# Eisenbud–Levine–Khimshiashvili signature formula

In mathematics, and especially differential topology and singularity theory, the Eisenbud–Levine–Khimshiashvili signature formula gives a way of computing the Poincaré-Hopf index of a real, analytic vector field at an algebraicially isolated singularity.[1][2] It is named after David Eisenbud, Harold Levine, and George Khimshiashvili. Intuitively, the index of a vector field near a zero is the number of times the vector field wraps around the sphere. Because analytic vector fields have a rich algebraic structure, the techniques of commutative algebra can be brought to bear to compute their index. The signature formula expresses the index of an analytic vector field in terms of the signature of a certain quadratic form.

## Nomenclature

Consider the n-dimensional space Rn. Assume that Rn has some fixed coordinate system, and write x for a point in Rn, where x = (x1, …, xn).

Let X be a vector field on Rn. For 1 ≤ kn there exist functions ƒk : RnR such that one may express X as

$X = f_1({\bold x})\,\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1} + \cdots + f_n({\bold x})\,\frac{\partial}{\partial x_n} .$

To say that X is an analytic vector field means that each of the functions ƒk : RnR is an analytic function. One says that X is singular at a point p in Rn (or that p is a singular point of X) if X(p) = 0, i.e. X vanishes at p. In terms of the functions ƒk : RnR it means that ƒk(p) = 0 for all 1 ≤ kn. A singular point p of X is called isolated (or that p is an isolated singularity of X) if X(p) = 0 and there exists an open neighbourhood URn, containing p, such that X(q) ≠ 0 for all q in U, different from p. An isolated singularity of X is called algebraically isolated if, when considered over the complex domain, it remains isolated.[3][4]

Since the Poincaré-Hopf index at a point is a purely local invariant (cf. Poincaré-Hopf theorem), one may restrict one's study to that of germs. Assume that each of the ƒk from above are function germs, i.e. ƒk : (Rn,0) → (R,0). In turn, one may call X a vector field germ.

## Construction

Let An,0 denote the ring of analytic function germs (Rn,0) → (R,0). Assume that X is a vector field germ of the form

$X = f_1({\bold x})\,\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1} + \cdots + f_n({\bold x})\,\frac{\partial}{\partial x_n}$

with an algebraicially isolated singularity at 0. Where, as mentioned above, each of the ƒk are function germs (Rn,0) → (R,0). Denote by IX the ideal generated by the ƒk, i.e. IX = (ƒ1, …, ƒn). Then one considers the local algebra, BX, given by the quotient

$B_X := A_{n,0} / I_X \, .$

The Eisenbud–Levine–Khimshiashvili signature formula gives the index of the vector field X, at 0, by assigning a non-degenerate bilinear form on the local algebra BX. The signature of this non-degenerate bilinear form being equal to the index of X.[2][4][5]

The dimension of BX is finite if and only if the complexification of X has an isolated singularity at 0 in Cn; i.e. X has an algebraically isolated singularity at 0 in Rn.[2] In this case, BX will be a finite dimensional, real algebra.

### Definition of the bilinear form

Using the analytic components of X, one defines another analytic germ F : (Rn,0) → (Rn,0) given by

$F({\bold x}) := (f_1({\bold x}), \ldots, f_n({\bold x})) ,$

for all xRn. Let JFAn,0 denote the determinant of the Jacobian matrix of F with respect to the basis {∂/∂x1, …, ∂/∂xn}. Finally, let [JF] ∈ BX denote the equivalence class of JF, modulo IX. Using ∗ to denote multiplication in BX one is able to define a non-degenerate bilinear form β as follows:[2][4]

$\beta : B_X \times B_X \stackrel{*}{\longrightarrow} B_X \stackrel{\ell}{\longrightarrow} \R; \ \ \beta(g,h) = \ell(g*h) ,$

where $\scriptstyle \ell$ is any linear function such that

$\ell \left( \left[ J_F \right] \right) > 0 .$

As mentioned: the signature of β is exactly the signature of X at 0.

## Example

Consider the case n = 2 of a vector field on the plane. Consider the case where X is given by

$X := (x^3 - 3xy^2) \, \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + (3x^2y - y^3) \, \frac{\partial}{\partial y} .$

Clearly X has an algebraically isolated singularity at 0 since X = 0 if and only if x = y = 0. The ideal IX is given by (x3 − 3xy2, 3x2yy3), and

$B_X = A_{2,0} / (x^3 - 3xy^2, 3x^2y - y^3) \cong \R\langle 1, x, y, x^2, xy, y^2, xy^2, y^3, y^4 \rangle .$

The first step for finding the non-degenerate, bilinear form β is to calculate the multiplication table of BX; reducing each entry modulo IX. Whence

1
x
y
x2
xy
y2
xy2
y3
y4
1
1
x
y
x2
xy
y2
xy2
y3
y4
x
x
x2
xy
3xy3
y3/3
xy2
y4/3
0
0
y
y
xy
y2
y3/3
xy2
y3
0
y4
0
x2
x2
3xy2
y3/3
y4
0
y4/3
0
0
0
xy
xy
y3/3
xy2
0
y4/3
0
0
0
0
y2
y2
xy2
y3
y4/3
0
y4
0
0
0
xy2
xy2
y4/3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
y3
y3
0
y4
0
0
0
0
0
0
y4
y4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Direct calculation shows that JF = 9(x4 + 2x2y2 + y4), and so [JF] = 24y4. Next one assigns values for $\scriptstyle \ell$. One may take

$\ell(1) = \ell(x) = \ell(y) = \ell(x^2) = \ell(xy) = \ell(y^2) = \ell(xy^2) = \ell(y^3) = 0, \ \text{and} \ \ell(y^4) = 3 .$

This choice was made so that $\scriptstyle \ell\left( \left[ J_F \right] \right) \, > \, 0$ as was required by the hypothesis, and to make the calculations involve integers, as aposed to fractions. Applying this to the multiplication table gives the matrix representation of the bilinear form β with respect to the given basis:

$\left[ \begin{array}{ccccccccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right]$

The eigenvalues of this matrix are −3, −3, −1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3 and 4. There are 3 negative eigenvalues (#N = 3), and six positive eigenvalues (#P = 6); meaning that the signature of β is #P − #N = 6 − 3 = +3. It follows that X has Poincaré-Hopf index +3 at the origin.

## Topological verification

With this particular choice of X it is possible to verify the Poincaré-Hopf index is +3 by a direct application of the definition of Poincaré-Hopf index.[6] This is very rarely the case, and was the reason for the choice of example. If one takes polar coordinates on the plane, i.e. x = rcos(θ) and y = rsin(θ) then x3 − 3xy2 = r3cos(3θ) and 3x2yy3 = r3sin(3θ). Restrict X to a circle, centre 0, radius 0 < ε ≪ 1, denoted by C0,ε; and consider the map G : C0,εC0,1 given by

$G: X \longmapsto \frac{X}{||X||} .$

The Poincaré-Hopf index of X is, by definition, the topological degree of the map G.[6] Restricting X to the circle C0,ε, for arbitrarily small ε, gives

$G(\theta) = (\cos(3\theta),\sin(3\theta)) , \,$

meaning that as θ makes one rotation about the circle C0,ε in an anti-clockwise direction; the image G(θ) makes three complete, anti-clockwise rotations about the unit circle C0,1. Meaning that the topological degree of G is +3 and that the Poincaré-Hopf index of X at 0 is +3.[6]

## References

1. ^ Arnold, V. I.; Varchenko, A. N.; Gusein-Zade, S. M. (2009), Singularities of Differentiable Maps: The Classification of Critical Points Caustics, Wave Fronts, Springer, p. 84, ISBN 3-642-05204-5
2. ^ a b c d Brasselet, J. P.; Seade, J.; Suwa, T. (2009), Vector Fields on Singular Varieties, Springer, pp. 123 − 125, ISBN 3-642-05204-5
3. ^ Arnold, V. I. (1978). "Index of a singular point of a vector field, the Petrovskii — Oleinik inequality, and mixed hodge structures". Functional Analysis and Its Applications (Springer New York) 12 (1): 1 − 12. ISSN 0016-2663.
4. ^ a b c Gómex Mont, X.; Mardešić, P. (1997). "The index of a vector field tangent to a hypersurface and the signature of the relative jacobian determinant". Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5 (47): 1523 − 1539.
5. ^ Eisenbud, D.; Levine, H. I. (1977). "An Algebraic Formula for the Degree of a C Map Germ". The Annals of Mathematics 106 (1): 19−38. JSTOR 1971156.
6. ^ a b c Milnor, J. W. (1997), Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-04833-9