Dirichlet integral

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, there are several integrals known as the Dirichlet integral, after the German mathematician Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet.

One of those is

\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin \omega}{\omega}\,d\omega = \frac{\pi}{2}

This integral is not absolutely convergent, and so the integral is not even defined in the sense of Lebesgue integration, but it is defined in the sense of the Riemann integral or the Henstock–Kurzweil integral.[1] The value of the integral (in the Riemann or Henstock sense) can be derived in various ways. For example, the value can be determined from attempts to evaluate a double improper integral, or by using differentiation under the integral sign.

Evaluation[edit]

Double improper integral method[edit]

Pre-knowledge of properties of Laplace transforms allows us to evaluate this Dirichlet integral succinctly in the following manner:

\int_0^\infty\frac{\sin t}{t}\, dt=\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathcal{L}\{\sin t\}(s)\; ds=\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{s^{2}+1}\, ds=\arctan s\bigg|_{0}^{\infty}=\frac{\pi}{2},

where \mathcal{L}\{\sin t\}(s) is the Laplace transform of the function, \sin t. Applying Euler's formula, then integrating, making the denominator real, and taking the imaginary part, we see the Laplace transform is the function \tfrac{1}{s^{2}+1}, a function of the Laplace transform variable, s. This is equivalent to attempting to evaluate the same double definite integral in two different ways, by reversal of the order of integration, viz.,

\left ( I_1=\int_0^\infty {\int _0^\infty e^{-st} \sin t\, dt}\, ds\right ) = \left ( I_2=\int_0^\infty {\int _0^\infty e^{-st} \sin t\, ds} \, dt \right ),
\left ( I_1=\int_0^\infty {\frac{1}{s^2+1}}\, ds = \frac{\pi}{2}\right ) = \left ( I_2=\int_0^\infty \sin t\, \frac{1}{t} \, dt\right ) \text{, provided } s>0.

Differentiation under the integral sign[edit]

First rewrite the integral as a function of variable \!a. Let

f(a)=\int_0^\infty e^{-a\omega} \frac{\sin \omega}{\omega} d\omega ;

then we need to find \!f(0).

Differentiate with respect to \!a and apply the Leibniz integral rule to obtain:

\frac{df}{da}=\frac{d}{da}\int_0^\infty e^{-a\omega} \frac{\sin \omega}{\omega} d\omega = \int_0^\infty  \frac{\partial}{\partial a}e^{-a\omega}\frac{\sin \omega}{\omega} d\omega = -\int_0^\infty e^{-a\omega} \sin \omega \,d\omega = -\mathcal{L}\{\sin \omega\}(a).

This integral was evaluated without proof, above, based on Laplace transform tables; we derive it this time. It is made much simpler by recalling Euler's formula,

\! e^{i\omega}=\cos \omega + i\sin \omega ,

then,

\Im e^{i\omega}=\sin \omega, where \Im represents the imaginary part.
\therefore\frac{df}{da}=-\Im\int_0^\infty e^{-a\omega}e^{i\omega}d\omega=\Im\frac{1}{-a+i}=\Im\frac{-a-i}{a^2+1}=\frac{-1}{a^2+1} \text{, given that } a > 0 .

Integrating with respect to \!a:

f(a) = \int \frac{-da}{a^2+1} = A - \arctan a,

where \! A is a constant to be determined. As,

f(+\infty)=0 \therefore A = \arctan (+\infty) = \frac{\pi}{2} + m\pi,
\therefore f(0)=\lim _{a \to 0^+} f(a) = \frac{\pi}{2} + m\pi - \arctan 0 = \frac{\pi}{2} + n\pi,

for some integers m & n. It is easy to show that \!n has to be zero, by analyzing easily observed bounds for this integral:

0<\int _0^\infty \frac {\sin x}{x}dx < \int _0^\pi \frac {\sin x}{x}dx < \pi

The left and right bounds can be derived by dividing the integrated region [0, \infty] into periodic intervals, over which the integrals have zero value.

Left bound: \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx = \sum_{n=0}^{n = \infty} \int_{2\pi n}^{2\pi (n+1)} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx = \sum_{n=0}^{n = \infty} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{\sin x}{2\pi n + x}dx > \sum_{n=0}^{n = \infty} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{\sin x}{2\pi (n+1)}dx = 0

Right bound: \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx = \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx + \int_{\pi}^{\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx < \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx + \int_{\pi}^{\infty} \sin x\,dx

The second term is zero, which can be proven using the same approach as for the left bound. The first term, \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin x}{x}dx < \int_0^{\pi} dx = \pi

End of proof.

Extending this result further, with the introduction of another variable, first noting that \! {\sin x}/{x} is an even function and therefore

\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx = \int_{-\infty}^0 \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx = -\int_0^{-\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx,

then:

\int_0^\infty \frac{\sin b\,\omega}{\omega}\,d\omega = \int_0^{b\,\infty} \frac{\sin b\,\omega}{b\,\omega}\,d(b\,\omega) = \int_0^{\sgn b\times\infty} \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx = \sgn b \int_0^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x}\,dx = \frac{\pi}{2}\,\sgn b

Complex integration[edit]

The same result can be obtained via complex integration. Let's consider

 f(z)=\frac{e^{iz}}{z}

As a function of the complex variable z, it has a simple pole at the origin, which prevents the application of Jordan's lemma, whose other hypotheses are satisfied. We shall then define a new function[2] g(z) as follows

 g(z)=\frac{e^{iz}}{z +i\epsilon}

The pole has been moved away from the real axis, so g(z) can be integrated along the semicircle of radius R centered at z=0 and closed on the real axis, then the limit \epsilon \rightarrow 0 should be taken.

The complex integral is zero by the residue theorem, as there are no poles inside the integration path

 0 = \int_\gamma g(z) dz = \int_{-R}^R \frac{e^{ix}}{x +i\epsilon} dx + \int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{e^{i(Re^{i\theta} + \theta)}}{Re^{i\theta} +i\epsilon} iR d\theta

The second term vanishes as R goes to infinity; for arbitrarily small  \epsilon , the Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem applied to the first one yields

 0= \mathrm{P.V.} \int \frac{e^{ix}}{x} dx - \pi i \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(x) e^{ix} dx

Where P.V. indicates Cauchy principal value. By taking the imaginary part on both sides and noting that  \mathrm{sinc}(x) is even and by definition  \mathrm{sinc}(0)=1 , we get the desired result

 \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}\int_\epsilon^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx = \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} dx = \frac{\pi}{2}

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Robert G. Bartle, Return to the Riemann Integral, The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 103, 1996, pp. 625-632.
  2. ^ Appel, Walter. Mathematics for Physics and Physicists. Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 226.

External links[edit]