Constitutional crisis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A constitutional crisis is a situation that the legal system's constitution or other basic principles of operation appear unable to resolve; it often results in a breakdown in the orderly operation of government. Often, generally speaking, a constitutional crisis is a situation in which separate factions within a government disagree about the extent to which each of these factions hold sovereignty. Most commonly, constitutional crises involve some degree of conflict between different branches of government (e.g., executive, legislature, and/or judiciary), or between different levels of government in a federal system (e.g., state and federal governments).

A constitutional crisis may occur because one or more parties to the dispute willfully chooses to violate a provision of a constitution or an unwritten constitutional convention, or it may occur when the disputants disagree over the interpretation of such a provision or convention. If the dispute arises because some aspect of the constitution is ambiguous or unclear, the ultimate resolution of the crisis often establishes a precedent for the future. For instance, the United States constitution is silent on the question of whether states are allowed to secede from the Union; however, after the secession of several states was forcibly prevented in the American Civil War, it has become generally accepted that states cannot leave the Union.

A constitutional crisis is distinct from a rebellion, which is defined as when factions outside of a government challenge that government's sovereignty, as in a coup or revolution led by the military or civilian protesters.

A constitutional crisis can lead to government paralysis, collapse, or civil war.

Contents

[edit] African Constitutional crises

[edit] Democratic Republic of the Congo

Patrice Lumumba

[edit] Asian Constitutional crises

[edit] Iran

[edit] Nepal

  • The Loktantra Andolan movement of 2006, which rejected King Gyanendra's year-long direct rule and stripped him of political authority

[edit] Pakistan

  • Supreme Court Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah clashed repeatedly with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in late 1997, accusing him of undermining the court's independence. After Ali Shah suspended a constitutional amendment that prevented dismissal of the prime minister, Sharif ordered President Farooq Leghari to appoint a new chief justice. When Leghari refused, Sharif considered impeaching him, but backed down after a warning from the armed forces. Faced with a choice of accepting Sharif's demands or dismissing him, Leghari resigned. Ali Shah resigned shortly afterward, establishing Sharif's dominance.

[edit] Thailand

  • In March 2006, 60 seats of the National Assembly of Thailand could not be elected, and Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra refused to resign. The judicial system did not lead up to Supreme Court as the top arbitrator so there were inconsistent rulings from the civil, criminal, administrative, and constitutional Courts.

[edit] European Constitutional crises

[edit] Belgium

[edit] Denmark

[edit] England

For events after 1707, see below.
John of England signs Magna Carta. Illustration from Cassell's History of England (1902)

[edit] Germany

  • In 2010, a Berlin court upheld the City of Berlin's decision to not recognize the marriage of two homosexual persons, which is in opposition to the 2009 decision of the Federal Constitutional Court's decision that demanded full marriage equality for gay persons.

[edit] Malta

  • The 1981 election, when, due to a quirk in that country's Single Transferrable Vote system, the party winning more than half the votes won fewer than half the seats

[edit] Norway

[edit] Rome

  • The crossing of the Rubicon by Julius Caesar in 49 BC with his legions. This action, which had no precedent, precipitated a crisis only fully resolved in 31 BC, when Octavian defeated all his enemies to become the sole master of the Roman world.

[edit] Russia

Tanks of the Taman Division shelling the Russian White House on 4 October 1993.

[edit] Scotland

This covers the Kingdom of Scotland, which became part of the Kingdom of Great Britain after 1707. For constitutional crises since then, see United Kingdom below.

[edit] United Kingdom

[edit] North American Constitutional crises

[edit] Canada

[edit] Honduras

[edit] United States

The Electoral Commission was a panel that resolved the disputed presidential election of 1876.
  • 1876 presidential election: Republicans and Democrats disputed voting results in three states. The Electoral Commission, created by Congress, voted along party lines in favor of Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes, who damped Southern fury by withdrawing federal troops from the South.
  • 2000 presidential election: The Republican candidate George W. Bush and the Democrat candidate Albert Gore Jr. disputed the voting results in Florida which would have determined the victor in the presidential election in the year 2000. The United States Supreme Court intervened in the recount and then later in Bush v. Gore to declare Florida's recount method a violation of the Equal Protection Clause and allow the previous certification of victory to stand - giving George W. Bush Florida's 25 electoral college votes and 271 electoral college votes overall.

[edit] Oceanian Constitutional crises

[edit] Australia

[edit] Fiji

[edit] Malaysia

[edit] New Zealand

[edit] South American Constitutional crises

[edit] Peru

[edit] Footnotes

  1. ^ Bardeesy, Karim: Chaos in Canada, Slate Magazine. December 5, 2008. Accessed 8 March 2011.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages