Deal of the day
Deal-of-the-day (also called flash sales or one deal a day) is an ecommerce business model in which a website offers a single product for sale for a period of 24 to 36 hours. Potential customers register as members of the deal-a-day websites and receive online offers and invitations by email or social networks.
As of 2011[update], deal-of-the-day sites have continued to grow in popularity, although new concerns have arisen over the longevity of the concept and the financial viability of one-day deals for small businesses.
The deal-of-the-day concept gained popularity with the launching of Woot.com in July 2004, although Woot itself was a modified version of earlier dot-com bubble sites such as uBid. By late 2006, the deal-of-the-day industry had greatly expanded to over 100 deal-a-day sites. In November 2008, Groupon entered the market and became the second fastest online company to reach a billion-dollar valuation.
Other online businesses, including Facebook, tested their own daily deal sites, withdrawing them after they proved unsuccessful. However, the rise of social networks, such as Facebook and Myspace, has accelerated the growth of daily deals sites, allowing popular deals to spread virally.
Business model overview
The deal-of-the-day business model works by allowing retailers to market discounted services or products directly to the customers of the deal company, who receives a portion of the retailer's profit. This allows retailers to build brand loyalty and quickly sell surplus inventory.
The majority of deal-of-the-day sites work directly with local businesses and online retailers to develop deals significantly discounted compared to recommended retail prices. Using a group buying formula, a minimum and maximum number of deals are made available. Typically, deal of the day sites segment merchandise by specific designer sales.[clarification needed] Deals are typically only offered for 24 hours, although daily deal websites are increasingly offering alternative, longer deal buying periods to increase sales and allow multiple deals to run in a single location concurrently.
Descriptions of the deals are often emailed to customers when the deal goes live, sometimes with creative or humorous descriptions. The practice of sending these emails has been criticized by e-mail marketing professionals and users. However, evidence suggests this aggressive strategy is effective at generating sales. Some sites allow members to receive an e-mail either daily or weekly, or to be notified of all current offers. Customers purchase the deal on the deal-of-the-day website, rather than directly from the retailer. The websites then retain the customer data, rather than the retailer.
Once the minimum number of deals have been sold, customers' credit cards are charged, and the deal is delivered as an electronic voucher redeemable at the retailer or service provider's location. The promotional value of the vouchers purchased from deal-of-the-day websites typically expire after a certain period, but maintain the original value paid.
Common products and services sold through deal-of-the-day websites include apparel, restaurants and bars, salons and spas, special events, health and fitness products, and travel packages.
Most businesses which run contracts with daily deal websites consider doing so as a marketing activity rather than a direct means of generating profit. Between the deep discount offered as part of the deal and the payout to the deal-of-the-day site, the businesses may net little or no profit (effectively making the deals loss leaders). There is evidence that these businesses gain significant increases in overall sales due to the amount of exposure gained from running a one-day deal. Many customers who purchase daily deals are "price-sensitive deal-seekers" who are unlikely to return to the business in the future without similar discounts. However, studies have shown that for small businesses and start-ups, daily deals can result in a substantial 30% increase in profits. A survey of businesses who ran daily deals in the past year revealed that more than half (55.5%) profited on their daily deal promotion, whereas just over a quarter (26.6%) lost money. The remainder (17.9%) broke even. Beyond mere exposure, these businesses hope to capitalize on the long-term value of new repeat customers. Thus deal-of-the-day sites also function as marketing platforms.
A study of small businesses revealed that on average, daily deal spending is the single largest expenditure in a company's marketing budget, at 23.5%, which translates to average annual spending on daily deal programs of $46,530. Lesser expenditures include e-mail promotions (16.1% or $31,878) and online search advertising through programs such as Google AdWords (14.7% or $29,106).
Most daily deal websites have an affiliate marketing program, allowing third-party websites to be paid for referring visitors, increasing the presence of the deal-of-the-day sites. These websites display syndicated offers from a number of deals sites, based on location and which categories of deal a user is interested in receiving. These aggregators earn a percentage of any sales made by the deal sites through their affiliate program.
Some daily deal websites, such as LivingSocial don't work with aggregators. In Australia, where the daily deals industry is dominated by six major companies, aggregators are treated as competitors.
|This section's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. (March 2013)|
Whereas 2010 was a year of rapid growth for the industry, daily deal sites began to slide in 2011 and 2012. Regardless, revenue forecasts for the industry continue to foresee strong growth. Analysts predicted that industry revenues would reach several billion dollars, at an increasing at annual rates in excess of 100% by the end of 2011. According to a study released by BIA/Kelsey,[clarification needed] gross revenues are projected to grow from a current $873 million to $3.9 billion by 2015.
The increase in venture capital injections and startup launches demonstrates the continued growth of the industry. Examples of such activity include the recent launches of Facebook, Amazon, Google, and AT&T's daily deal sites. Groupon filed for its IPO in June 2011 and went public in November of that year.
Despite positive growth figures, some studies suggest there is a structural weakness to the industry that will have to be addressed. Such shortcomings exist on both the consumer and merchant sides of the industry. For example, deal users very rarely return for a full price purchase, and a large percentage of businesses indicate their disinterest in further deals in the future. Thus the industry may need to settle for lower shares of revenues from businesses compared to their current levels (20-50%), which are not sustainable. It is unclear whether industry diversification, increasing competition, and larger revenue shares for merchants will disrupt the industry leaders or cannibalize the industry as a whole.
- Dholakia, Utpal M. (June 13, 2011). "How Businesses Fare with Daily Deals: A Multi-Site Analysis of Groupon, Livingsocial, Opentable, Travelzoo, and BuyWithMe Promotions". Social Science Research Network, Working Paper Series.
- Steiner, Christopher. “Meet The Fastest Growing Company Ever”, Forbes Magazine, August 30, 2010, retrieved October 1, 2011
- Barr, Alistair. “Facebook ending Deals product after four-month test, Reuters, August 26, 2011, retrieved October 1, 2011
- Sheft- Ason, Jessica. "Gilt Groupe Launches Editorial Site For Men, Competes With Amazon", Forbes, August 9, 2011, retrieved October 3, 2011
- Storey, Phillip (April 11, 2011). "Groupon: your email marketing is failing your fans". econsultancy.com. Retrieved November 10, 2011.
- Dholakia, Utpal. “What Daily-Deal Shoppers Want”, Forbes, September 23, 2011, retrieved October 2, 2011
- Cain Miller, Claire. Bargains on Flash Sale Sites Serve a Long-Range View “Bargains on Flash Sale Sites Serve a Long-Range View”, New York Times, June 19, 2011, Retrieved October 1, 2011
- Saint, Nick. “Groupon Aggregator Yipit Raises $1.3 Million In Venture Funding”, Business Insider, June 30, 2011, retrieved October 2, 2011
- Robert, Liu. “Daily revenues and market share of Australian daily deals sites”, Deals Extra, November 8, 2011, retrieved November 8, 2011
- Dholakia, Utpal M. and Tsabar, Gur.“A Startup’s Experience with Running a Groupon Promotion”, SSRN, May 1, 2011.
- Krug, Frances Mary. "Groupon And Other Deal-Of-The-Day Sites Booming". Search Marketing Standard, March 3, 2011, retrieved October 2, 2011
- Rusli, Evelyn M., “A Good Day for Groupon and Internet Start-Ups”, SSRN, June 13, 2011, retrieved October 1, 2011
- Frommer, Dan.“Ignore The Groupon Hate: Group Buying Isn't Dying It's Just Getting Started”, Business Insider, September 1, 2011, retrieved October 2, 2011
- Farrel, Maureen. “Are Next Generation Groupons Potential Disruptors or Cannibalizers”, Forbes, April 30, 2011, retrieved October 2, 2011