|This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
the United Kingdom
An election court is, in United Kingdom election law, a special court convened to hear a petition against the result of a local government or parliamentary election. The court is created to hear the individual case, and ceases to exist when it has made its decision.
The election court is established following the presentation, to the High Court or Court of Session, of an election petition challenging the result of the election. The constitution of the court differs depending on whether the election being challenged is for a seat on a local council or in Parliament. In the case of a parliamentary election, the court comprises two of the High Court or Court of Session judges who are on the rota. In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the judges appoint an experienced barrister as a commissioner to hear the case. In the case of a council election in Scotland, the case is heard by one or more sheriff principals. The Court sits in the parliamentary constituency, or in the local government area, in question. The election court ceases to exist when the case is concluded.
The election court tries the petition without a jury, and has all the powers of the High Court or Court of Session. Witnesses give evidence on oath, and a witness is not excused from answering a question even if the answer would incriminate him, although the answer cannot be used against him in any subsequent criminal proceedings (except in the case of a charge of perjury). The trial itself is preceded by 'the scrutiny' in which the ballot papers are examined by an officer of the court (or, in rare cases, by the court itself) in order to establish a factual basis for the trial. The scrutiny may be attended by the parties and their lawyers, who can make representations to the person carrying out the scrutiny.
After the judges trying a petition against the result of a parliamentary election have determined whether the successful candidate was validly elected or not, they issue a certificate of their decision to the Speaker of the House of Commons. If the two judges disagree as to whether the election is valid, the original result of the election stands. In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the commissioner issues a certificate of their decision to the High Court (in Scotland, the commissioner's determination does not need to be certified to the Court of Session).
In either case, if the election court considers that corrupt practices have taken place during the election, it also issues a report (to the Speaker or the High Court, as the case may be) stating whether it finds any candidate in the election guilty, either personally or by his agents, of corrupt practices. The effect of such a report is that the candidate's election is void (if he had been successful originally), and he is prohibited from holding any elected office for five years; in the case of some corrupt practices he may also be prohibited from voting in any election for the same period.
Recent cases in which election courts have ruled on the validity of elections include local government elections:
- for the Aberman South ward of Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council held on 23 November 1995
- for the Bordesley Green and Aston wards of the Birmingham City Council held on 10 June 2004
- for the Aston ward of Birmingham City Council in May 2007
- for the Central Borough ward of Slough Borough Council held on 3 May 2007.
- for the Leyton ward of Waltham Forest Council in September 2007
- for the Prestatyn North ward of Denbighshire County Council in January 2013 
- for the Maybury and Sheerwater ward of Woking Borough Council held in May 2012
Two election petitions were lodged after the general election on 6 May 2010. The defeated Independent Rodney Connor, who lost in Fermanagh and South Tyrone by four votes has lodged a petition seeking a recount with scrutiny, and the case began on 13 September 2010.
In the Oldham East and Saddleworth constituency, the defeated Liberal Democrat candidate Elwyn Watkins petitioned against the election of Phil Woolas, a former Labour Minister, alleging that the result was affected by false statements of fact about his personal character. The election court which heard the case ordered a re-run of the election in Woolas' constituency after finding him guilty of making false statements against his opponent during the original campaign. Phil Woolas sought a judicial review of the decision in the High Court, but was unsuccessful overall as that court upheld the decision of the election court in relation to two statements, whilst quashing the decision in relation to a third.
- Representation of the People Act 1983 official text at legislation.gov.uk
- Section 123
- Bradley, Anthony; Ewing, Keith (2006). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Longman. pp. 169–170. - limited preview available on Google Books
- Section 130
- Pilkington, Colin (1999). The Politics today companion to the British Constitution. Manchester University Press. p. 59. - limited preview available on Google Books
- Section 134
- Per Robert Goff LJ in R v Cripps ex p Muldoon  1 QB 68, confirmed by the Court of Appeal in "The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner (2010) EWCA Civ 1332". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 23 November 2010. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
- Section 139
- Sections 140-141
- Section 157(2). See also paragraphs 308-309 of the Commissioner's "Judgment in the matters of Local Government elections for the Bordesley Green and Aston Wards of the Birmingham City Council both held on 10th June 2004". HM Courts Service. 4 May 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- Section 144
- Section 145
- Section 158
- Section 159
- Section 160
- Barnett, Hilaire (2004). Constitutional & administrative law. Routledge-Cavendish. p. 361. - limited preview available on Goodle Books
- Section 144(1) and 145(1)
- "R on the application of Woolas v The Parliamentary Election Court and others (2010) EWHC 3169 (Admin)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 3 December 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
- "Court of Appeal decision in re Local government election for the Aberman South Ward of Rhonnda Cynon Taff County Borough Council 1997 EWCA Civ 1512". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 24 April 1997. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- "Judgment in the matters of Local Government elections for the Bordesley Green and Aston Wards of the Birmingham City Council both held on 10th June 2004". HM Courts Service. 4 May 2005. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- "Aehmed v Afzal & Anor 2008 EWHC B5 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 2 April 2008. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- "Simmons v Khan 2008 EWHC B4 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 18 March 2008. Retrieved 1 May 2010. and "The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner & Ors 2010 EWHC 285 (Admin)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 19 February 2010. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
- "Councillor slurred election rival". BBC News. 21 September 2007. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- "Penlington-Pennington Denbighshire vote mix-up reversed". BBC News. 23 January 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
- Finnerty, Joe (29 July 2013). "Councillor guilty of voting fraud". Get Surrey. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
- Saunderson, Sarah (3 June 2010). "Connor asks High Court for election recount". The Impartial Reporter.
- "Election petition submitted to the High Court of Northern Ireland". Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Retrieved 15 September 2010..
- "Notice of Election Court". Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Retrieved 15 September 2010..
- "Losing candidate challenges Oldham election result". BBC. 28 May 2010. Retrieved 2010-05-28.
- Election Petition submitted to the High Court - Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. Parts 2 and 3 includes copies of the election literature challenged. (Oldham Council website, retrieved 30 June 2010)
- "Judges order election re-run in ex-minister's seat". BBC News. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
- "Watkins v Woolas 2010 EWHC 2702 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.