Electoral reform in California
|Elections in California|
Alternate voting systems
In 2002, San Francisco adopted instant-runoff voting in part because of low turnout in its runoff elections. The system is called "Ranked Choice Voting" there. In 2006, Oakland, California passed Measure O, adopting instant runoff voting. Circa 2006, the city council of Davis voted 3-2 to place a measure on the ballot to recommend use of single transferable vote for city elections; the measure was approved by the electorate. The state legislature has approved AB 1294 which if signed by the Governor would codify ranked choice elections in state law and allow general law cities (those without charters) to use these election methods. Californians for Electoral Reform is a non-profit organization which promotes the use of ranked choice voting at all levels of government (city, county, state legislature, school boards, etc.).
Allocation of electoral votes
Currently, California's 55 electoral votes are designated to the candidate winning the statewide popular vote.
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
In 2006, both houses of the California Legislature passed AB 2948, a bill to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and designate California's electoral votes to the ticket winning the popular vote nationwide. Hours before it was scheduled to become law, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it. Assemblyman Tom Umberg indicated he planned to support a ballot initiative, paraphrasing the Governor by saying, "We'll be back." There are also 2 slightly different versions of the Popular Vote Interstate Compact attempting to qualify for the ballot in 2008.
Electors by Congressional district
Republicans proposed a rival reform to allocate electoral votes by Congressional district, similarly to Maine and Nebraska. The California Democratic Party calculated that this would likely result in 22 of California's electoral votes going to the Republican candidate in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election.
In November 2005, the electorate rejected Proposition 77 which called for a panel of three retired judges to draw boundaries for California’s Senate, Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization districts. It had been viewed with suspicion due to its Republican backers. FairVote suggested that independent redistricting would help avoid gerrymandering, but the major reform needed was the replacement of single member districts with multi-member districts. This would make it possible to implement single transferable vote or other proportional representation systems.
In November 2008, voters in California passed Proposition 11 to reform how electoral districts are drawn in the state. The proposition called for a commission of fourteen non-politician voters to draw boundaries for the Senate, Assembly, and Board of Equalization districts. The commission is to be made up of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four commissioners from neither major party.
In November 2010, Proposition 20 was passed, which put the commission in charge of drawing United States House of Representatives districts in California.
Nonpartisan blanket primaries
In the June 2010 elections, voters approved Proposition 14, establishing the nonpartisan blanket primary as the election method for state and federal offices except for local, non-partisan, and presidential elections.
Expansion of the electorate
In California, voting rights are restored to felons automatically after release from prison and discharge from parole. Probationers may vote. Prior to 1978, only persons who had a certified medical excuse, or who could demonstrate that they would be out of town on Election Day, were allowed to vote absentee. Today, any voter may vote absentee. In 2004, State Sen. John Vasconcellos (D-Santa Clara) proposed a youth suffrage constitutional amendment called Training Wheels for Citizenship that would give 14-year-olds a quarter vote, 16-year-olds a half vote, and 17-year-olds a full vote.
- Electoral reform in the United States
- California Counts
- For the effects of Open Primaries and Neutral Party Redistricting upon the 2012 General ELection results, see Politics_of_California#California_delegation_to_the_U._S._House_of_Representatitives
- NYC, meet IRV, Clinton Hendler, Sept. 21, 2005.
- Oakland Adopts Instant Runoff Voting, Davina Attar and Adithya Sambamurthy, UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism, November 7, 2006.
- Campaign 2006 and Bringing Instant Runoff Voting to the Tipping Point, Rob Richie, November 3, 2006.
- AB 1294, An act to add Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 10050) to Part 1 of Division 10 of the Elections Code, relating to elections, California Legislature.
- California Secretary of State - Elections & Voter Information - Initiative Update
- California initiative proposed to divvy up electoral votes, Scott Shepard, Cox News Service, Aug. 19, 2007.
- STOP the Republican "Steal the State" Plot, California Democratic Party.
- Proposition 77 Fails - But Voters Still Want Reform, FairVote.
- John Wildermuth (2008-11-27). "Redistricting victory a big win for governor". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-03-16.
- Felony Disenfranchisement Laws, Brennan Center.
- California Ponders Letting 14-year-olds Vote, Robert Longley.
- Californians consider granting 14-year-olds the right to vote, Bobby Caina Calvan, Boston Globe, April 25, 2004.