Denmark and the euro
Denmark uses the krone as its currency and does not use the euro, having negotiated an opt-out from participation under the Edinburgh Agreement in 1992. In 2000, the government held a referendum on introducing the euro, which was defeated with 46.8% voting yes and 53.2% voting no. The Danish krone is part of the ERM-II mechanism, so its exchange rate is tied to within 2.25% of the euro.
Most of the large political parties in Denmark favour the introduction of the euro and the idea of a second referendum has been suggested several times since 2000. However, some important parties such as the Danish People's Party and Socialist People's Party do not currently support a referendum. Public opinion surveys have shown fluctuating support for the single currency with majorities in favour for some years after the physical introduction of the currency. However, following the financial crisis of 2008, support began to fall, and in late 2011, support for the euro crashed in light of the escalating European sovereign debt crisis.
The Maastricht Treaty originally required that all members of the European Union join the euro once certain economic criteria are met. Denmark ratified this treaty on 18 May 1993, but with the addition of the Edinburgh Agreement which gives it an exception and allows it to not adopt the euro if it does not want to. However, Denmark meets all five criteria and could join the euro if it chooses.
Since 1 January 1999, the krone has been part of the ERM II mechanism, under which it is required to trade within 2.25% either side of a specified rate of 1 euro equal to 7.46038 kroner (making the lower rate 7.29252 and the upper rate 7.62824). This band, 2.25%, is narrower than the 15% band used for most ERM II members. However, the exchange rate has kept within 0.5% of the defined rate, even less than the set limits. The independence of the Danish central bank is therefore limited in practice. Its aim is to keep the krone within this exchange rate band. This policy marks a continuation of the situation that existed from 1982–1999 with regard to the Deutsche Mark, which provided a similar anchor currency for the krone. The ECB is also obliged to help protect the Danish currency in the case of speculative attacks.
|Assessment month||Country||HICP inflation rate
of annual rates)[nb 1]
|Budget deficit to GDP||Debt-to-GDP ratio||ERM II member||Long-term interest rate
of 10yr bond yields)[nb 2]
|2012 ECB Report||Reference values[nb 3]||max. 3.1%
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
(Fiscal year 2011)
|max. 60%, or declining
(Fiscal year 2011)
|min. 2 years
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
(as of 31 Mar 2012)
|Denmark||2.7%||1.8%||46.5%||1 January 1999||2.39%|
|April 2013||Reference values||max. 2.5%[nb 4][nb 5]
(as of 31 Mar 2013)
(Fiscal year 2012)
|max. 60%, or declining
(Fiscal year 2012)
|min. 2 years
(as of 31 Mar 2013)
|max. 4.81%[nb 4][nb 6]
(as of 31 Mar 2013)
|Denmark||1.8%||4.0%||45.8%||1 January 1999||1.33%|
- The 12-months average for the annual HICP inflation rate must be no more than 1.5% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the similar HICP inflation rates in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these 3 states have a HICP rate significantly below the similarly averaged HICP rate for the eurozone (which according to ECB practice means more than 2% below), and if this low HICP rate has been primarily caused by exceptional circumstances (i.e. severe wage cuts or a strong recession), then such a state is not included in the calculation of the reference value and is replaced by the EU state with the fourth lowest HICP rate.
- The annual average for the yield of 10-year government bonds must be no more than 2.0% larger than the unweighted arithmetic average of the bond yields in the 3 EU member states with the lowest HICP inflation. If any of these states have bond yields which are significantly larger than the similarly averaged yield for the eurozone (which according to previous ECB reports means more than 2% above) and at the same time does not have complete funding access to financial markets (which is the case for as long as a government receives bailout funds), then such a state is not be included in the calculation of the reference value.
- Reference values from the ECB convergence report of May 2012.
- The reference values for HICP inflation and long-term interest rates are calculated based on the "calculation principle" outlined in the 2012 ECB Convergence Report, with the input of forecasted data for the sliding assessment year 1 April 2012 - 31 March 2013.
- The 3 best performing countries in regards to HICP inflation were Greece (0.614%), Sweden (0.843%) and Latvia (1.567%), with no outliers detected.
- As Greece is still part of a bailout program, and suffered from elevated interest rates significantly above the eurozone average (being 15.40% above), this country was excluded from the calculation of the reference limit for "long term interest rates", leaving just Sweden (av. rate=1.61%) and Latvia (av. rate=4.00%) as benchmark countries for the calculation of the reference value limit.
Early monetary unions in Denmark (1873–1914) 
On 5 May 1873 Denmark with Sweden fixed their currencies against gold and formed the Scandinavian Monetary Union. Prior to this date Denmark used the Danish rigsdaler divided into 96 rigsbank skilling. In 1875, Norway joined this union. A rate of 2.48 kroner per gram of gold, or roughly 0.403 grams per krone was established. An equal valued krone of the monetary union replaced the three legacy currencies at the rate of 1 krone = ½ Danish rigsdaler = ¼ Norwegian speciedaler = 1 Swedish riksdaler. The new currency became a legal tender and was accepted in all three countries. This monetary union lasted until 1914 when World War I brought an end to it.[why?] But the name of the currencies in each country remained unchanged.
European Monetary System and pre-euro monetary co-operation 
The Danish krone was fixed to a basket of European currencies during the 1980s. This was formalised in the European Monetary System (EMS). Prior to that Denmark had participated in the "European currency snake" in the years after the collapse of the Bretton Woods system.
Pre-eurozone documents (1992–1999) 
The Maastricht Treaty originally required that all EU member states except the UK join the euro. However, following a referendum on 2 June 1992 in which Danes rejected this treaty, Denmark negotiated the Edinburgh Agreement, under which Denmark was also allowed to opt out from eurozone membership, which was accepted in a referendum on 18 May 1993. As the result, Denmark is not required to join the eurozone. Denmark did however participate in Stage 2 of EMU, which was considered the preparatory phase for the introduction of the euro. As a part of this process, the National Bank of Denmark participated in various aspects of the planning of the euro as it was still considered to be very important for future Danish economic policy. According to a history published by the central bank, "Firstly, it was important to create a solid framework for price stability in the euro area, making it an appropriate anchor for the Danish fixed-exchange-rate policy. Secondly, Denmark had an interest in developing an expedient framework for exchange rate cooperation between the euro area and the non-euro area member states. Thirdly, Denmark had a general interest in the formulation of the ground rules for Stage 3 of EMU to ensure that Denmark would be able to adopt the single currency at a later stage on the same terms as those applying to the initial euro area member states."
Euro referendum (2000) 
A referendum held on 28 September 2000 rejected membership of the eurozone. 87.6% of eligible voters turned out, with 46.8% voting yes and 53.2% voting no. Most political parties, media organisations and economic actors in Denmark campaigned in favour of adopting the euro. However, a couple of major parties campaigned against. Had the vote been favourable, Denmark would have joined the eurozone on 1 January 2002, and introduced the banknotes and coins in 2004. The immediate run-up to the referendum saw a significant weakening of the euro vs. the US dollar. Some analysts believe that this resulted in a general weakening of confidence in the new currency, directly contributing to its rejection. The bank believes that the debate was "coloured by the view that, on account of its fixed-exchange-rate policy, Denmark had already reaped some of the benefits of joining the euro area."
Possible second euro referendum 
|Wikinews has related news: Danish PM pushes for new referendum on euro|
On 22 November 2007, the newly re-elected Danish government declared its intention to hold a new referendum on the abolition of the four exemptions, including exemption from the euro, by 2011. It was unclear if people would vote on each exemption separately, or if people would vote on all of them together. However, this referendum did not take place before the 2011 parliamentary election, and the new government does not intend to hold a referendum on the euro.
Usage today 
The euro can be used in some locations in Denmark, usually in places catering to tourists, such as museums, airports and shops with large numbers of international visitors. However, change is usually given in kroner. Double krone-euro prices are used on all ferries going between Denmark and Germany.
Consequences of a euro adoption 
If Denmark were to adopt the euro, the monetary policy would be transferred from the Danmarks Nationalbank to the ESCB. In theory this would limit the ability of Denmark to conduct an independent monetary policy, however a study of the history of the Danish monetary policy shows that, "while Denmark does not share a single currency, its central bank has always tracked changes made by the ESCB".
However, whilst outside the euro, Denmark does not have any representation in the ESCB direction. This motivated the support for an adoption of the euro by former Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen: "De facto, Denmark participates in the euro zone but without having a seat at the table where decisions are made, and that's a political problem". Furthermore the ESCB does not defend the Danish krone exchange rate. This is done by Danmarks Nationalbank, and the Danish government. In a crisis it can be tough for a small country to defend its exchange rate.
The expected practical advantages of euro adoption are a decrease of transaction costs with the eurozone, a better transparency of foreign markets for Danish consumers, and more importantly a decrease of the interest rates which has a positive effect on growth. However, when joining the euro, Denmark would abandon the possibility to adopt a different monetary policy from the ECB. If ever an economic crisis were to strike specifically the country it would have to rely only on fiscal policy and labour market reforms.
In the wake of the 2010 European sovereign debt crisis European leaders established the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) which is a special purpose vehicle aimed at preserving financial stability in Europe by providing financial assistance to eurozone states in difficulty. It has two parts. The first part expands a €60 billion stabilisation fund (European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism). All EU countries contribute to this fund on a pro-rata basis, whether they are eurozone countries or not. The second part, worth €440 billion consists of government-backed loans to improve market confidence. All eurozone economies will participate in funding this mechanism, while other EU members can choose whether to participate. Unlike Sweden and Poland, Denmark has refused to help fund this portion of the EFSF. If Denmark joined the eurozone it would then be obliged to help fund the second portion.
Polls on the question whether Denmark should abolish the krone and join the euro. The actual wording of the question may have varied.
|Date||YES||NO||Unsure||Number of participants||Held by||Ref|
|29 March – 30 April 2002||47%||33%||20%||Unknown||Eurobarometer|||
|March 2007||56%||39%||5%||910 persons||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|April 2007||53%||40%||7%||910 persons||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|November 2007||54%||42%||4%||Unknown||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|26 November 2007||52%||39%||9%||1016 Danish adults||Vilstrup Synovate published in Politiken|||
|April 2008||55%||38%||7%||1009 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|5 – 7 May 2008||54%||42%||4%||1009 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|middle of June 2008||40%||48%||12%||1036 Danish||Capacent Epinions|||
|29 September – 1 October 2008||52%||44%||4%||1050 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|3 – 5 November 2008||54%||38%||8%||1098 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|December 2008||54%||40%||6%||>1000 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|5 – 7 January 2009||56%||38%||4%||1307 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|2 – 4 February 2009||57%||39%||4%||1124 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|11 February 2009||42%||42%||16%||Unknown||Gallup Poll in Berlingske Tidende|||
|2 – 4 March 2009||52%||38%||10%||1085 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|30 March – 1 April 2009||51%||42%||7%||1007 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|27 – 29 April 2009||52%||40%||8%||1178 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|13 May 2009||43%||45%||11%||Unknown||Rambøll|||
|25 – 27 May 2009||51%||42%||7%||951 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|September 2009||50%||43%||7%||951 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|October 2009||50%||43%||7%||1081 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|2 – 4 November 2009||54%||41%||5%||1158 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|30 November – 2 December 2009||50%||40%||10%||1001 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|2–4 January 2010||51%||42%||7%||1162 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1–3 February 2010||49%||45%||6%||1241 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1–3 March 2010||48%||46%||6%||552 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|12–14 April 2010||52%||41%||7%||988 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|3–5 May 2010||48%||45%||7%||1004 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|11–13 May 2010||45%||43.2%||11.2%||1002 Danish adults||Catinét Ritzau published in Fyens|||
|31 May – 2 June 2010||45%||48%||7%||1079 Danish adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|27 September 2010||45%||48.3%||6.7%||Unknown||Jyllands-Posten|||
|1 October 2010||46%||48%||6%||1025 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 November 2010||44%||49%||7%||Unknown||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 December 2010||46%||48%||6%||1006 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 January 2011||43%||50%||7%||1336 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 February 2011||43%||48%||9%||1053 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 March 2011||47%||46%||7%||1060 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 April 2011||43%||50%||7%||1286 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 May 2011||44%||48%||8%||1133 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|1 August 2011||37%||54%||9%||1143 Danish Adults||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|September 2011?||22.5%||50.6%||28.1%||unknown||Danske Bank|||
|11 October. 2011||29%||65%||6%||1239||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|4–6 May 2012||26%||67%||7%||1092||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
|24–27 February 2013||29%||64%||7%||1004||Greens Analyseinstitut published in Børsen|||
Greens Analyseinstitut, a public opinion research company, has generally asked "How would you vote at a possible new referendum about participation of Denmark in the common currency?" ("Hvad ville du stemme ved en evt. ny folkeafstemning om Danmarks deltagelse i den fælles valuta?").
Danish dominions 
The Faroe Islands currently use the Faroese króna, a localised version of the Danish krone but legally the same currency. Such notes are normally not accepted by shops in Denmark proper, or foreign exchange bureaus, but exchanged 1:1 in Danish banks. Greenland currently uses ordinary Danish kroner but has considered introducing its own currency, the Greenlandic krone in a system similar to that of the Faroese one. Both continue to use Danish coins.
It remains unclear if Greenland and the Faroe Islands will adopt the euro should Denmark choose to do so. Both are parts of the Kingdom of Denmark, but remain outside of the EU. For this reason, they do not take part in EU referenda.
Possible euro coin design 
Before Denmark's 2000 referendum on the issue, Danmarks Nationalbank and the Royal Mint were asked by the Ministry of Economics to propose possible designs for the future Danish euro coins. The suggested design was based on the designs of the Danish 10- and 20-krone coins, with Queen Margrethe II on the front, and the 25- and 50-øre coins, switching their back motif (a crown) to the front of the euro coins.
See also 
- Danish euro referendum, 2000
- Sweden and the euro
- United Kingdom and the euro
- Denmark and the European Union
- "Danskerne siger nej tak til euroen". Business.dk (in Danish). 27 September 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2011.
- Travel Document Systems – Denmark Economy: Denmark meets, and even exceeds, the economic convergence criteria for participating in the third phase (a common European currency–the euro) of the European Monetary Union (EMU)
- Upper and lower limits of the exchange rate of the DKK
- The lowest and highest rates as posted by the ECB are 7.4234 (0.49% below) and 7.468 (0.1% above) kroner per euro, posted on 25 April 2003 and 18 September 2000 respectively. See  (previous rates: CSV zipped).
- "HICP (2005=100): Monthly data (12-month average rate of annual change)". Eurostat. 16 August 2012. Retrieved 6 September 2012.
- "What is ERM II?". European Commission. 31 July 2012. Retrieved 8 September 2012.
- "Long-term interest rate statistics for EU Member States (monthly data for the average of the past year)". Eurostat. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
- "Convergence Report May 2012". European Central Bank. May 2012. Retrieved 2013-01-20.
- "European economic forecast - spring 2012" (PDF). European Commission. 1 May 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2012.
- "Convergence report 2012". European Central Bank. May 2012. Retrieved 2013-01-15.
- "Government deficit/surplus data". Eurostat. 22 April 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- "Government debt data". Eurostat. 22 April 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- "Luxembourg Report prepared in accordance with Article 126(3) of the Treaty" (PDF). European Commission. 12 May 2010. Retrieved 18 November 2012.
- "EMI Annual Report 1994" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). April 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
- "Progress towards convergence - Nov. 1995 (report prepared in accordance with article 7 of the EMI statute)" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). November 1995. Retrieved 22 November 2012.
- "Progress towards convergence - November 1995 (report prepared in accordance with article 7 of the EMI statute)" (PDF). European Monetary Institute (EMI). November 1995. Retrieved 17 March 2013.
- "Monetary and Exchange-Rate Policy". Danmarks Nationalbank – Report and Accounts 1998. Danmarks Nationalbank. Retrieved 25 October 2011.
- Abildgren, Kim (2010). Monetary History of Denmark 1990–2005. Copenhagen: Danmarks Nationalbank. p. 216.
- "Folkeafstemning om euroen den 28. september 2000" (in Danish). Folketinget. 8 August 2006. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- Abildgren, 221.
- Stratton, Allegra (22 November 2007). "Danes to hold referendum on relationship with EU". London: Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-11-22.
- Dagens Huvudledare (24 November 2007). "Danmark går före" (in Swedish). Dagens Nyheter. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- Brand, Constant (13 October 2011). "Denmark scraps border-control plans". European Voice. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- Henrik Brors (22 November 2007). "Utspelet kan höja temperaturen i den iskalla svenska EU-debatten" (in Swedish). Dagens Nyheter. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
- "Rasmussen Says He Isn't Candidate for EU Presidency (Update1)". Bloomberg. 31 March 2008.
-  "The Council and the member states decided on a comprehensive package of measures to preserve financial stability in Europe, including a European financial stabilisation mechanism, with a total volume of up to EUR 500 billion."
-  "European Financial Stability Facility, the special-purpose vehicle (SPV) set up to support ailing euro-zone countries, is even being run by a former hedgie. But this is one fund that will never short its investments."
-  "Media reports said that Spain would ask for support from two EU funds for eurozone governments in financial difficulty: a €60bn ‘European financial stabilisation mechanism', which is reliant on guarantees from the EU budget."
- Moya, Elena (10 May 2010). "Debt crisis Q&A: How the EU bailout will work". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 12 May 2010.
- "France attacks UK over attitude to bail-out fund". EUObserver. 11 May 2010. Retrieved 12 May 2010.
- "EU's lånepakke kan koste Danmark ni milliarder kroner" (in Danish). Politiken. 10 May 2010. Retrieved 12 May 2010.
- http://web.archive.org/web/20071203092905/http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/cmsmedia/514_content_2_5737.pdf (Danish)
- http://www.dr.dk/Nyheder/Politik/2008/06/20/044801.htm (Danish)
- http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/cmsmedia/693_content_2_8211.pdf (Danish)
- http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/cmsmedia/857_content_2_3629.pdf (Danish)
- http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/cmsmedia/877_content_2_7366.pdf (Danish)
- http://img.borsen.dk/img/cms/cmsmedia/881_content_2_5141.pdf (Danish)
- http://jp.dk/indland/indland_politik/article1692022.ece (Danish)
- Parliament of Denmark, 2006–2007 session, law no. 42
- Folketingets EU-oplysning – Illustration af danske euromønter (Danish)