Criticism of monotheism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Criticism of monotheism remains prevalent throughout the history, monotheism has been criticized as total discourse.[1] Criticism varied from linking monotheism as form of oppression, limited point of view, while some have ultimately regarded it as reason behind violence.

Contradictions[edit]

Through the means of defining, it is traditionally agreed among the major monotheistic religions that the one God is, inter alia, omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent. However, one scholar argues that "this definition of God [is] contradictory to what has been perceived by us in the empirical world."[2]

Feminist thinkers have criticized the monotheistic concept as the model of highest form of patriarchal power, they argues that the one god is regarded to be male and opposed to everything related to change, sensuality, nature, feeling, and femininity.[3]

Forcing one belief[edit]

David Hume has argued that monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism because the former stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one.[4] In the same vein, Auguste Comte argues, "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator.[5]

James Lovelock criticized monotheism, due to its idea of a transcendent almighty father, he says about monotheism, "seems to anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract."[6]

Violence in monotheism[edit]

In the ancient times, monotheism is blamed as the instigator of violence in its early days as it inspired the Israelites to wage war upon the Canaanites who believed in multiple gods.[7]

Highly acclaimed Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan regarded monotheism to be one reason of violence, he said:-

The intolerance of narrow monotheism is written in letters of blood across the history of man from the time when first the tribes of Israel burst into the land of Canaan. The worshippers of the one jealous God are egged on to aggressive wars against people of alien cults. They invoke divine sanction for the cruelties inflicted on the conquered. The spirit of old Israel is inherited by Christianity and Islam, and it might not be unreasonable to suggest that it would have been better for Western civilization if Greece had moulded it on this question rather than Palestine.[8]

Success of monotheistic religions[edit]

Bertrand Russell has stated that in recent history William James popularized the idea that the belief in one god causes people not be behave improperly. Furthermore, Russell expostulates through examples that whether "politicians and educators ought to try to make people think there is one [god]" is "a political one" since one cannot prove the moralistic argument of William James.[9]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts", p. 11
  2. ^ Worship as a Hindrance to Self
  3. ^ Encyclopedia of religion - Volume 9 - Page 6161, by Lindsay Jones
  4. ^ "David Hume argued that unlike monotheism, polytheism is pluralistic in nature, unbound by doctrine, and therefore far more tolerant than monotheism, which tends to force people to believe in one faith." [1]
  5. ^ The Catechism of Positive Religion, page 251
  6. ^ "A Reenchanted World: The Quest for a New Kinship with Nature", by James William Gibson, p. 98, Publisher = Macmillan, Year = 2009
  7. ^ The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism ISBN 978-0-226-74199-4
  8. ^ "A Primal Perspective on the Philosophy of Religion", by Arvind Sharma, page 29
  9. ^ Is There a God?,(Commissioned by Bertrand Russell, but never published in, Illustrated Magazine, in 1952) [2]