Don Juanism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Don Juanism or Don Juan syndrome is a non-clinical term for the desire, in a man, to have sex with many different female partners, arguably due to his latent homosexuality or insecurity about his masculinity.[1]

The name derives from Don Juan of opera and fiction, who seems in turn to have been patterned after the Spanish noble Don Juan Tenorio.[citation needed]The term satyriasis is sometimes used as a synonym for Don Juanism. The term has also been referred to as the male equivalent of nymphomania in women.[2] Historian Carol Groneman has demonstrated that these terms no longer apply with any accuracy as psychological or legal categories of psychological disorder.[2]

Analytical psychology[edit]

Psychologist Carl Jung believed that Don Juanism was an unconscious desire of a man to seek his mother in every woman he encountered. However, he didn't see the trait as entirely negative; Jung felt that positive aspects of Don Juanism included heroism, perseverance and strength of will.[3] Jung argues that related to the mother-complex "are homosexuality and Don Juanism, and sometimes also impotence. In homosexuality, the son's entire heterosexuality is tied to the mother in an unconscious form; in Don Juanism, he unconsciously seeks his mother in every woman he meets....Because of the difference in sex, a son's mother-complex does not appear in pure form. This is the reason why in every masculine mother-complex, side by side with the mother archetype, a significant role is played by the image of the man's sexual counterpart, the anima."[4]

Psychoanalysis[edit]

Sigmund Freud explored the connections between mother-fixation and a long series of love-attachments in the first of his articles on the 'Psychology of Love';[5] while Otto Rank published an article on the Don Juan gestalt in 1922.[6] Otto Fenichel saw Don Juanism as linked to the quest for narcissistic supply, and for proof of achievement (as seen in the number of conquests).[7] He also described what he called the 'Don Juans of Achievement' – people compelled to flee from one achievement to another in an unconscious but never ending quest to overcome an unconscious sense of guilt[8] Sandor Ferenczi stressed the fear of punishment (Hell) in the syndrome, linking it to the Oedipus complex.[9]

Contemorary psychoanalysis stresses the denial of psychic reality and the avoidance of change implicit in Don Juan's (identificatory) pursuit of multiple females.[10]

Cultural references[edit]

Aspects of the character are examined by Mozart and his librettist Da Ponte in their opera Don Giovanni, perhaps the best-known artistic work on this subject. To write their opera, Mozart and Da Ponte are known to have consulted with the famous libertine, Giacomo Casanova, the usual historic example of Don Juanism. Although not conclusively established, it is probable that Casanova attended the premiere of this opera, which was likely understood by the audience to be about himself.[citation needed] Charles Rosen saw what he called “the seductive physical power” of Mozart's music as linked to 18thC libertinism, political fervor and incipient Romanticism,[11] while in a famous passage the philosopher Kierkegaard discusses Mozart's version of the Don Juan story.[12]

Albert Camus has also written on the subject;[13] while Jane Austen was fascinated by the character of Don Juan: “I have seen nobody on the stage who has been a more interesting Character than that compound of Cruelty and Lust”.[14] Anthony Powell in his novel Casanova's Chinese Restaurant distinguishes Don Juan from Casanova: “Don Juan merely liked power. He obviously did not know what sensuality was....Casanova, on the other hand, undoubtedly had his sensuous moments”.[15]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Don Juan Syndrome". Farlex. Retrieved 30 November 2012. 
  2. ^ a b Carol Groneman Nymphomania, a History (New York, 2000). ISBN 0-393-04838-1
  3. ^ C. G. Jung, Psychological Aspects of the Mother Archetype, Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 9, Part 1. 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, 1968. 451 p. (pp. 75-80). ISBN 978-0-691-01833-1
  4. ^ Jung, Carl. 1959. Symbols of Transformation. New York: Princeton University Press. p85.
  5. ^ Sigmund Freud, On Sexuality (PFL7) p. 234-6
  6. ^ Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 646
  7. ^ Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 243-4
  8. ^ Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 502-3
  9. ^ S. Ferenczi, Further Contributions to the Theory and Technique of Psychoanalysis (1994) p. 358
  10. ^ Juliet Mitchell, Siblings (2013) p. 178-82
  11. ^ Charles Rosen, The Classical Style (1977) p. 323-4
  12. ^ Søren Kierkegaard, Either/Or, "The Immediate Stages of the Erotic, or Musical Erotic."
  13. ^ Albert Camus, The Myth of Sisyphus, "The Absurd Man: Don Juanism"
  14. ^ D. Le Faye ed., Jane Austen's Letters (1996) p. 221
  15. ^ Anthony Powell, Casanova's Chinese Restaurant (1980) p. 38

Further Reading[edit]

Juliet Mitchell, Mad Men and Medusas (2000)