Seriousness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Degree of seriousness)
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Serious (disambiguation).

Seriousness (noun; adjective: serious) is an attitude of gravity, solemnity, persistence, and earnestness toward something considered to be of importance.[1] Some notable philosophers and commentators have criticised excessive seriousness, while others have praised it.[2][3][4][5][6] Seriousness is often contrasted with comedy, as in the seriocomedy.[7] In the theory of humor, one must have a sense of humor and a sense of seriousness to distinguish what is supposed to be taken literally or not,[8] or of being important or not. Otherwise, it may also be contrasted with a sense of play.[9] How children learn a sense of seriousness to form values and differentiate between the serious and that which is not is studied in developmental psychology and educational psychology.[10] There is a distinction between the degree of seriousness of various crimes in sentencing under the law, and also in law enforcement.[11] There is a positive correlation with the degree of seriousness of a crime and viewer ratings of news coverage.[12] What is or is not considered serious varies widely with different cultures.[13]

Sometimes fields studying degrees of seriousness overlap, such as developmental psychology studies of development of the sense of degrees of seriousness as it relates to transgressions, which has overlap with criminology and the seriousness of crimes.[10]

Philosophical attitudes toward seriousness[edit]

Praise for "high seriousness" in scholarship and poetry[edit]

Some use "seriousness" as a term of praise for scholarship or in literary review.[6] 19th century poet, cultural critic, and literary critic, Matthew Arnold said that the most important criteria used to judge the value of a poem were "high truth" and "high seriousness".[14]

Philosophical disdain for seriousness[edit]

Many have expressed an attitude of disdain toward taking things too seriously, as opposed to viewing things with an attitude of humor. Poet, playwright, and philosopher Joseph Addison said that being serious is dull, "we are growing serious, and let me tell you, that's the next step to being dull."[5][5] Political satirist P.J. O'Rourke said that "Seriousness is stupidity sent to college."[15] Epigramist, poet, and playwright Oscar Wilde said that "life is too important to be taken seriously."[16] In a play on words, novelist Samuel Butler indicated that the central serious conviction in life is that nothing should be taken with too much seriousness, "the one serious conviction that a man should have is that nothing is to be taken too seriously."[17]

In some ascetic or puritan religious sects, an attitude of seriousness is always to be taken, and solemnity, sobriety, and puritanism with its hostility to social pleasures and indulgences are the only acceptable attitudes. Perry Miller, "the master of American intellectual history", wrote of excessive seriousness of the Puritans, "simple humanity cries at last for some relief from the interminable high seriousness of the Puritan code."[2]

Taking oneself seriously[edit]

Many philosophical attitudes express derision for those who take themselves too seriously.[18]

The "spirit of seriousness" in existential philosophy[edit]

Further information: Bad faith (existentialism)

Existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre called the "spirit of seriousness’’ the belief that there is an objective and independent goodness in things for people to discover, and that this belief leads to bad faith. He argued that people forget that values are not absolute, but are contingent and subjectively determined.[3][4] In Sartre’s words, "the spirit of seriousness has two characteristics: it considers values as transcendent ‘'givens’’, independent of human subjectivity, and it transfers the quality of ‘desirable’ from the ontological structure of things to their simple material constitution."[4]

Seriousness and comedy[edit]

Further information: Seriocomedy

Seriousness is sometimes contrasted with the comical in humor. In the performing arts and literature, the seriocomedy is a genre which blends seriousness with the comical, drama with comedy.[7][19]

Measurement and detection[edit]

Detecting presence and absence of seriousness in humor[edit]

Further information: Theory of humor

In the theory of humor, one must have a sense of humor and a sense of seriousness to distinguish what is supposed to be taken literally or not. An even more keen sense is needed when humor is used to make a serious point.[8][20] Psychologists have studied how humor is intended to be taken as having seriousness, as when court jesters used humor to convey serious information.[21] Conversely, when humor is not intended to be taken seriously, bad taste in humor may cross a line after which it is taken seriously, though not intended.[21]

Detecting degree of seriousness in developmental psychology[edit]

Further information: Educational psychology

In Developmental psychology and educational psychology, seriousness is studied as it relates to how children develop an ability to distinguish levels of seriousness as it relates to transgressions and expenditure of time; for example, a child must learn to distinguish between levels of seriousness in admonitions such as between "don't fidget" and "don't forget to look both ways when crossing the street", which have the same linguistic and normative structure, but different levels of seriousness.[10][22]

Measuring degree of seriousness in crime[edit]

Further information: Punishment, Felony and Misdemeanor

The degree of seriousness of crimes is an important factor relating to crime. One standard for measurement is the degree to which a crime affects others or society. A felony is generally considered to be a crime of "high seriousness", while a misdemeanor is not.

In criminal law the degree of seriousness is considered when meting out punishment to fit the crime, and in considering to what extent overcrowded prison facilities will be used.[23] Seriousness of a crime is a major factor in considerations of the allocation of scarce law enforcement funds.[24][25]

The meaning and measurement of seriousness is a major concern in public policy considerations. A quantitative scoring system called the "seriousness score" has been developed for use in allocating law enforcement resources and sentencing.[11]

As to England and Wales, see section 143 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

Medical triage[edit]

Degrees of seriousness are used in medicine to make decisions about care. Seriousness is related to the effects of delaying or not having medical care. In an emergency hospital, the triage nurse must evaluate levels of seriousness of medical emergencies and rank them to determine order of care. Seriousness of illness is used to make decisions as to whether to perform invasive procedures such as surgery.

Measuring crime seriousness in the media[edit]

There is a positive correlation between the degree of seriousness of a crime and viewer ratings of news coverage.[12]

Cultural variation in measurement and detection[edit]

What is considered serious varies widely across cultures and is studied in sociology, cultural anthropology, and criminology; being of the wrong religious faith may be considered a serious crime in some cultures; smoking marijuana may be a serious crime in some cultures and not others; homosexuality a serious crime in some cultures; and prostitution is a serious crime in some cultures.[13] Perception of seriousness is measured in assessing varying cultural perceptions on health risks.[26]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Seriousness, The Free Dictionary
  2. ^ a b The Puritans: A Sourcebook of Their Writings, Perry Miller, Thomas Herbert Johnson, p. 59, [1]
  3. ^ a b "Spirit of Seriousness", The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy, NICHOLAS BUNNIN and JIYUAN YU, editors, [2]
  4. ^ a b c Being and Nothingness, Jean-Paul Sartre
  5. ^ a b c Joseph Adler on Seriousness, Dictionary Quotes.com, [www.dictionary-quotes.com/we-are-growing-serious-and-let-me-tell-you- thats-the-next-step-to-being-dull-addison-joseph/]
  6. ^ a b "High Seriousness", Historicism Once More: Problems and Occasions for the American Scholar, NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction, Vol. 4, No. 3 (Spring, 1971), pp. 283–286, Roy Harvey Pearce, George Levine, [3]
  7. ^ a b Joel Chaston – Baum, Bakhtin, and Broadway: A Centennial Look at the Carnival of Oz, The Lion and the Unicorn – Volume 25, Number 1, January 2001, pp. 128–149, Joel D. Chaston, [4]
  8. ^ a b Bernard F. Dukore (2010). "Seriousness Redeemed by Frivolity: Ayckbourn's Intimate Exchanges". Journal of Modern Drama 53 (4). pp. 447–470. 
  9. ^ http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges
  10. ^ a b c Variation in Seriousness of Transgressions and Children's Moral and Conventional Concepts, Developmental Psychology Volume 24, Issue 3, May 1988, Pages 352–357, Marie S. Tisak, Elliot Turiel
  11. ^ a b Offense Seriousness Scaling: An Alternative to Scenario Methods, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Volume 9, Number 3, 309–322, doi:10.1007/BF01064464 James P. Lynch and Mona J. E. Danner, [5]
  12. ^ a b News Media Use and Public Perceptions of Crime Seriousness, Canadian Journal of Criminology 3 (1988), Robert J. Gebotys, Julia V. Roberts, Bikram DasGupta
  13. ^ a b Cultural Relativism and Comparative Criminology, Crime, Law and Social Change, Volume 7, Number 4, pp. 371–391, Piers Beirne, [6]
  14. ^ Arnold, Pater, Wilde, and the Object as in Themselves They See It, Wendell V. Harris, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900, Vol. 11, No. 4, Nineteenth Century (Autumn, 1971), pp. 733–747
  15. ^ P. J. O'Rourke on Seriousness, Quotations Book
  16. ^ Seriously Oscar Wild", Dictionary of Quotes
  17. ^ Samuel Butler on Seriousness, Book of Famous Quotes
  18. ^ Taking Self Seriously, Brainy Quote
  19. ^ The Dark Comedy: The Development of Modern Comic Tragedy, J. L. Styan, [7]
  20. ^ When Congress makes a joke: Congressional Humor as Serious and Purposeful Communication, International Journal of Humor Research. Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 359–394, Nov 2004, Dean L. Yarwood
  21. ^ a b Negotiating the Serious Import of Humor, Sociometry, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Jun., 1969), pp. 169–181, Joan P. Emerson
  22. ^ "regarding the seriousness... their ability to understand the reality-fantasy distinction", Preschoolers' Moral Judgments: Distinctions Between Realistic and Cartoon-Fantasy Transgressions, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community , 2004, Kristen M. Peters, Fran C. Blumberg
  23. ^ Doing Justice – The Choice of Punishments, A VONHIRSCH, 1976, p.220
  24. ^ Criminology, Larry J. Siegel
  25. ^ An Economic Analysis of the Criminal Law as Preference-Shaping Policy, Duke Law Journal, Feb 1990, Vol. 1, Kenneth Dau-Schmidt, [8]
  26. ^ Explaining Risk Perception: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Paradigm in Risk Perception Research, Lennart Sjöberg, Bjørg-Elin Moen, Torbjørn Rundmo, [9]