EdisonLearning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Edison Schools)
Jump to: navigation, search

EdisonLearning Inc., formerly known as Edison Schools Inc., is a for-profit education management organization for public schools in the United States and the United Kingdom. It was founded in 1992 as The Edison Project, largely the brainchild of Chris Whittle. The initial expansion of Edison included the involvement of Tom Ingram (campaign manager and chief of staff to former Tennessee governor and United States Secretary of Education from 1991-1993, Lamar Alexander), Benno C. Schmidt, Jr., John Chubb (political scientist from the Hoover and Brookings Institute), and Chester E. Finn, Jr. (assistant secretary of education to former presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush). Originally founded around the idea of school vouchers, Edison primarily contracts with school districts on the basis of performance partnerships, alliances, and charter school establishment.

EdisonLearning has its headquarters in Midtown Manhattan, New York City.[1]

Approach to Education[edit]

Edison claimed that it could run public schools for less money than school districts could, and that it would improve student achievement while making a profit for its shareholders. Edison attracted ideological support from backers of privatization and school vouchers, including the Wall Street Journal[2] and the Hoover Institution.[3]

Edison Schools work on the principle of being partners with the school district concerned. They are divided into three sub-companies: District Partners, Charter, and Alliance. In addition Edison runs afterschool programmes under the Newton brand and extended school year programmes under the Tungsten brand.

Edison has also made some headway in Britain with Edison Schools UK. Colbayns High School in Essex was the first Edison School in that country, and received praise from OFSTED for its progress over nine months.

Edison Schools bases its approach on ten fundamentals and various core values. The fundamentals include a better use of time (which means a longer school day and a longer school year—189 days as opposed to 180 in the standard American school) and assessments that provide accountability (including benchmark assessments and a structured portfolio and a quarterly learning contract).

Expansion and contraction[edit]

Edison's stock was publicly traded on the NASDAQ for four years. The company reported only one profitable quarter while it was publicly traded.[4] After reaching a high of close to USD$40 per share in early 2001, shares fell to 14 cents. Also in 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged that Edison failed to disclose that as much as 41 percent of its revenue that year consisted of money that it never saw: $154 million. By 2002, Edison was courting Roger Milliken for a possible bailout. The company was eventually taken private in 2003, in a buyout facilitated by Liberty Partners on behalf of the Florida Retirement System, which handles pension investments for the state's public school teachers; The deal valued the company at $180 million[5] or $1.76 per share.[6] The three pension fund trustees at the time that endorsed the deal were: Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, Florida Chief Financial Officer Tom Gallagher, and Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

After losing many contracts,[7] Edison diversified away from the management of public schools and into marketing conventional supplemental services such as testing, summer school and tutoring. Most of its new business involves providing such services rather than trying to manage schools.[8]

In 2008, the School District of Philadelphia, Edison's largest single client with 20 schools (Edison was originally planned to take over the entire district), later announced plans to dismiss the company as a manager, noting that it and other private firms would be eligible to reapply.[9] By June 18 that year, Philadelphia's School Reform Commission voted to seize six schools from outside contractors— four of them run by Edison— citing lack of improvement.[10]

EdisonLearning has not made a profit for the last 4 years and has been relying heavily on Liberty Partners for financial support. Over the last few years, Liberty Partners has replaced the senior leadership in hopes for making the company profitable.

Criticism[edit]

Edison's educational and financial performance has been the subject of criticism. Despite initial promises of costs reductions client districts reported higher costs for their Edison schools.[11] Edison's claims about academic improvement failed to live up to the company's promises. A July 2002 New York Times analysis of Edison's claims found that the troubled Cleveland, Ohio, school system achieved higher gains than Edison's schools when analyzed with the methodology Edison applied to its own schools' achievement.[12]

Edison's methods and processes were mentioned prominently in Alissa Quart's Branded: The Buying and Selling of Teenagers (2003), when some students started a demonstration against an Edison School being built in their area, due to the commercial takeover of their public schools.

Kenneth J. Saltman's The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling and the Assault on Public Education (Routledge, 2005) examines the efficacy of the company and raises questions about the broader social, political, and cultural implications of public schools being run for profit.

In the period the failure of Edison Schools to revolutionize education became apparent, supporters of privatized education have criticized Whittle's for entering contracts with public school districts rather than setting up completely private schools. Writing in the Wall Street Journal in 2005, James K. Glassman stated[13]

Today, instead of owning 1,000 private schools, Edison merely manages 157 public ones.

What happened? Edison had nowhere near the funding to construct such a gigantic enterprise so quickly, and Mr. Whittle and Mr. Schmidt lacked management skills and patience. After early setbacks in starting his private schools, Mr. Whittle decided to switch focus entirely and sought management contracts from urban school boards. With no experience dealing with big-city unions and politicians, Edison blundered into disaster after disaster. "Too often," writes Mr. Whittle, "what rules schools is politics, not grades." He should have recognized that fact earlier and stuck to creating his own low-cost schools.

See also[edit]


References[edit]

  1. ^ Contact Us." EdisonLearning. Retrieved on October 4, 2011. "General Inquiries EdisonLearning, Inc. 485 Lexington Avenue, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10017"
  2. ^ "Holier Than the Children: Big-city liberals put teachers unions first". The Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  3. ^ "Hoover Institution - Education Next - The Philadelphia Experiment". Archived from the original on 2008-05-21. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  4. ^ "Business: Legislators, teachers balk at deal for Edison Schools". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  5. ^ "Edison buyout draws Ire in Florida. - Free Online Library". Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  6. ^ "Edison Schools accepts buyout". Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  7. ^ Cancelled Edison Contracts
  8. ^ "Parents Advocating School Accountability Edison Page". Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  9. ^ "Plan would bolster troubled city schools". Philadelphia Inquirer. 2008-02-15. Archived from the original on 2008-05-21. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  10. ^ Kristen A. Graham (June 18, 2008). "Six Philly schools returning to district in blow to private operators". Philadelphia Inquirer. 
  11. ^ "How Edison Survived". The Nation. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 
  12. ^ Jacques Steinberg and Diana B. Henriques, Complex Calculations on Academics, New York Times, July 16, 2002
  13. ^ Glassman, James K. (2005-09-07). "An Entrepreneur Goes to School". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2008-02-16. 

External links[edit]