Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
North American colonies 1763–76

The cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies includes the foods, eating habits, and cooking methods of the Thirteen British colonies in North America before the American revolution. It was derived from familiar traditions from the colonists’ home countries in the British Isles and particularly England. Many agricultural items came through trade with England and the West Indies. Certain familiar items grew better in the Old World than others, and this led to a dependence on imports which drove the daily lives of the colonists. However, the colonial diet was increasingly supplemented by new animal and plant foods indigenous to the New World.

In the years leading up to 1776, a number of events led to a drastic change in the diet of the American colonists. As they could no longer depend on British and West Indian imports, agricultural practices of the colonists began to focus on becoming completely self-sufficient.[1]

Regional cuisines[edit]

The majority of immigrants to North America in the 17th and 18th centuries came from various parts of Britain in four waves. These four migration waves established the four major regional cultures that still affect life in the United States to this day. Each of the migrations settled in different regions and were dominated by regional cultures from the British Isles that were transplanted across the Atlantic. Along with specific customs related to everything from religion to language, the British migrants brought with them food habits that formed major regional cuisines of English-speaking America.[2]

New England[edit]

One of the icons of American culture, the apple pie, had its origin in East Anglian cooking traditions.

New England was the first region to experience large scale colonization in the early 17th century, beginning in 1620, and it was dominated by East Anglian Calvinists, better known as the Puritans. The religious fundamentalism of the Puritans created a cuisine that was austere, disdainful of feasting and with few embellishments. Eating was seen as a largely practical matter and one of the few occasions when New Englanders would engage in massive bouts of eating and drinking was at funerals, times when even children might drink large amounts of alcohol. Age was one of the most important signs of authority and determined eating practices; though Puritan society was less stratified, particularly compared to the southern colonies, heads of the household and their spouses would often eat separately from both children and servants. Though New England had a great abundance of wildlife and seafood, traditional East Anglian fare was preferred, even if it had to be made with New World ingredients. Baked beans and pease porridge were everyday fare, particularly during the winter, and usually eaten with coarse, dark bread. At first it was made with a mixture of wheat and maize (corn), but after a disease called wheat rust struck in the 1660s, it was made of rye and maize, creating what has later been known as "rye 'n' injun". Vegetables with meat boiled thoroughly was a popular dish, and unlike many other regions in North American colonies, they were cooked together, rather than separately, and frequently without seasoning. Baking was a particular favorite of the New Englanders and was the origin of dishes today seen as quintessentially American, such as apple pie and the baked Thanksgiving turkey.[3]

Virginia[edit]

In the mid-17th century a second wave of English immigrants began arriving in North America, settling mainly around Chesapeake Bay in Virginia and Maryland, though English settlers had lived in Virginia, along the James River, since 1607. The Virginian settlers were dominated by English noblemen with their servants (many were Cavaliers fleeing in the aftermath of the English Civil War 1642–51) and poor peasants from southern England.

The society the Cavaliers brought with them was highly stratified and this was reflected in food and eating habits. The aristocrats that would be the basis for the First Families of Virginia were very fond of game and red meat. Roast beef was a particular favorite, and even when oysters and goose were available, wealthy colonists could complain about the absence of meat. Virginia was the only place in North America where haute cuisine of any kind was practiced before the 19th century. Virginians such as William Byrd (1652–1704) would indulge in extravagant dishes such as stewed swan or roast snipe, dinners were important social events, and the art of dinner conversation was considered an important skill in affluent households.

Poor white farmers and black slaves ate much more humble fare and were quicker to incorporate American and African foodstuffs and flavorings. The food of the poor whites in the 17th century was similar to soul food of the 20th century. Overall, both rich and poor southerners ate spicier and more pungent food than elsewhere in the early colonies, and feasting was an important part of life for all social classes.

Cooking in southern England was noted for a tendency toward frying, simmering and roasting, and this also became true for Virginian cooking. While wealthy households tended to vary cooking methods greatly, poor households were generally confined to boiling and frying. The only form of cooking that was slow to develop was baking. Typical dishes among the upper classes were fricassees of various meats with herbs, and sometimes a good amount of claret. Common food among the lower classes was corn porridge, or mush, and hominy with greens and salt-cured meat, and later the traditional southern fried chicken and chitlins.[4]

Delaware Valley and Mid-Atlantic region[edit]

The Quakers emigrated to the New World from the Northern English Midlands during the 17th century, and eventually settled primarily in the Delaware Valley. They were similar to the Puritans in the strictness that they applied to everyday life, though their religious teachings were far more egalitarian. The food was plain and simple. Excessive consumption was discouraged and failure to eat or drink moderately was punished with public acts of self-criticism. William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania and an important figure in the development of the Quaker movement encouraged frugality in his followers with advice such as "If thou rise with an appetite thou are sure never to sit down without one".[5] Just like the Puritans, the Quakers encountered an abundance of food in the New World; forests rich with game and berries, streams teeming with fish, and flocks of birds so abundant that they would sometimes block the sun for several hours. Still the asceticism persevered. Many Quakers avoided eating butter as a form of self-mortification, and the most eccentric followers would avoid tea and meat. The idealist and pacifist ideas of the Quakers also encouraged many to boycott products that were considered to be tainted by sin. This included salt, due to its role in raising war taxes, and sugar, because it was produced by slave labor. Eating habits were more egalitarian than either that of the Puritans or the Virginian Anglicans. At meals, entire households would dine at the same table, including children and servants.[6]

A plate of scrapple, a traditional dish of the Delaware Valley region still eaten today

The most typical cooking method of the Quakers was boiling, a method brought from ancestral northern England. Boiled breakfast and dinner were standard fare, as well as "pop-robbins", balls of batter made from flour and eggs boiled in milk. Boiled dumplings and puddings were so common in Quaker homes that they were referred to by outsiders as "Quakers' food". Travelers noted apple dumplings as an almost daily dish in the Delaware Valley and cook books specialized in puddings and dumplings. Food was mostly preserved through boiling, simmering or standing. A popular genre of dishes made from this favored method of food preparation was "cheese" (or "butter"), a generic term for dishes prepared by slow boiling or pressing. It could be made from ingredients as varying as apples (i.e., apple butter), plums and walnuts. Cream cheese had its origins in Quaker cooking, but was in colonial times not true cheese made with rennet or curds, but rather cream that was warmed gently and then allowed to stand between cloth until it became semi-solid. Dried beef was widely popular in the Delaware Valley and was eaten along with puddings and dumplings to add flavor. The use of dried beef was so widespread that it was often called "Quaker gravy" in the 18th century. Though the Quaker influence from the Northern Midlands was the most dominant, there was some influence from German immigrants during the 18th century. Scrapple, a pot pudding made from meat scraps and grain, became a staple of the regional cuisine for many generations.[7]

Backcountry[edit]

The last major wave of British immigrants to the colonies took place from 1720–1775. About 250,000 people travelled across the Atlantic primarily to seek economic betterment and to escape hardships and famine. Most of these came from the borderlands of northern Britain and were of Scots-Irish or Scottish descent. Many were poor and therefore accustomed to hard times, setting them apart from the other major British immigrant groups.[8] They settled in what would come to be known generally as the "Backcountry", on the frontier and in the highlands in the north and south.

A typical breakfast could be toasted bread, cheese, and any leftover meat or vegetables from the previous dinner. In summer, people drank fresh milk.[9]

The backcountry relied heavily on a diet based on mush made from soured milk or boiled grains. Clabber, a yogurt-like food made with soured milk, was a standard breakfast dish and was eaten by backcountry settlers of all ages. This dietary habit was not shared by other British immigrant groups and was equally despised by those still in Britain. The Anglican missionary Charles Woodmason, who spent time among Ulster Irish immigrants, described them as depending "wholly on butter, milk, clabber and what in England is given to hogs".[10] Oatmeal mush was a popular meal in the British borderlands and remained popular in America. The only difference was that the oatmeal was replaced by corn, and is still known today in the South as grits. Cakes of unleavened dough baked on bakestones or circular griddles were common and went by names such as "clapbread", "griddle cakes" and "pancakes". While the potato had originated in South America, it did not become established in North America until it was brought to the colonies by northern British settlers in the 18th century and became an important backcountry staple along with corn. Pork had been a food taboo among northern Britons and the primary meat had been sheep. In the American colonies the raising of sheep was not as efficient and mutton was therefore replaced with pork. The habit of eating "sallet" or "greens" remained popular, but the vegetables of the Old World were replaced with plants like squashes, gourds, beans, corn, land cress and pokeweed. The distinctive cooking style of the British borderlands and the American backcountry was boiling. Along with clabber, porridge and mushes, the typical dishes were various stews, soups and pot pies.

Food was eaten from wooden or pewter trenchers with two-tined forks, large spoons and hunting knives. Dishware was not popular since it was easily breakable and tended to dull knives quickly. Unlike the Quakers and Puritans, feasting with an abundance of food and drink was never discouraged and practiced as often as was feasible. Generally, the backcountry cuisine did not share the religious austerity of the North nor the refinement of the South and was therefore denigrated by outside commentators. An apparent lack of fastidiousness in preparing the food provoked further criticism from many sources. The Anglican Woodmason characterized backcountry cooking as "exceedingly filthy and most execrable".[11] Others told of matrons washing their feet in the cookpot, that it was considered unlucky to wash a milk churn and that human hairs in butter were considered a sign of quality. These descriptions seem to be confirmed by an old saying attributed to Appalachian housewives: "The mair [more] dirt the less hurt". Another expression of backcountry hardiness was the lack of appreciation of coffee and tea. Both were described as mere "slops" and were deemed appropriate only for those who were sick or unfit for labor.[12]

Diet before the American Revolution[edit]

The Compleat Housewife was a cookbook that proliferated in the Thirteen Colonies.

When colonists arrived in America, they planted familiar crops from the Old World with varying degrees of success and raised domestic animals for meat, leather, and wool, as they had done in Britain. The colonists faced difficulties owing to different climate and other environmental factors, but trade with Britain, continental Europe, and the West Indies allowed the American colonists to create a cuisine similar to the various regional British cuisines. Local plants and animals offered tantalizing alternatives to the Old World diet, but the colonists held on to old traditions and tended to use these items in the same fashion as they did their Old World equivalents (or even ignore them if more familiar foods were available).[13] The American colonial diet varied depending on region, with local cuisine patterns established by the mid-18th century.

A preference for British cooking methods is apparent in cookbooks brought to the New World. There was a general disdain for French cookery, even among the French Huguenots in South Carolina and French Canadians.[14] One cookbook common in the colonies, The Art of Cookery Made Plain and Easy, by Hannah Glasse, held the French style of cookery in disdain, stating "the blind folly of this age that would rather be imposed on by a French booby, than give encouragement to a good English cook!"[15] She does add French recipes to the text but speaks out flagrantly against the dishes, "...think(ing) it an odd jumble of trash."[15] The French and Indian War (1754–1764) reinforced anti-French sentiment. The conflict strengthened an age-old English distrust of the French, and led the English to deport French-speaking people, as in the forced migration of the Acadians to Louisiana. The Acadian French brought a profound French influence to the diet of settlers in Louisiana, but had little influence outside of that region.[16]

Northern colonies[edit]

A striking characteristic of the diet in New England was the seasonal availability of food.[17] While farming in the southern colonies took place for most of the year, northern growing seasons were more restricted, limiting the availability of fresh fruit and vegetables. However, the coastal colonists' close proximity to the ocean gave them a bounty of fresh fish to supplement their diet year-round, especially in the north. Wheat, the grain primarily used in English bread, was almost impossible to grow in the North, and imports of wheat were far from cost productive.[18] Substitutes included corn (maize) in the form of cornmeal. The johnnycake was generally considered a poor substitute for wheaten bread, but was accepted by residents in both the northern and southern colonies.[19]

Animal proteins[edit]

Deer was a popular game meat.

Game hunting was a familiar beneficial skill to the colonists when they immigrated to the New World. Most northern colonists depended upon hunting, whether they hunted themselves or purchased game from others. As a method of obtaining protein for consumption, hunting was preferred over animal husbandry as domestic animals were expensive and more work was required to defend domestic animals against natural predators, Native Americans or the French.[20] Commonly hunted game included deer, bear, buffalo and turkey. The larger parts of the animals were roasted and served with currant and other sauces, while smaller portions went into soups, stews, sausages, pies and pasties.[21]

Venison was the most popular game. The plentiful meat was often potted or jerked, and its tripe was popular as well. Venison was especially popular during the Thanksgiving season. Buffalo was an important protein source until roughly 1770, when the animals were over-hunted in the eastern United States. Bear were numerous in the northern colonies, especially in New York, and many considered the leg meat to be a delicacy. Bear meat was frequently jerked as a preservation method.[22]

Sheep were valuable livestock in the Colonies.

In addition to game, mutton was consumed from time to time. Keeping sheep provided wool to the household, and when a sheep reached an age when it was unmanageable for wool production; it could be harvested as mutton.[23] Sheep were originally introduced to the Americas through the Spanish in Florida. In the north, the Dutch and English also introduced several varieties of sheep. The casual English practice of animal husbandry allowed sheep to roam free, consuming a variety of forage. Forage–based diets produce meat with a characteristically strong, gamey flavor and a tough consistency, which requires aging and slow cooking to tenderize.[24]

Fats and oils derived from animals were used to cook many colonial foods. Rendered pork fat, especially from bacon, was the most popular cooking medium. Pork fat was used more often in the southern colonies than the northern colonies as the Spanish introduced pigs earlier to the south. Many homes kept a deerskin sack filled with bear oil for use in cooking. Solidified bear fat resembled shortening. The colonists enjoyed butter in cooking as well, but it was rare prior to the American Revolution, as cattle were not yet plentiful.[25]

Colonists near the shores in New England often dined on fish, crustaceans and other sea animals. Colonists ate large quantities of turtle, a delicacy also exportable to Europe. Cod was enjoyed in both fresh and salted form, salted cod being suitable for long-term storage. Lobsters proliferated in the waters as well, and were commonplace in the New England diet. Some complained about dining on lobster and codfish too often and they were even used as pig fodder. The highest quality cod was usually dried and salted, however, and exported to the Mediterranean in exchange for fruits not grown in American colonies.[26]

Fruits and vegetables[edit]

Beans were an integral part of the colonial diet as an indigenous crop.

A number of vegetables were grown in the northern colonies, including turnips, onions, cabbage, carrots, and parsnips, along with pulses and legumes. These vegetables stored well through the colder months. Other vegetables, such as cucumbers, could be salted or pickled for preservation. Agricultural success in the northern colonies came from following the seasons, with consumption of fresh greens only occurring during summer months. In addition to vegetables, a large number of seasonal fruits were grown. Fruits not eaten in season were often preserved as jam, wet sweetmeats, dried, or cooked into pies that could be frozen during the winter months.[27] Some vegetables originating in the New World, including beans, squashes, and corn, were readily adopted and grown by the European colonists. Pumpkins and gourds grew well in the northern colonies and were often used for fodder for animals in addition to human consumption.

Alcohol[edit]

Hard apple cider was by far the most common alcoholic beverage available to colonists.[28] This is because apple trees could be grown locally throughout the colonies, unlike grapes and grain which did not grow well at all in New England. Cider was also easier to produce than beer or wine, so it could be made by farmers for their own consumption. Since it was not imported, it was much more affordable to the average colonist than beer or wine.[29] Apple trees were planted in both Virginia and the Massachusetts Bay Colony as early as 1629.[28] Most of these trees were not grafted, and thus produced apples too bitter or sour for eating; they were planted expressly for making cider. Cider was sometimes also distilled or freeze-distilled into applejack (so called because freeze-distillation was called "jacking"); the cold climate of the Northeast in the wintertime encouraged the process.[30] The beverage was particularly popular in New Jersey, where applejack was occasionally called "Jersey Lightning" and was sometimes used to pay road-construction crews.[31]

Before the Revolution, New Englanders consumed large quantities of rum and beer as maritime trade provided relatively easy access to the goods needed to produce these items. Rum was the distilled spirit of choice as molasses, the main ingredient, was readily available from trade with the West Indies.[32] In the continent's interior, colonists drank whiskey, as they had ready access to corn and rye but did not have good access to sugar cane.[33] However, up until the Revolution, many colonists considered whiskey to be a coarse beverage unfit for human consumption, believing that it caused the poor to become raucous and disorderly.[34]

Beer was such an important consumable to Americans that they would closely watch the stocks of barley held by farmers to ensure quality beer production. In John Adams' correspondence with his wife Abigail, he asked about the quality of barley crops to ensure adequate supply for the production of beer for himself and their friends. However, hops, essential to production of beer, did not grow well in the colonies. It only grew wild in the New World, and needed to be imported from England and elsewhere.[35] In addition to these alcohol-based products produced in America, merchants imported wine and brandy.[36] Beer was not only consumed for its flavor and alcohol content, but because it was safer to drink than water, which often harbored disease-causing microorganisms. Even children drank small beer.

Southern colonies[edit]

Unlike the north, the south did not have a central cultural origin or a single culinary tradition. The southern colonies were also more diverse in their agricultural products. Slaves and poor Europeans in the south shared a similar diet, based on many of the indigenous New World crops. The rural poor often hunted and ate squirrel, opossum, rabbit, and other woodland animals. Salted or smoked pork often supplemented the vegetable diet. Those on the "rice coast" ate ample amounts of rice, while the southern poor and slaves used cornmeals in breads and porridges. Wheat was not an option for most poorer residents in the southern colonies.[36]

Well into the eighteenth century, the Chesapeake region still relied on home-brewed cider as a primary beverage. [37]In most small planters' households, women were responsibile for the production of the drink and relied on local products to make the different ciders.[38] This production was seasonal, as only large planters had the funds and the technology necessary to produce alcohol year round.[39]

The southern colonies can be culturally divided between the uplands and the lowlands, and this distinction is seen in diet and food preparation in the two regions. The diet of the uplands often included cabbage, string beans, white potatoes, while most affluent whites in the uplands avoided crops imported from Africa because they were associated with, and reflected the social inferiority of, black slaves. Those who could grow or afford wheat often had biscuits on their table for breakfast, along with healthy portions of pork. Salted pork was a staple of any meal, as it was used in the preparations of vegetables for flavor, in addition to its direct consumption as a protein.[40]

The coastal lowlands, particularly surrounding Charleston and New Orleans and which also included much of the Acadian French regions of Louisiana and the surrounding area, more varied diet was heavily influenced by Africans and Caribbeans, as well as the French. Rice played a large part in the diet. In addition, unlike the uplands, the lowlands' protein came mostly from coastal seafood and game meats. Much of the diet involved the use of peppers, as it still does today.[41] Although the English had an inherent disdain for French food as well as many of the native foods, the French had no such disdain for indigenous foodstuffs. In fact, they expressed an appreciation for native ingredients and dishes.[42]

Dietary changes through boycott[edit]

The colonists were quite dependent on their "parent" England for imports of food and other basic products. When taxes and British Parliamentary tariffs on products used by the American colonists increased, the colonists were forced into paying the taxes if they were to continue importing English and West Indian goods. As a result, a number of colonists began to boycott imported goods in favor of domestic goods. The boycott was not initially widespread, especially as it could not be officially enforced, and so lacked luster in a number of regions. Increasing support for this boycott, however, helped generate the revolution against England.[1]

American grown maize, or "corn", became a staple for whiskey production.

As England imposed its series of acts upon the colonists, changes in the American colonist’s purchases and trades eventually altered the American diet. Starting with the Molasses Act of 1733, followed by the Sugar Act of 1760, a shift in alcohol consumption occurred. This was more than a protest against taxation of molasses, the main ingredient in rum production. Whiskey became the spirit of choice for many American colonists who wished to thumb their noses at England. In the northern colonies, whiskey was made with rye, while the southern colonies preferred corn. Rye was seen as a more civilized grain, while corn whiskey was presented as a more patriotic version as it was produced from an indigenous American crop.[43]

The production of whiskey was certainly not a norm in the colonies in the early years. The upper echelon of colonial society looked down upon American whiskey up until the time of the American Revolution. Some even saw the harsh spirit as a bastion of debauchery in the American colonies.[43] Whatever the sentiment, the Scottish, Irish, and Germans brought a taste for hard spirits from their homelands to the American colonies in the 1730s. These groups continued to produce hard spirits in imported stills, or stills based on Old World designs, in retaliation against the English economic controls.[44]

Benjamin Franklin promoted growing Vitis labrusca grapes for wine production in protest of the taxation of Madeira imports.

The Revenue Act of 1764 that heavily taxed Madeira and other wines led to yet another boycott, this time against imported wines. This promoted another indigenous agricultural item of the American Colonies, the Vitis labrusca grapes. In 1765, Benjamin Franklin decided to use Poor Richard's Almanack to promote the growing of American grapes in order to encourage the production of domestic wines.[45] One of Franklin's friends, Benjamin Gale, stated one evening at one of their gatherings "We must drink wine of our own making or none at all;"[46] this opinion seemed to be a prevailing sentiment in the colonies from 1764 until the Revolution. Many who supported temperance in the colonies also supported the production of American wine at this time since the colonial form of temperance at the time was to drink only wine or beer instead of hard spirits.[34][47]

The Quartering Act of 1765, probably more than anything else, stripped the colonists of funds and thus the ability to purchase imported luxuries. The Stamp Act of 1765 resulted in a boycott on imported goods by many merchants, which was further strengthened by the passage of the Townshend Act of 1767. These boycotts, however, were short lived, to the dismay of more radical colonists who hoped to take control of superficial goods imported by the English and imports from the West Indies. Once the Townshend Act was repealed, colonists flocked back to markets to purchase non-essentials.[48]

Coffee became the American alternative to tea after the enactment of the Tea Act of 1773.

The enforcement of the Tea Act of 1773 became a heated issue with the colonists, with the well-known demonstration at the Boston harbor, the Boston Tea Party, a direct reaction to the act. However, a much more important shift occurred in the colonists' drink of choice. In 1773, John Adams wrote a letter to his wife stating, "Tea must be universally renounced and I must be weaned, and the sooner the better."[49] Thus began the American shift from tea to coffee. In a concentrated boycott, the housewives of Falmouth, Massachusetts publicly united, vowing to serve only coffee in their homes. This inspired other households throughout the colonies, both in the north and south, to do the same.[50]

Effects of the American Revolution[edit]

In 1775, the Continental Congress decreed that no imports would enter the American colonies, nor would any exports move from America to England. Some historians state that this had a profound effect on the agriculture of America, while others state that there was no effect as the domestic market was strong enough to sustain American agriculturists. The dispute lies in the fact that the American economy was highly diverse; there was no standard form of currency, and records were not consistently kept.[51]

Hops, a necessary ingredient to make beer, were not imported during the American Revolution, leading to a decline in beer production.

By the declaration of the American Revolution, with George Washington as its military leader, a number of dietary changes had already occurred in America. Coffee was quickly becoming the normal hot drink of the colonies and a taste for whiskey had been acquired among many of those who could produce it. In fact, in 1774, the first corn was grown in Kentucky specifically for production of American Bourbon whiskey.[52] This step may have established this American spirit in American culture, just as the country was going to war with England. In addition to whiskey coming into favor, a shift began in the consumption of cider over beer. Colonists opted to grow less barley as it was easier to ferment apple cider than to brew beer.[53] Another reason for this change would have been the lack of imported hops needed to brew beer.[54]

As game became scarce and a moratorium was placed on mutton consumption, cattle husbandry increased.

As the American colonies went to war, they needed soldiers, supplies, and lots of them. Soldiers needed uniforms and, as all shipping into the colonies had ceased, wool became an integral commodity to the war effort. During the Revolution the consumption of mutton ceased almost entirely in many areas, and in Virginia it became illegal to consume except in cases of extreme necessity.[55]

Game had begun to become scarce in the region east of the Mississippi river. This could have been from over-hunting, or the game could have been driven westward as the colonial population increased.[56] Fortunately, Irish and Scottish immigrants had been importing cattle into the American colonies during the early part of the 18th century. Consequently, when game was becoming scarce and mutton had a moratorium placed upon it, cattle were available to take their place as a protein source. This change increased farmers' profit from animal husbandry. Cattle raising had begun on a small scale during the French-Indian War, but when the American Revolution came, farmers were able to increase their cattle holdings and increase the presence of beef in the American diet.[57] In addition to beef production, the cattle also increased the production of milk and dairy products like butter. This may have contributed to the preference of butter over pork fat, especially in the northern colonies.[58]

With the arrival of English soldiers by ship, and naval battles on the seas, areas used for salt water fishing became perilous, and lay dormant for much of the war. In addition, many of the fishing vessels were converted into warships. Before the war, there was often talk about the excess of lobsters and cod off the shores of New England. This seemed to change during and after the war, due to the vast numbers of ships and artillery entering the ocean waters. Once lobster harvesting and cod fishing was reestablished, most fishermen found that the lobster and cod had migrated away from the shores.[59]

Where Americans had a historic disdain for the refineries of French cooking, that opinion, at least in a small part, began to change with the American alliance with the French. In the first American publication of Hannah Glasse’s Art of Cookery Made Easy, the insults toward French dishes disappeared. A number of Bostonians even attempted to cook French cuisine for their French allies, sometimes with comedic results when entire frogs were put into soups rather than just their legs. Nonetheless, the alliance supported a friendship with France that later resulted in a large migration of French cooks and chefs to America during the French Revolution.[60]

The American diet was changed through this friendship as well as due to the changes forced through boycott and hostilities with England. After a time, trade did resume with the West Indies but was limited to necessities. Items that sustained the war effort in America were traded, with crops such as rice from the Carolinas shipped out and coffee beans imported in order to brew America’s new beverage of choice.[61]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b Breen, p. 199.
  2. ^ See Fischer (1989) for a detailed description of the various aspects of the regional cultures. The following sections are all based primarily on the chapters in Fischer dealing with food and eating habits.
  3. ^ Fischer, pp. 74, 114, 134–39.
  4. ^ Fischer, pp. 349–354
  5. ^ Quoted in Fischer, p. 539
  6. ^ Fischer, p. 483
  7. ^ Fischer, p. 538–44
  8. ^ Fischer, pp. 608–12
  9. ^ James M. Volo and Dorothy Denneen, Volo, Daily Life on the Old Colonial Frontier (2002) p 149
  10. ^ Quoted in Fischer, pp. 727–28
  11. ^ Quoted in Fischer, p. 730
  12. ^ Fischer, pp. 727–31
  13. ^ Oliver, pp. 16–19.
  14. ^ Smith, The Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America, vol. 1, p. 512.
  15. ^ a b Glasse(London,1750)
  16. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 1, p. 512.
  17. ^ Oliver, pp. 6–19.
  18. ^ Pillsbury, p. 25.
  19. ^ Oliver, p. 22.
  20. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol.2., p. 26.
  21. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol.2., pp. 546–547.
  22. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol.2., p. 547.
  23. ^ Root pp. 176–82.
  24. ^ Apple Jr., R.W. (2006-03-29). "Much Ado About Mutton, but Not in These Parts". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-01-23. "Until it fell from favor after World War II, mutton (defined as the meat of sheep at least two years old) was a favorite of most Britons, who prized it above lamb (from younger animals) for both its texture and flavor. It has a bolder taste, a deeper color and a chewier consistency." 
  25. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 2, pp. 458–459.
  26. ^ Root, pp. 82–85.
  27. ^ Oliver, pp. 56–70.
  28. ^ a b http://www.essortment.com/all/hardapplecider_rxvs.htm
  29. ^ http://www.drinkfocus.com/articles/apple-cider/history-of-cider.php
  30. ^ Black, Rachel (2010). Alcohol in Popular Culture: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: AB-CLIO, LLC. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-313-38048-8. Retrieved 2011-10-22. 
  31. ^ Karen Tina Harrison, Jersey Lightning, New Jersey Monthly, July 13, 2009.
  32. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 2, p. 123.
  33. ^ Pillsbury, p. 17.
  34. ^ a b Crowgey, pp. 18–19.
  35. ^ Smith. Beer in America The Early Years—1587–1840 pp. 60–63.
  36. ^ a b Pillsbury, p. 18.
  37. ^ Meacham, Sarah (2009). Every Home a Distillery: Alcohol, Gender, and Technology in the Colonial Chesapeake. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 0801893127. 
  38. ^ Meacham, Sarah (2009). Every Home a Distillery: Alcohol, Gender, and Technology in the Colonial Chesapeake. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 0801893127. 
  39. ^ Meacham, Sarah (2009). Every Home a Distillery: Alcohol, Gender, and Technology in the Colonial Chesapeake. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 1–5. ISBN 0801893127. 
  40. ^ Pillsbury, pp. 47–48.
  41. ^ Pillsbury, p. 49.
  42. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 2, p. 149.
  43. ^ a b Crowgey, pp. 8–16.
  44. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 1, p. 607.
  45. ^ Pinney, p. 86.
  46. ^ Franklin, Papers of Benjamin Franklin
  47. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 2, p. 533.
  48. ^ Breen, p. 298.
  49. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 1, p. 266.
  50. ^ Root, p. 91.
  51. ^ Schlebecker, pp. 21–23.
  52. ^ Crowgey, p. 25.
  53. ^ Schlebecker, p. 28.
  54. ^ Smith, Beer in America, p. 62.
  55. ^ Oliver, p. 46.
  56. ^ Smith, Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink, Vol. 1, p. 548.
  57. ^ Mitchell, pp. 3–5.
  58. ^ Mitchell, p. 23.
  59. ^ Root, p. 101.
  60. ^ Root, pp. 102–103.
  61. ^ Schlebecker, p. 27.

References[edit]

  • Breen, T.H. The Marketplace of Revolution: How Consumer Politics Shaped American Independence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Crowgey, Henry G. Kentucky Bourbon: The Early Years of Whiskeymaking. Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1971.
  • Glasse, Hannah . Art of Cookery Made Easy. London:1750.
  • Glasse, Hannah. Art of Cookery Made Easy. Virginia:1812.
  • Jones, Evan. American Food: What We’ve Cooked, How We’ve Cooked it, and the Ways We’ve Eaten in America Through the Centuries. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press, 2007.
  • Fischer, David Hackett. Albion's Seed: Four British Folkways in America New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989
  • Franklin, Benjamin. Papers of Benjamin Franklin (Vol.12) : January 1, Through December 31, 1765. Edited by Leonard W. Labaree. Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1962.
  • McWilliams, James E. A Revolution in Eating: How the Quest for Food Shaped America. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
  • Mitchell. Robert D. “Agricultural Change and the American Revolution: A Virginia Case Study” Agricultural History, Vol. 47, No. 2, (1973)
  • Oliver, Sandra L. Food in Colonial and Federal America. London: Greenwood Press, 2005.
  • Pillsbury, Richard. No Foreign Food: The American Diet in Time and Place. Colorado: Westview Press, 1998.
  • Pinney, Thomas. A History of Wine in America: From the Beginnings to Prohibition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
  • Root, Waverly and De Rochemont, Richard. Eating in America: a History. New Jersey: The Ecco Press, 1981.
  • Schlebecker, John T. “Agricultural Markets and Marketing in the North 1774–1777” Agricultural History, Vol. 50, No. 1, Bicentennial Symposium: Two Centuries of American Agriculture, (1976)
  • Smith, Andrew F. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Food and Drink in America, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Smith, Gregg. Beer in America The Early Years—1587–1840: Beer’s Role in Settling America and the Birth of a Nation. Boulder Colorado: Brewers Publications, 1998.