In astrodynamics and the aerospace industry, a delta-v budget (literally "change in velocity budget") is an estimate of the total delta-v required for the various propulsive tasks and orbital maneuvers over one or more phases of a space mission. Delta-v is a scalar quantity. Delta-v budget is the total of all changes in speed made by the propulsion system during the mission.
Delta-v is a particularly useful measure since it is independent of the mass of the space vehicle. For example, while more thrust, fuel, etc. will be needed to transfer a larger communication satellite from low Earth orbit to geosynchronous orbit, the delta-v required is the same. Also delta-v is additive, as contrasted to rocket burn time, the latter having greater effect later in the mission when more fuel has been used up.
Tables of the delta-v required to move between different space venues are useful in the conceptual planning of space missions. In the absence of an atmosphere, the delta-v is typically the same for changes in orbit in either direction; in particular, gaining and losing speed cost an equal effort. An atmosphere can be used to slow a spacecraft by aerodynamic braking.
A typical delta-v budget might enumerate various classes of maneuvers, delta-v per maneuver, and number of each maneuver required over the life of the mission, and simply sum the total delta-v, much like a typical financial budget. Because the delta-v needed to achieve the mission usually varies with the relative position of the gravitating bodies, launch windows are often calculated from porkchop plots that show delta-v plotted against the launch time.
The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation shows that the delta-v of a rocket (stage), is proportional to the logarithm of the fuelled-to-empty mass ratio of the vehicle, and to the specific impulse of the rocket engine. A key goal in designing space mission trajectories is to minimize the required delta-v, so as to reduce the size and expense of the rocket that would be needed to successfully deliver any particular payload to its destination.
The simplest delta-v budget can be calculated with Hohmann transfer, which moves from one circular orbit to another coplanar circular orbit via an elliptical transfer orbit. In some cases a bi-elliptic transfer can give a lower delta-v.
A more complex transfer occurs when the orbits are not coplanar. In that case there is an additional delta-v necessary to change the plane of the orbit. The velocity of the vehicle needs substantial burns at the intersection of the two orbital planes and the delta-v is usually extremely high. However, these plane changes can be almost free in some cases if the gravity and mass of a planetary body is used to perform the deflection. In other cases, boosting up to a relatively high altitude apoapsis gives low speed before performing the plane change and this can give lower total delta-v.
The slingshot effect can be used in some cases to give a boost of speed/energy; if a vehicle goes past a planetary or lunar body, it is possible to pick up (or lose) much of that body's orbital speed relative to the Sun or a planet.
Another effect is the Oberth effect - this can be used to greatly decrease the delta-v needed, as using propellant at low potential energy/high speed multiplies the effect of a burn. Thus for example the delta-v for a Hohmann transfer from Earth's orbital radius to Mars' orbital radius (to overcome the Sun's gravity) is many kilometres per second, but the incremental burn from LEO over and above the burn to overcome the Earth's gravity is far less if the burn is done close to the Earth than if the burn to reach a Mars transfer orbit is performed at Earth's orbit, but far away from Earth.
A less used effect is low energy transfers. These highly nonlinear effects work by orbital resonances and by choosing trajectories close to Lagrange points. They can be very slow, but use very little delta-v.
Because delta-v depends on the position and motion of celestial bodies, particularly when using the slingshot effect and Oberth effect, the delta-v budget changes with launch time. These can be plotted on a porkchop plot.
Course corrections usually also require some propellant budget. Propulsion systems never provide precisely the right propulsion in precisely the right direction at all times and navigation also introduces some uncertainty. Some propellant needs to be reserved to correct variations from the optimum trajectory.
The delta-v requirements for sub-orbital spaceflight are much lower than for orbital spaceflight. For the Ansari X Prize altitude of 100 km, Space Ship One required a delta-v of roughly 1.4 km/s. To reach low earth orbit of the space station of 300 km, the delta-v is over six times higher about 9.4 km/s. Because of the exponential nature of the rocket equation the orbital rocket needs to be considerably bigger.
- Launch to LEO — this not only requires an increase of velocity from 0 to 7.8 km/s, but also typically 1.5–2 km/s for atmospheric drag and gravity drag
- Re-entry from LEO — the delta-v required is the orbital maneuvering burn to lower perigee into the atmosphere, atmospheric drag takes care of the rest.
|Maneuver||Average delta-v per year [m/s]||Maximum per year [m/s]|
|Drag compensation in 400–500 km LEO||<25||<100|
|Drag compensation in 500–600 km LEO||< 5||< 25|
|Drag compensation in > 600 km LEO||< 7.5|
|Station-keeping in geostationary orbit||50–55|
|Station-keeping in L1/L2||30–100|
|Station-keeping in lunar orbit||0–400 |
|Attitude control (3-axis)||2–6|
|Spin-up or despin||5–10|
|Stage booster separation||5–10|
Earth–Moon space — high thrust
Delta-v needed to move inside Earth–Moon system (speeds lower than escape velocity) are given in km/s units. This table assumes that the Oberth effect is being used - this is possible with high thrust chemical propulsion but not with current (As of 2011[update]) electrical propulsion.
The return to LEO figures assume that a heat shield and aerobraking/aerocapture is used to reduce the speed by up to 3.2 km/s. The heat shield increases the mass, possibly by 15%. Where a heat shield is not used the higher from LEO Delta-v figure applies, the extra propellant is likely to be heavier than a heat shield. LEO-Ken refers to a low Earth orbit with an inclination to the equator of 28 degrees, corresponding to a launch from Kennedy Space Center. LEO-Eq is an equatorial orbit.
|∆V km/s From\To||LEO-Ken||LEO-Eq||GEO||EML-1||EML-2||EML-4/5||LLO||Moon||C3=0|
|Earth||9.3 - 10|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO-Ken)||4.24||4.33||3.77||3.43||3.97||4.04||5.93||3.22|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO-Eq)||4.24||3.90||3.77||3.43||3.99||4.04||5.93||3.22|
|Geostationary Orbit (GEO)||2.06||1.63||1.38||1.47||1.71||2.05||3.92||1.30|
|Lagrangian point 1 (EML-1)||0.77||0.77||1.38||0.14||0.33||0.64||2.52||0.14|
|Lagrangian point 2 (EML-2)||0.33||0.33||1.47||0.14||0.34||0.64||2.52||0.14|
|Lagrangian point 4/5 (EML-4/5)||0.84||0.98||1.71||0.33||0.34||0.98||2.58||0.43|
|Low Lunar orbit (LLO)||1.31||1.31||2.05||0.64||0.65||0.98||1.87||1.40|
|Earth Escape velocity (C3=0)||0.00||0.00||1.30||0.14||0.14||0.43||1.40||2.80|
Earth-Moon space — low thrust
Current electric ion thrusters produce a very low thrust (milli-newtons, yielding a small fraction of a g), so the Oberth effect cannot normally be used. This results in the journey requiring a higher delta-V and frequently a large increase in time compared to a high thrust chemical rocket. Nonetheless, the high specific impulse of electrical thrusters may significantly reduce the cost of the flight. For missions in the Earth-Moon system, an increase in journey time from days to months could be unacceptable for human space flight, but difference in flight time for interplanetary flights are less significant and could be favorable.
The table below presents delta-v's in km/s, normally accurate to 2 significant figures and will be the same in both directions, unless aerobreaking is used as described in the high thrust section above.
|From||To||delta-v in km/s|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO)||Earth-Moon Lagrange 1 (EML-1)||7.0|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO)||Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO)||6.0|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO)||Low Lunar Orbit (LLO)||8.0|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO)||Sun-Earth Lagrange 1 (SEL-1)||7.4|
|Low Earth Orbit (LEO)||Sun-Earth Lagrange 2 (SEL-2)||7.4|
|Earth-Moon Lagrange 1 (EML-1)||Low Lunar Orbit (LLO)||0.60 - 0.80|
|Earth-Moon Lagrange 1 (EML-1)||Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO)||1.4 - 1.75|
|Earth-Moon Lagrange 1 (EML-1)||Sun-Earth Lagrange 2 (SEL-2)||0.30 - 0.40|
The spacecraft is assumed to be using chemical propulsion and the Oberth effect.
|From||To||delta-v in km/s|
|LEO||Mars Transfer Orbit||4.3 |
|Earth Escape velocity (C3=0)||Mars Transfer Orbit||0.6 |
|Mars Transfer Orbit||Mars Capture Orbit||0.9 |
|Mars Capture Orbit||Deimos Transfer Orbit||0.2 |
|Deimos Transfer Orbit||Deimos surface||0.7 |
|Deimos Transfer Orbit||Phobos Transfer Orbit||0.3 |
|Phobos Transfer Orbit||Phobos surface||0.5 |
|Mars Capture Orbit||Low Mars Orbit||1.4 |
|Low Mars Orbit||Mars surface||4.1 |
|EML-2||Mars Transfer Orbit||<1.0 |
|Mars Transfer Orbit||Low Mars Orbit||2.7 |
|Earth Escape velocity (C3=0)||Closest NEO Asteroids||0.8 - 2.0|
Delta-vs between Earth, Moon and Mars
Near earth objects
Near earth objects are asteroids that are within the orbit of Mars. The delta-v to return from them are usually quite small, sometimes as low as 60 m/s, using aerobraking in Earth's atmosphere. However, the usual substantial reentry shields would be required. The orbital phasing can be problematic; once rendezvous has been achieved, low delta-v return windows can be fairly far apart (more than a year, often many years), depending on the body.
However, the delta-v to reach near earth objects is usually higher, over 3.8 km/s, which is still less than the delta-v to reach the moon's surface. In general bodies that are much further away or closer to the Sun than the Earth have more frequent windows for travel, but usually require larger delta-v's.
- Bi-elliptic transfer
- Gravity assist
- Hohmann transfer
- The Oberth effect
- Tsiolkovsky rocket equation
- Pork-chop plot
- Synodic period
- Frozen lunar orbits
- list of delta-v
- L2 Halo lunar orbit
- Strategic Considerations for Cislunar Space Infrastructure
- FISO “Gateway” Concepts 2010, various authors page 26
- Zegler and Kutter (AIAA 2010-8638)
- "Rockets and Space Transportation". Retrieved June 1, 2013.
- NEO list
- "New methods in celestial mechanics and mission design". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
- Atomic Rocket: Missions
- cislunar delta-vs
- ""Ion Propulsion for a Mars Sample Return Mission" John R. Brophy and David H. Rodgers, AIAA-200-3412, Table 1".
- "Near-Earth Asteroid Delta-V for Spacecraft Rendezvous". JPL NASA.