The number of derangements of a set of size n, usually written Dn, dn, or !n, is called the "derangement number" or "de Montmort number". (These numbers are generalized to rencontres numbers.) The subfactorial function (not to be confused with the factorial n!) maps n to !n. No standard notation for subfactorials is agreed upon; n¡ is sometimes used instead of !n.
Suppose that a professor has had 4 of his students – student A, student B, student C, and student D - take a test and wants to let his students grade each other's tests. Of course, no student should grade his or her own test. How many ways could the professor hand the tests back to the students for grading, such that no student received his or her own test back? Out of 24 possible permutations (4!) for handing back the tests, there are only 9 derangements:
- BADC, BCDA, BDAC,
- CADB, CDAB, CDBA,
- DABC, DCAB, DCBA.
In every other permutation of this 4-member set, at least one student gets his or her own test back.
Another version of the problem arises when we ask for the number of ways n letters, each addressed to a different person, can be placed in n pre-addressed envelopes so that no letter appears in the correctly addressed envelope.
Suppose that there are n persons numbered 1, 2, ..., n. Let there be n hats also numbered 1, 2, ..., n. We have to find the number of ways in which no one gets the hat having same number as his/her number. Let us assume that the first person takes hat i. There are n − 1 ways for the first person to make such a choice. There are now two possibilities, depending on whether or not person i takes hat 1 in return:
- Person i does not take the hat 1. This case is equivalent to solving the problem with n − 1 persons and n − 1 hats: each of the remaining n − 1 people has precisely 1 forbidden choice from among the remaining n − 1 hats (i's forbidden choice is hat 1).
- Person i takes the hat 1. Now the problem reduces to n − 2 persons and n − 2 hats.
From this, the following relation is derived:
where !n, known as the subfactorial, represents the number of derangements, with the starting values !0 = 1 and !1 = 0.
Notice that this same recurrence formula also works for factorials with different starting values. That is 0! = 1, 1! = 1 and
which is helpful in proving the limit relationship with e below.
Also, the following formulae are known:
where [x] is the nearest integer function.
Starting with n = 0, the numbers of derangements of n are:
- 1, 0, 1, 2, 9, 44, 265, 1854, 14833, 133496, 1334961, 14684570, 176214841, 2290792932, ... (sequence A000166 in OEIS).
These numbers are also called subfactorial or rencontres numbers.
Perhaps a more well-known method of counting derangements uses the inclusion-exclusion principle.
Limit of ratio of derangement to permutation as n approaches ∞
Using this recurrence, it can be shown that, in the limit,
This is the limit of the probability pn = dn/n! that a randomly selected permutation is a derangement. The probability converges to this limit extremely quickly as n increases, which is why dn is the nearest integer to n!/e. The above semi-log graph shows that the derangement graph lags the permutation graph by an almost constant value.
More information about this calculation and the above limit may be found in the article on the statistics of random permutations.
The problème des rencontres asks how many permutations of a size-n set have exactly k fixed points.
Derangements are an example of the wider field of constrained permutations. For example, the ménage problem asks if n opposite-sex couples are seated man-woman-man-woman-... around a circular table, how many ways can they be seated so that nobody is seated next to his or her partner?
More formally, given sets A and S, and some sets U and V of surjections A → S, we often wish to know the number of pairs of functions (f, g) such that f is in U and g is in V, and for all a in A, f(a) ≠ g(a); in other words, where for each f and g, there exists a derangement φ of S such that f(a) = φ(g(a)).
Another generalization is the following problem:
- How many anagrams with no fixed letters of a given word are there?
For instance, for a word made of only two different letters, say n letters A and m letters B, the answer is, of course, 1 or 0 according whether n = m or not, for the only way to form an anagram without fixed letters is to exchange all the A with B, which is possible if and only if n = m. In the general case, for a word with n1 letters X1, n2 letters X2, ..., nr letters Xr it turns out (after a proper use of the inclusion-exclusion formula) that the answer has the form:
for a certain sequence of polynomials Pn, where Pn has degree n. But the above answer for the case r = 2 gives an orthogonality relation, whence the Pn's are the Laguerre polynomials (up to a sign that is easily decided).
- The name "subfactorial" originates with William Allen Whitworth; see Cajori, Florian (2011), A History of Mathematical Notations: Two Volumes in One, Cosimo, Inc., p. 77, ISBN 9781616405717.
- Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, Oren Patashnik, Concrete Mathematics (1994), Addison–Wesley, Reading MA. ISBN 0-201-55802-5
- de Montmort, P. R. (1708). Essay d'analyse sur les jeux de hazard. Paris: Jacque Quillau. Seconde Edition, Revue & augmentée de plusieurs Lettres. Paris: Jacque Quillau. 1713.
- Hassani, M. "Derangements and Applications." J. Integer Seq. 6, No. 03.1.2, 1–8, 2003
- See the notes for (sequence A000166 in OEIS).
- Even, S.; J. Gillis (1976). "Derangements and Laguerre polynomials". Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 79 (01): 135–143. doi:10.1017/S0305004100052154. Retrieved 27 December 2011.
- Lubiw, Anna (1981), "Some NP-complete problems similar to graph isomorphism", SIAM Journal on Computing 10 (1): 11–21, doi:10.1137/0210002, MR 605600. Babai, László (1995), "Automorphism groups, isomorphism, reconstruction", Handbook of combinatorics, Vol. 1, 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1447–1540, MR 1373683,
A surprising result of Anna Lubiw asserts that the following problem is NP-complete: Does a given permutation group have a fixed-point-free element?.
- Baez, John (2003). "Let's get deranged!".
- Bogart, Kenneth P. and Doyle, Peter G. (1985). "Non-sexist solution of the ménage problem".
- Dickau, Robert M. "Derangement diagrams". Figures Using Mathematica.
- Hassani, Mehdi. "Derangements and Applications". Journal of Integer Sequences (JIS), Volume 6, Issue 1, Article 03.1.2, 2003.
- Weisstein, Eric W. "Derangement". MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource.
- Debra K. Borkovitz. "Derangements and the Inclusion-Exclusion Principle". Articles, Associate Professor of Mathematics, Wheelock College.