Convergent and divergent production
|This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.
Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion, read the guide to deletion.
|This article does not cite any references or sources. (August 2009)|
Convergent and divergent production are the two types of human response to a set problem that were identified by J.P. Guilford (1967).
Guilford observed that most individuals display a preference for either convergent or divergent thinking. Others observe that most people prefer a convergent closure (Cropley, 2006). As opposed to TRIZ or lateral thinking divergent thinking is not about tools for creativity or thinking, but a way of categorizing what can be observed.
According to J.P. Guilford, divergent or "synthetic thinking" is the ability to draw on ideas from across disciplines and fields of inquiry to reach a deeper understanding of the world and one's place in it.
There is a movement in education that maintains divergent thinking might create more resourceful students. Rather than presenting a series of problems for rote memorization or resolution, divergent thinking presents open-ended problems and encourages students to develop their own solutions to problems.
Critic of the analytic/dialectic approach
While the observations made in psychology can be used to analyze the thinking of humans, such categories may also lead to oversimplifications and dialectic thinking.
Categorizing thinkers as "divergent" or "convergent" may seem appropriate for the purpose of general analyses.
- Guilford, J. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence.
- Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.