|This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2011)|
One of those is
This integral is not absolutely convergent, and so the integral is not even defined in the sense of Lebesgue integration, but it is defined in the sense of the improper Riemann integral or the Henstock–Kurzweil integral. The value of the integral (in the Riemann or Henstock sense) can be derived in various ways. For example, the value can be determined from attempts to evaluate a double improper integral, or by using differentiation under the integral sign.
Double improper integral method
Pre-knowledge of properties of Laplace transforms allows us to evaluate this Dirichlet integral succinctly in the following manner:
where is the Laplace transform of the function, . Applying Euler's formula, then integrating, making the denominator real, and taking the imaginary part, we see the Laplace transform is the function , a function of the Laplace transform variable, s. This is equivalent to attempting to evaluate the same double definite integral in two different ways, by reversal of the order of integration, viz.,
Differentiation under the integral sign
First rewrite the integral as a function of variable . Let
then we need to find .
Differentiate with respect to and apply the Leibniz integral rule to obtain:
This integral was evaluated without proof, above, based on Laplace transform tables; we derive it this time. It is made much simpler by recalling Euler's formula,
- where represents the imaginary part.
Integrating with respect to :
where is a constant to be determined. As,
for some integers m & n. It is easy to show that has to be zero, by analyzing easily observed bounds for this integral:
The left and right bounds can be derived by dividing the integrated region into periodic intervals, over which the integrals have zero value.
The second term is zero, which can be proven using the same approach as for the left bound. The first term,
End of proof.
Extending this result further, with the introduction of another variable, first noting that is an even function and therefore
The same result can be obtained via complex integration. Let's consider
As a function of the complex variable z, it has a simple pole at the origin, which prevents the application of Jordan's lemma, whose other hypotheses are satisfied. We shall then define a new function g(z) as follows
The pole has been moved away from the real axis, so g(z) can be integrated along the semicircle of radius R centered at z=0 and closed on the real axis, then the limit should be taken.
The complex integral is zero by the residue theorem, as there are no poles inside the integration path
The second term vanishes as R goes to infinity; for arbitrarily small , the Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem applied to the first one yields
Where P.V. indicates Cauchy principal value. By taking the imaginary part on both sides and noting that is even and by definition , we get the desired result
- Robert G. Bartle, Return to the Riemann Integral, The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 103, 1996, pp. 625-632.
- Appel, Walter. Mathematics for Physics and Physicists. Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 226.