To perform dubbing, the tissues are first disinfected and, if available, an anesthetic is applied to limit pain. Sterile scissors or dubbing shears are used to cut the tissues off, and a styptic, an astringent chemical that reduces bleeding, is applied. The wounds are left uncovered. Some recommend dubbing should be done on day-old chicks whilst others advise waiting until the birds are a few months old when the comb is more developed.
Dubbing is sometimes performed to limit damage caused by injury or frostbite. Dubbing for some breeds has become a tradition and is required for some birds to meet breed-specifications. Other reasons include removing combs which have become so large they prevent the bird taking food into its mouth or making the head so heavy it sinks into the bird's chest. In the US, the National Chicken Council (2003) listed dubbing of cockerels as one of the acceptable procedures that may cause short-term stress but which are necessary for the long-term welfare of the flock. Dubbing is also performed to prevent injuries from other birds, either during cock-fighting or while being kept in pens. However, cock-fighting is now illegal in many places.
In practice, an anesthetic is rarely used during dubbing and as a consequence, the RSPCA Australia is opposed to dubbing on poultry intended to be exhibited at shows, and describes the practise as a cause of pain and distress. The comb and wattles function in thermoregulation; blood circulating from the comb and the wattles helps the bird lose heat during hot weather. The comb is also used in mate-assessment in some poultry species. Dubbing would interfere with both these functions of the comb and wattles.
In commercial laying hens, those dubbed at hatching exhibit few effects on egg production but the older the birds are when dubbed, the greater the negative effects of dubbing.
In the UK, the Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) concludes "that removal of the comb offers no welfare advantages to offset the disturbance caused by the procedure and believe the practice should be phased out." The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) writes: "Removal of the comb offers few, if any, welfare advantages in comparison with the disturbance and pain likely to be caused and should be avoided." The Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966 (Schedule 3 Amendment) Order 1988 (SI 1988 No. 526) permits only a veterinary surgeon to remove the combs of a domestic fowl which has reached the age of 72 hours.
In 2010, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed scientific evidence and concluded "that no mutilation with an effect on welfare as severe as those resulting from cutting off toes or dubbing the comb should be carried out unless justified by evidence for a substantial and unavoidable level of poor welfare in the birds themselves and other birds."
- Debeaking/beak trimming
- Fighting cock
- Overview of discretionary invasive procedures on animals
- "Dubbing by Jennifer A. Floyd". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- "Dubbing Poultry on freewebs". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- "Report in The Nelson Mail by Alice Cowdrey". Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "Leghorn club forum comments on dubbing". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- "National Chicken Council view on dubbing". Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- "RSPCA view on dubbing". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- Jones, E.K.M. and Prescott, N.B., (2000). Visual cues used in the choice of mate by fowl and their potential importance for the breeder industry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 56: 127-138. doi:10.1079/WPS20000010
- Fairfull, R.W., Crober, D.C. and Gowe, R.S., (1985). Effects of comb dubbing on the performance of laying stocks. Poultry Science, 64: 434–439. doi:10.3382/ps.0640434
- "FAWC report on broiler breeds". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- "DEFRA statement on dubbing". Retrieved 5 December 2011.
- "NAWAC statement on dubbing". Retrieved 9 December 2011.
- "EFSA (2010). Scientific opinion on welfare aspects of the management and housing of the grandparent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes.". EFSA Journal 8 (7): 1667. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1667. Retrieved 9 December 2011.