nauka, p. 170–181.
  74. ^ a b c d Montagu A. (1968) Natural Superiority of Women, The, Altamira Press, 1999.
  75. ^ a b c d e f g h i Riley M., Halliday J. (2002) Birth Defects in Victoria 1999-2000, Melbourne.
  76. ^ Shaw G.M., Carmichael S.L., Kaidarova Z., Harris J.A. (2003) Differential risks to males and females for congenital malformations among 2.5 million California births, 1989-1997. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol. 67(12) p. 953-958.
  77. ^ Reyes F.I., Boroditsky R.S., Winter J.S., Faiman C. (1974) Studies on human sexual development. II. Fetal and maternal serum gonadotropin and sex steroid concentrations. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 38 p. 612– 617.
  78. ^ "Key Findings: Updated National Birth Prevalence Estimates for Selected Birth Defects in the United States, 2004-2006". CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Retrieved October 2014. 

External links[edit]