Dakota language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Dakota
Dakhótiyapi, Dakȟótiyapi
Pronunciation [daˈkʰotijapi], [daˈqˣotijapi]
Native to United States, with some speakers in Canada
Region Primarily North Dakota and South Dakota, but also northern Nebraska, southern Minnesota
Ethnicity Santee, Sisseton, Yankton, Yanktonai Sioux
Native speakers
21,000  (2010 & 2011 censuses)[1]
Siouan
Language codes
ISO 639-2 dak
ISO 639-3 dak
Glottolog dako1258[2]
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters.

Dakota (also Dakhota) is a Siouan language spoken by the Dakota people of the Sioux tribes. Dakota is closely related to and mutually intelligible with the Lakota language.

Dialects[edit]

Dakota has two major dialects with two sub-dialects each (and minor variants, too):[3]

  1. Eastern Dakota (AKA Santee-Sisseton or Dakhóta)
    • Santee (Isáŋyáthi: Bdewákhaŋthuŋwaŋ,[4] Waȟpékhute)
    • Sisseton (Sisíthuŋwaŋ, Waȟpéthuŋwaŋ)
  2. Western Dakota (AKA Yankton-Yanktonai or Dakȟóta/Dakhóta, and erroneously classified, for a very long time, as “Nakota[5])
    • Yankton (Iháŋktȟuŋwaŋ)
    • Yanktonai (Iháŋktȟuŋwaŋna)
      • Upper Yanktonai (Wičhíyena)

The two dialects differ phonologically, grammatically, and to a large extent, also lexically. They are mutually intelligible to a high extent, although Western Dakota is lexically closer to the Lakota language with which it has higher mutual intelligibility.

Writing systems[edit]

For a comparative table of the various writing systems conceived over time for the Sioux languages, cf. the specific section of the article Sioux language.

Sound system[edit]

Vowels[edit]

Dakota has five oral vowels, /a e i o u/, and three nasal vowels, /aŋ iŋ uŋ/.

Front Central Back
high oral i u
nasal
mid e o
low oral a
nasal

Consonants[edit]

Labial
(-ized)
Dental/
Alveolar
Palatal
(-ized)
Velar/
Uvular
Glottal
Nasal m [m] n [n]
Stop aspirated ph [pʰ]
pȟ [pˣ]
th [tʰ]
tȟ [tˣ]
čh [ʧʰ]
 
kh [kʰ]
kȟ [kˣ]
voiceless p [p] t [t] č [ʧ] k [k] [ʔ]
ejective p’ [pʔ] t’ [tʔ] č’ [ʧʔ] k’ [kʔ]
voiced b [b] d [d] g [ɡ]
Fricative voiceless s [s] š [ʃ] ȟ [χ]
ejective s’ [sʔ] š’ [ʃʔ] ȟ [χʔ]
voiced z [z] ž [ʒ] ǧ [ʁ]
Approximant w [w] y [j] h [h]

Comparison of the dialects[edit]

Phonological differences[edit]

In respect to phonology Eastern and Western Dakota differ particularly in consonant clusters. The table below gives the possible consonant clusters and shows the differences between the dialects:[3]

Dakota consonant clusters
Santee
Sisseton
Yankton Yanktonai
b ȟ k m p s š t h k[6] g
bd ȟč mn šk tk hm km gm
ȟd kp ps sk šd hn kn gn
ȟm ks sd šb hd kd gd
ȟn pt sm šn hb kb gb
ȟp kt sn šp
ȟt sp št
ȟb st šb
sb

The two dialects also differ in the diminutive suffix (-daŋ in Santee, and -na in Yankton-Yanktonai and in Sisseton) and in a number of other phonetic issues that are harder to categorize. The following table gives examples of words that differ in their phonology.[3]

Eastern Dakota Western Dakota gloss
Santee Sisseton Yankton Yanktonai
hokšídaŋ hokšína hokšína boy
nína nína nína / dína[7] very
hdá kdá gdá to go back[8]
hbéza kbéza gbéza ridged
hnayáŋ knayáŋ gnayáŋ to deceive
hmúŋka kmúŋka gmúŋka to trap
ahdéškadaŋ ahdéškana akdéškana agdéškana lizzard

Lexical differences[edit]

There are also numerous lexical differences between the two Dakota dialects as well as between the sub-dialects. Yankton-Yanktonai is in fact lexically closer to the Lakota language than it is to Santee-Sisseton. The following table gives some examples:[3]

English gloss Santee-Sisseton Yankton-Yanktonai Lakota
Northern Lakota Southern Lakota
child šičéča wakȟáŋyeža wakȟáŋyeža
knee hupáhu čhaŋkpé čhaŋkpé
knife isáŋ / mína mína míla
kidneys phakšíŋ ažúŋtka ažúŋtka
hat wapháha wapȟóštaŋ wapȟóštaŋ
still hináȟ naháŋȟčiŋ naháŋȟčiŋ
man wičhášta wičháša wičháša
hungry wótehda dočhíŋ ločhíŋ
morning haŋȟ’áŋna híŋhaŋna híŋhaŋna híŋhaŋni
to shave kasáŋ kasáŋ kasáŋ glak’óǧa

Grammatical differences[edit]

Yankton-Yanktonai has the same three ablaut grades as Lakota (a, e, iŋ),[9] while in Santee-Sisseton there are only two (a, e). This significantly impacts word forms, especially in fast speech and it is another reason why Yankton-Yanktonai has better mutual intelligibility with Lakota than with Santee-Sisseton.

Some examples:

English gloss to go [8] I shall go to go back [8] he/she/it will go back
santee-sisseton yá bdé kte hdá hdé kte
yankton-yanktonai yá mníŋ kte kdá/gdá kníŋ/gníŋ kte
lakota yá mníŋ kte glá gníŋ kte

There are other grammatical differences between the dialects.

Learning Dakota: language revitalization efforts[edit]

Software and mobile apps for learning Dakhóta[edit]

A Dakota 1 app is available for iPhone, iPad, and other iOS devices.[10] The Association on American Indian Affairs website offers an extensive selection of Dakotah learning resources, including CDs, DVDs, flashcards, and software.[11]

Curriculum, textbooks, and other materials for teaching and learning Dakhóta[edit]

A Level 1 Speak Dakota! textbook is available from the Dakhóta Iápi Okhódakičhiye. Developed by Dakota language speakers, teachers, and linguists, the textbook is the first fully illustrated Dakota language textbook that is linguistically and pedagogically consistent. Dakota language learning materials are also available on their website.[12]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Dakota at Ethnologue (17th ed., 2013)
  2. ^ Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Dakota". Glottolog 2.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 
  3. ^ a b c d Ullrich, Jan (2008). New Lakota Dictionary (Incorporating the Dakota Dialects of Yankton-Yanktonai and Santee-Sisseton). Lakota Language Consortium. ISBN 0-9761082-9-1. 
  4. ^ Formerly Mdewákhaŋthuŋwaŋ
  5. ^ for a report on the long-established blunder of misnaming “Nakota” the Yankton and the Yanktonai, see the article Nakota
  6. ^ many Yankton speakers pronounce the following clusters in the same way as the Yanktonai (Ullrich, p. 5).
  7. ^ in Upper Yanktonay
  8. ^ a b c more precisely: ‘he/she/it is going (back)’ (hence elsewhere).
  9. ^ which means that, in many words ending in -a (which are conventionally cited, in Ullrich’s dictionary (cf. pp. 699/700), with a capitalized final –A/Aŋ), the same -a turns into -e or into -iŋ when some circumstances occur (the word is the last in a sentence, or is modified by suffixes that trigger the ablaut, or, still, is followed by a word that triggers the ablaut, as well).
  10. ^ "App Shopper: Dakota 1 (Education)". Retrieved 2012-09-12. 
  11. ^ "AAIA Native Language Program". Retrieved 2013-01-19. 
  12. ^ "Dakhóta Iápi Okhódakičhiye/Dakota Language Society". Retrieved 2014-08-29. 

Bibliography[edit]

  • DeMallie, Raymond J. (2001). Sioux until 1850. In R. J. DeMallie (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, Part 2, pp. 718–760). W. C. Sturtevant (Gen. Ed.). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 0-16-050400-7.
  • Parks, Douglas R.; & Rankin, Robert L. (2001). The Siouan languages. In Handbook of North American Indians: Plains (Vol. 13, Part 1, pp. 94–114). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
  • de Reuse, Willem J. (1987). One hundred years of Lakota linguistics (1887–1987). Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 12, 13-42.
  • de Reuse, Willem J. (1990). A supplementary bibliography of Lakota languages and linguistics (1887–1990). Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 15 (2), 146-165. (Studies in Native American languages 6).
  • Rood, David S.; & Taylor, Allan R. (1996). Sketch of Lakhota, a Siouan language. In Handbook of North American Indians: Languages (Vol. 17, pp. 440–482). Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.
  • Parks, D.R. & DeMallie, R.J. (1992). Sioux, Assiniboine, and Stoney Dialects: A Classification . Anthropological Linguistics vol. 34, nos. 1-4
  • Riggs, S.R., & Dorsey, J.O. (Ed.). (1973). Dakota grammar, texts, and ethnography. Minneapolis: Ross & Haines, Inc.
  • Shaw, P.A. (1980). Theoretical issues in Dakota phonology and morphology. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
  • Ullrich, Jan. (2008). New Lakota Dictionary & Incorporating the Dakota Dialects of Santee-Sisseton and Yankton-Yanktonai (Lakota Language Consortium). ISBN 0-9761082-9-1.