Counterhegemony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Counter-hegemony refers to attempts to critique or dismantle hegemonic power. In other words it is a confrontation and/or opposition to existing status quo and its legitimacy in politics, but can also be observed in various other spheres of life, such as history, media, music, etc. Neo-Gramscian theorist Nicola Pratt (2004) has described counter-hegemony as “a creation of an alternative hegemony on the terrain of civil society in preparation for political change”.[1]

According to Theodore H. Cohn, "a counterhegemony is an alternative ethical view of society that poses a challenge to the dominant bourgeois-led view".[2]

If a counterhegemony grows large enough it is able to subsume and replace the historic bloc it was born in. Neo-Gramscians use the Machiavellian terms war of position and war of movement to explain how this is possible. In a war of position a counterhegemonic movement attempts, through persuasion or propaganda, to increase the number of people who share its view on the hegemonic order; in a war of movement the counterhegemonic tendencies which have grown large enough overthrow, violently or democratically, the current hegemony and establish themselves as a new historic bloc.

An example of counter-hegemony in politics is the “anti-globalization movement”. An example of counter-hegemony in media could be a documentary questioning the government’s involvement in a war.[3]

Origins of the concept[edit]

Term “Hegemony” came from the writings of Karl Marx and was conceptualized by Antonio Gramsci, a Marxist social philosopher who lived in Mussolini's Italy. Because Gramsci was a Marxist, he subscribed to the basic Marxist premise of the historical dialectic. Therefore, according to classic Marxist theories, societies will transform over time from oppressive economic systems to more and more liberating ones, until finally the Utopian state of communism in society is reached.

In his writings Gramsci claim that intellectuals create both, hegemony and counter-hegemony. He argues that "there is no organization without intellectuals," for to be without them is to be without "the theoretical aspect of the theory-practice nexus essential to all effective organizations".[4]

Counter-hegemonic actions[edit]

Counter-hegemonic groups of people do not start off as radical or extremist groups; they encourage people to share their view against hegemony through the use of persuasion and/or propaganda whilst raising awareness. One view describes the possibility that once the Counter-Hegemonic group has gained enough support and consensus against the current powers, they would then attempt to overthrow them, whether through violence or democracy. Depending on whether full power is given to each individual, or if it is kept among a close few could be the deterministic factor between a decentralized government and a dictatorship.[5]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Pratt, N. (2004), Bringing politics back in: examining the link between globalisation and democratization, Review of International Political Economy [online], Vol. 11, No. 2, [accessed: 28th May 2010], pp. 331-336, Available at: http://www.jstor.org/pss/4177500
  2. ^ Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice, Theodore H. Cohn, Other Paperback Editions, June 2004, ISBN 0-321-20949-4, page 131
  3. ^ Cohn, T. H. (2004), Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice, Other Paperback Editions, ISBN 0-321-20949-4, page 131
  4. ^ Simms, R. (2003), “I am a Non-Denominational Christian and a Marxist Socialist: A Gramscian Analysis of the Convention People’s Party and Kwame Nkrumah’s Use of Religion”, Association for the Sociology of Religion, Inc., Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 463-477
  5. ^ Barden, T (2010), “Exploring the concept of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony within the modern world and how, as a designer, I can influence for the better”, Theoretically Interesting Publications