Ease of Doing Business Index

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
World map of the Ease of Doing Business Index, circa September 2009. Green nations rank higher, red nations lower. Grey represents nations lacking sufficient data. Each colour represents one quartile of the ranked nations.

The Ease of Doing Business Index is an index created by the World Bank.[1] Higher rankings indicate better, usually simpler, regulations for businesses and stronger protections of property rights. Empirical research funded by the World Bank to justify their work show that the effect of improving these regulations on economic growth is strong.[2]

"Empirical research is needed to establish the optimal level of business regulation—for example, what the duration of court procedures should be and what the optimal degree of social protection is. The indicators compiled in the Doing Business project allow such research to take place. Since the start of the project in November 2001, more than 800 academic papers have used one or more indicators constructed in Doing Business and the related background papers by its authors."[3]

Contents

[edit] Methodology

The index is based on the study of laws and regulations, with the input and verification by more than 8,000 government officials, lawyers, business consultants, accountants and other professionals in 183 economies who routinely advise on or administer legal and regulatory requirements.

The Ease of Doing Business index is meant to measure regulations directly affecting businesses and does not directly measure more general conditions such as a nation's proximity to large markets, quality of infrastructure, inflation, or crime. A nation's ranking on the index is based on the average of 10 subindices:

  • Starting a Business - Procedures, time, cost and minimum capital to open a new business
  • Dealing with construction permits - Procedures, time and cost to build a warehouse
  • Employing workers - Difficulty of hiring index, rigidity of hours of index, difficulty of redundancy index, rigidity of employment index, redundancy costs
  • Registering property - Procedures, time and cost to register commercial real estate
  • Getting credit - Strength of legal rights index, depth of credit information index
  • Protecting investors - Indices on the extent of disclosure, extent of director liability and ease of shareholder suits
  • Paying taxes - Number of taxes paid, hours per year spent preparing tax returns and total tax payable as share of gross profit
  • Trading across borders - Number of documents, cost and time necessary to export and import
  • Enforcing contracts - Procedures, time and cost to enforce a debt contract
  • Closing a business - Index of recovery rate which is a function of time, cost and other factors such as lending rate and the likelihood of the company continuing to operate [4]

For example, according to the Doing Business 2010 report, Australia ranked third on the first subindex "Starting a business" behind only New Zealand and Canada. In Australia there are 2 procedures required to start a business which take on average 2 days to complete. The official cost is 0.8% of the Gross National Income per capita. There is no minimum capital requirement. By contrast, in Guinea-Bissau which ranked among the worst (183rd out of 183) on this same subindex, there are 16 procedures required to start a business taking 213 days to complete. The official cost is 323.0% of the gross national income per capita. A minimum capital investment of 1006.6% of the gross national income per capita is required.

While fewer and simpler regulations often imply higher rankings, this is not always the case. Protecting the rights of creditors and investors, as well as establishing or upgrading property and credit registries, may mean that more regulation is needed.

[edit] Research and influence

More than 800 academic papers have used data from the index. The effect of improving regulations on economic growth is claimed to be very strong. Moving from the worst one-fourth of nations to the best one-fourth implies a 2.3 percentage point increase in annual growth.[5]

The various subcomponents of the index in themselves provide concrete suggestions for improvement. Many of them may be relatively easy to implement and uncontroversial (except perhaps among corrupt officials who may gain from onerous regulations requiring bribes to bypass). As such, the index has influenced many nations to improve their regulations. Several have explicitly targeted to reach a minimum position on the index, for example the top 25 list. Between June 2008 and May 2009, Doing Business recorded 287 reforms in 131 economies, 20% more than in the year before. The 10 top reformers were Rwanda, Kyrgyz Republic, Macedonia, Belarus, United Arab Emirates, Moldova, Colombia, Tajikistan, Egypt and Liberia.[6]

The correlations between the subindices are low, which suggest that countries rarely score universally well or universally badly on the indicators. In other words, there is usually much room for partial reform even in the best ranking nations.[4]

The annual Reformers' Club event brings together individuals from top reformer countries who have been instrumental in initiating and implementing business environment reform. These reformers are acknowledged for their success in improving the ease of doing business in their country.[7] Presentations and case studies are available online.[8]

Somewhat similar annual reports are the Indices of Economic Freedom and the Global Competitiveness Report. They, especially the later, look at many more factors that affect economic growth, like inflation and infrastructure. These factors may however be more subjective and diffuse since many are measured using surveys and they may be more difficult to change quickly compared to regulations.

According to some critics, however, some of the research lacks the rigor of a coherent economic theory, contains unstated ideological biases, and too much of it is undertaken by individuals closely associated with the index and reforms, so it is not sufficiently independent to be fully credible.[9] This blanket criticism is often offered by those with their own ideological bias.

[edit] Criticism

The Doing Business methodology regarding labor regulations has been criticized because of the support for flexible employment regulations.[10] For instance, the easier it is to dismiss a worker for economic reasons in a country, the more one goes up in the rankings. The Employing Workers index was revised in Doing Business 2008 to be in full compliance with the 188 International Labour Organization conventions. A country can have all ILO conventions ratified and still rank #1 on the Ease of Employing Workers. As a further step, according to the Report 2010, Doing business plans to develop a new worker protection indicator, a process that will benefit from the advice of a working group with broad stakeholder representation. The ILO, which has leadership on the core labor standards, will serve as an essential source of guidance in this process.

In 2008 the World Bank Group's Independent Evaluation Group, a semi-independent watchdog within the World Bank Group, published an evaluation of the Doing Business index.[11] The report, titled Doing Business: An Independent Evaluation, contained both praise and criticism of Doing Business. The report recommended that Doing Business be clearer about what is and is not measured, disclose changes to published data, recruit more informants, and simplify the Paying Taxes indicator.

In April 2009 the World Bank issued a note with revisions to the Employing Workers index.[12] The note explained that scoring for the Employing Workers indicator would be updated in Doing Business 2010 to give favorable scores for complying with relevant ILO conventions. The Employing Workers indicator was also removed as a guidepost for Country Policy and Institutional Assessments, which help determine resources provided to IDA countries.

A study commissioned by the Norwegian government alleges methodological weaknesses, an uncertainty in the ability of the indicators to capture the underlying business climate, and a general worry that many countries may find it easier to change their ranking in Doing Business than to change the underlying business environment.[9]

[edit] Ranking

The most recent rankings come from the "Doing Business 2012" report.[13]

Singapore topped the ranking on Ease of Doing Business for the sixth year.[14] Based on Singapore's experience, IDA International is collaborating with public agencies in several countries in the areas such as ICT strategy, national infocomm planning and solutions implementation that can help increase the ease of doing business.

2012 Rank 2011 Rank 2010 Rank 2009 Rank Country/Region
1 1 1 1  Singapore
2 2 2 2  Hong Kong
3 3 3 3  New Zealand
4 5 4 4  United States
5 6 6 5  Denmark
6 8 10 10  Norway
7 4 5 6  United Kingdom
8 16 19 23  South Korea
9 15 14 11  Iceland
10 9 7 7  Ireland
11 13 16 14  Finland
12 11 13 15  Saudi Arabia
13 7 8 8  Canada
14 14 18 17  Sweden
15 10 9 9  Australia
16 12 13 16  Georgia
17 19 12 12  Thailand
18 21 23 21  Malaysia
19 22 25 27  Germany
20 18 15 13  Japan
21 24 27 29  Latvia
22 38 32 69  Macedonia
23 20 17 24  Mauritius
24 17 24 22  Estonia
25 33 46 61  Taiwan (Republic of China)
26 27 21 19  Switzerland
27 23 26 25  Lithuania
28 25 22 20  Belgium
29 26 31 31  France
30 31 48 48  Portugal
31 30 30 28  Netherlands
32 32 28 26  Austria
33 40 33 47  United Arab Emirates
34 29 29 30  Israel
35 34 34 32  South Africa
36 50 39 37  Qatar
37 42 53 57  Slovenia
38 28 20 18  Bahrain
39 43 49 40  Chile
40 37 40 36  Cyprus
41 36 56 65  Peru
42 39 37 49  Colombia
43 47 35 33  Puerto Rico
44 49 62 51  Spain
45 58 67 143  Rwanda
46 55 69 73  Tunisia
47 59 63 64  Kazakhstan
48 41 42 35  Slovakia
49 57 65 60  Oman
50 45 64 53  Luxembourg
51 46 47 41  Hungary
52 53 36 34  Saint Lucia
53 35 51 55  Mexico
54 52 45 39  Botswana
55 48 43 50  Armenia
56 66 71 77  Montenegro
57 64 50 44  Antigua and Barbuda
58 71 52 46  Tonga
59 51 44 42  Bulgaria
60 61 57 68  Samoa
61 72 77 83  Panama
62 70 72 72  Poland
63 67 92 87  Ghana
64 63 74 66  Czech Republic
65 88 83 76  Dominica
66 54 38 38  Azerbaijan
67 74 61 52  Kuwait
68 97 81 78  Trinidad and Tobago
69 68 58 82  Belarus
70 44 41 80  Kyrgyzstan
71 65 73 63  Turkey
72 56 55 45  Romania
73 92 91 88  Grenada
74 96 104 96  Solomon Islands
75 75 70 62  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
76 60 59 58  Vanuatu
77 62 54 43  Fiji
78 69 66 54  Namibia
79 85 87 71  Maldives
80 84 103 110  Croatia
81 90 94 108  Moldova
82 82 82 89  Albania
83 112 96 94  Brunei
84 76 90 99  Zambia
85 77 68 59  Bahamas
86 73 60 56  Mongolia
87 80 78 74  Italy
88 81 75 67  Jamaica
89 102 105 97  Sri Lanka
90 124 114 109  Uruguay
91 79 89 86  China
92 89 88 90  Serbia
93 99 80 75  Belize
94 114 128 130  Morocco
95 87 76 70  Saint Kitts and Nevis
96 111 100 104  Jordan
97 101 110 117  Guatemala
98 78 93 91  Vietnam
99 105 99 103  Yemen
100 109 109 100  Greece
101 103 102 95  Papua New Guinea
102 106 124 122  Paraguay
103 95 111 105  Seychelles
104 113 108 101  Lebanon
105 83 85 85  Pakistan
106 108 98 93  Marshall Islands
107 116 123 123  Nepal
108 91 86 102  Dominican Republic
109 98 95 84  Kenya
110 94 106 116  Egypt
111 104 107 111  Ethiopia
112 86 84 81  El Salvador
113 115 118 112  Argentina
114 100 101 98  Guyana
115 93 79 79  Kiribati
116 120 97 92  Palau
117 119 113 107  Kosovo
118 117 117 113  Nicaragua
119 132 146 147  Cape Verde
120 123 120 118  Russia
121 125 121 120  Costa Rica
122 107 119 115  Bangladesh
123 122 112 106  Uganda
124 118 115 114  Swaziland
125 110 116 119  Bosnia and Herzegovina
126 127 129 127  Brazil
127 128 131 126  Tanzania
128 131 141 136  Honduras
129 121 122 129  Indonesia
130 130 138 133  Ecuador
131 135 139 137  West Bank and Gaza
132 134 133 132  India
133 137 125 121  Nigeria
134 144 143 138  Syria
135 154 154 149  Sudan
136 148 144 141  Philippines
137 140 134 144  Madagascar
138 147 145 139  Cambodia
139 126 135 140  Mozambique
140 141 127 125  Federated States of Micronesia
141 143 148 156  Sierra Leone
142 142 126 124  Bhutan
143 138 130 128  Lesotho
144 129 137 142  Iran
145 133 132 131  Malawi
146 153 156 162  Mali
147 139 152 164  Tajikistan
148 136 136 134  Algeria
149 146 140 135  Gambia
150 151 147 155  Burkina Faso
151 155 149 159  Liberia
152 145 142 145  Ukraine
153 149 161 158  Bolivia
154 152 157 152  Senegal
155 164 170 169  Equatorial Guinea
156 156 158 151  Gabon
157 159 162 153  Comoros
158 161 155 148  Suriname
159 165 166 161  Mauritania
160 167 160 168  Afghanistan
161 168 171 167  Cameroon
162 160 165 166  Togo
163 178 180 180  São Tomé and Príncipe
164 166 153 150  Iraq
165 171 167 165  Laos
166 150 150 146  Uzbekistan
167 169 168 163  Côte d'Ivoire
168 174 164 173  Timor-Leste
169 181 176 177  Burundi
170 158 163 157  Djibouti
171 157 159 160  Zimbabwe
172 163 169 170  Angola
173 173 174 174  Niger
174 162 151 154  Haiti
175 170 172 172  Benin
176 176 181 181  Guinea-Bissau
177 172 177 178  Venezuela
178 175 182 182  Democratic Republic of the Congo
179 179 173 171  Guinea
180 180 175 175  Eritrea
181 177 179 179  Republic of the Congo
182 182 183 183  Central African Republic
183 183 178 176  Chad

North Korea, Turkmenistan, Somalia, Libya, Cuba and the disputed territory Western Sahara are not ranked.

[edit] Notes

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages