Edward Oxford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Contemporary watercolor of Edward Oxford's attempt to assassinate Queen Victoria. Oxford stands in front of the Green Park railings, pointing a pistol at Victoria and the Prince Consort, while a policeman runs towards him. One of the Queen's attendants is on horseback at left.

Edward Oxford (19 April 1822 – 23 April 1900) was the first of eight people who tried to assassinate Queen Victoria.

Early life[edit]

Edward was born in Birmingham in 1822, the third of Hannah Marklew and George Oxford's seven children. His father, a gold chaser, died when he was seven. His mother was able to find work and support the family, which meant Edward was able to attend school both in Birmingham and the Lambeth area of London, where the family moved when he was about 10. When Oxford left school, he first took bar work with his aunt in Hounslow, then in other public houses as a pot boy, or waiter.[1] At the time of the attack he was barely eighteen years old, unemployed, and living with his mother and sister in lodgings in Camberwell, having recently quit his job at the Hog-in-the-Pound in Oxford Street. Since his mother had returned to Birmingham on a regular trip to see family over a month before, Oxford was, in effect, living alone at the time of the event.[2]

The assassination attempt[edit]

On 4 May 1840, he bought a pair of pistols for £2, as well as a gunpowder flask, and began practising in various shooting galleries in Leicester Square, the Strand, and the West End. A week before the attack, he went into a Lambeth shop owned by a former schoolmate named Gray and bought fifty copper percussion caps, and inquired where he could buy some bullets and three-penny's worth of gunpowder.[3] Gray sold him the powder, and told him where he could find the ammunition. On the evening of 9 June he displayed what appeared to be a loaded pistol to several witnesses; when he was asked what he planned to do with it, he refused to say, other than stating that he had been firing at a target.[4]

At about 4 p.m. on 10 June 1840, Oxford took up a position on a footpath at Constitution Hill, near Buckingham Palace. The Queen, who was four months pregnant with her first child (Victoria, Princess Royal) was accustomed to riding out in a phaeton, or low, open horse-drawn carriage, with her husband, Prince Albert in the late afternoon or early evening, with no other escort than two outriders.[5] When the royal couple appeared some two hours later and drew level with him, he fired both pistols in succession, missing both times. He was immediately seized by onlookers and disarmed. Oxford made no attempt to hide his actions, openly declaring: "It was I, it was me that did it."[6]

He was immediately arrested and charged with treason for attempting to assassinate the sovereign. When he was taken into custody at the police station he asked if the Queen was hurt; he was informed she was unharmed. When he was asked if the pistols had been loaded, he said they were. After his arrest, his lodgings were searched and a locked box was found containing a sword and scabbard, two pistol-bags, powder, a bullet-mould, five lead balls, some of the percussion caps bought from Gray,[3] and the intricate rules and proceedings of an imaginary military society called "Young England" (not to be confused with the later conservative political group of the same name), complete with a list of made-up officers and correspondence.[7] Members were to be armed with a brace of pistols, a sword, a rifle and a dagger.[8]

Oxford's trial at the Old Bailey was postponed until 9 July, after a thorough investigation was made of both his background and his possible motives. In spite of his earlier admissions, no bullets could be found at the scene, so that the Crown could not prove that the pistols were, in fact, armed and that he could have harmed anyone. Oxford later claimed that the guns contained only gunpowder.[9]

Oxford appeared to be oblivious for most of the proceedings. The prosecution presented much eyewitness evidence, while the defence case consisted of various family members and friends who testified that Oxford had always seemed of unsound mind, and that both his grandfather and father were alcoholics who had exhibited signs of mental illness. This carried a great deal of weight, as it was thought during this time that both drink and hereditary influence were strong causal factors for insanity. Oxford's mother testified her late husband had been violent and intimidating, and that her son was not only prone to fits of hysterical laughter and emitting strange noises, he had been obsessed with firearms since he was a child. Various eminent pathologists and physicians testified that due to "brain disease" or other factors, such as the shape of his head, Oxford was either a mental imbecile or simply incapable of controlling himself.[10]

Commitment[edit]

The following day, the jury acquitted Oxford, declaring him to be "not guilty by reason of insanity". Like all such prisoners, he was sentenced to be detained "until Her Majesty’s pleasure be known". In effect, this was an indefinite sentence, and the source of the asylum term "pleasure men". Oxford was sent to the State Criminal Lunatic Asylum in Bethlem, Southwark, where he remained as a model patient for the next twenty-four years. During that time he occupied himself by drawing, reading, and learning to play the violin; the Bethlem doctors reported that he could play draughts and chess better than any other patient,[11] He also learnt French, German and Italian to a degree of fluency, acquired some knowledge of Spanish, Greek and Latin, and was employed as a painter and decorator within the confines of the hospital. When he was transferred to Broadmoor Hospital in 1864,[12] the notes taken on his arrival describe him as "apparently sane". He still claimed the pistols he fired at the Queen were not loaded with anything other than powder, and that his attack was fueled not by a desire to injure her, but purely by a desire for notoriety.[13]

Oxford continued to be orderly and well-behaved at Broadmoor, working as a wood grainer and painter. While it was clear to the hospital's governors that Oxford was of sound mind and no longer a threat to society, George Grey, the current Home Secretary ignored the request to order his release. It is possible that since he had been the Judge Advocate General at the time of Oxford's trial, he could have been reluctant to discharge a prisoner he had once had such a vested interest in incarcerating. It was not until three years later that a new Home Secretary offered to discharge Oxford, on the condition that he leave for one of the Empire's overseas colonies, and if he returned to the United Kingdom he would be incarcerated for life.[14]

Later life[edit]

Oxford lived out the rest of his life in Melbourne, Australia. His patient record at Broadmoor includes a letter sent in 1883 by George Haydon, a Steward at Bethlem, to Dr. David Nicolson. It includes an article from The Age, a Melbourne newspaper, which reports that on 4 May 1880, a "John" Oxford, identified as the man who shot at the Queen many years ago, and who had subsequently been a patient in an asylum before he was discharged to Australia, had recently been convicted of stealing a shirt and spent a week in jail. Upon his release, the prison governor requested the police to keep an eye on him, "in consequence of the old man’s eccentric conduct". The police subsequently arrested Oxford for vagrancy, and he was reportedly remanded for further medical examination. There were no further updates to the record.[15] It is not certain that this person was Edward Oxford.

Oxford landed in Melbourne with a new alias, John Freeman. Setting out to reform himself and become a respectable citizen, Freeman became a house painter and joined the West Melbourne Mutual Improvement Society. In 1881 he married a widow with two children, became a church warden at St James, and wrote newspaper articles about the city's slums, markets and racetracks, under the pseudonym "Liber" for The Argus, which became the basis for an 1888 book, Lights and Shadows of Melbourne Life. Freeman died in 1900.

The connection was established by FB Smith's 1987 article "Lights and Shadows in the Life of John Freeman".[16] Freeman wrote several letters to Haydon, beginning in 1888 and apparently ceasing on Haydon's death in 1889. Freeman's wife and stepchildren appear to have been totally ignorant that he might be anyone other than John Freeman. Freeman's correspondence to Haydon was donated to the National Library in the 1950s by the family. Stevens points out that the former Steward contributed nothing more to Oxford's Broadmoor record about his progress beyond the troubling report published in the newspaper, and never confirmed that Oxford was the author of Freeman's book. This may have been because Haydon was departing Bethlem at the time he began receiving the letters.

Aftermath[edit]

Despite the historical precedent of the insanity defense, Queen Victoria represented popular opinion when she remained morally convinced that Oxford and other malefactors who came after him were perfectly cognizant of their actions. She was furious when Daniel M'Naghten, who attempted to assassinate Prime Minister Sir Robert Peel and instead killed his private secretary, was acquitted in 1843. When Roderick McLean attempted to shoot her on the Windsor Railway Platform forty years later and was sent to Broadmoor, her response was to demand of Prime Minister Gladstone that the law be changed to "guilty but insane", to better accommodate her unwavering belief that if Oxford had only been hanged at the outset, his death would have acted as a deterrent to other potential regicides:

Punishment deters not only sane men but also eccentric men, whose supposed involuntary acts are really produced by a diseased brain capable of being acted upon by external influence. A knowledge that they would be protected by an acquittal on the grounds of insanity will encourage these men to commit desperate acts, while on the other hand certainty that they will not escape punishment will terrify them into a peaceful attitude towards others.

Unpublished correspondence of HM Victoria to Prime Minister Gladstone, April 23, 1882 [17]

In fiction[edit]

The Old Curiosity Shop: Waxwork exhibit of a deranged Edward Oxford clutching pistol and pint pot (far right); Queen Victoria, in coronation garb, is in the line of fire at top right.

A contemporary reference to Oxford appears in Charles Dickens' The Old Curiosity Shop, the novel that Dickens was writing during the months before and after the attempted regicide. Although Dickens took a strong interest in the case, Oxford appears not in Dickens’s text, which was serialized in his weekly publication, Master Humphrey's Clock, but in one of the novel's accompanying illustrations, rendered by Hablot K. Browne, popularly known as "Phiz".[18]

In an illustration for Chapter 28, Mrs. Jarley, the proprietress of a waxworks, is shown training the heroine, Little Nell, to be a guide. Although the novel is set some fifteen years before 1840, Browne was no doubt inspired by Madame Tussauds' London waxworks, where the exhibit of Edward Oxford was a star attraction for that year, to create a contemporary reference. His caricature of the would-be assassin as a wide-eyed, imbecilically grinning youth, clutching a flintlock pistol in his right hand and a pot of beer in his left, with a sheet of paper labelled “Young England” spilling out of his pocket, was easily identifiable by anyone at the time. In the direct line of fire behind him sits a calmly serene Queen Victoria, dressed in her 1838 coronation robes and holding the orb and sceptre. While Oxford’s pistol may be pointing in her direction, "Phiz" reassuringly depicts the sovereign as literally far above her attacker, serenely and majestically removed from the lunatic's threat.

Oxford is a major character in Mark Hodder's 2010 novel, The Strange Affair of Spring-Heeled Jack.

In Film[edit]

In 2009 an inaccurate version of the assassination attempt was portrayed in The Young Victoria. While Oxford (played by Josef Altin) is shown firing twice on the royal couple, Prince Albert (Rupert Friend) throws himself in front of Victoria (Emily Blunt) and is wounded by Oxford's second bullet. A scene in which the police search his lodgings and find newspaper illustrations of the royal pair papering the glass skylight was not included the theatrical release.

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ Stevens 2009, p1
  2. ^ Stevens 2009, p1
  3. ^ a b Milton, Giles. "Killing Queen Victoria: How (Not) To Shoot A Monarch". http://surviving-history.blogspot.com.au. Retrieved 6 August 2013. 
  4. ^ The Newgate Calendar
  5. ^ The Newgate Calendar
  6. ^ Stevens 2009, p2
  7. ^ The Newgate Calendar
  8. ^ The Proceedings of the Old Bailey
  9. ^ Charles 2012, p23
  10. ^ Stevens 2009, p4
  11. ^ Stevens 2009, p5.
  12. ^ Broadmoor Hospital case file: Berkshire Record Office D/H14/D2/2/1/96
  13. ^ Stevens 2009, p6
  14. ^ Stevens 2009, p7
  15. ^ Stevens 2009, p8
  16. ^ Smith, 1987
  17. ^ Walker, N., Crime and insanity in England, Volume I: The historical perspective. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 1978, p. 189.
  18. ^ Murphy,2012

References[edit]

Charles, Barrie, Kill the Queen! The Eight Assassination Attempts on Queen Victoria, Amberley Publishing, 2012, ISBN 978-1-4456-0457-2.

Murphy, Paul, Shooting Victoria, Pegasus Books, 2012, ISBN 1605983543, ISBN 978-1605983547.

Smith, F.B, "Lights and Shadows in the Life of John Freeman" Victorian Studies Vol. 30, No. 4 (Summer, 1987), pp. 459–473

Stevens, Mark, Broadmoor Revealed: Some patient stories, Berkshire Record Office, 2009.

Further reading[edit]

  • Sinclair, Jenny, A Walking Shadow: The Remarkable Double Life of Edward Oxford, Arcade Publications, 2012, ISBN 0987239090.
  • Stevens, Mark, Broadmoor Revealed: Victorian Crime and the Lunatic Asylum, Kindle Edition, 2011, ASIN: B005DXFGJE

External links[edit]