Epsilon calculus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hilbert's epsilon calculus is an extension of a formal language by the epsilon operator, where the epsilon operator substitutes for quantifiers in that language as a method leading to a proof of consistency for the extended formal language. The epsilon operator and epsilon substitution method are typically applied to a first-order predicate calculus, followed by a showing of consistency. The epsilon-extended calculus is further extended and generalized to cover those mathematical objects, classes, and categories for which there is a desire to show consistency, building on previously-shown consistency at earlier levels.[1]

Contents

[edit] Epsilon operator

[edit] Hilbert notation

For any formal language L, extend L by adding the epsilon operator to redefine quantification:

  •  (\exists x) A(x)\ \equiv \ A(\epsilon x\ A)
  •  (\forall x) A(x)\ \equiv \ A(\epsilon x\ (\neg A))

The intended interpretation of εx A is some x that satisfies A, if it exists. In other words, εx A returns some term t such that A(t) is true, otherwise it returns some default or arbitrary term. If more than one term can satisfy A, then any one of these terms (which make A true) can be chosen, non-deterministically. Equality is required to be defined under L, and the only rules required for L extended by the epsilon operator are modus ponens and the substitution of A(t) to replace A(x) for any term t.[2]

[edit] Bourbaki notation

In tau-square notation from N. Bourbaki's Theory of Sets, the quantifiers are defined as follows:

  •  (\exists x) A(x)\ \equiv \ (\tau_x(A)|x)A
  •  (\forall x) A(x)\ \equiv \ \neg (\tau_x(\neg A)|x)\neg A\ \equiv \ (\tau_x(\neg A)|x)A

where A is a relation in L, x is a variable, and τx(A) juxtaposes a τ at the front of A, replaces all instances of x with \square, and links them back to τ. Then let Y be an assembly, (Y|x)A denotes the replacement of all variables x in A with Y.

This notation is equivalent to the Hilbert notation and is read the same.

[edit] Modern approaches

Hilbert's Program for mathematics was to justify those formal systems as consistent in relation to constructive or semi-constructive systems. While Gödel's results on incompleteness mooted Hilbert's Program to a great extent, modern researchers find the epsilon calculus to provide alternatives for approaching proofs of systemic consistency as described in the epsilon substitution method.

[edit] Epsilon substitution method

A theory to be checked for consistency is first embedded in an appropriate epsilon calculus. Second, a process is developed for re-writing quantified theorems to be expressed in terms of epsilon operations via the epsilon substitution method. Finally, the process must be shown to normalize the re-writing process, so that the re-written theorems satisfy the axioms of the theory.[3]

[edit] References

  • Moser, G.; R. Zach. The Epsilon Calculus (Tutorial). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. OCLC 108629234. 

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Stanford, overview paragraphs
  2. ^ Stanford, the epsilon calculus paragraphs
  3. ^ Stanford, more recent developments paragraphs
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export