Coppermine Expedition of 1819–22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Lieutenant John Franklin, the leader of the expedition.

The Coppermine Expedition of 1819–1822 had as its goal the exploration of the northern coast of Canada, which was accessed by way of the Coppermine River. The British expedition was organised by the Royal Navy as part of its attempt to discover and map the Northwest Passage. It was the first of three Arctic expeditions to be led by John Franklin, and also included George Back and John Richardson, both of whom would become significant Arctic explorers in their own right.

The expedition was plagued by poor planning, bad luck and unreliable allies. The expected assistance from the local fur trading companies and native peoples was less forthcoming than expected, and the dysfunctional supply line, coupled with unusually harsh weather and the resulting absence of game, meant that the explorers were never far from starvation. Eventually the Arctic coast was reached, but barely 500 mi (800 km) had been explored before the exhaustion of the party's supplies and the onset of winter forced them to turn back.

The expedition made a desperate retreat across uncharted territory in a state of starvation, often with nothing more than lichen to eat. Eleven of the twenty strong party died amid accusations of murder and cannibalism before the survivors were rescued by native people of the Yellowknife tribe, who had previously given them up for dead.

In the aftermath of the expedition, John Franklin was much criticised by local fur traders for his haphazard planning and failure to adapt to the circumstances he faced, but in Britain he was received as a hero, fêted for the courage he had shown in extreme adversity. The expedition captured the public imagination, and in reference to a desperate measure he took while starving, he became known as "the man who ate his boots".

Background[edit]

Sir John Barrow was the driving force for the Royal Navy's exploration of the Arctic in the early 19th century.

In the years following the Napoleonic Wars the British Navy, under the influence of Sir John Barrow turned its attention to the discovery of the Northwest Passage, a putative sea route around the north coast of Canada which would allow European ships easy access to the markets of the Orient. Evidence for the existence of a passage came from the fact that whalers in the Bering Strait had killed whales which carried tusks of the type used in Greenland and vice versa,[1] but the maze of islands to the north of Canada was almost completely unmapped; and it was not known whether a navigable, ice-free passage existed.[2] In fact, by 1819 the northern coast of Canada had been glimpsed only twice by Europeans. In 1771 Samuel Hearne had followed the Coppermine River to the sea at a point around 1,500 mi (2,400 km) east of the Bering Strait. He was followed in 1789 by Alexander MacKenzie, who traced what is now the Mackenzie River to open sea 500 mi (800 km) west of the mouth of the Coppermine.[3]

In 1818 John Barrow had sent his first expedition to seek the Northwest Passage. Led by John Ross, it ended ignominiously when Ross entered the Lancaster Sound, the true entrance to the Northwest Passage, but judging it to be a bay turned around and returned to Britain.[4] At the same time, David Buchan made an attempt to sail directly to the North Pole from Britain (Barrow was a believer in the Open Polar Sea hypothesis), but returned only with the news that the pack ice north of Spitsbergen was a barrier which could not be breached.[5]

The following year, John Barrow planned two further expeditions to the Arctic. A seaborne expedition under William Edward Parry would follow on from Ross' work, seeking an entrance to the Northwest Passage from Lancaster Sound. Simultaneously, a party would travel overland to the Canadian coast by way of the Coppermine River and map as much of the coastline as possible, and perhaps even rendezvous with Parry's ships. John Franklin, a lieutenant who had commanded one of David Buchan's ships the previous year, was chosen to lead the overland party.

Expedition planning[edit]

Franklin's orders were somewhat general in nature. He was to travel overland to Great Slave Lake, and from there go to the coast by way of the Coppermine River. On reaching the coast he was advised to head east towards Repulse Bay and William Edward Parry's (hopefully victorious) ships, but if it seemed better he was also given the option of going west to map the coastline between the Coppermine and the Mackenzie Rivers, or even heading north into wholly unknown seas.[3]

More serious than the ambiguity of the instructions was the fact that the expedition was organised with an extremely limited budget. John Franklin was to take only a minimum of naval personnel, and would be reliant on outside help for much of the journey. Manual assistance was meant to be provided by voyageurs (local furriers of mixed French and Aboriginal descent) supplied by the Hudson's Bay Company and the rival North West Company, while the local Yellowknives would act as guides and provide food should John Franklin's supplies run out.[3]

Only four naval personnel accompanied John Franklin; the doctor, naturalist and second in command John Richardson, two midshipmen named George Back and Robert Hood who had sailed with David Buchan in 1818, and ordinary seaman, John Hepburn.[6]

England to Fort Enterprise[edit]

The Coppermine Expedition sailed from Gravesend on 23 May 1819 on a Hudson's Bay Company supply ship, after three months of planning, and immediately hit a note of farce. The ship had stopped briefly off the Norfolk coast, where George Back had business to attend to, but before he had returned a favourable wind blew up and the ship sailed off, leaving Back to make his own way to their next stop in Orkney by stagecoach and ferry.[7] A more serious problem arose in Stromness when the expedition, now reunited with George Back, attempted to hire local boatmen to act as manhaulers for the first part of the trek across Canada. The people of Stromness were far less keen to sign up than the navy had anticipated, and only four men were recruited, and even they agreed to go only as far as Fort Chipewyan on Lake Athabasca.[7]

On 30 August 1819, John Franklin's men reached York Factory, the main port on the southwest coast of Hudson Bay, to begin the 1,700 mi (2,700 km) trek to the Great Slave Lake. They immediately encountered the first of the supply problems which were to plague the expedition. Much of the assistance which had been offered by the Hudson's Bay Company and the North West Company failed to materialise; the companies had spent the preceding years in a state of virtual war, cooperation between them would be virtually nonexistent, and they had few resources to spare.[3] Franklin was provided with a boat which was too small to carry all his supplies (he was assured the rest would be sent on) and proceeded along normal trading routes to Cumberland House (at the time little more than a log cabin which was home to 30 Hudson's Bay men) where he and his men spent the winter. The winter of 1819-1820 was a harsh one, and ominously, the local Indians who came to the post for supplies reported that game had become so scarce that some families were resorting to cannibalism to survive.[8]

Constructing a camp during the first winter of the expedition.

The following January, John Franklin, George Back and John Hepburn formed an advance party to head through the pine forests to Fort Chipewyan, to hire voyageurs and arrange supplies for the next leg of the expedition. Led by Canadian guides, the Britons, who had no experience of the harsh Canadian winter, found the journey extremely arduous. The constant cold froze their tea almost immediately after it had been poured, as well as the mercury in their thermometers. Without tents, they were grateful for snowfall, as it provided an extra layer of insulation over their blankets. John Franklin would later write that the journey brought "a great inter-mixture of agreeable and disagreeable circumstances. Could the amount of each be balanced, I suspect the latter would much preponderate."[9]

The advance party arrived at Fort Chipewyan in late March, having covered 857 mi (1,379 km) in six weeks. Once there, John Franklin found equipping his expedition far more difficult than had been anticipated. The harsh winter meant that food was barely available, and he had to make do with a vague promise that hunters would feed them en route, and that the chief of the Coppermine Indians would offer assistance. Furthermore, the best voyageurs were preoccupied with the conflict between the two fur trading companies, or unwilling to risk a journey into unknown terrain, far outside their normal range and with uncertain supplies. Eventually John Franklin was able to recruit a team of sixteen voyageurs, but most of the men fell well below the standard he desired.[10]

Akaitcho, the native chief on whom John Franklin relied for aid, with his son.

Reunited with Robert Hood and Richardson, the party left for the Great Slave Lake in July, reaching the trading post at Fort Providence on its northern shore ten days later. Here they met Akaitcho (Big Foot[11]), the leader of the local Yellowknives who had been recruited by the North West Company as guides and hunters for John Franklin's men. Akaitcho, described as a man "of great penetration and shrewdness"[12] understood the concept of the Northwest Passage, and patiently listened as Franklin explained that its use would bring wealth to his people. Apparently realising that Franklin was exaggerating the benefits, he asked a question which Franklin was unable to answer; why, if the Northwest Passage was so crucial to trade, had it not been discovered already?[13]

His point effectively made, Akaitcho discussed his terms with John Franklin. In return for the cancellation of his tribe's debts to the North West Company, and some supplies of weapons, ammunition and tobacco, his men would hunt and guide for Franklin on the northward journey down the Coppermine River, and leave depots of food for their return. However, they would not enter the Inuit lands at the far north of the river (they and the Inuit viewed each other with mutual hostility and suspicion), and Akaitcho warned John Franklin that in such a hard year, he could not guarantee that food would always be available.[13]

John Franklin and his men spent the remainder of the summer of 1820 trekking north to a point on the bank of the Coppermine River which Akaitcho had chosen as their winter quarters. Food quickly ran short and the voyageurs began to lose faith in their leader; Franklin's threats of severe punishment prevented a mutiny in the short term, but eroded the remaining goodwill felt by the men.[14][15] The encampment, which Franklin named Fort Enterprise was reached without further incident, and wooden huts were constructed as winter quarters.

The Coppermine River and the Arctic coast[edit]

Winter at Fort Enterprise.

The expedition's second winter in Canada was another difficult one. Supplies arrived only intermittently; the rival companies each preferring to let the other provide them. Ammunition ran short, and the Indian hunters were less effective than had been hoped. Finally, with the party at risk of starvation, George Back was sent back to Fort Providence to browbeat the companies into action. After a 1,200 mi (1,900 km) journey on snowshoes, often with no shelter beyond blankets and a deerskin in temperatures as low as −67 °F (−55 °C), Back returned having secured enough supplies to meet the expedition's immediate needs.[5][15]

"Greenstockings" (left), the Indian girl over whom two of John Franklin's men almost fought a duel.

There was also continuing unrest in the camp. The voyageurs, led by the two interpreters Pierre St Germain and Jean Baptiste Adam, again rebelled. This time Franklin's threats were ineffective, St Germian and Adam insisting that as continuing into the wilderness would mean certain death, the threat of execution for mutiny was laughable. Negotiation by Willard Wentzel, the North West Company's representative, eventually restored an uneasy truce.[16] The discord was not confined to the voyageurs; George Back and Robert Hood had fallen out over their rivalry for the affections of an Indian girl nicknamed Greenstockings, and would have fought a duel over her had John Hepburn not removed the gunpowder from their weapons.[17] The situation was defused when Back was dispatched south, and Hood subsequently fathered a child with the girl.

The winter of 1820-1821 passed and John Franklin set out again on 4 June 1821. His plans for the coming summer were vague; he had decided to explore east from the mouth of the Coppermine in the hope of either meeting William Edward Parry or reaching Repulse Bay, where he might obtain adequate supplies from local Inuit to allow him to return directly to York Factory by way of Hudson Bay. However, if Parry failed to appear, or he was unable to reach Repulse Bay he would either retrace his outward route or, if it seemed better, return directly to Fort Enterprise across the uncharted Barren Lands to the east of the Coppermine River.[18]

Franklin's camp at the mouth of the Coppermine River.

The journey down the Coppermine River took far longer than planned, and John Franklin quickly lost faith in his Indian guides, who in fact knew the area little better than he did, and assured him that the sea was close, then far, then close again. The Arctic Ocean was finally sighted on 14 July 1821, shortly before the expedition encountered its first Inuit camp. The Inuit fled, and Franklin's men never had the opportunity to make further contact or trade for supplies as he had hoped.[15] The abandoned camp gave a further indication of the scarcity of food in the area; the stocks of dried salmon were rotting and maggot-infested, and the meat which was drying consisted mainly of small birds and mice.[19]

The Indians turned for home as had been agreed, as did Willard Wentzel, leaving John Franklin with fifteen voyageurs and his four Britons. Franklin gave orders to those departing that caches of food were to be left on route and that most importantly Fort Enterprise be stocked with a large amount of dried meat. With the lateness of the season the latter point was crucial because Franklin now feared that if, as seemed likely, he failed to reach Repulse Bay, the sea would freeze and prevent him returning to the mouth of the Coppermine River. If so, he would be forced to make a direct return across the Barren Lands, where he and his men would be dependent on whatever food they could forage. There was therefore a real risk that they would be close to starvation by the time they reached Fort Enterprise; he repeated again and again that their survival would depend on the huts being well stocked.[20]

Franklin's canoes caught by a storm in Coronation Gulf on 23 August 1821.

At the mouth of the Coppermine, John Franklin set off east in three canoes with enough food for fourteen days. Their progress was impeded by storms which frequently damaged the canoes, and their attempts to supplement their rations by hunting were so unsuccessful that Franklin suspected the voyageurs of deliberately failing to find game, in order to compel him to turn around. After mapping 500 mi (800 km) of the coastline, Franklin stopped on 22 August 1821 at a place on the Kent Peninsula which he named Point Turnagain. As he had feared, rough seas and the damage to their canoes made a return via the Coppermine impracticable, and the Franklin party decided upon a return via the Hood River, from which they would attempt to make an overland return across the Barren Lands.

Return to Fort Enterprise[edit]

The party encamped at Point Turnagain, just before they elected to return to Fort Enterprise

The going across the Barren Lands was extremely arduous. The ground was a treacherous expanse of sharp rocks which cut their boots and their feet, and constantly threatened more serious injury. John Richardson remarked that "if anyone had broken a limb here his fate would have been melancholy indeed, as we could neither have remained with him, nor carried him on with us".[21] The canoes, which were proving difficult to carry, were dropped by the voyageurs (John Franklin suspected deliberately) and became completely unusable. Winter arrived early, game became even scarcer than it had already been, and by 7 September 1821 the expedition's rations were exhausted. Apart from the rare deer they managed to kill, they were reduced to eating barely nutritious lichens, which they christened tripe de roche, and the occasional rotting carcass left by packs of wolves. So desperate did they become that they even boiled and devoured the leather from their spare boots.[22]

The party preparing a camp and gathering lichens in the Barren Lands, 20 September 1821.

The voyageurs, who were carrying an average of 90 lb (41 kg) each and had been promised a ration of 8 lb (3.6 kg) of meat a day when they signed up, suffered most from the hunger, and their discontent again turned into rebellion. They secretly discarded some of the heavy equipment, including the fishing nets, which would prove a serious loss. John Richardson wrote that they "became desperate and were perfectly regardless of the commands of the officers."[23] The only thing which was preventing them deserting en masse and attempting to reach Fort Enterprise by themselves was that they did not know how to find it. However, they began to realise that John Franklin had little idea of where he was going either - his compass was of little use as the magnetic deviation for the area was unknown, and the constant cloud cover made navigating by the sun or stars impossible. A full-scale mutiny was averted only by the fact that on 26 September 1821 they reached a large river which was undoubtedly the Coppermine.[24]

The party's joy at reaching the Coppermine River quickly turned to despair when it became obvious that without boats, it would be impossible to cross the river to reach Fort Enterprise, which John Franklin estimated lay 40 mi (64 km) away on the far bank. The fast-flowing river was 120 yd (110 m) wide in places, and attempts to find a spot where it could be forded proved futile. The voyageurs, according to John Richardson, "bitterly execrated their folly in breaking the canoe"[25] and became "careless and disobedient... [and] ceased to dread punishment or hope for reward."[26] One of them, Juninus, slipped away, perhaps hoping to reach safety by himself, and never returned. Richardson himself risked his life trying to swim across the river with a line tied around his waist, but losing the feeling in his limbs he sank to the riverbed and had to be hauled back. Hypothermia sapped his strength, leaving him a virtual invalid.[27]

Lichens (tripe de roche) of the type eaten by the party in the absence of any other food.

With the starving party weakening rapidly, the situation was saved by Pierre St Germain, who alone had the strength and willpower to construct a makeshift, one-man canoe from willow branches and canvas. The other men cheered when, on 4 October 1821, he crossed the river, trailing a lifeline. The rest of the party crossed one at a time. The boat sank lower and lower in the water as they did so, but all crossed safely.[28]

Fort Enterprise now lay less than a week's march away, but for some of the starving men, that would prove to be an insurmountable barrier. At the back of the line, the two weakest voyageurs, Credit and Vaillant, collapsed and were left where they fell. John Richardson and Robert Hood were also too weak to continue. At this point, John Franklin split his party. George Back, the fittest remaining officer, was sent ahead with three voyageurs to bring food back from Fort Enterprise. Franklin would follow at a slower pace with the remaining voyageurs. Hood and Richardson would stay in their camp, with John Hepburn to look after them, in the hope that one of the other parties could bring them food. Franklin was disturbed by the apparent abandonment of Hood and Richardson, but they were insistent that the party would have a better chance of survival without them.[29]

John Franklin had only gone a short distance towards Fort Enterprise when four voyageurs — Michel Terohaute, Jean Baptiste Belanger, Perrault, and Fontano — said they were unable to continue and asked to return to Robert Hood and John Richardson's camp. Franklin agreed. He staggered on towards Fort Enterprise with his five remaining companions, growing weaker and weaker. No game was to be found, even if any of them had been strong enough to hold a rifle, and recounting the story, Franklin made a comment which would become famous: "There was no tripe de roche, so we drank tea and ate some of our shoes for supper."[30]

John Franklin's party reached Fort Enterprise on 12 October 1821, two days after George Back. They found it deserted and unstocked. The promised supplies of dried meat had not appeared, and there was nothing to eat except bones from the previous winter, a few rotting skins which had been used as bedding, and a little tripe de roche. A note from Back explained that he had found the fort in this state, and that he was heading towards Fort Providence to look for Akaitcho and his Indians. The party despaired. Two voyageurs, Augustus and Benoit, set off upriver in the hope of meeting some Indians there. The rest of the group remained, too weak to go any further. Two of the voyageurs lay down crying and waited to die, and even the normally optimistic Franklin wrote of how quickly his strength was evaporating. None of them had eaten meat for four weeks.[31]

Murder[edit]

Of the four voyageurs who had left John Franklin's party to return to Robert Hood and John Richardson, only Michel Terohaute reached the camp, having taken several days to cover the 4 mi (6.4 km) from where they left Franklin. He told the Britons that he had become separated from the others, and assumed that they would be following. Whatever doubts the officers may have had about his story gave way to gratitude when he presented them with meat, which he said had come from a hare and partridge he had managed to kill on the way. Two days later he went hunting and brought back meat he said came from a wolf he had found. The Britons were delighted, and eagerly devoured the meat.[32]

Over the next few days, however, Michel Terohaute's behaviour became more and more erratic. He disappeared for short periods, refusing to say where he had gone. He would not gather tripe de roche. When asked to go hunting he refused, replying that "there are no animals, you had better kill and eat me."[33] He later accused the Britons of having eaten his uncle.

At some point (Richardson's journal is unclear on when), John Richardson and Robert Hood began to suspect that Michel Terohaute had killed the three missing voyageurs, and was disappearing from camp to feed on their corpses. The "wolf meat" they had eaten was probably human flesh. Then, on 20 October while Richardson and John Hepburn were foraging, they heard a shot from the camp. They found Hood dead, and Michel standing with a gun in his hand.[34]

Michel Terohaute's explanation was that Robert Hood had been cleaning his gun and that it had gone off, shooting him through the head. The claim was self-evidently absurd; the rifle was too long for a man to shoot himself with, moreover Hood had been shot in the back of the head, apparently while reading a book. But with Michel stronger than them and armed, there was nothing John Hepburn and Richardson could do for the next three days, as Michel refused to let them out of his sight, became more and more aggressive, repeatedly asking to know if they thought he had murdered Hood. Finally on 23 October Michel left them for a short time to gather lichen. Richardson took the opportunity to load his pistol, and on Michel Terohaute's return, he shot him dead.[35]

Rescue[edit]

John Richardson and John Hepburn struggled on to Fort Enterprise and were appalled by the scene when they arrived on 29 October 1821. Of the four men who remained, only Peltier was strong enough to stand and greet them. The floorboards had been dug up for firewood, and the skins which covered the windows had been removed and eaten by the starving men. John Richardson wrote that "the ghastly countenances, dilated eyeballs and sepulchral voices of Captain John Franklin and those with him were more than we could at first bear."[36]

For over a week the men at Fort Enterprise subsisted on tripe de roche and rotten deerskins, which they ate complete with the maggots, which tasted "as fine as gooseberries."[37] Two of the voyageurs, Peltier and Samandré, died on the night of 1 November 1821. The third, Adam, was close to death. John Hepburn's limbs began to swell with protein deficiency oedema. Finally, on 7 November, help arrived with the arrival of three of Akaitcho's Indians, with whom George Back (who had also lost a man to starvation) had finally managed to make contact. They brought food, caught fish for the survivors, and treated them "with the same tenderness they would have bestowed on their own infants."[38] After building up their strength for a week, they left Fort Enterprise on 15 November 1821, arriving at Fort Providence on 11 December.

Akaitcho explained why Fort Enterprise had not been stocked with food as promised. Part of the reason was that three of his hunters had been killed when they fell through the ice on a frozen lake, and he had not been supplied with ammunition at Fort Providence, but he admitted the main reason the fort had been abandoned; he had believed that the white men's expedition was the height of folly, and that they would not return to Fort Enterprise alive.[39] In spite of this, John Franklin refused to blame Akaitcho, who had shown him much kindness during the rescue, and, because of the ongoing dispute between the fur companies, had not received the payment he had been promised.[40]

Aftermath and legacy[edit]

George Simpson, a particularly vehement critic of Franklin.

By almost any objective standard, the expedition had been a disaster. John Franklin had travelled 5,500 mi (8,900 km) and lost eleven of his nineteen men, only to map a small portion of coastline. He got nowhere near his goal of Repulse Bay or to meeting up with William Edward Parry's ships. When the party arrived back at York Factory in July 1822, George Simpson of the Hudson's Bay Company, who had objected to John Franklin's expedition from the start, wrote that "They do not feel themselves at liberty to enter into the particulars of their disastrous enterprise, and I fear they have not fully achieved the object of their mission."[41] Simpson and other fur traders who knew the terrain were scathing in their descriptions of the expedition's poor planning and assessment of Franklin's competence. His reluctance to deviate from his original plan, even when it became obvious that supplies and game would be too scarce to complete the journey safely, were cited as evidence of his inflexibility and inability to adapt to a changing situation. Had Franklin been more experienced, he might have reconsidered his goals, or abandoned the expedition altogether.[15][42] In a particularly harshly worded letter, Simpson also wrote of Franklin's physical failings; "[He] has not the physical powers required for the labor of moderate Voyaging in this country; he must have three meals per diem, Tea is indispensable, and with the utmost exertion he cannot walk above Eight miles in one day, so that it does not follow if those Gentlemen are unsuccessful that the difficulties are insurmountable."[43] However, it should be kept in mind that many of the fur traders resented having had to assist John Franklin in the first place, and Simpson in particular was angry with what he saw as Franklin's support for the rival North West Company in their trade war.[15]

There were also dark murmurings about what exactly had happened to Robert Hood and Michel Terohaute. The only account of the incident was John Richardson's, published after consultation with John Franklin; and there was nothing to prove that he and John Hepburn had not killed and eaten Hood and the four voyageurs themselves.[44] Willard Wentzel, the North West Company interpreter who was blamed for failing to ensure that Fort Enterprise was stocked, went so far as to accuse John Richardson of murder, and demanded that he be brought to trial.[44] George Back subsequently wrote to him that "to tell the truth Wentzel, things have taken place which must not be known."[45] The Admiralty launched no official inquiry and the matter was quietly dropped.[46]

The romantic Victorian view of the Arctic.

On John Franklin's return to England in October 1822, none of the rumours or criticism mattered. The failure to meet the expedition's key goals was overlooked in favour of admiration of his tale of courage in the face of adversity. Franklin, who had been made a commander in his absence was promoted to captain on 20 November 1822 and elected a Fellow of the Royal Society,[42] while George Back was made a lieutenant.[5] Franklin's account of the expedition, published in 1823, was regarded as a classic of travel literature[42] and, when the publishing company could not keep up with demand, second-hand copies sold for up to ten guineas.[47] Ordinary people would point him out in the street, and, recalling his desperate measures to avoid starvation, he became affectionately known as "the man who ate his boots".[42][48]

John Franklin made another expedition to the Arctic in 1825. With a party which included John Richardson and George Back, he journeyed down the Mackenzie River to map a further section of Canada's coast. This time the expedition was better organised, with less reliance on outside help, and all the major objectives were met.[42] After stints commanding ships outside the Arctic, and an unhappy period as Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemen's Land (now Tasmania), he led a final expedition to discover the Northwest Passage in 1845. Franklin vanished almost without trace, with all 132 of his men, and the mystery of his fate has still to be fully discovered.

The story of the Coppermine Expedition was to serve as an influence on Roald Amundsen, who would eventually become the first man to navigate the entire Northwest Passage, as well as the first to reach the South Pole. At the age of fifteen he read John Franklin's account, and decided that he wanted to be a polar explorer. He recalled:

Notes and references[edit]

  1. ^ Fleming, p. 30
  2. ^ In fact, no sea route through the Canadian Arctic exists which is free of ice often enough to be economically useful, though this may change in the future due to global warming.
  3. ^ a b c d Fleming p. 125
  4. ^ Fleming pp. 29-51
  5. ^ a b c Beesly
  6. ^ A second seaman, Samuel Wilks, was initially assigned to the party, but fell ill on arriving in Canada and played no further part in the expedition.
  7. ^ a b Fleming p. 127
  8. ^ Fleming, p. 128
  9. ^ Franklin, John (1823). Narrative of a Journey to the Shores of the Polar Sea in the Years 1819-22. London: John Murray. p. 140.  Quoted in Fleming.
  10. ^ Fleming pp. 129-130
  11. ^ Arctic Profiles
  12. ^ Franklin, p. 251. Quoted in Flemong
  13. ^ a b Fleming, p. 131
  14. ^ Fleming p. 133
  15. ^ a b c d e Holland
  16. ^ Fleming p. 135
  17. ^ Burant
  18. ^ Fleming p. 132
  19. ^ Fleming p. 136
  20. ^ Fleming p. 136-137
  21. ^ Richardson, John (1984). Arctic Ordeal. The Journal of John Richardson 1820-1822. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 129.  Quoted in Fleming.
  22. ^ Fleming pp. 139-140
  23. ^ Richardson p. 138. Quoted in Fleming.
  24. ^ Fleming pp. 139-141
  25. ^ Richardson p. 141. Quoted in Fleming
  26. ^ Richardson, p. 140. Quoted in Fleming
  27. ^ Fleming pp. 141-142
  28. ^ Fleming p. 143
  29. ^ Fleming p. 144
  30. ^ Franklin p. 438. Quoted in Fleming.
  31. ^ Fleming pp. 145-146
  32. ^ Fleming p. 146
  33. ^ Richardson p. 154. Quoted in Fleming.
  34. ^ Fleming p. 147
  35. ^ Fleming p. 148
  36. ^ Richardson p. 197. Quoted in Fleming.
  37. ^ Richardson, p. 197. Quoted in Fleming
  38. ^ McIlraith, J (1868). Life of Sir John Richardson. London: Longman. p. 112.  Quoted in Fleming.
  39. ^ Fleming pp. 149-150
  40. ^ Fleming p. 150
  41. ^ Fleming, H. (ed.) (1941). Minutes of Council, Northern Department of Rupert Land1821-31. Toronto: The Champlain Society. p. 341.  Quoted in Fleming.
  42. ^ a b c d e Riffenburghy
  43. ^ Quoted in Holland
  44. ^ a b Fleming p. 152
  45. ^ Masson, L. (ed.) (1889). Les Bourgeois de la Compagnie de Nord Ouest (Vol I). Quebec. pp. 148–149.  Quoted in Fleming, emphasis as in Fleming.
  46. ^ Johnson & Johnson
  47. ^ Fleming p. 123
  48. ^ Fleming p. 153
  49. ^ Huntford, Robert (2000). The Last Place on Earth. Abacus. p. 19. ISBN 0-349-11395-5. 

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]