En passant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
en passant

En passant (from French: in passing) is a move in the board game of chess.[1] It is a special pawn capture which can occur immediately after a player moves a pawn two squares forward from its starting position, and an enemy pawn could have captured it had the same pawn moved only one square forward. The opponent captures the just-moved pawn as if taking it "as it passes" through the first square. The resulting position is the same as if the pawn had moved only one square forward and the enemy pawn had captured normally.

The en passant capture must be done on the very next turn, or the right to do so is lost.[2] Such a move is the only occasion in chess in which a piece captures but does not move to the square of the captured piece. If an en passant capture is the only legal move available, it must be made. En passant capture is a common theme in chess compositions.

This rule was added in the 15th century when the rule giving pawns the option of initially moving two squares was introduced. It prevents a pawn from using the two-square advance to pass an adjacent enemy pawn without the risk of being captured.

Contents


The rule [edit]

A pawn on its fifth rank may capture an enemy pawn on an adjacent file that has moved two squares in a single move, as if the pawn had moved only one square. The conditions are:

  • the capturing pawn must be on its fifth rank
  • the captured pawn must be on an adjacent file and move two squares in a single move (i.e. a double-step move)
  • the capture can only be done immediately after the opposing pawn makes the double-step move (if not done then, the right to capture it en passant is lost)
Example of en passant
Black to move
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 8
7 black pawn 7
6 cross 6
5 white pawn 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
The black pawn is on its initial square. If it moves to f6 (marked by ×), the white pawn could capture it.
White to move
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 8
7 7
6 cross 6
5 white pawn black pawn 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
Black moved his pawn forward two squares in a single move from f7 to f5, "passing" f6.
Black to move
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 8
7 7
6 white pawn 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
White captures en passant in response, capturing the pawn as if it had moved only one square to f6.

Such a move is the only occasion in chess in which a piece captures but does not move to the square of the captured piece.[3]:463

Examples [edit]

Petrov's Defence
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook b8 black knight c8 black bishop d8 black queen e8 black king f8 black bishop h8 black rook 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn c7 black pawn d7 black circle f7 black pawn g7 black pawn h7 black pawn 7
6 d6 cross 6
5 d5 black pawn e5 white pawn 5
4 d4 white queen e4 black knight 4
3 f3 white knight 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 white pawn c2 white pawn f2 white pawn g2 white pawn h2 white pawn 2
1 a1 white rook b1 white knight c1 white bishop e1 white king f1 white bishop h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
Black just played 5...d7–d5. White's e5-pawn may capture en passant.

In the opening [edit]

There are some examples of en passant in chess openings. In this line from Petrov's Defence, White can capture the pawn on d5 en passant on his sixth move.

1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. d4 exd4
4. e5 Ne4
5. Qxd4 d5 (diagram)
6. exd6 [4]:124–125.

Another example occurs in the French Defense after 1.e4 e6 2.e5, a move once advocated by Wilhelm Steinitz.[5]:2 If Black responds with 2...d5, White can capture the pawn en passant with 3.exd6. Likewise, White can answer 2...f5 with 3.exf6.

Steinitz vs. Fleissig, 1882
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook b8 black knight c8 black bishop d8 black queen e8 black king f8 black bishop g8 black knight h8 black rook 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn c7 black pawn f7 black pawn g7 black pawn h7 black pawn 7
6 d6 white pawn e6 black pawn 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 white pawn c2 white pawn d2 white pawn f2 white pawn g2 white pawn h2 white pawn 2
1 a1 white rook b1 white knight c1 white bishop d1 white queen e1 white king f1 white bishop g1 white knight h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
After 3.exd6 e.p.

An example is from this game by Steinitz and Bernhard Fleissig.[6]

1.e4 e6
2.e5 d5
3.exd6 e.p.

Unusual examples [edit]

Gundersen vs. Faul, 1928
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook c8 black bishop d8 black queen f8 black rook 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn e7 black knight g7 black pawn 7
6 e6 black pawn g6 black king 6
5 d5 black pawn e5 white pawn f5 black pawn g5 white knight 5
4 b4 black bishop d4 black knight g4 white queen h4 white pawn 4
3 c3 white knight 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 white pawn f2 white pawn g2 white pawn 2
1 a1 white rook c1 white bishop e1 white king h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
Position after 12...f7–f5
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook c8 black bishop d8 black queen f8 black rook 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn e7 black knight 7
6 e6 white knight h6 black king 6
5 d5 black pawn e5 white pawn f5 black pawn g5 black pawn h5 white pawn 5
4 b4 black bishop d4 black knight g4 white queen 4
3 c3 white knight 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 white pawn f2 white pawn g2 white pawn 2
1 a1 white rook c1 white bishop e1 white king h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
After 14...g7–g5. White mates by taking the pawn en passant.

Black has just moved his pawn from f7 to f5 in this game between Gunnar Gundersen and Albert H. Faul.[7] White could capture the f-pawn en passant with his e-pawn, but had a different idea:

13. h5+ Kh6
14. Nxe6+

Note that the bishop on c1 effects the check, via a discovered check. 14...Kh7 results in 15.Qxg7#.

14... g5
15. hxg6e.p.#

The en passant capture and discovered checks place Black in checkmate (from White's rook on h1, even without help from White's bishop).

The largest known number of en passant captures in one game is three, shared by three games; in none of them were all three captures by the same player. The earliest known example is a 1980 game between Alexandru Sorin Segal and Karl Heinz Podzielny.[8]:98–99[9]

Kenneth S. Howard, 1938
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 white bishop f8 black knight 8
7 d7 black pawn e7 black pawn f7 black pawn 7
6 b6 white knight c6 black pawn e6 black king h6 white knight 6
5 c5 white pawn e5 white pawn 5
4 c4 black pawn e4 black pawn h4 black pawn 4
3 g3 white bishop 3
2 d2 white pawn f2 white pawn 2
1 a1 white queen e1 white rook g1 white king 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
White mates in three

In chess compositions [edit]

En passant captures have often been used as a theme in chess compositions, as they "produce striking effects in the opening and closing of lines".[10]:106 In the 1938 composition by Kenneth S. Howard, the key move 1.d4 introduces the threat of 2.d5+ cxd5 3.Bxd5#. Black may capture the d4-pawn en passant in either of two ways:

  • The capture 1...exd3e.p. shifts the e4-pawn from the e- to the d-file, preventing an en passant capture after White plays 2.f4. To stop the threatened mate (3.f5#), Black may advance 2...f5, but this allows White to play 3.exf6e.p. with checkmate due to the decisive opening of the e-file.
  • If Black plays 1...cxd3e.p., White exploits the newly opened a2–g8 diagonal with 2.Qa2+ d5 3.cxd6e.p.#

Historical context [edit]

Allowing the en passant capture is one of the last major rule changes in European chess that occurred between 1200 and 1600, together with the introduction of the two-square first move for pawns, castling, and the unlimited range for queens and bishops.[11]:14,16,57 Spanish master Ruy López de Segura gives the rule in his 1561 book Libro de la invencion liberal y arte del juego del axedrez.[12]:108 In most places the en passant rule was adopted as soon as the rule allowing the pawn to move two squares on its first move, but it was not universally accepted until the Italian rules were changed in 1880.[4]:124-125

The motivation for en passant was to prevent the newly added two-square first move for pawns from allowing a pawn to evade capture by an enemy pawn.[11]:16. Asian chess variants, because of their separation from European chess prior to that period, do not feature any of these moves.

Notation [edit]

In either algebraic or descriptive chess notation, en passant captures are sometimes denoted by "e.p." or similar, but such notation is not required. In algebraic notation, the move is written as if the captured pawn just advanced only one square, e.g., bxa3 (or bxa3e.p.) in this example.[12]:216

Threefold repetition and stalemate [edit]

The possibility of an en passant capture has an effect on claiming a draw by threefold repetition. Two positions whose pieces are all on the same squares, with the same player to move, are considered different if there was an opportunity to make an en passant capture in the first position, because that opportunity by definition no longer exists the second time the same configuration of pieces occurs.[13]:27

In his book about chess organization and rules, International Arbiter Kenneth Harkness wrote that it is frequently asked if an en passant capture must be made if it is the only move to get out of stalemate.[14]:49 This point was debated in the 19th century, with some arguing that the right to make an en passant capture is a "privilege" that one cannot be compelled to exercise. In his 1860 book Chess Praxis, Howard Staunton wrote that the en passant capture is mandatory in that instance. The rules of chess were amended to make this clear.[8] Today, it is settled that the player must make that move (or resign). The same is true if an en passant capture is the only move to get out of check.[14]:49

See also [edit]

References [edit]

  1. ^ Brace, Edward (1977), "en passant", An Illustrated Dictionary of Chess, Craftwell, ISBN 1-55521-394-4 
  2. ^ FIDE rules (En Passant is rule 3.7, part d)
  3. ^ Burgess, Graham (2000), The Mammoth Book of Chess (2nd ed.), Carroll & Graf, ISBN 978-0-7867-0725-6 
  4. ^ a b Hooper, David; Whyld, Kenneth (1992), "en passant", The Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-866164-9 
  5. ^ Minev, Nikolay (1998), The French Defense 2: New and Forgotten Ideas, Thinkers' Press, ISBN 0-938650-92-0 
  6. ^ Steinitz vs. Fleissig, 1882
  7. ^ Gundersen vs. Faul. ChessGames.com. Retrieved on 2009-06-12.
  8. ^ a b Winter, Edward (1999), Stalemate, Chesshistory.com, retrieved 2009-06-12 
  9. ^ A. Segal vs. K. Podzielny, Dortmund 1980. Published by 365Chess.com. Retrieved on 2009-12-05.
  10. ^ Howard, Kenneth S. (1961), How to Solve Chess Problems (2nd ed.), Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-20748-3, retrieved 2009-11-30 
  11. ^ a b Davidson, Henry (1949), A Short History of Chess (1981 paperback ed.), McKay, ISBN 0-679-14550-8 
  12. ^ a b Golombek, Harry (1977), "en passant, capture", Golombek's Encyclopedia of Chess, Crown Publishing, ISBN 0-517-53146-1 
  13. ^ Schiller, Eric (2003), Official Rules of Chess (2nd ed.), Cardoza, ISBN 978-1-58042-092-1 
  14. ^ a b Harkness, Kenneth (1967), Official Chess Handbook, McKay, ISBN 1-114-15703-1 
  • Just, Tim; Burg, Daniel B. (2003), U.S. Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess (5th ed.), McKay, ISBN 0-8129-3559-4 
  • Winter, Edward (2006), Chess Facts and Fables, McFarland, ISBN 0-7864-2310-2