Reverse auction

A reverse auction is a type of auction in which the roles of buyers and sellers are reversed. In an ordinary auction (also known as a forward auction), buyers compete to obtain a good or service, and the price typically increases over time. In a reverse auction, sellers compete to obtain business, and prices typically decrease over time.

In business, the term most commonly refers to a specific type of auction process (also called procurement auction, e-auction, sourcing event, e-sourcing or eRA, eRFP, e-RFO, e-procurement, B2B Auction) used in government or private sector procurement.

In consumer auctions, the term is often used to refer to sales process that share some characteristics with auctions, but are not necessarily auctions.

Context

The most common application of reverse auctions is in E-procurement. Reverse auction is a strategy used by purchasing and supply management organizations for spend management, as part of strategic sourcing and overall supply management activities.

In a typical auction, the seller puts an item up for sale. Multiple buyers bid for the item, and one or more of the highest bidders buys the goods at a price determined at the conclusion of the bidding.

In a reverse auction, a buyer puts a contract out for bid, either using specialized software or through an online marketplace. Multiple sellers offer bids on the item, competing to offer the lowest price that meets all of the specifications of the bid. As the auction progresses, the price decreases as sellers compete to offer lower bids than their competitors.

Bidding performed in real-time via the Internet results in a dynamic, competitive process. This helps achieve rapid downward price pressure that is not normally attainable using traditional static paper-based bidding processes.^{[citation needed]}

The buyer may award the contract to the seller who bid the lowest price. Or, a buyer may award contracts to suppliers who bid higher prices depending upon the buyer's specific needs with regards to quality, lead-time, capacity, or other value-adding capabilities.^{[citation needed]}

The use of Optimization software has become popular since about 2002 to help buyers determine which supplier is likely to provide the best value in providing goods or services. It includes relevant buyer and seller business data, including constraints.^{[citation needed]}

Reverse auctions are used to fill both large and small value contracts for both public sector and private commercial organizations. In addition to items traditionally thought of as commodities, reverse auctions are also used to source buyer-designed goods and services, and they have even been used to source reverse auction providers. The first time this occurred was in August 2001, when America West Airlines (now US Airways) used FreeMarkets software and awarded the contract to MaterialNet.^{[citation needed]}

In 2003, researchers claimed an average of 5% of total corporate spending was sourced using reverse auctions.

History

Reverse auctions gained popularity in the late 1990s as a result of the emergence of Internet-based online auction tools. Pioneer of online reverse auctions, FreeMarkets, was founded in 1995 by former McKinsey consultant and General Electric executive Glen Meakem after he failed to find internal backing for the idea of a reverse auction division at GE. Meakem hired McKinsey colleague Sam Kinney who developed much of the intellectual property behind FreeMarkets. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA, FreeMarkets built teams of "market makers" and "commodity managers" to manage the process of running the online tender process and set up market operations to manage auctions on a global basis.^{[citation needed]}

The company's growth was aided greatly by the hype of the dot-com boom era. FreeMarkets customers included BP plc, United Technologies, Visteon, H.J. Heinz, Phelps Dodge, Exxon Mobil, and Royal Dutch Shell, to name a few. Dozens of competing start-up reverse auction service providers and established companies such as General Motors (an early FreeMarkets customer) and SAP, rushed to join the reverse auction marketspace.^{[citation needed]}

Although FreeMarkets survived the winding down of the dot-com boom, by the early 2000s it was apparent that its business model was really like an old-economy consulting firm with some sophisticated proprietary software. Online reverse auctions started to become mainstream and the prices that FreeMarkets had commanded for its services dropped significantly. This led to a consolidation of the reverse auction service marketplace. In January 2004, Ariba announced its purchase of FreeMarkets for $493 million.

Fortune magazine published an article in March 2000 describing the early days of reverse auctions.

In the past few years mobile reverse auction have evolved. Unlike business-to-business (B2B) reverse auctions, mobile reverse auctions are business-to-consumer (B2C) and allow consumers to bid on products for pennies. The lowest unique bid wins.^{[citation needed]}

Very recently business-to-consumer (B2C) auctions with a twist have started to evolve - they are more similar to the original business-to-business (B2B) auctions than mobile reverse auctions in that they offer consumers the option of placing a specification before retailers or resellers and allowing them to publicly bid for their business.^{[citation needed]}

In Congressional testimony on the 2008 proposed legislative package to use federal funds to buy toxic assets from troubled financial firms, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke proposed that a reverse auction could be used to price the assets.^{[citation needed]}

Current State

Reverse auctions (also becoming known as service auctions) are undergoing a resurgence at present, as evidenced by a number of service auction sites that are doing a significant volume of business both in number of projects and amount of money spent. There are narrow scope sites, such as those specializing in programming, technical writing and other professional, desk-based work or in home improvement and construction work.^{[citation needed]}

In 2004, the White House Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) issued a memorandum encouraging increased use of commercially available online procurement tools, including reverse auctions. In 2005, both the Government Accountability Office and Court of Federal Claims upheld the legality of Federal agency use of online reverse auctions. In 2008, OFPP issued a governmentwide memorandum encouraging agencies to improve and increase competitive procurement and included specific examples of competition best practices, including reverse auctions. In 2010, The White House Office of Management and Budget cited “continued implementation of innovative procurement methods, such as the use of web-based electronic reverse auctions” as one of the contracting reforms helping agencies meet acquisition savings goals.

Keys to success as a supplier in reverse auctions are: (a) Thorough preparation – it's essential to know your costs, your suppliers, your requirements, and your market to the greatest extent possible – tiny details can make the difference between winning and losing, and between being profitable or not; (b) Reverse auctions should be largely kept to the supply of commodity products rather than proprietary ones; and (c) Having a strong, competent bidder leading your effort at the time of the auction, with clear guidelines on when to bid and when to fold is essential.

See also

• Tendering
• Request for Quotation
• Request For Tender
• Request For Information
• Request For Proposal
• Optimization (mathematics)
• Operations research

Further reading

• Bounds, G., "Toyota Supplier Development", in Cases in Quality, G. Bounds, Editor, R.D. Irwin Co., Chicago, IL, 1996, pp. 3–25
• Shalev, E. Moshe and Asbjornsen, S., "Electronic Reverse Auctions and the Public Sector – Factors of Success", Journal of Public Procurement, 10(3) 428-452.
• Bounds, G., Shaw, A., and Gillard, J., "Partnering the Honda Way", in Cases in Quality, G. Bounds, Editor, R.D. Irwin Co., Chicago, IL, 1996, pp. 26–56
• Dyer, J. and Nobeoka, K., "Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge Sharing Network: The Toyota Case," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 345–367
• Liker, J. and Choi, T., “Building Deep Supplier Relationships,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 12, December 2004, pp. 104–113
• Womack, J., Jones, D., and Roos, D., The Machine that Changed the World, Rawson Associates, New York, NY, 1990, Chapter 6
• Jap, Sandy D. (2007), The Impact of Online Reverse Auction Design on Buyer-Supplier Relationships, Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 146-50

External links

• Comprehensive reverse auction research from the School of Technology at Central Connecticut State University
• University of the West of England in association with CIPS research into a suppliers perspective on e-Auctions