Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the nuclear power station in Trino Vercellese, Italy, see Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Plant (Italy).
Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station
Fermi NPP.jpg
The Fermi Station (NRC image)
Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station is located in Michigan
Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station
Location of Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station in USA Michigan
Country United States
Location Newport, Michigan
Coordinates 41°57′46″N 83°15′27″W / 41.96278°N 83.25750°W / 41.96278; -83.25750Coordinates: 41°57′46″N 83°15′27″W / 41.96278°N 83.25750°W / 41.96278; -83.25750
Status Operational
Commission date Unit 1: 1957
Unit 2: January 23, 1988
Decommission date Unit 1: Shutdown in September 22, 1972 & decommissioned in December 31, 1975
Owner(s) DTE Energy
Operator(s) DTE Energy
Nuclear power station
Reactor type BWR-4 (Unit 2)
Reactor supplier General Electric
Power generation
Units operational 1198 MW (Unit 2)
Units planned 1550 MW (Unit 3)
Units decommissioned 69 MW (Unit 1)
Annual generation 8,314 GWh

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on the shore of Lake Erie near Monroe, in Frenchtown Charter Township, Michigan on approximately 1,000 acres. All units of the plant are operated by the DTE Energy Electric Company and owned (100 percent) by parent company DTE Energy. It is approximately halfway between Detroit, Michigan, and Toledo, Ohio. It is also visible from parts of Amherstburg and Colchester, Ontario as well as on the shore of Lake Erie in Ottawa County, Ohio. Two units have been constructed on this site. The first unit's construction started in August 4, 1956 and reached initial criticality in August 23, 1963, and the second unit received its construction permit in September 26, 1972. It reached criticality (head on) in June 21, 1985 and was declared commercial in November 18, 1988. The plant is connected to two single-circuit 345 kV Transmission Lines and 3 120 kV lines. They are operated and maintained by ITC Transmission.

The plant is named after the Italian nuclear physicist Enrico Fermi, most noted for his work on the development of the first nuclear reactor as well as many other major contributions to nuclear physics. Fermi won the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on induced radioactivity.

On October 5, 1966, Fermi 1, a prototype fast breeder reactor, suffered a partial fuel meltdown, although no radioactive material was released. After repairs it was shut down by 1972.[1]

On August 8, 2008, John McCain was taken on a 45-minute tour of the plant, becoming the first actively campaigning presidential candidate to visit a nuclear plant.[2]

Fermi 1[edit]

The 69 MWe prototype fast breeder reactor Fermi 1 unit was under construction and development at the site from 1956 to 1963. Initial criticality was achieved on August 23, 1963. On October 5, 1966 Fermi 1 suffered a partial fuel meltdown. Two of the 92 fuel assemblies were partially damaged. According to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, there was no abnormal radioactivity release to the environment.[3]

Fermi 1 was a liquid metal (sodium) cooled fast breeder reactor design. It was capable of producing 200 megawatts thermal (MWt) power or 69 MW electrical power with 26% enriched metallic uranium fuel. The enriched uranium section of the reactor (core) was a 30 inch in diameter cylinder by 30 inches high and contained 92 fuel assemblies. The core was surrounded by 548 additional assemblies containing depleted uranium. These assemblies were about 2.5 inches square by about 8 feet tall. Only the core section contained the enriched uranium while depleted uranium was placed above and below within the assemblies. The core also contained 2 control rods and 8 safety rods. The plant was designed for 430 MWt and 125 MWe using a newer uranium oxide fuel, but the plant was closed before the fuel was ever ordered.

The shield plug was a rotating part of the inner reactor vessel and sat over the fuel. It could be rotated in order to facilitate fuel movements. The shield plug also provided radioactive shielding. During fuel loading, new assemblies were lowered down a tube into an adjacent Transfer Rotor which was integral with the reactor vessel. Then an Offset Handling Mechanism lifted the assembly from the Transfer Rotor and placed it into the vessel. Once all of the assemblies were loaded, a Hold Down Mechanism sat atop them so as to prevent them from moving upwards during operation. The Hold Down Mechanism also contained temperature measuring devices (resistance temperature detectors) to monitor sodium outlet temperatures from the assemblies.

The (primary) sodium which flowed through the core exchanged heat with a secondary sodium system which then exited the containment. The secondary sodium then passed through the tube side of 3 parallel steam generators and transferred heat to water on the shell side. The “once through” design produced superheated steam which turned the main turbine-generator.

A 168 MWe oil fired boiler was added in 1966 to utilize the turbine-generator during periods when the reactor was not producing power.

The main cause of the partial meltdown was due to a temperature increase caused by a blockage in one of the lower support plate orifices that allowed the flow of liquid sodium into the reactor. The blockage caused an insufficient amount of coolant to enter the fuel assembly; this was not noticed by the operators until the core temperature alarms sounded. Several fuel rod subassemblies reached high temperatures of around 700 °F (370 °C) (with an expected range near 580 °F, 304 °C), causing them to melt.[3]

Following an extended shutdown that involved fuel replacement, repairs to vessel, and cleanup, Fermi 1 restarted in July 1970 and reached full power. Due of lack of funds and aging equipment it was finally decided to shut down permanently on November 27, 1972. It was officially decommissioned December 31, 1975 under the definition of the Atomic Energy Commission. Later, the Nuclear Energy Commission replaced the AEC and under their new definitions, Fermi was re-designated as being in SAFSTOR due to some remaining radioactivity at the site. On May 16, 1996, decommissioning was restarted. However, by November 2011 with very little activity remaining, a decision was made to halt further work. It is currently in SAFSTOR . [3]

A number of accounts of the accident are available. One book is Fermi-1 New Age for Nuclear Power[4] and published by the American Nuclear Society in 1979. A fictional book, We Almost Lost Detroit, was written by local Detroit newsman John Grant Fuller (subtitled "This Is Not A Novel").[5] The song "We Almost Lost Detroit", by Gil Scott-Heron is also about the Fermi 1 meltdown.[6] The book Normal Accidents, written by Yale professor Charles Perrow, describes this accident in more detail. A 44 page booklet, "We Did Not Almost Lose Detroit" was issued in May 1976 with very little circulation. It was written by Earl M. Page, a famous nuclear Physicist who worked on the Fermi 1 project.

Fermi 2[edit]

Fermi 2 is a 1,150 MWe General Electric boiling water reactor owned and operated by DTE Energy. Plans to build it was announced in July 1968. It began commercial operation in January 23, 1988.[7]

The reactor vessel holds 764 fuel assemblies and 185 control rods which modulate the power. The fuel assemblies are about 6 inches square by about 12 feet long. The turbine generator is an English Electric unit, but the company changed it's name to General Electric Company later. Water flowing through the reactor vessel changes to saturated steam and then travels to the main turbine-generator to produce electricity. After that, the steam drops into a main condenser where it reverts back to water and is recycled. A secondary loop of water which enters the tube side of the condenser is non-radioactive. It flows to two large cooling towers which stand 400 feet tall where the hot water is cooled by natural circulation with ambient air. This is a closed loop with only a small amount of make-up water needed from Lake Erie to replace any evaporation.

Two 345,000 volt lines send power to the customers. In an emergency, those same lines can be used to supply electricity to the site to run various equipment. Three additional 120,000 volt lines from the old Fermi 1 plant are also available to supply any needed back-up power. Additionally, 4 emergency generators and 5 other generators are available on site to provide any electricity if needed.

Fermi 3[edit]

The original Fermi 3 project was to be a companion unit identical to Fermi 2. It was ordered in 1972 and cancelled in 1974. See DOE data page 67 and WNA Fermi 3 data.

In September 2008, Detroit Edison filed an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) for a third reactor.[8] The new unit is supposed to be built on the same site, slightly to the southwest of Fermi 2. The reactor design selected is the 1,550 MWe GE-designed passive Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR). Review of the 17,000-page application could take four years, after which construction could take six years. The cost is estimated at as much as $10 billion.[9] CEO Anthony Earley said that DTE's analysis "so far shows that nuclear power will, over the long term, be the most cost-effective baseload option for our customers, ... We expect nuclear to remain the low-cost option, but we will continue to evaluate nuclear against other resources and will commit to proceeding with construction only at the right time and at the right cost".[10]

In March 2009, a coalition of citizen groups asked federal regulators to reject plans for Fermi 3, contending that it would pose a range of threats to public health and the environment. The groups have filed 14 contentions with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, claiming that a new plant would pose "radioactive, toxic and thermal impacts on Lake Erie's vulnerable western basin."[11][12]

In May 2015, The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced it would issue a combined construction and operating license for Fermi 3. However, there were no plans for construction at that time. [13]

Seismic risk[edit]

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Fermi was 1 in 238,095 (less than those of Three Mile Island), according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[14][15]

Reactor data[edit]

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station consist of one operational reactor, one closed unit and one additional is planned.

Reactor Unit[16] Reactor Type Electrical Generation Capacity Construction Start Initial Criticality Commercial Operation Start Permanent Shutdown
Net Gross
Fermi 1 LMFBR 60 MW 69 MW 8/8/1956 8/23/1963 7/8/1966 11/29/1972
Fermi 2 BWR-4 1152 MW 1198 MW 9/26/1972 7/2/1985 1/23/1988
Fermi 3 (planned)[17] ESBWR 1490 MW 1550 MW

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/enrico-fermi-atomic-power-plant-unit-1.html
  2. ^ NucNet. McCain Reiterates Support For Nuclear During Enrico Fermi Visit. August 8, 2008.
  3. ^ a b c NRC "Fermi, Unit 1", NRC Website, 3 February 2011, accessed 17 March 2011.
  4. ^ ISBN 0-89448-017-0
  5. ^ Originally published 1975 by Reader's Digest Press, republished 1984 by Berkley, ISBN 0-425-06700-9
  6. ^ Spignesi, Stephen J. (December 1, 2004). Catastrophe!: The 100 Greatest Disasters Of All Time. Citadel Press. p. 304. ISBN 978-0806525587. 
  7. ^ NRC "Fermi, Unit 2", NRC Website, 13 January 2011, accessed 17 March 2011.
  8. ^ "Fermi, Unit 3 Application". U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2008-09-19. Retrieved 2008-09-19. 
  9. ^ Lam, Tina (2008-09-19). "DTE applies for another nuclear plant". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved 2008-09-19. [dead link]
  10. ^ Dolley, Steven (2008-09-18). "Detroit Edison files with NRC for license to build new nuke unit". Platts Nucleonics Week (McGraw-Hill). Retrieved 2008-09-19. 
  11. ^ Groups petition against new nuclear plant
  12. ^ Fermi 3 opposition takes legal action to block new nuclear reactor
  13. ^ http://www.freep.com/story/news/2015/04/30/fermi3-nuke-plant-approved/26659891/
  14. ^ Bill Dedman, "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk," msnbc.com, March 17, 2011 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42103936/ Accessed April 19, 2011.
  15. ^ http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf
  16. ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „United States of America: Nuclear Power Reactors- Alphabetic“
  17. ^ Power Reactor Information System of the IAEA: „Nuclear Power Reactor Details - ENRICO FERMI-3“

References[edit]

  • We Almost Lost Detroit, John G. Fuller, Ballantine Books, 1976
  • Normal Accident, Charles Perrow, Basic Books, 1984
  • We Did Not Almost Lose Detroit, Earl M. Page, Published by Detroit Edison Co., 3rd Edition in May 1976
  • Some notes written by hands on principal engineer who worked at the site from 1967 to 2006.
  • Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Hazards Summary Report
  • Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant 236 page booklet published by the Atomic Power Development Associates, Inc. (now defunct) in January 1959

External links[edit]

  • Public Comments "Public Comments at the meeting re: FERMI 3 with the NRC. This includes youtube videos of speakers calling for an end to the new nuclear reactor project. Featured are a Professor from the U of M, Don't Waste Michigan members, Sierra Club members, and other concerned citizens."