Critical exponent of a word

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics and computer science, the critical exponent of a finite or infinite sequence of symbols over a finite alphabet describes the largest number of times a contiguous subsequence can be repeated. For example, the critical exponent of "Mississippi" is 7/3, as it contains the string "ississi", which is of length 7 and period 3.

If w is an infinite word over the alphabet A and x is a finite word over A, then x is said to occur in w with exponent α, for positive real α, if there is a factor y of w with y = xax0 where x0 is a prefix of x, a is the integer part of α, and the length |y| ≥ α |x|: we say that y is an α-power. The word w is α-power-free if it contains no factors which are α-powers.[1]

The critical exponent for w is the supremum of the α for which w has α-powers,[2] or equivalently the infimum of the α for which w is α-power-free.[3]

Examples[edit]

  • The critical exponent of the Fibonacci word is (5 + √5)/2 ≈ 3.618.[3][4]
  • The critical exponent of the Thue–Morse sequence is 2.[3] The word contains arbitrarily long squares, but in any factor xxb the letter b is not a prefix of x.

Properties[edit]

  • The critical exponent can take any real value greater than 1.[3][5]
  • The critical exponent of a morphic word over a finite alphabet is an algebraic number of degree at most the size of the alphabet.[3]

Repetition threshold[edit]

The repetition threshold of an alphabet A of n letters is the minimum critical exponent of infinite words over A: clearly this value RT(n) depends only on n. For n=2, any binary word of length four has a factor of exponent 2, and since the critical exponent of the Thue–Morse sequence is 2, the repetition threshold for binary alphabets is RT(2) = 2. It is known that RT(3) = 7/4, RT(4) = 7/5 and that for n≥5 we have RT(n) ≥ n/(n-1). It is conjectured that the latter is the true value, and this has been established for 5 ≤ n ≤ 14 and for n ≥ 33.[2][4]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Krieger (2006) p.281
  2. ^ a b Berstel et al (2009) p.126
  3. ^ a b c d e Krieger (2006) p.280
  4. ^ a b Allouche & Shallit (2003) p. 37
  5. ^ Krieger & Shallit (2007).

References[edit]