Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
| Argued October 1, 2001 Decided November 27, 2001 |
||||||
| Full case name | Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko | |||||
| Citations | 534 U.S. 61 (more) | |||||
| Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||
| Majority | Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas | |||||
| Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Thomas | |||||
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer | |||||
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) should not be extended to allow recovery against a private corporation operating a halfway house under contract with the Bureau of Prisons.
[edit] See also
Works related to Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko at Wikisource- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 534
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
Works related to [edit] External links
- Text of Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001) is available from: Justia · Findlaw
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
