Elwha Dam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Elwha Dam (also known as the lower dam)
Elwha Dam.jpg
Elwha Dam in 2005
Location Clallam County, Washington, USA
Construction began 1910
Opening date 1913
Demolition date 2012
Dam and spillways
Impounds Elwha River
Height 105 ft (33 m)
Elwha River Hydroelectric Power Plant
Nearest city Port Angeles, Washington
Area 3.5 acres (1.4 ha)
Built 1911
Architectural style Other, Concrete gravity dam
Governing body Private
MPS Hydroelectric Power Plants in Washington State, 1890--1938 MPS
NRHP Reference # 88002741[1]
Added to NRHP December 15, 1988

The Elwha Dam was a 108-ft (33 m) high dam located in the United States, in the state of Washington, on the Elwha River approximately 4.9 miles (7.9 km) upstream from the mouth of the river on the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The dam was built under the direction of Thomas Aldwell. Aldwell previously bought up tracts of land around the river, and with the help of Canadian financier George Glines, began construction of the Elwha Dam in 1910.

Aldwell and his contractors cut corners on constructing the dam, including not building fish passages and did not secure it to the bedrock.[2] Thus, in 1912, as the reservoir filled behind the nearly completed dam, the lower sections of the dam gave way and a torrent of water headed downstream, taking out a bridge. Aldwell was able to get funding for reconstructing the dam and it was completed in 1913. The reservoir that filled the valley behind was known as Lake Aldwell. The dam was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1988.[3]

Initially, along with the Glines Canyon Dam, which was completed in 1926, it helped to fuel economic growth and development for the Olympic Peninsula and the community of Port Angeles, Washington. However, today the combined power output of both dams only provides the equivalent of 38% of the electricity needed to operate one paper mill, the Daishowa America mill.[citation needed]

Lacking passage for migrating salmon, its construction blocked access by anadromous salmonids to the upper 38 miles (48 km) of mainstem habitat and more than 30 miles (48 km) of tributary habitat.[citation needed] The salmon runs that once numbered more than 400,000 adult returns in over 70 miles (110 km) of available habitat, now number less than 4,000 adult returns on only 4.9 miles (7.9 km) of available habitat.[citation needed]

The "Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act of 1992" authorized the US Federal Government to acquire the Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam hydroelectric power projects for decommissioning and demolition for habitat restoration. Work is under way on the Elwha Ecosystem Restoration project, with actual dam removal started on September 27, 2011. The dam was fully removed and the Elwha River flowed freely through the site by March 2012.

Effects of dam on river habitat[edit]

Since the construction of the dams, the lower reach of the river has seen a drastic decrease in sediment delivery. This has led to a net erosion of the riverbed, including the gravels needed to create suitable habitats for spawning. Replacement gravel has been trapped in the sediment load behind the dams.[4] These gravels are considered an essential resource for restoration of salmon habitats.[5] The delta at the mouth of the river, where it enters the Strait of Juan de Fuca, has also seen a net erosion effect, confirmed by local tribal leaders.[4]

Another effect of damming is the creation of Lake Aldwell and Lake Mills. These lakes have a multitude of impacts on the river beyond sediment retention. Because the water stays in the lake for so long, it warms up to approximately 16 °C.[6] Normal water temperatures are around 0 °C.[7] These higher temperatures are unnatural for spawning fish, which prefer colder ocean temperature waters. This increase in temperature also increases parasite populations.[4] Disease has been known to wipe out two thirds of a spawning population, before it has a chance to spawn.[4] The lakes also act as buffers for high and low flow conditions. While the dams are not actively used for flood control, the reservoirs behind them alter the natural flow patterns of the river. The normal seasonal high and low flow are evened out by the reservoirs and dams so that flow is relatively constant throughout the year. Natural flow patterns are known to promote the health of native species and to help eliminate non native species after dam removal.[8]

History of the Elwha fishery[edit]

Restoration prospects for various species of fish in the Elwha River. Prospects are presented for the different options and degrees of dam removal or fish bypass plans. Shows that removal of both dams results in the best prospects for all types of fish.[4]

At its peak, the Elwha supported spawning runs of Chinook, Coho, Chum, Pink, and Sockeye Salmon as well as Steelhead, Cutthroat, and Bull Trout. The Chinook were known to reach sizes of 45 kg. Sockeye, Chinook, Chum, and Pink Salmon are all currently thought to be extinct or nearly extinct in the Elwha. Leaving one or both of the dams in place, even with modern fish passage systems, would not result in a dramatic recovery of species due to other factors like water temperature, gravel beds, etc. which would still have negative effects on the fish species (see Table 1). The most valuable spawning habitats are located far upstream from the Glines Canyon dam, so it still acts as a major barrier to the recovery of the runs. Removal of the dams is thus considered the only viable option for full restoration of the river and habitat.

Dam removal[edit]

The dam under deconstruction, September 2011.
The progression of reclamation of 715 acres (2.9 km2) of vegetation habitat currently covered by the lakes. The river channel restores itself to a natural state as does the vegetation. Prior to dam removal, upstream waters are depleted in nutrients, impounded waters increase in temperature, and downstream waters are depleted in sediments and woody debris.[9]
Elwha river and dam locations

The Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act of 1992 created funding and government support for mitigation of the dams on the Elwha. While fish ladders were proposed as a possibility, they were ultimately ruled out for the reasons above. The major problem raised with regard to removal of the two dams is the approximately 34 million cubic yards of sediment that has built up behind the dams.[10] Of that 34 million, 28 million is behind the Glines Canyon Dam, while 6 million is behind the Elwha Dam. Releasing all of this sediment at once would have devastating effects on the remaining habitats downstream from the dams, as well as along beaches at the coast. A drawdown experiment was conducted on the Glines Canyon Dam to assess the erosion of the sediments from Lake Mills.[11] The lake was drawn down 18 feet (5.5 m) over one week and then allowed to remain stable for one more week. This test showed that the river would rapidly cut into the existing delta as soon as the lake level dropped, creating a deep, narrow channel. A new delta immediately began to form at the new lake level. Once the lake level was held steady, the channel migrated laterally along the existing delta. This test resulted in a sediment erosion model in which gradual drawdown of the lake would result in a greatly decreased sediment load downstream. Using this model, the plan is to drain the lake gradually over a two year time period, allowing much of the sediment to remain in the old lake basin.

After the two year dam removal period, the river will begin to restore itself to natural conditions. Sediment discharge rates will increase, resulting in restored and rejuvenated habitats downstream from the dams. Fish will return to the upper reaches of the Elwha as quickly as a year after dam removal is complete.[12] While the river may never return to historically large runs, after 15–20 years or more, there may be the recovery of salmon to some sort of “pre-dam” condition.[4] In addition to restoring the fish habitats, the draining of Lake Mills and Lake Aldwell will create an additional 715 acres (2.9 km2) of terrestrial vegetation, improving elk habitats as well [8] (Figure 1). Increased sediments loads are also predicted to help restore the retreating delta at the mouth of the Elwha.

Removal of the dams on the Elwha River has been a long, ongoing process. It appears now that the end is relatively near. Removal started on September 27, 2011.[13] Once the removal is complete, there is uncertainty about what exactly happens next. Because so few dam removal projects have been accompanied by scientific study, perhaps fewer than 20,[12] this project will be a model of the effectiveness of dam removal on this scale. If it is successful, there could be a movement towards the restoration of natural stream morphology through the removal of larger dams, although the results may not be apparent for some time. Most fish populations are expected to make a return to the river (Table 1). While fish may return to the river as soon as a year after the removal is complete,[12] it may take 15 to 20 years for the river to fully return to its pre-dam conditions.[4] The ultimate goal of the dam removal is restoring the river to a nearly pristine state.

Increased Sediment Load Following Demolition[edit]

As predicted, the sediment load from the point of dam demolition to the river mouth has increased dramatically resulting in turbidity much higher than what was originally predicted. The increased sediment load negatively effected drinking water intakes and associated facilities for the city of Port Angeles. The city has been placed into a position of having to rely on its one deep fresh water well to supply drinking water to residents. The increased sediment load has also had a deleterious effect on aquatic flora decreasing the carrying capacity of the river to support aquatic wildlife. Bank erosion and river sedimentation caused by higher turbidity differs considerably from what was experienced for decades prior to dam removal.

It has been estimated that the removal of the dams will cost $350 million.

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. 2010-07-09. 
  2. ^ Lichatowich, Jim; Lichatowich, James A. (2001). Salmon Without Rivers: A History of the Pacific Salmon Crisis. Island Press. pp. 132–135. ISBN 978-1-55963-361-1. Retrieved 23 October 2011. 
  3. ^ "National Register of Historical Places record for Elwha River Hydroelectric Power Plant". Retrieved 2012-06-17. 
  4. ^ a b c d e f g Wunderlich, 1994
  5. ^ Bureau of Reclamation, 1996
  6. ^ USGS, 2005
  7. ^ USGS 2005
  8. ^ a b American Rivers, 2002
  9. ^ Hart et al. 2002
  10. ^ Randle, 2012
  11. ^ Randle, 2001
  12. ^ a b c Hart et al., 2002
  13. ^ nps.gov

References[edit]

  • Wunderlich, R. C., B. D. Winter, and J. H. Meyer. 1994. Restoration of the Elwha River ecosystem. Fisheries 19, no. 8:11-20.
  • U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 1996. Sediment Analysis And Modeling Of The River Erosion Alternative. Elwha Technical Series, PN-95-9.
  • USGS. 2005. Hoko, Elwha, and Dungeness River Basins. http://pubs.usgs.gov/wdr/2005/wdr-wa-05-1/pdf/wa00103ADR2005_Figure14.pdf
  • American Rivers (Organization). 2002. The ecology of dam removal: a summary of benefits and impacts. Washington, DC: American Rivers.
  • Proceedings of the Seventh Federal interagency sedimentation conference. United States (USA):2001.
  • Hart, D. D., et al. 2002. Dam Removal: Challenges and Opportunities for Ecological Research and River Restoration. Bioscience 52, no. 8:669-682.
  • National Park Service. Elwha River Projected Timeline. http://www.nps.gov/archive/olym/elwha/history.htm

External links[edit]

Coordinates: 48°5′42″N 123°33′23″W / 48.09500°N 123.55639°W / 48.09500; -123.55639