Ethanol fuel in Brazil
Brazil is the world's second largest producer of ethanol fuel, and until 2010, the world's largest exporter. Together, Brazil and the United States lead the industrial production of ethanol fuel, accounting together for 87.8 percent of the world's production in 2010, and 87.1 percent in 2011. In 2011 Brazil produced 21.1 billion liters (5.57 billion U.S. liquid gallons), representing 24.9 percent of the world's total ethanol used as fuel.
Brazil is considered to have the world's first sustainable biofuels economy and the biofuel industry leader, a policy model for other countries; and its sugarcane ethanol "the most successful alternative fuel to date." However, some authors consider that the successful Brazilian ethanol model is sustainable only in Brazil due to its advanced agri-industrial technology and its enormous amount of arable land available; while according to other authors it is a solution only for some countries in the tropical zone of Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa.
Brazil’s 37-year-old ethanol fuel program is based on the most efficient agricultural technology for sugarcane cultivation in the world, uses modern equipment and cheap sugar cane as feedstock, the residual cane-waste (bagasse) is used to produce heat and power, which results in a very competitive price and also in a high energy balance (output energy/input energy), which varies from 8.3 for average conditions to 10.2 for best practice production. In 2010, the U.S. EPA designated Brazilian sugarcane ethanol as an advanced biofuel due to its 61% reduction of total life cycle greenhouse gas emissions, including direct indirect land use change emissions.
There are no longer any light vehicles in Brazil running on pure gasoline. Since 1976 the government made it mandatory to blend anhydrous ethanol with gasoline, fluctuating between 10% to 22%. and requiring just a minor adjustment on regular gasoline engines. In 1993 the mandatory blend was fixed by law at 22% anhydrous ethanol (E22) by volume in the entire country, but with leeway to the Executive to set different percentages of ethanol within pre-established boundaries. In 2003 these limits were set at a minimum of 20% and a maximum of 25%. Since July 1, 2007 the mandatory blend is 25% of anhydrous ethanol and 75% gasoline or E25 blend. The lower limit was reduced to 18% in April 2011 due to recurring ethanol supply shortages and high prices that take place between harvest seasons.
The Brazilian car manufacturing industry developed flexible-fuel vehicles that can run on any proportion of gasoline (E20-E25 blend) and hydrous ethanol (E100). Introduced in the market in 2003, flex vehicles became a commercial success, reaching a record 92.3% share of all new cars and light vehicle sales for 2009. By December 2009 they represented 39% of Brazil's registered Otto cycle light motor vehicle fleet, and the cumulative production of flex-fuel cars and light commercial vehicles reached the milestone of 10 million vehicles in March 2010, and 15.3 million units by March 2012. By mid-2010 there were 70 flex models available in the market manufactured from 11 major carmakers. The success of "flex" vehicles, together with the mandatory E25 blend throughout the country, allowed ethanol fuel consumption in the country to achieve a 50% market share of the gasoline-powered fleet in February 2008. In terms of energy equivalent, sugarcane ethanol represented 17.6% of the country's total energy consumption by the transport sector in 2008.
- 1 History
- 2 Production
- 2.1 Economic and production indicators
- 2.2 Agricultural technology
- 2.3 Production process
- 2.4 Exports
- 3 Prices and effect on oil consumption
- 4 Comparison with the United States
- 5 Ethanol diplomacy
- 6 Environmental and social impacts
- 7 See also
- 8 Bibliography
- 9 References
- 10 External links
|Historical evolution of ethanol blends used in Brazil
|Source: J.A. Puerto Rica (2007), Table 3.8, pp. 81–82
Note: The 2010 reduction from E25 to E20 was temporary and took
place between February and April. In April 2011 the lower
blend floor was reduced to E18.
Sugarcane has been cultivated in Brazil since 1532 as sugar was one of the first commodities exported to Europe by the Portuguese settlers. The first use of sugarcane ethanol as a fuel in Brazil dates back to the late twenties and early thirties of the twentieth century, with the introduction of the automobile in the country. Ethanol fuel production peaked during World War II and, as German submarine attacks threatened oil supplies, the mandatory blend became as high as 50% in 1943. After the end of the war cheap oil caused gasoline to prevail, and ethanol blends were only used sporadically, mostly to take advantage of sugar surpluses, until the seventies, when the first oil crisis resulted in gasoline shortages and awareness of the dangers of oil dependence. As a response to this crisis, the Brazilian government began promoting bioethanol as a fuel. The National Alcohol Program -Pró-Álcool- (Portuguese: 'Programa Nacional do Álcool'), launched in 1975, was a nation-wide program financed by the government to phase out automobile fuels derived from fossil fuels, such as gasoline, in favor of ethanol produced from sugar cane.
The first phase of the program concentrated on production of anhydrous ethanol for blending with gasoline. The Brazilian government made mandatory the blending of ethanol fuel with gasoline, fluctuating from 1976 until 1992 between 10% to 22%. Due to this mandatory minimum gasoline blend, pure gasoline (E0) is no longer sold in the country. A federal law was passed in October 1993 establishing a mandatory blend of 22% anhydrous ethanol (E22) in the entire country. This law also authorized the Executive to set different percentages of ethanol within pre-established boundaries; and since 2003 these limits were fixed at a maximum of 25% (E25) and a minimum of 20% (E20) by volume. Since then, the government has set the percentage of the ethanol blend according to the results of the sugarcane harvest and the levels of ethanol production from sugarcane, resulting in blend variations even within the same year.
Since July 2007 the mandatory blend is 25% of anhydrous ethanol and 75% gasoline or E25 blend. However, in 2010, and as a result of supply concerns and high ethanol fuel prices, the government mandated a temporary 90-day blend reduction from E25 to E20 beginning February 1, 2010.
After testing in government fleets with several prototypes developed by the local carmakers, and compelled by the second oil crisis, the Fiat 147, the first modern commercial neat ethanol car (E100 only) was launched to the market in July 1979. The Brazilian government provided three important initial drivers for the ethanol industry: guaranteed purchases by the state-owned oil company Petrobras, low-interest loans for agro-industrial ethanol firms, and fixed gasoline and ethanol prices where hydrous ethanol sold for 59% of the government-set gasoline price at the pump. Subsidising ethanol production in this manner and setting an artificially low price established ethanol as an alternative to gasoline.
After reaching more than 4 million cars and light trucks running on pure ethanol by the late 1980s, representing one third of the country's motor vehicle fleet, ethanol production and sales of ethanol-only cars tumbled due to several factors. First, gasoline prices fell sharply as a result of lower gasoline prices, but mainly because of a shortage of ethanol fuel supply in the local market left thousands of vehicles in line at gas stations or out of fuel in their garages by mid-1989. As supply could not keep pace with the increasing demand required by the now significant ethanol-only fleet, the Brazilian government began importing ethanol in 1991.
Confidence on ethanol-powered vehicles was restored only with the introduction in the Brazilian market of flexible-fuel vehicles. In March 2003 Volkswagen launched in the Brazilian market the Gol 1.6 Total Flex, the first commercial flexible fuel vehicle capable of running on any blend of gasoline and ethanol. By 2010 manufacturers that build flexible fuel vehicles include Chevrolet, Fiat, Ford, Peugeot, Renault, Volkswagen, Honda, Mitsubishi, Toyota, Citroën, Nissan, and Kia Motors. In 2013, Ford launched the first flex fuel car with direct injection: the Focus 2.0 Duratec Direct Flex.
Flexible fuel cars were 22% of the car sales in 2004, 73% in 2005, 87.6% in July 2008, and reached a record 94% in August 2009. The cumulative production of flex-fuel cars and light commercial vehicles reached the milestone of 10 million vehicles in March 2010, and 15.3 million units by March 2012. The rapid adoption and commercial success of "flex" vehicles, as they are popularly known, together with the mandatory blend of alcohol with gasoline as E25 fuel, have increased ethanol consumption up to the point that by February 2008 a landmark in ethanol consumption was achieved when ethanol retail sales surpassed the 50% market share of the gasoline-powered fleet. This level of ethanol fuel consumption had not been reached since the end of the 1980s, at the peak of the Pró-Álcool Program. From 1979 until December 2010, Brazil has substituted more than 18 million pure gasoline-powered vehicles with 5.7 million neat ethanol vehicles, almost 12 million flex-fuel light vehicles, and 515.7 thousand flex-fuel motorcycles. The number of neat ethanol vehicles still in use was estimated between 2 to 3 million vehicles by 2003, and 1.22 million as of December 2011.
Under the auspices of the BioEthanol for Sustainable Transport (BEST) project, the first ethanol-powered (ED95) bus began operations in São Paulo city on December 2007 as a one-year trial project. A second ED95 trial bus began operating in São Paulo city in November 2009. Based on the satisfactory results obtained during the 3-year trial operation of the two buses, in November 2010 the municipal government of São Paulo city signed an agreement with UNICA, Cosan, Scania and Viação Metropolitana", the local bus operator, to introduced a fleet of 50 ethanol-powered ED95 buses by May 2011. The local government objective is for the city's entire bus fleet, which is made of 15,000 diesel-powered buses, to use only renewable fuels by 2018. The first ethanol-powered buses were delivered in May 2011, and the 50 ethanol-powered ED95 buses are scheduled to begin regular service in São Paulo in June 2011.
Another innovation of the Brazilian flexible-fuel technology was the development of flex-fuel motorcycles. The first flex motorcycle was launched by Honda in March 2009. Produced by its Brazilian subsidiary Moto Honda da Amazônia, the CG 150 Titan Mix is sold for around US$2,700. In order to avoid cold start problems, the fuel tank must have at least 20% of gasoline at temperatures below 15 °C (59 °F). In September 2009, Honda launched a second flexible-fuel motorcycle, the on-off road NXR 150 Bros Mix. By December 2010 both Honda flexible-fuel motorcycles had reached cumulative sales of 515,726 units, representing an 18.1% market share of the Brazilian new motorcycle sales in 2010.
Economic and production indicators
|Brazilian ethanol production(a)(b)
(Millions of U.S. gallons)
|Note: (a) 2004–06 for all grades. (b) 2007–10 ethanol fuel only.|
Ethanol production in Brazil uses sugarcane as feedstock and relies on first-generation technologies based on the use of the sucrose content of sugarcane. Ethanol yield has grown 3.77% per year since 1975 and productivity gains have been based on improvements in the agricultural and industrial phases of the production process. Further improvements on best practices are expected to allow in the short to mid-term an average ethanol productivity of 9,000 liters per hectare.
There were 378 ethanol plants operating in Brazil by July 2008, 126 dedicated to ethanol production and 252 producing both sugar and ethanol. There are 15 additional plants dedicated exclusively to sugar production. These plants have an installed capacity of crushing 538 million metric tons of sugarcane per year, and there are 25 plants under construction expected to be on line by 2009 that will add an additional capacity of crushing 50 million tons of sugarcane per year. The typical plant costs approximately US$150 million and requires a nearby sugarcane plantation of 30,000 hectares.
Ethanol production is concentrated in the Central and Southeast regions of the country, led by São Paulo state, with around 60% of the country's total ethanol production, followed by Paraná (8%), Minas Gerais (8%) and Goiás (5%). These two regions have been responsible for 90% of Brazil's ethanol production since 2005 and the harvest season goes from April to November. The Northeast Region is responsible for the remaining 10% of ethanol production, led by Alagoas with 2% of total production. The harvest season in the North-Northeast region goes from September to March, and the average productivity in this region is lower than the South-Central region. Due to the difference in the two main harvest seasons, Brazilian statistics for sugar and ethanol production are commonly reported on a harvest two-year basis rather than on a calendar year.
For the 2008/09 harvest it is expected that about 44% of the sugarcane will be used for sugar, 1% for alcoholic beverages, and 55% for ethanol production. An estimate of between 24.9 billion litres (6.58 billion U.S. liquid gallons) to 27.1 billion litres (7.16 billion gallons) of ethanol are expected to be produced in 2008/09 harvest year, with most of the production being destined for the internal market, and only 4.2 billion liters (1.1 billion gallons) for exports, with an estimated 2.5 billion liters (660 million gallons) destined for the US market. Sugarcane cultivated area grew from 7 million to 7.8 million hectares of land from 2007 to 2008, mainly using abandoned pasture lands. In 2008 Brazil has 276 million hectares of arable land, 72% use for pasture, 16.9% for grain crops, and 2.8% for sugarcane, meaning that ethanol is just requiring approximately 1.5% of all arable land available in the country.
As sugar and ethanol share the same feedstock and their industrial processing is fully integrated, formal employment statistics are usually presented together. In 2000 there were 642,848 workers employed by these industries, and as ethanol production expanded, by 2005 there were 982,604 workers employed in the sugarcane cultivation and industrialization, including 414,668 workers in the sugarcane fields, 439,573 workers in the sugar mills, and 128,363 workers in the ethanol distilleries. While employment in the ethanol distilleries grew 88.4% from 2000 to 2005, employment in the sugar fields just grew 16.2% as a direct result of expansion of mechanical harvest instead manual harvesting, which avoids burning the sugarcane fields before manual cutting and also increases productivity. The states with the most employment in 2005 were São Paulo (39.2%), Pernambuco (15%), Alagoas (14.1%), Paraná (7%), and Minas Gerais (5.6%).
Since 2009 the Brazilian ethanol industry has experienced a crisis due to multiple causes. They include the economic crisis of 2008; poor sugarcane harvests due to unfavorable weather; high sugar prices in the world market that made more attractive to produce sugar rather than ethanol; a freeze imposed by the Brazilian government on the petrol and diesel prices. Brazilian ethanol fuel production in 2011 was 21.1 billion liters (5.6 billion U.S. liquid gallons), down from 26.2 billion liters (6.9 billion gallons) in 2010, while in 2012 the production of ethanol was 26% lower than in 2008. By 2012 41 ethanol plants out of about 400 have closed and the sugar-cane crop yields dropped from 115 tonnes per hectare in 2008 to 69 tonnes per hectare in 2012.
A supply shortage took place for several months during 2010 and 2011, and prices climbed to the point that ethanol fuel was no longer attractive for owners of flex-fuel vehicles; the government reduced the minimum ethanol blend in gasoline to reduce demand and keep ethanol fuel prices from rising further; and for the first time since the 1990s, (corn) ethanol fuel was imported from the United States. The imports totaled around 1.5 billion litres in 2011–2012. The ethanol share in the transport fuel market decreased from 55% in 2008 to 35% in 2012. As a result of higher ethanol prices combined with government subsidies to keep gasoline price lower than the international market value, by November 2013 only 23% flex-fuel car owners were using ethanol regularly, down from 66% in 2009.
A key aspect for the development of the ethanol industry in Brazil was the investment in agricultural research and development by both the public and private sector. The work of EMBRAPA, the state-owned company in charge for applied research on agriculture, together with research developed by state institutes and universities, especially in the State of São Paulo, have allowed Brazil to become a major innovator in the fields of biotechnology and agronomic practices, resulting in the most efficient agricultural technology for sugarcane cultivation in the world. Efforts have been concentrated in increasing the efficiency of inputs and processes to optimize output per hectare of feedstock, and the result has been a threefold increase of sugarcane yields in 29 years, as Brazilian average ethanol yields went from 2,024 liters per ha in 1975 to 5,917 liters per ha in 2004; allowing the efficiency of ethanol production to grow at a rate of 3.77% per year. Brazilian biotechnologies include the development of sugarcane varieties that have a larger sugar or energy content, one of the main drivers for high yields of ethanol per unit of planted area. The increase of the index total recoverable sugar (TRS) from sugarcane has been very significant, 1.5% per year in the period 1977 to 2004, resulting in an increase from 95 to 140 kg/ha. Innovations in the industrial process have allowed an increase in sugar extraction in the period 1977 to 2003. The average annual improvement was 0.3%; some mills have already reached extraction efficiencies of 98%.
Biotechnology research and genetic improvement have led to the development of strains that are more resistant to disease, bacteria, and pests, and also have the capacity to respond to different environments, thus allowing the expansion of sugarcane cultivation to areas previously considered inadequate for such cultures. By 2008 more than 500 sugarcane varieties are cultivated in Brazil, and 51 of them were released just during the last ten years. Four research programs, two private and two public, are devoted to further genetic improvement. Since the mid nineties, Brazilian biotechnology laboratories have developed transgenic varieties, still non commerciallized. Identification of 40,000 cane genes was completed in 2003 and there are a couple dozen research groups working on the functional genome, still on the experimental phase, but commercial results are expected within five years.
Also, there is ongoing research regarding sugarcane biological nitrogen fixation, with the most promising plant varieties showing yields three times the national average in soils of very low fertility, thus avoiding nitrogenous fertilization. There is also research for the development of second-generation or cellulosic ethanol. In São Paulo state an increase of 12% in sugar cane yield and 6.4% in sugar content is expected over the next decade. This advance combined with an expected 6.2% improvement in fermentation efficiency and 2% in sugar extraction, may increase ethanol yields by 29%, raising average ethanol productivity to 9,000 liters/ha. Approximately US$50 million has recently been allocated for research and projects focused on advancing the obtention of ethanol from sugarcane in São Paulo state.
Sucrose extracted from sugarcane accounts for little more than 30% of the chemical energy stored in the harvested parts of the mature plant; 35% is in the leaves and stem tips, which are left in the fields during harvest, and 35% are in the fibrous material (bagasse) left over from pressing. Most of the industrial processing of sugarcane in Brazil is done through a very integrated production chain, allowing sugar production, industrial ethanol processing, and electricity generation from byproducts. The typical steps for large-scale production of sugar and ethanol include milling, electricity generation, fermentation, distillation of ethanol, and dehydration.
Milling and refining
Once harvested, sugarcane is usually transported to the plant by semi-trailer trucks. After quality control sugarcane is washed, chopped, and shredded by revolving knives; the feedstock is fed to and extracted by a set of mill combinations to collect a juice, called garapa in Brazil, that contain 10–15% sucrose, and bagasse, the fiber residue. The main objective of the milling process is to extract the largest possible amount of sucrose from the cane, and a secondary but important objective is the production of bagasse with a low moisture content as boiler fuel, as bagasse is burned for electricity generation (see below), allowing the plant to be self-sufficient in energy and to generate electricity for the local power grid. The cane juice or garapa is then filtered and treated by chemicals and pasteurized. Before evaporation, the juice is filtered once again, producing vinasse, a fluid rich in organic compounds. The syrup resulting from evaporation is then precipitated by crystallization producing a mixture of clear crystals surrounded by molasses. A centrifuge is used to separate the sugar from molasses, and the crystals are washed by addition of steam, after which the crystals are dried by an airflow. Upon cooling, sugar crystallizes out of the syrup. From this point, the sugar refining process continues to produce different grades of sugar, and the molasses continue a separate process to produce ethanol.
Fermentation, distillation and dehydration
The resulting molasses are treated to become a sterilized molasse free of impurities, ready to be fermented. In the fermentation process sugars are transformed into ethanol by addition of yeast. Fermentation time varies from four to twelve hours resulting in an alcohol content of 7-10% by total volume (°GL), called fermented wine. The yeast is recovered from this wine through a centrifuge. Making use of the different boiling points the alcohol in the fermented wine is separated from the main resting solid components. The remaining product is hydrated ethanol with a concentration of 96°GL, the highest concentration of ethanol that can be achieved via azeotropic distillation, and by national specification can contain up to 4.9% of water by volume. This hydrous ethanol is the fuel used by ethanol-only and flex vehicles in the country. Further dehydration is normally done by addition of chemicals, up to the specified 99.7°GL in order to produce anhydrous ethanol, which is used for blending with pure gasoline to obtain the country's E25 mandatory blend. The additional processing required to convert hydrated into anhydrous ethanol increases the cost of the fuel, as in 2007 the average producer price difference between the two was around 14% for São Paulo State. This production price difference, though small, contributes to the competitiveness of the hydrated ethanol (E100) used in Brazil, not only with regard to local gasoline prices but also as compared to other countries such as the United States and Sweden, that only use anhydrous ethanol for their flex fuel fleet.
Electricity generation from bagasse
Since the early days bagasse was burnt in the plant to provide the energy required for the industrial part of the process. Today, the Brazilian best practice uses high-pressure boilers that increases energy recovery, allowing most sugar-ethanol plants to be energetically self-sufficient and even sell surplus electricity to utilities. By 2000, the total amount of sugarcane bagasse produced per year was 50 million tons/dry basis out of more than 300 million tons of harvested sugarcane. Several authors estimated a potential power generation from the use of sugarcane bagasse ranging from 1,000 to 9,000 MW, depending on the technology used and the use of harvest trash. One utility in São Paulo is buying more than 1% of its electricity from sugar mills, with a production capacity of 600 MW for self-use and 100 MW for sale. According to analysis from Frost & Sullivan, Brazil's sugarcane bagasse used for power generation has reached 3.0 GW in 2007, and it is expected to reach 12.2 GW in 2014. The analysis also found that sugarcane bagasse cogeneration accounts for 3% of the total Brazilian energy matrix. The energy is especially valuable to utilities because it is produced mainly in the dry season when hydroelectric dams are running low.
According to a study commissioned by the Dutch government in 2006 to evaluate the sustainability of Brazilian bioethanol "...there are also substantial gains possible in the efficiency of electricity use and generation: The electricity used for distillery operations has been estimated at 12.9 kWh/tonne cane, with a best available technology rate of 9.6 kWh/tonne cane . For electricity generation the efficiency could be increased from 18 kWh/tonne cane presently, to 29.1 kWh/tonne cane maximum. The production of surplus electricity could in theory be increased from 5.3 kWh/tonne cane to 19 kWh/tonne cane."
Electric generation from ethanol
Brazil has several experimental programs for the production of electricity using sugar cane ethanol as fuel. A joint venture of General Electric and Petrobras is operating one commercial pilot plant in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais.
Overall energy use
Energy-use associated with the production of sugarcane ethanol derives from three primary sources: the agricultural sector, the industrial sector, and the distribution sector. In the agricultural sector, 35.98 GJ of energy are used to plant, maintain, and harvest one hectare (10,000 m2) of sugarcane for usable biofuel. This includes energy from numerous inputs, including nitrogen, phosphate, potassium oxide, lime, seed, herbicides, insecticides, labor and diesel fuel. The industrial sector, which includes the milling and refining sugarcane and the production of ethanol fuel, uses 3.63 GJ of energy and generates 155.57 GJ of energy per hectare of sugarcane plantation. Scientists estimate that the potential power generated from the cogeneration of bagasse could range from 1,000 to 9,000 MW, depending on harvest and technology factors. In Brazil, this is about 3% of the total energy needed. The burning of bagasse can generate 18 kilowatt-hours, or 64.7 MJ per Mg of sugarcane. Distillery facilities require about 45 MJ to operate, leaving a surplus energy supply of 19.3 MJ, or 5.4 kWh. In terms of distribution, researchers calculates sugarcane ethanol’s transport energy requirement to be .44 GJ per cubic-meter, thus one hectare of land would require 2.82 GJ of energy for successful transport and distribution. After taking all three sectors into account, the EROEI (Energy Return over Energy Invested) for sugarcane ethanol is about 8.
There are several improvements to the industrial processes, such as adopting a hydrolysis process to produce ethanol instead of surplus electricity, or the use of advanced boiler and turbine technology to increase the electricity yield, or a higher use of excess bagasse and harvest trash currently left behind in the fields, that together with various other efficiency improvements in sugarcane farming and the distribution chain have the potential to allow further efficiency increases, translating into higher yields, lower production costs, and also further improvements in the energy balance and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
by selected country and region (2005–2007)
(Millions of liters)
|Trinidad and Tobago||158.87||71.58||36.12|
|Republic of Korea||66.69||92.27||216.36|
|Notes: (1)Only countries with more than 100,000 liters imports on a given year are
shown. (2)It includes exports to Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands. (3) Including Mexico
that trades with the U.S. under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
Brazil is the world's largest exporter of ethanol. In 2007 it exported 933.4 million gallons (3,532.7 million liters), representing almost 20% of its production, and accounting for almost 50% of the global exports. Since 2004 Brazilian exporters have as their main customers the United States, Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, Jamaica, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Trinidad & Tobago, Nigeria, Mexico, India, and South Korea.
The countries in the Caribbean Basin import relative high quantities of Brazilian ethanol, but not much is destined for domestic consumption. These countries reprocess the product, usually converting Brazilian hydrated ethanol into anhydrous ethanol, and then re-export it to the United States, gaining value-added and avoiding the 2.5% duty and the US$0.54 per gallon tariff, thanks to the trade agreements and benefits granted by Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI). This process is limited by a quota, set at 7% of U.S. ethanol consumption. Although direct U.S. exports fell in 2007, imports from four CBI countries almost doubled, increasing from 15.5% in 2006 to 25.8% in 2007, reflecting increasing re-exports to the U.S., thus partially compensating the loss of Brazilian direct exports to the U.S. This situation has caused some concerns in the United States, as it and Brazil are trying to build a partnership to increase ethanol production in Latin American and the Caribbean. As the U.S. is encouraging "new ethanol production in other countries, production that could directly compete with U.S.-produced ethanol".
The U.S., potentially the largest market for Brazilian ethanol imports, currently imposes a tariff on Brazilian ethanol of US$0.54 per gallon in order to encourage domestic ethanol production and protect the budding ethanol industry in the United States. Historically, this tariff was intended to offset the 45 cent per gallon blender's federal tax credit that is applied to ethanol no matter its country of origin. Exports of Brazilian ethanol to the U.S. reached a total of US$1 billion in 2006, an increase of 1,020% over 2005 (US$98 millions), but fell significantly in 2007 due to sharp increases in American ethanol production from corn. As shown in the table, the United States remains the largest single importer of Brazilian ethanol exports, though collectively the European Union and the CBI countries now import a similar amount.
A 2010 study by Iowa State University's Center for Agricultural and Rural Development found that removing the U.S. import tariff would result in less than 5% of the United States’ ethanol being imported from Brazil. Also a 2010 study by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that the costs to American taxpayers of using a biofuel to reduce gasoline consumption by one gallon are $1.78 for corn ethanol and $3.00 for cellulosic ethanol. In a similar way, and without considering potential indirect land use effects, the costs to taxpayers of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through tax credits are about $750 per metric ton of CO2-equivalent for ethanol and around $275 per metric ton for cellulosic ethanol.
After being renewed several times, the tax credit is set to expire on December 31, 2011, and both the US$0.54 per gallon tariff and US$0.45 per gallon blender’s credit have been the subject of contentious debate in Washington, D.C. with ethanol interest groups and politicians staking positions on both sides of the issue. On June 16, 2011, the U.S. Congress approved an amendment to the economic development bill to repeal both the tax credit and the tariff on ethanol, and though this bill has an uncertain future, it is considered a signal that the tax credits will not be renew when they expire at the end of 2011. The eventual elimination of the import tariff is not expect to have significant effects in the short term. That is because the Brazilian ethanol industry has been having trouble meeting its own domestic demand for ethanol during 2010 and 2011, and actually Brazil imported some corn ethanol from the U.S. The shortage in supply is due in part to high sugar prices, which make it more profitable for Brazilian producers to sell it as sugar than convert it to ethanol fuel. Also, as a result of the credit crunch caused by the financial crisis of 2007–2010, the expansion of the Brazilian ethanol industry has not being able keep up pace with the accelerated growth of the flex fuel fleet.
As U.S. EPA's 2010 final ruling for the Renewable Fuel Standard designated Brazilian sugarcane ethanol as an advanced biofuel, Brazilian ethanol producers hope this classification will contribute to lift import tariffs both in the U.S. and the rest of the world. Also they expect to increase exports to the U.S., as the blending mandate requires an increasing quota of advanced biofuels, which is not likely to be fulfilled with cellulosic ethanol, and then it would force blenders to import more Brazilian sugarcane-based ethanol, despite the existing 54¢ per gallon tariff on ethanol imported directly from Brazil, or duty-free from the CBI countries that convert Brazilian hydrated ethanol into anhydrous ethanol.
Prices and effect on oil consumption
Most automobiles in Brazil run either on hydrous alcohol (E100) or on gasohol (E25 blend), as the mixture of 25% anhydrous ethanol with gasoline is mandatory in the entire country. Since 2003, dual-fuel ethanol flex vehicles that run on any proportion of hydrous ethanol and gasoline have been gaining popularity. These have electronic sensors that detect the type of fuel and adjust the engine combustion to match, so users can choose the cheapest available fuel. Sales of flex fuel vehicles reached 9.3 million by December 2009, representing 39 percent of the gasoline-powered fleet. By mid-2010 there were 70 flex models available in the market and production by December 2010 reached more than 12.5 million flex vehicles including more than 500 thousand flex fuel motorcycles.
Due to the lower energy content of ethanol fuel, full flex-fuel vehicles get fewer miles per gallon. Ethanol price has to be between 25-30% cheaper per gallon to reach the break even point. As a rule of thumb, Brazilian consumers are frequently advised by the media to use more alcohol than gasoline in their mix only when ethanol prices are 30% lower or more than gasoline, as ethanol price fluctuates heavily depending on the harvest yields and seasonal fluctuation of sugarcane harvest.
Since 2005, ethanol prices have been very competitive without subsidies, even with gasoline prices kept constant in local currency since mid-2005, at a time when oil was just approaching US$60 a barrel. However, Brazilian gasoline taxes are high, around 54 percent, while ethanol fuel taxes are lower and vary between 12% to 30%, depending of the state. As of October 2008 the average price of E25 gasoline was $4.39 per gallon while the average price for ethanol was US$2.69 per gallon. This differential in taxation favors ethanol fuel consumption, and by the end of July 2008, when oil prices were close to its latest peak and the Brazilian real exchange rate to the US dollar was close to its most recent minimum, the average gasoline retail price at the pump in Brazil reached US$6.00 per gallon. The price ratio between gasoline and ethanol fuel has been well above 30 percent during this period for most states, except during low sugar cane supply between harvests and for states located far away from the ethanol production centers. According to Brazilian producers, ethanol can remain competitive if the price of oil does not fall below US$30 a barrel.
By 2008 consumption of ethanol fuel by the Brazilian fleet of light vehicles, as pure ethanol and in gasohol, is replacing gasoline at the rate of about 27,000 cubic meters per day, and by February 2008 the combined consumption of anhydrous and hydrated ethanol fuel surpassed 50 percent of the fuel that would be needed to run the light vehicle fleet on pure gasoline alone. Monthly consumption of anhydrous ethanol for the mandatory E25 blend, together with hydrous ethanol used by flex vehicles, reached 1.432 billion liters, while pure gasoline consumption was 1.411 billion liters. Despite this volumetric parity, when expressed in terms of energy equivalent (toe), sugarcane ethanol represented 17.6 percent of the country's total energy consumption by the transport sector in 2008, while gasoline represented 23.3 percent and diesel 49.2 percent.
For the first time since 2003 sales of hydrous ethanol fell in 2010, with a decrease of 8.5 percent as compared to 2009. Total consumption of both hydrous and anhydrous ethanol fell by 2.9 percent while gasoline consumption increased by 17.5 percent. Despite the reduction in ethanol consumption, total ethanol sales reached 22.2 billion liters while pure gasoline consumption was 22.7 billion liters, keeping the market share for each fuel close to 50 percent. The decrease in hydrous ethanol consumption was due mainly to high sugar prices in the international markets, which reached a 30-year high in 2010. This peak in sugar prices caused sugarcane processing plants to produce more sugar than ethanol, and as supply contracted, E100 prices increased to the point that several times during 2010 the price of hydrous ethanol was less than 30 percent cheaper than gasoline. Another factor that contributed to this shift was the increase sales of imported gasoline only vehicles that took place during 2010.
E25 - E100
E25 - E100
E25 - E100
|Acre (AC)||2.080||2.943||29.32||Maranhão (MA)||1.709||2.628||34.97||Rio de Janeiro (RJ)||1.676||2.531||33.78|
|Alagoas (AL)||1.844||2.766||33.33||Mato Grosso (MT)||1.452||2.677||45.76||Rio Grande do Norte (RN)||1.940||2.669||27.31|
|Amapá (AP)||2.246||2.686||16.38||Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)||1.683||2.676||37.11||Rio Grande do Sul (RS)||1.779||2.574||30.89|
|Amazonas (AM)||2.773||2.452||27.69||Minas Gerais (MG)||1.610||2.377||32.27||Rondônia (RR)||1.839||2.669||31.10|
|Bahia (BA)||1.630||2.522||35.37||Pará (PA)||2.120||2.772||23.52||Roraima (RO)||2.154||2.710||20.52|
|Distrito Federal (DF)||1.884||2.586||27.15||Paraíba (PB)||1.883||2.553||26.24||Santa Catarina (SC)||1.697||2.556||33.61|
|Ceará (CE)||1.768||2.510||29.56||Paraná (PR)||1.445||2.429||40.51||São Paulo (SP)||1.306||2.398||45.54|
|Espírito Santo (ES)||1.795||2.662||32.57||Pernambuco (PE)||1.700||2.573||33.93||Sergipe (SE)||1.888||2.518||25.02|
|Goiás (GO)||1.581||2.565||38.36||Piauí (PI)||1.927||2.655||27.42||Tocantins (TO)||1.708||2.748||37.85|
Source: Agência Nacional do Petróleo (ANP). Average retail prices for week of 26/10/2008 to 01/11/2008.
Comparison with the United States
Brazil's sugar cane-based industry is more efficient than the U.S. corn-based industry. Sugar cane ethanol has an energy balance seven times greater than ethanol produced from corn. Brazilian distillers are able to produce ethanol for 22 cents per liter, compared with the 30 cents per liter for corn-based ethanol. U.S. corn-derived ethanol costs 30% more because the corn starch must first be converted to sugar before being distilled into alcohol. Despite this cost differential in production, the U.S. did not import more Brazilian ethanol because of U.S. trade barriers corresponding to a tariff of 54-cent per gallon, first imposed in 1980, but kept to offset the 45-cent per gallon blender's federal tax credit that is applied to ethanol no matter its country of origin. In 2011 the U.S. Congress decided not to extend the tariff and the tax credit, and as a result both ended on December 31, 2011. During these three decades the ethanol industry was awarded an estimated US$45 billion in subsidies and US$6 billion just in 2011.
Sugarcane cultivation requires a tropical or subtropical climate, with a minimum of 600 mm (24 in) of annual rainfall. Sugarcane is one of the most efficient photosynthesizers in the plant kingdom, able to convert up to 2% of incident solar energy into biomass. Sugarcane production in the United States occurs in Florida, Louisiana, Hawaii, and Texas. The first three plants to produce sugarcane-based ethanol are expected to go online in Louisiana by mid-2009. Sugar mill plants in Lacassine, St. James and Bunkie were converted to sugar cane-based ethanol production using Colombian technology in order to make possible a profitable ethanol production. These three plants will produce 100 million gallons (378.5 million liters) of ethanol within five years. By 2009 two other sugarcane ethanol production projects are being developed in Kauai, Hawaii and Imperial Valley, California.
|Comparison of key characteristics between
the ethanol industries in the United States and Brazil
||Main cash crop for ethanol production, the US has less than 2% from other crops.|
|Total ethanol fuel production (2011)||
||Million U.S. liquid gallons.|
|Total arable land||
|Total area used for ethanol crop (2006)||
||Million hectares (% total arable).|
|Productivity per hectare||
||Liters of ethanol per hectare. Brazil is 727 to 870 gal/acre (2006), US is 321 to 424 gal/acre (2003).|
|Energy balance (input energy productivity)||
||Ratio of the energy obtained from ethanol/energy expended in its production.|
|Estimated GHG emissions reduction||
||% GHGs avoided by using ethanol instead of gasoline, using existing crop land (No ILUC).|
|EPA's estimated 2022 GHG reduction for RFS2.||61%(3)||21%||Average % GHGs change by using ethanol as compared to gasoline, considering direct and indirect land use change effects.|
|CARB's full life-cycle carbon intensity||
||Grams of CO2 equivalent released per MJ of energy produced, includes indirect land use changes.|
|Estimated payback time for GHG emissions||
||Brazilian cerrado for sugarcane and US grassland for corn. Land use change scenarios by Fargione.|
|Total flex-fuel vehicles produced/sold||16.3 million||10 million||All fleets as of December 2011. The Brazilian fleet includes 1.5 million flex fuel motorcycles.
USDOE estimates that in 2009 only 504,297 flex-fuel vehicles were regularly fueled with E85 in the US.
|Ethanol fueling stations in the country||
||As % of total gas stations in the country. Brazil by December 2007. U.S. by July 2010. (170,000 total)|
|Ethanol's share in the gasoline market||
||As % of total consumption on a volumetric basis. Brazil as of April 2008. U.S. as of December 2011.|
|Cost of production (USD/gallon)||
||2006/2007 for Brazil (22¢/liter), 2004 for U.S. (35¢/liter).|
|Notes: (1) Only contiguous U.S., excludes Alaska. (2) Assuming no land use change. (3) Estimate is for U.S. consumption and sugarcane ethanol is imported from Brazil. Emissions from sea transport are included. Both estimates include land transport within the U.S. (4) CARB estimate for Midwest corn ethanol. California's gasoline carbon intensity is 95.86 blended with 10% ethanol. (5) Assuming direct land use change only.|
In March 2007, "ethanol diplomacy" was the focus of President George W. Bush's Latin American tour, in which he and Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, were seeking to promote the production and use of sugar cane–based ethanol throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. The two countries also agreed to share technology and set international standards for biofuels. The Brazilian sugar cane technology transfer will permit various Central American countries, such as Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama, several Caribbean countries, and various Andean Countries tariff-free trade with the U.S. thanks to existing concessionary trade agreements.
Even though the U.S. has imposed a US$0.54 tariff on every gallon of imported ethanol since 1980, the Caribbean nations and Central American countries are exempt from such duties based on the benefits granted by the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI). CBI provisions allow tariff-free access to the US market from ethanol produced from foreign feedstock (outside CBI countries) up to 7% of the previous year US consumption. Also additional quotas are allowed if the beneficiary countries produce at least 30% of the ethanol from local feedstocks up to an additional 35 million gallons (132.5 million liters). Thus, several countries have been importing hydrated ethanol from Brazil, processing it at local distilleries to dehydrate it, and then re-exporting it as anhydrous ethanol. American farmers have complained about this loophole to legally bypass the tariff. The 2005 Dominican Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) maintained the benefits granted by the CBI, and CAFTA provisions established country-specific shares for Costa Rica and El Salvador within the overall quota. An initial annual allowance was established for each country, with gradually increasing annual levels of access to the US market. The expectation is that using Brazilian technology for refining sugar cane–based ethanol, such countries could become net exporters to the United States in the short-term. In August 2007, Brazil's President toured Mexico and several countries in Central America and the Caribbean to promote Brazilian ethanol technology.
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that the American and Brazilian presidents signed in March 2007 may bring Brazil and the United States closer on energy policy, but it is not clear whether there has been substantive progress implementing the three pillars found in that agreement.
Brazil has also extended its technical expertise to several African countries, including Ghana,Mozambique, Angola, and Kenya. This effort is led by EMBRAPA, the state-owned company in charge for applied research on agriculture, and responsible for most of the achievements in increasing sugarcane productivity during the last thirty years. Another 15 African countries have shown interest in receiving Brazilian technical aid to improve sugarcane productivity and to produced ethanol efficiently. Brazil also has bilateral cooperation agreements with several other countries in Europe and Asia.
"Brazil’s ethanol and biodiesel programmes are a benchmark for alternative and renewable fuel sources. Partnerships are being established with developing countries seeking to follow Brazil’s achievements—a 675m-tonne reduction of greenhouse-gas emissions, a million new jobs and a drastic reduction in dependence on imported fossil fuels coming from a dangerously small number of producer countries. All of this has been accomplished without compromising food security, which, on the contrary, has benefited from rising agricultural output...We are setting up offices in developing countries interested in benefiting from Brazilian know-how in this field."
Ethanol produced from sugarcane provides energy that is renewable and less carbon intensive than oil. Bioethanol reduces air pollution thanks to its cleaner emissions, and also contributes to mitigate global warming by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
One of the main concerns about bioethanol production is the energy balance, the total amount of energy input into the process compared to the energy released by burning the resulting ethanol fuel. This balance considers the full cycle of producing the fuel, as cultivation, transportation and production require energy, including the use of oil and fertilizers. A comprehensive life cycle assessment commissioned by the State of São Paulo found that Brazilian sugarcane-based ethanol has a favorable energy balance, varying from 8.3 for average conditions to 10.2 for best practice production. This means that for average conditions one unit of fossil-fuel energy is required to create 8.3 energy units from the resulting ethanol. These findings have been confirmed by other studies.
Greenhouse gas emissions
Another benefit of bioethanol is the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as compared to gasoline, because as much carbon dioxide is taken up by the growing plants as is produced when the bioethanol is burnt, with a zero theoretical net contribution. Several studies have shown that sugarcane-based ethanol reduces greenhouse gases by 86 to 90% if there is no significant land use change, and ethanol from sugarcane is regarded the most efficient biofuel currently under commercial production in terms of GHG emission reduction.
However, two studies published in 2008 are critical of previous assessments of greenhouse gas emissions reduction, as the authors considered that previous studies did not take into account the effect of land use changes. Recent assessments carried out in 2009 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) included the impact of indirect land use changes (ILUC) as part of the lifecycle analysis of crop-based biofuels. Brazilian sugarcane ethanol meets both the ruled California Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and the proposed federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2), despite the additional carbon emissions associated with ILUC. On February 3, 2010, EPA issued its final ruling regarding the RFS2 for 2010 and beyond, and determined that Brazilian ethanol produced from sugarcane complies with the applicable 50% GHG reduction threshold for the advanced fuel category. EPA’s modelling shows that sugarcane ethanol from Brazil reduces greenhouse gas emissions as compared to gasoline by 61%, using a 30-year payback for indirect land use change (ILUC) emissions. By September 2010 five Brazilian sugarcane ethanol mills have been approved by the EPA to export their ethanol in the U.S. under the advanced biofuel category.
A report commissioned by the United Nations, based on a detailed review of published research up to mid-2009 as well as the input of independent experts worldwide, found that ethanol from sugar cane as produced in Brazil "in some circumstances does better than just "zero emission." If grown and processed correctly, it has negative emission, pulling CO2 out of the atmosphere, rather than adding it. In contrast, the report found that U.S. use of maize for biofuel is less efficient, as sugarcane can lead to emissions reductions of between 70% and well over 100% when substituted for gasoline. A 2010 study commissioned by the European Commission found that emission reduction effects of first-generation biofuels are positive, even after discounting indirect land use change effects, particularly the "more emission-efficient" sugarcane ethanol from Brazil, which would have to be imported to assure the environmental viability of the EU's biofuels mandate.
Another 2010 study published by the World Bank found that "Brazil's transport sector has a lower carbon intensity compared to that of most other countries because of its widespread use of ethanol as a fuel for vehicles." The study also concluded that despite the already low emission intensity, urban transportation is responsible for 51% of CO2 emissions within the Brazilian transport sector in 2008, and mainly originate in the growing use of private cars, traffic congestion and inefficient public transportation systems. Nevertheless, the study concluded that the increased use of flexible-fuel vehicles and the switch from gasoline to sugarcane ethanol are expected to stabilize GHG emissions from the light vehicle fleet over the next 25 years despite an expected increase in the number of kilometers traveled. Furthermore, the study found that if bioethanol's market share of the gasoline-powered vehicle market reaches 80% in 2030, this switch from gasoline "could deliver more than one-third of total emissions reduction targeted for the transport sector over the period" (2008–2030). The study also concluded that by increasing Brazilian ethanol exports to attend the increasing international demand for low-carbon fuels, its trade partners will benefit from reduced CHG emissions. However, for this opportunity to be realized, trade barriers and subsidies in many countries will have to be reduced or eliminated.
A 2009 study published in Energy Policy found that the use of ethanol fuel in Brazil has allowed to avoid over 600 million tons of CO2 emissions since 1975, when the Pró-Álcool Program began. The study also concluded that the neutralization of the carbon released due to land-use change was achieved in 1992. In another estimate, UNICA, the main Brazilian ethanol industry organization, estimated that just the use of ethanol fuel in flex-fuel vehicles in Brazil has avoided 83.5 millions tons of CO2 emissions between March 2003 and January 2010.
The widespread use of ethanol brought several environmental benefits to urban centers regarding air pollution. Lead additives to gasoline were reduced through the 1980s as the amount of ethanol blended in the fuel was increased, and these additives were completely eliminated by 1991. The addition of ethanol blends instead of lead to gasoline lowered the total carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons, sulfur emissions, and particulate matter significantly. The use of ethanol-only vehicles has also reduced CO emissions drastically. Before the Pró-Álcool Program started, when gasoline was the only fuel in use, CO emissions were higher than 50 g/km driven; they had been reduced to less than 5.8 g/km in 1995. Several studies have also shown that São Paulo has benefit with significantly less air pollution thanks to ethanol's cleaner emissions. Furthermore, Brazilian flex-fuel engines are being designed with higher compression ratios, taking advantage of the higher ethanol blends and maximizing the benefits of the higher oxygen content of ethanol, resulting in lower emissions and improving fuel efficiency.
Even though all automotive fossil fuels emit aldehydes, one of the drawbacks of the use of hydrated ethanol in ethanol-only engines is the increase in aldehyde emissions as compared with gasoline or gasohol. However, the present ambient concentrations of aldehyde, in São Paulo city are below the reference levels recommended as adequate to human health found in the literature. Other concern is that because formaldehyde and acetaldehyde emissions are significantly higher, and although both aldehydes occur naturally and are frequently found in the open environment, additional emissions may be important because of their role in smog formation. However, more research is required to establish the extent and direct consequences, if any, on health.
Water use and fertilizers
Ethanol production has also raised concerns regarding water overuse and pollution, soil erosion and possible contamination by excessive use of fertilizers. A study commissioned by the Dutch government in 2006 to evaluate the sustainability of Brazilian bioethanol concluded that there is sufficient water to supply all foreseeable long-term water requirements for sugarcane and ethanol production. Also, and as a result of legislation and technological progress, the amount of water collected for ethanol production has decreased considerably during the previous years. The overuse of water resources seems a limited problem in general in São Paulo, particularly because of the relatively high rainfall, yet, some local problems may occur. Regarding water pollution due to sugarcane production, Embrapa classifies the industry as level 1, which means "no impact" on water quality.
This evaluation also found that consumption of agrochemicals for sugar cane production is lower than in citric, corn, coffee and soybean cropping. Disease and pest control, including the use of agrochemicals, is a crucial element in all cane production. The study found that development of resistant sugar cane varieties is a crucial aspect of disease and pest control and is one of the primary objectives of Brazil’s cane genetic improvement programs. Disease control is one of the main reasons for the replacement of a commercial variety of sugar cane.
Advancements in fertilizers and natural pesticides have all but eliminated the need to burn fields. Sugarcane fields are traditionally burned just before harvest to avoid harm to the workers, by removing the sharp leaves and killing snakes and other harmful animals, and also to fertilize the fields with ash. There has been less burning due to pressure from the public and health authorities, and as a result of the recent development of effective harvesting machines. In the mid 90s, it was very common to experience quite dense ash rains in cities within the sugarcane's fields during harvest seasons. A 2001 state law banned burning in sugarcane fields in São Paulo state by 2021, and machines will gradually replace human labor as the means of harvesting cane, except where the abrupt terrain does not allow for mechanical harvesting. However, 150 out of 170 of São Paulo's sugar cane processing plants signed in 2007 a voluntary agreement with the state government to comply by 2014. Independent growers signed in 2008 the voluntary agreement to comply, and the deadline was extended to 2017 for sugar cane fields located in more abrupt terrain. By the 2009/10 harvest season more than 50% of the cane was collected in São Paulo with harvesting machines. Mechanization will reduce pollution from burning fields and has higher productivity than people, but also will create unemployment for these seasonal workers, many of them coming from the poorest regions of Brazil. Due to mechanization the number of temporary workers in the sugarcane plantations has already declined as each harvester machine replaces about 100 cane cutters a day and creates 30 jobs including operators and maintenance teams.
Effects of land use change
Two studies published in 2008 questioned the benefits estimated in previous assessments regarding the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from sugarcane-based ethanol, as the authors consider that previous studies did not take into account the direct and indirect effect of land use changes. The authors found a "biofuel carbon debt" is created when Brazil and other developing countries convert land in undisturbed ecosystems, such as rainforests, savannas, or grasslands, to biofuel production, and to crop production when agricultural land is diverted to biofuel production. This land use change releases more CO2 than the annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions that these biofuels would provide by displacing fossil fuels. Among others, the study analyzed the case of Brazilian Cerrado being converted for sugarcane ethanol production. The biofuel carbon debt on converted Cerrado is estimated to be repaid in 17 years, the least amount of time of the scenarios that were analyzed, as for example, ethanol from US corn was estimated to have a 93-year payback time. The study conclusion is that the net effect of biofuel production via clearing of carbon-rich habitats is to increase CO2 emissions for decades or centuries relative to fossil fuel use.
Regarding this concern, previous studies conducted in Brazil have shown there are 355 million ha of arable land in Brazil, of which only 72 million ha are in use. Sugarcane is only taking 2% of arable land available, of which ethanol production represented 55% in 2008. Embrapa estimates that there is enough agricultural land available to increase at least 30 times the existing sugarcane plantation without endangering sensible ecosystems or taking land destined for food crops. Most future growth is expected to take place on abandoned pasture lands, as it has been the historical trend in São Paulo state. Also, productivity is expected to improve even further based on current biotechnology research, genetic improvement, and better agronomic practices, thus contributing to reduce land demand for future sugarcane cultures. This trend is demonstrated by the increases in agricultural production that took place in São Paulo state between 1990 and 2004, where coffee, orange, sugarcane and other food crops were grown in an almost constant area.
Also regarding the potential negative impacts of land use changes on carbon emissions, a study commissioned by the Dutch government concluded that "it is very difficult to determine the indirect effects of further land use for sugar cane production (i.e. sugar cane replacing another crop like soy or citrus crops, which in turn causes additional soy plantations replacing pastures, which in turn may cause deforestation), and also not logical to attribute all these soil carbon losses to sugar cane." Other authors have also questioned these indirect effects, as cattle pastures are displaced to the cheaper land near the Amazon. Studies rebutting this concern claim that land devoted to free grazing cattle is shrinking, as density of cattle on pasture land increased from 1.28 heads of cattle/ha to 1.41 from 2001 to 2005, and further improvements are expected in cattle feeding practices.
A paper published in February 2010 by a team led by Lapola from the University of Kassel found that the planned expansion of biofuel plantations (sugarcane and soybean) in Brazil up to 2020 will have a small direct land-use impact on carbon emissions, but indirect land-use changes could offset the carbon savings from biofuels due to the expansion of the rangeland frontier into the Amazonian forests, particularly due to displacement of cattle ranching. "Sugarcane ethanol and soybean biodiesel each contribute to nearly half of the projected indirect deforestation of 121,970 km2 by 2020, creating a carbon debt that would take about 250 years to be repaid using these biofuels instead of fossil fuels." The analysis also showed that intensification of cattle ranching, combined with efforts to promote high-yielding oil crops are required to achieve effective carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil, "while still fulfilling all food and bioenergy demands."
The main Brazilian ethanol industry organization (UNICA) commented that this study and other calculations of land-use impacts are missing a key factor, the fact that in Brazil "cattle production and pasture has been intensifying already and is projected to do so in the future."
Other criticism have focused on the potential for clearing rain forests and other environmentally valuable land for sugarcane production, such as the Amazonia, the Pantanal or the Cerrado. Embrapa and UNICA have rebutted this concern explaining that 99.7% of sugarcane plantations are located at least 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi) from the Amazonia, and expansion during the last 25 years took place in the Center-South region, also far away from the Amazonia, the Pantanal or the Atlantic forest. In São Paulo state growth took place in abandoned pasture lands.
The impact assessment regarding future changes in land use, forest protection and risks on biodiversity conducted as part of the study commissioned by the Dutch government concluded that "the direct impact of cane production on biodiversity is limited, because cane production replaces mainly pastures and/or food crop and sugar cane production takes place far from the major biomes in Brazil (Amazon Rain Forest, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Campos Sulinos and Pantanal)." However, "...the indirect impacts from an increase of the area under sugar cane production are likely more severe. The most important indirect impact would be an expansion of the area agricultural land at the expense of cerrados. The cerrados are an important biodiversity reserve. These indirect impacts are difficult to quantify and there is a lack of practically applicable criteria and indicators."
In order to guarantee a sustainable development of ethanol production, in September 2009 the government issued by decree a countrywide agroecological land use zoning to restrict sugarcane growth in or near environmentally sensitive areas such as the Pantanal wetlands, the Amazon Rainforest and the Upper Paraguay River Basin. The installation of new ethanol production plants will not be permitted on these locations, and only existing plants and new ones with environmental licensed already approved before September 17, 2009, will be allowed to remain operating in these sensitive areas. According to the new criteria, 92.5% of the Brazilian territory is not suitable for sugarcane plantation. The government considers that the suitable areas are more than enough to meet the future demand for ethanol and sugar in the domestic and international markets foreseen for the next decades.
Sugarcane has had an important social contribution to the some of the poorest people in Brazil by providing income usually above the minimum wage, and a formal job with fringe benefits. Formal employment in Brazil accounts an average 45% across all sectors, while the sugarcane sector has a share of 72.9% formal jobs in 2007, up from 53.6% in 1992, and in the more developed sugarcane ethanol industry in São Paulo state formal employment reached 93.8% in 2005. Average wages in sugar cane and ethanol production are above the official minimum wage, but minimum wages may be insufficient to avoid poverty. The North-Northeast regions stands out for having much lower levels of education among workers and lower monthly income. The average number workers with 3 or less school years in Brazil is 58.8%, while in the Southeast this percentage is 46.2%, in the Northeast region is 76,4%. Therefore, earnings in the Center-South are not surprisingly higher than those in the North-Northeast for comparable levels of education. In 2005 sugarcane harvesting workers in the Center-South region received an average wage 58.7% higher than the average wage in the North-Northeast region. The main social problems are related to cane cutters which do most of the low-paid work related to ethanol production.
The total number of permanent employees in the sector fell by one-third between 1992 and 2003, in part due to the increasing reliance on mechanical harvesting, especially in the richest and more mature sugarcane producers of São Paulo state. During the same period, the share of temporary or seasonal workers has fluctuated, first declining and then increasing in recent years to about one-half of the total jobs in the sector, but in absolute terms the number of temporary workers has declined also. The sugarcane sector in the poorer Northeast region is more labor-intensive as production in this region represents only 18.6% of the country's total production but employs 44.3% of worker force in the sugarcane sector.
The manual harvesting of sugarcane has been associated with hardship and poor working conditions. In this regard, the study commissioned by the Dutch government confirmed that the main problem is indeed related to manual cane harvesting. A key problem in working conditions is the high work load. As a result of mechanization the workload per worker has increased from 4 to 6 ton per day in the eighties to 8 to 10 ton per day in the nineties, up to 12 to 15 ton per day in 2007. If the quota is not fulfilled, workers can be fired. Producers say this problem will disappear with greater mechanization in the next decade. Also, as mechanization of the harvesting is increasing and only feasible in flat terrain, more workers are being used in areas where conditions are not suitable for mechanized harvesting equipment, such as rough areas where the crops are planted irregularly, making working conditions harder and more hazardous.
Also unhealthy working conditions and even cases of slavery and deaths from overwork (cane cutting) have been reported, but these are likely worst-case examples. Even though sufficiently strict labor laws are present in Brazil, enforcement is weak. Displacement and seasonal labor also implies physical and cultural disruption of multifunctional family farms and traditional communities.
Regarding social responsibility the ethanol production sector maintains more than 600 schools, 200 nursery centers and 300 day care units, as legislation requires that 1% of the net sugar cane price and 2% of the net ethanol price must be devoted to medical, dental, pharmaceutical, sanitary, and educational services for sugar cane workers. In practice more than 90% of the mills provide health and dental care, transportation and collective life insurance, and over 80% provide meals and pharmaceutical care. However, for the temporary low wage workers in cane cutting these services may not be available.
Effect on food prices
Some environmentalists, such as George Monbiot, have expressed fears that the marketplace will convert crops to fuel for the rich, while the poor starve and biofuels cause environmental problems. Environmental groups have raised concerns about this trade-off for several years. The food vs fuel debate reached a global scale in 2008 as a result of the international community's concerns regarding the steep increase in food prices. On April 2008, Jean Ziegler, back then United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, called biofuels a "crime against humanity", a claim he had previously made in October 2007, when he called for a 5-year ban for the conversion of land for the production of biofuels. Also on April 2008, the World Bank's President, Robert Zoellick, stated that "While many worry about filling their gas tanks, many others around the world are struggling to fill their stomachs. And it's getting more and more difficult every day."
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva gave a strong rebuttal, calling these claims "fallacies resulting from commercial interests," and putting the blame instead on U.S. and European agricultural subsidies, and a problem restricted to U.S. ethanol produced from maize. The Brazilian President has also claimed on several occasions that his country's sugar cane–based ethanol industry has not contributed to the food price crises.
A report released by Oxfam in June 2008 criticized biofuel policies of rich countries as neither a solution to the climate crisis nor the oil crisis, while contributing to the food price crisis. The report concluded that from all biofuels available in the market, Brazilian sugarcane ethanol is "far from perfect" but it is the most favorable biofuel in the world in term of cost and greenhouse gas balance. The report discusses some existing problems and potential risks, and asks the Brazilian government for caution to avoid jeopardizing its environmental and social sustainability. The report also says that: "Rich countries spent up to $15 billion last year supporting biofuels while blocking cheaper Brazilian ethanol, which is far less damaging for global food security."
A World Bank research report published on July 2008 found that from June 2002 to June 2008 "biofuels and the related consequences of low grain stocks, large land use shifts, speculative activity and export bans" accounted for 70-75% of total price rises. The study found that higher oil prices and a weak dollar explain 25-30% of total price rise. The study said that "...large increases in biofuels production in the United States and Europe are the main reason behind the steep rise in global food prices" and also stated that "Brazil's sugar-based ethanol did not push food prices appreciably higher." The report argues that increased production of biofuels in these developed regions were supported by subsidies and tariffs on imports, and considers that without such policies, price increases worldwide would have been smaller. This research paper also concluded that Brazil's sugar cane–based ethanol has not raised sugar prices significantly, and recommends removing tariffs on ethanol imports by both the U.S. and E.U., to allow more efficient producers such as Brazil and other developing countries, including many African countries, to produce ethanol profitably for export to meet the mandates in the E.U. and U.S..
An economic assessment report also published in July 2008 by the OECD agrees with the World Bank report regarding the negative effects of subsidies and trade restrictions, but found that the impact of biofuels on food prices are much smaller. The OECD study is also critical of the limited reduction of GHG emissions achieved from biofuels produced in Europe and North America, concluding that the current biofuel support policies would reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport fuel by no more than 0.8% by 2015, while Brazilian ethanol from sugar cane reduces greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% compared to fossil fuels. The assessment calls on governments for more open markets in biofuels and feedstocks in order to improve efficiency and lower costs.
A study by the Brazilian research unit of the Fundação Getúlio Vargas regarding the effects of biofuels on grain prices. concluded that the major driver behind the 2007–2008 rise in food prices was speculative activity on futures markets under conditions of increased demand in a market with low grain stocks. The study also concluded that expansion of biofuel production was not a relevant factor and also that there is no correlation between Brazilian sugarcane cultivated area and average grain prices, as on the contrary, the spread of sugarcane was accompanied by rapid growth of grain crops in the country.
- Renewable energy in Brazil
- Common ethanol fuel mixtures
- Biofuels by region
- List of renewable energy topics by country
- Ethanol fuel by country
- Ethanol fuel in Australia
- Ethanol fuel in the Philippines
- Ethanol fuel in Sweden
- Ethanol fuel in the United States
- Flexible-fuel vehicle
- Low-carbon fuel standard
- Macedo, Isaias de Carvalho, editor (2007). A Energia da Cana-de-Açúcar – Doze estudos sobre a agroindústria da cana-de-açúcar no Brasil e a sua sustentabilidade (Available in PDF) (in Portuguese) (Second ed.). Berlendis & Vertecchia, São Paulo: UNICA – União da Agroindústria Canavieira do Estado de São Paulo. CDD-338.173610981. Retrieved 2009-03-09.
- Neves, Marcos Fava, Mairun Junqueira Alves Pinto, Marco Antonio Conejero and Vinicius Gustavo Trombin (2011). Food and fuel: The example of Brazil. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-8686-166-8
- Rothkopf, Garten (2007). A Blueprint for Green Energy in the Americas (Available in PDF). Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C. Retrieved 2009-03-09.
- Mitchell, Donald (2010). Biofuels in Africa: Opportunities, Prospects, and Challenges (Available in PDF). The World Bank, Washington, D.C. ISBN 978-0-8213-8516-6. Retrieved 2011-02-08. See Appendix A: The Brazilian Experience
- F.O. Lichts. "Industry Statistics: 2010 World Fuel Ethanol Production". Renewable Fuels Association. Retrieved 2011-04-30.
- "Biofuels: The Promise and the Risks, in World Development Report 2008" (PDF). The World Bank. 2008. pp. 70–71. Retrieved 2008-05-04.
- Renewable Fuels Association (2012-03-06). "Acelerating Industry Innovation—2012 Ethanol Industry Outlook". Renewable Fuels Association. Retrieved 2012-03-22. See pp. 3, 8, 10 22 and 23.
- Daniel Budny and Paulo Sotero, editor (April 2007). "Brazil Institute Special Report: The Global Dynamics of Biofuels" (PDF). Brazil Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center. Retrieved 2008-05-03.
- Inslee, Jay; Bracken Hendricks (2007). "6. Homegrown Energy". Apollo's Fire. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp. 153–155, 160–161. ISBN 978-1-59726-175-3.
- Larry Rohter (2006-04-10). "With Big Boost From Sugar Cane, Brazil Is Satisfying Its Fuel Needs". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- "Biofuels in Brazil: Lean, green and not mean". The Economist. 2008-06-26. Retrieved 2008-11-28.
- Sperling, Daniel and Deborah Gordon (2009). "4 Brazilian Cane Ethanol: A Policy Model. The authors consider that ethanol production in Brazil is a unique situation and it is not replicable, they think there is no other country where it makes sense to convert sugar or starch crops to ethanol, particularly the US.". Two billion cars: driving toward sustainability. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 95–96. ISBN 978-0-19-537664-7.
- Thomas L. Friedman (2008). Hot, Flat, and Crowded. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York. p. 190. ISBN 978-0-374-16685-4. The author considers that ethanol can be a transport solution for Brazil, but one that only can be replicated in other tropical countries, from Africa to the Caribbean.
- Hausmann, Ricardo and Rodrigo Wagner (October 2009). "Certification Strategies, Industrial Development and a Global Market for Biofuels". Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Sustainability Science Program, Center for International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved 2010-02-09. Discussion Paper 2009-15. The authors found that for some countries in Central Africa and Latin America ethanol can represent a large industry, at least relative to current exports. The list of the relative importance of biofuels (sugarcane ethanol in particular and replicating the Brazilian production system) is headed by Suriname, Guyana, Bolivia, Paraguay, DR of Congo, and Cameroon. See pp. 5–6
- Mitchell, Donald (2010). Biofuels in Africa: Opportunities, Prospects, and Challenges. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. pp. xix–xxxii. ISBN 978-0-8213-8516-6. See Executive Summary and Appendix A: The Brazilian Experience.
- Garten Rothkopf (2007). "A Blueprint for Green Energy in the Americas". Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved 2008-08-22. See chapters Introduction (pp. 339–444) and Pillar I: Innovation (pp. 445–482)
- Macedo Isaias, M. Lima Verde Leal and J. Azevedo Ramos da Silva (2004). "Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in the production and use of fuel ethanol in Brazil" (PDF). Secretariat of the Environment, Government of the State of São Paulo. Archived from the original on 2008-05-28. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
- "Greenhouse Gas Reduction Thresholds". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- "EPA designates sugarcane ethanol as advanced biofuel". Green Momentum. 2010-02-05. Retrieved 2010-02-09.[dead link]
- Julieta Andrea Puerto Rico (2008-05-08). "Programa de Biocombustíveis no Brasil e na Colômbia: uma análise da implantação, resultados e perspectivas" (in Portuguese). Universidade de São Paulo. Retrieved 2008-10-05. Ph.D. Dissertation Thesis, pp. 81–82
- "Lei Nº 8.723, de 28 de Outubro de 1993. Dispõe sobre a redução de emissão de poluentes por veículos automotores e dá outras providências" (in Portuguese). Casa Civil da Presidência da República. Archived from the original on 2008-10-06. Retrieved 2008-10-05. See article 9º and modifications approved by Law Nº 10.696, 2003-07-02
- "Portaria Nº 143, de 27 de Junho de 2007" (in Portuguese). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Retrieved 2008-10-05. This decree fixed the mandatory blend at 25% starting July 1st, 2007
- "Dilma assina medida que dá poder à ANP para regular etanol". Reuters Brasil (in Portuguese). 2011-04-28. Retrieved 2011-05-03.
- Luiz A. Horta Nogueira (2004-03-22). "Perspectivas de un Programa de Biocombustibles en América Central: Proyecto Uso Sustentable de Hidrocarburos" (PDF) (in Spanish). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Retrieved 2008-05-09.
- William Lemos (2007-11-12). "Brazil's flex-fuel car production rises, boosting ethanol consumption to record highs". ICIS chemical business. Retrieved 2008-05-03.
- "UNICA: venda de veículos flex no Brasil cresce 13,9% em 2009 e frota ultrapassa 9 milhões de unidades" (in Portuguese). UNICA. 2010-01-11. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- Agência Estado (2010-03-04). "Brasil alcança marca de 10 milhões de carros flex" (in Portuguese). Veja (magazine). Retrieved 2010-03-07.
- "Automakers in Brazil Hit 10M Flex-Fuel Vehicle Mark; Brazilian Sugarcane Association Urges Global Dissemination". Green Car Congress. 2010-03-06. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- MDIC (2012). "Álcool combustível - Uso veicular do álcool combustível" (in Portuguese). Ministério de Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior (MDIC). Retrieved 2012-03-22.
- "Etanol: Carros flex representam 92% das vendas de março, último mês de IPI reduzido" (in Portuguese). UNICA, Brazil. 2010-04-20. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- Agência Brasil (2008-07-15). "ANP: consumo de álcool combustível é 50% maior em 2007" (in Portuguese). Invertia. Retrieved 2008-08-09.
- UOL Noticias (2008-04-11). "Consumo de álcool supera o de gasolina pela primeira vez em 20 anos" (in Portuguese). Cornélio Notícias. Retrieved 2008-10-18.
- Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2009). "Balanço Energético Nacional 2009: Ano base 2008" (in Portuguese and English). Ministério de Minas e Energia do Brasil. Retrieved 2010-06-22. Tables 3.6a and 3.6b. Data expressed in energy equivalent (toe). Report is based in 2008 data.
- "Portaria No. 7 de 11 de Janeiro de 2010 do Ministério de Estado da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento e Resolução No. 1 do Conselho Interministeriarl do Açúcar e do Álcool" (in Portuguese). Diário Oficial da União. 2010-01-12. Retrieved 2010-02-10. pp. 3
- "Setor Sucroenergético - Histórico: Ciclo Econômico da Cana-de-Açúcar" (in Portuguese). UNICA. Retrieved 2008-11-09.
- "USGA: Em 1927, o Primeiro Grande Empreendimento Brasileiro em Álcool Combustível" (in Portuguese). Onde Vamos Boletim Enfoque. June 2000. Archived from the original on March 19, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-09.
- William Kovarik (2008). "Ethanol's first century". Radford University. Retrieved 2008-11-13. This paper was originally presented in the XVI International Synposium on Alcohol Fuels, and augmented or slightly revised with the addition of new information in 2006–2008.
- Milton Briquet Bastos (2007-06-20). "Brazil’s Ethanol Program – An Insider's View". Energy Tribune. Retrieved 2008-08-14.
- Revista Veja (1979-06-13). "O petróleo da cana" (in Portuguese). Editora Abril. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Marla Dickerson (2005-06-17). "Brazil's ethanol effort helping lead to oil self-sufficiency". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- "Anúario da Industria Automobilistica Brasileira 2010: Tabelas 2.1-2.2-2.3 Produção por combustível - 1957/2009" (in Portuguese). ANFAVEA - Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (Brasil). pp. 62–64. Retrieved 2011-02-10. For the complete detail year by year up to 2010 see table in History of ethanol fuel in Brazil
- "Produção de Automóveis por Tipo e Combustível - 2010 (Tabela 10)" (PDF) (in Portuguese). ANFAVEA - Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (Brasil). January 2011. Retrieved 2011-02-10. Production up to December 2010
- "Governo reduz mistura de etanol na gasolina para 20%" (in Portuguese). Reuters Brasil. 2010-01-11. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
- Lovins. A.B. (2005). Winning the Oil Endgame, p. 105.
- Revista Veja (1989-05-24). "Um sonho corroído" (in Portuguese). Editora Abril. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- "Volkswagen to stop making gas-only cars for Brazil". Automotive News. 2006-03-23. Retrieved 2008-10-18.[dead link]
- "A Nova Volkswagen" (in Portuguese). Wolkswagen Brazil. Archived from the original on 2008-09-15. Retrieved 2008-10-18.
- "Volkswagen lança Golf Total Flex 1.6" (in Portuguese). ParanaOnline. 2006-03-30. Retrieved 2008-10-18.
- Adam Lashinsky and Nelson D. Schwartz (2006-01-24). "How to Beat the High Cost of Gasoline. Forever!". Fortune. Retrieved 2008-05-04.
- "Livina, primeiro carro flex da Nissan chega com preços entre R$ 46.690 e R$ 56.690" (in Portuguese). Car Magazine Online. 2009-03-18. Retrieved 2009-03-26.[dead link]
- "Kia introduces new Flex-Fuel Soul Flex at Brazilian Motor Show; boosts output and lowers fuel consumption". Green Car Congress. 2010-10-27. Retrieved 2010-10-28.
- Ford põe no Focus o 1º motor flex com injeção direta; preço é segredo - UOL Carros, 28 August 2013
- Adam Lashinsky and Nelson D. Schwartz (2006-01-24). "How to Beat the High Cost of Gasoline. Forever!". Fortune. Retrieved 2008-08-13.
- Reuters (2008-08-06). "Vendas de veículos flex no Brasil sobem 31,1% em julho 2008" (in Portuguese). Hoje Notícias. Retrieved 2008-08-13.
- "Participação de carros flex nas vendas volta a bater 94%" (in Portuguese). UNICA. 2009-09-08. Retrieved 2009-09-13.
- Gazeta Mercantil (2008). "ANP estima que consumo de álcool supere gasolina" (in Portuguese). Agropecuária Brasil. Retrieved 2008-08-09.[dead link]
- Abraciclo (2010-01-27). "Motos flex foram as mais vendidas em 2009 na categoria 150cc" (in Portuguese). UNICA. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
- "Produção Motocicletas 2010" (in Portuguese). ABRACICLO. Retrieved 2011-02-15.
- UNICA, Brazil (October 2012). "Frota brasileira de autoveículos leves (ciclo Otto)" [Brazilian fleet of light vehicles (Otto cycle)] (in Portuguese). UNICA Data. Retrieved 2012-10-31.
- "Começa a circular em São Paulo ônibus movido a etanol" (in Portuguese). Estado de São Paulo. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
- "São Paulo joins EU's BEST project with pure ethanol bus trial; over 400 in operation so far". Biopact. 2008-01-31. Archived from the original on 2008-09-22. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
- "Sao Paulo Puts Ethanol Bus into Service in BEST Project". Green Car Congress. 2007-12-23. Retrieved 2008-11-22.
- Fernando Saker (2009-11-13). "São Paulo recebe segundo ônibus movido a etanol" (in Portuguese). Centro Nacional de Referência em Biomassa. Retrieved 2011-05-28.
- Reuters (2010-11-25). "São Paulo terá primeira frota de ônibus movida a etanol". Terra Networks (in Portuguese). Retrieved 2010-11-27.
- "São Paulo putting 50 Scania ethanol buses into service". Green Car Congress. 2010-11-29. Retrieved 2010-11-29.
- Martha San Juan França (2011-05-26). "São Paulo ganha frota de ônibus a etanol". Brasil Econômico (in Portuguese). Retrieved 2011-05-27.
- "Substituição de diesel por etanol: vantagem que novos ônibus trazem à cidade de São Paulo". UNICA (in Portuguese). 2011-05-26. Retrieved 2011-05-27.
- "Magneti Marelli apresenta a moto flexível em combustível" (in Portuguese). WebMotors. 2007-11-07. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- Aldo Tizzani (2008-04-23). "Moto flex 'imita' carros e deve chegar até dezembro" (in Portuguese). UOL Carros. Retrieved 2008-09-07.
- "Honda lança primeira moto bicombustível do mundo" (in Portuguese). G1 Portal de Notícias da Globo. 2003-03-11. Retrieved 2003-03-11.
- Agencia EFE (2003-03-11). "Honda lançará moto flex ainda neste mês no Brasil" (in Portuguese). Folha Online. Retrieved 2003-03-11.
- "Honda lança no Brasil primeira moto flex do mundo" (in Portuguese). UNICA. 2003-03-11. Retrieved 2003-03-11.
- "Nova Honda NXR 150 Bros Mix é a 1ª On-Off Road com tecnologia bicombustível do Brasil" (in Portuguese). MotoDriver. 2009-09-17. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
- "2010 Ethanol Industry Outlook: Cimate of Opportunity". Renewable Fuels Association. 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-17.
- "Industry Statistics: 2008 World Fuel Ethanol Production". Renewable Fuels Association. Archived from the original on April 8, 2008. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
- José Goldemberg (2008-05-01). "The Brazilian biofuels industry". Biotechnology for Biofuels 1 (6): 4096. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-1-6 (inactive 2010-01-08). PMC 2405774. PMID 18471272. PDF version available at BioMedcentral
- Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (2008-10-03). "Perspectivas para o Etanol no Brasil" (in Portuguese). Ministério de Minas e Energia. Retrieved 2008-11-09.[dead link] See Table 6, pp. 36[dead link]
- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (Brazil). "Produção de etanol do Brasil" (in Portuguese). UNICA. Retrieved 2008-11-17. Click link Produção de etanol do Brasil to download the Excel spreadsheet.
- Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB Brazil) (August 2008). "Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira Cana-de-Açúcar Zafra 08" (in Portuguese). CONAB. Retrieved 2008-11-18.
- "Produção de álcool e de açúcar baterá recorde em 2008, prevê Conab" (in Portuguese). Folha de São Paulo. 2008-04-29. Retrieved 2008-11-09.
- Márcia Azanha Ferraz Dias de Moraes (2007). "O mercado de trabalho da agroindústria canavieira: desafios e oportunidades". Economia Aplicada (in Portuguese) 11 (4): 605. doi:10.1590/S1413-80502007000400008. Retrieved 2008-11-17. See Table 3
- Raymond Colitt and Stephan Nielsen (2012-03-13). "Brazil Ethanol Drive Falters on Domestic Supply Shortage". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 2012-03-22.
- "Brazilian brew: America opens up to Brazilian ethanol". The Economist. 2012-01-07. Retrieved 2012-03-22.
- Kris Bevill (2011-11-15). "How ethanol moves and where it’s going". Ethanol Producer Magazine. Retrieved 2012-03-22.
- Angelo, Claudio (2012). "Growth of ethanol fuel stalls in Brazil". Nature 491: 446–447.
- Estadão (2013-11-14). "Etanol é usado hoje em apenas 23% dos carros" [Today just 23% of flex fuel cars are using ethanol] (in Portuguese). Revista Veja. Retrieved 2013-11-16.
- Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (Brazil). "Preço ao produtor no Estado de São Paulo - Etanol anidro e etanol hidratado" (in Portuguese). UNICA. Retrieved 2008-11-23. Click link Preço ao produtor no Estado de São Paulo - Etanol anidro e etanol hidratado to download the Excel spreadsheet with producer prices of both types of ethanol by year.
- Antonio Flavio Dias Avila et al. (2000). "The Economic Challenge of Biotechnology in Brazil" (pdf). EMBRAPA. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Tarcízio Goes and Renner Marra (2008). "A Expansão da Cana-de-Açúcar e sua Sustentabilidade" (pdf) (in Portuguese). EMBRAPA. Retrieved 2008-11-30.
- Macedo et al. (2007). "A Energia da Cana-de-Açúcar – Doze estudos sobre a agroindústria da cana-de-açúcar no Brasil e a sua sustentabilidade" (in Portuguese). UNICA. Retrieved 2008-11-30. Click on the link to download the zip file with the pdf chapters.
- Macedo (2007) Chapter 10, pp. 185–186
- "Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Sugarcane". Embrapa. 2007-06-24. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
- Brazil Invests $50 M in Ethanol from Sugarcane Projects
- Edward Smeets, Martin Junginger et al. (August 2006). "Sustainability of Brazilian bio-ethanol". Copernicus Institute at Universiteit Utrecht and Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Archived from the original on May 28, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-23. Report NWS-E-2006-110, ISBN 90-8672-012-9
- Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis (ANP) (2005-12-06). "Resolução ANP Nº 36, DE 6.12.2005 - DOU 7.12.2005" (in Portuguese). ANP. Retrieved 2008-11-15. See Table I – Specifications for AEAC and AEHC at "Anexo: Regulamente Técnico ANP Nº 7/2005.
- Goettemoeller, Jeffrey; Adrian Goettemoeller (2007). Sustainable Ethanol: Biofuels, Biorefineries, Cellulosic Biomass, Flex-Fuel Vehicles, and Sustainable Farming for Energy Independence. Prairie Oak Publishing, Maryville, Missouri. p. 42. ISBN 978-0-9786293-0-4.
- S. Meyers, J. Sathaye et al. (December 2000). "Preliminary Assessment of Potential CDM Early Start Projects in Brazil" (PDF). Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Retrieved 2008-11-23. Report LBNL-46120, pp. 16
- Frost & Sullivan (2008-09-30). "Frost: Brazil Turns to Sugarcane Bagasse Power Generation to Reduce Hydropower Dependence". Information Handling Services (IHS). Retrieved 2008-11-23.
- Holly Jessen (2010-01-04). "Petrobras tests flex-fuel turbine generator". Ethanol Producer Magazine. Retrieved 2011-02-05.
- De Oliveira, Marcelo E. Dias de, Burton E. Vaughan & Edward J. Rykiel Jr.; "Ethanol as Fuel: Energy, Carbon dioxide Balances, and Ecological Footprint." BioScience Vol. 55 No. 7, July 2005.
- "Exportações Brasileira de Álcool (NCM: 2207.10.00 e 2207.20.10) realizadas em 2007 - Por País" (PDF) (in Portuguese). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- Flávia Ribeiro (2008-02-07). "The New European Challenge for Brazilian Ethanol Exports". Frost & Sullivan. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- "Exportações Brasileira de Álcool (NCM: 2207.10.00 e 2207.20.10) realizadas em 2006 - Por País" (PDF) (in Portuguese). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- "Exportações Brasileira de Álcool (NCM: 2207.10.00 e 2207.20.10) realizadas em 2005 - Por País" (PDF) (in Portuguese). Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- "Brazil's ethanol exports to rise in 2008:F.O.Licht". Reuters UK. 2008-03-05. Retrieved 2008-05-10.[dead link]
- Charles E. Grassley (2007-03-02). "Grassley Expresses Concern Over Possible U.S.-Brazil Partnership on Ethanol" (PDF). United States Senate. Archived from the original on August 2, 2008. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- Letter from six Democratic Senators to President Bush at
- Anna Austin (September 2008). "Brazil launches campaign to remove ethanol tariff". Ethanol Producer Magazine. Retrieved 2009-06-24. The U.S. tax credit was reduced from 51 to 45 cents by the 2008 Farm Bill and went into effect on January 1, 2009.
- Mary Clare Jalonick (2008-05-22). "Congress enacts $290B farm bill over Bush veto". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 2009-06-24. The previous tax credit was 51-cents and it expired on 2008-12-31.
- "Ethanol Tax Credit Reduced January 1, 2009!!". Gasoline & Automotive Dealers of America. 2008-12-31. Retrieved 2009-06-24.[dead link]
- "Exportações de álcool para os EUA crescem mais de 900% em 2006" (in Portuguese). Folha de São Paulo. 2007-05-30. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- Inae Riveras (2008-01-04). "Brazil local demand to drive ethanol production". Reuters. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
- "Brazilian ethanol exports plummet 31 percent as US ethanol glut dampens trade". Biofuels Digest. 2007-12-04. Retrieved 2008-05-11.[dead link]
- Costs and Benefits to Taxpayers, Consumers, and Producers from U.S. Ethanol Policies, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. 2010-7-20. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- Little impact if U.S. ethanol tax breaks end: Study Reuters. 2010-7-20. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- "Using Biofuel Tax Credits to Achieve Energy and Environmental Policy Goals". Congressional Budget Office. July 2010. Retrieved 2010-07-25.
- Growth Energy proposes shift in fuel policy Ethanol Producer Magazine. 2010-7-15. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- After 30 years of federal subsidies, ethanol can go it alone The Sacramento Bee. 2010-8-12. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- Ag leaders, RFA push for VEETC extension Ethanol Producer Magazine. 2010-5-26. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- Path Forward for Biofuels Incentives U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 2010-7-14. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- Grassley, Conrad work to extend ethanol tax incentives to build energy security and create jobs Office of Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA). 2010-4-20. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- "Ethanol subsidies: Fiscal sobriety". The Economist. 2011-06-23. Retrieved 2011-06-25. Print edition June 25th - July 1st, pp. 38.
- Clifford Krauss (2011-06-17). "Ethanol Industry Is Unruffled by Senate Vote Against Tax Breaks". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-06-25.
- O Globo (2011-02-16). "Combustível mais barato e poluente" (in Portuguese). UNICA, Brazil. Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- Reuters (2011-02-16). "Consumo de etanol no Brasil cai pela 1ª vez desde 2003". Veja (magazine) (in Portuguese). Retrieved 2011-02-16.
- "Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2): Final Rule". U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- "Agência ambiental dos EUA reconhece etanol de cana como biocombustível avançado" (in Portuguese). UNICA. 2010-02-03. Retrieved 2010-02-14.
- "EPA Deems Sugarcane Ethanol an Advanced Biofuel". DOMESTICFUEL.com. 2010-02-04. Retrieved 2010-02-14.
- Oil Daily (2010-02-05). "Brazilian Ethanol Producers Hope to Benefit From US Ruling". UNICA. Retrieved 2010-02-14.
- Philip Brasher (2010-02-21). "U.S. law assists Brazilian ethanol imports". The Des Moines Register. Retrieved 2010-02-23.[dead link]
- JB Online (2007-11-20). "Álcool ou Gasolina? Saiba qual escolher quando for abastecer" (in Portuguese). Opinaoweb. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
- InfoMoney (2007-05-30). "Saiba o que fazer para economizar gasolina" (in Portuguese). IGF. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
- "Brazil to hike fuel prices after 2½ yr freeze". Reuters. 2008-04-30. Retrieved 2008-05-04.
- Daniel Bergamasco and Roberto Machado (2008-08-27). "Imposto põe gasolina brasileira entre as mais caras" (in Portuguese). Folha de São Paulo Online. Retrieved 2008-08-29. Brazilian gasoline is among the most expensive in the world. The price of US$6.00 per gallon results from the Brazilian average price of R$ 2.50 per liter converted at a exchange rate of R$ 1.575 per USD by late July 2008.
- Carolina Eloy (2010-01-04). "Combustíveis: cadastro pode facilitar a arrecadação de impostos" (in Portuguese). JB Online. Retrieved 2010-01-04.[dead link]
- "Síntese dos Preços Praticados - Brasil. RESUMO III - Gasolina R$/l" (in Portuguese). Agência Nacional do Petróleo. October 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-08. Retail prices of gasoline for week of 26/10/2008 to 01/11/2008.
- "Síntese dos Preços Praticados - Brasil. RESUMO III - Álcool R$/l" (in Portuguese). Agência Nacional do Petróleo. October 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-08. Retail prices of ethanol for week of 26/10/2008 to 01/11/2008.
- "Real Comercial (REAL COM/DOLAR)" (in Portuguese). Terra: Invertia. Retrieved 2008-11-08. Closing exchange rate for week of 2008-10-31.
- The Economist, March 3–9, 2007 "Fuel for Friendship" p. 44
- David Shepardson (2011-12-24). "Congress ends corn ethanol subsidy". The Detroit News. Retrieved 2011-12-29.[dead link]
- Robert Pear (2012-01-01). "After Three Decades, Tax Credit for Ethanol Expires". The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-01-04.
- Gerardo Reyes (2008-06-08). "Colombians in U.S. sugar mills to produce ethanol". Miami Herald. Retrieved 2008-06-11.
- Erin Voegele (March 2009). "Sugarcane Economics". Ethanol Producer Magazine. Retrieved 2009-02-12.
- Julia Duailibi (2008-04-27). "Ele é o falso vilão" (in Portuguese). Veja Magazine. Retrieved 2008-05-03.
- Maria Helena Tachinardi (2008-06-13). "Por que a cana é melhor que o milho" (in Portuguese). Época Magazine. Retrieved 2008-08-06. Print edition pp. 73
- Timothy Searchinger et al. (2008). "Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change". Science 319 (5867): 1238–40. doi:10.1126/science.1151861. PMID 18258860.. There are critics to these findings for assuming a worst-case scenario.
- "Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis" (PDF). EPA. February 2010. Retrieved 2010-02-12. See pp. 480 and 489, Figures 2.6-1 and 2.6-9.
- "Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Volume I: Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons" (PDF). California Air Resources Board. 2009-03-05. Retrieved 2009-04-26.
- "Draft Attachment B: Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of a Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard - Staff’s Suggested Modifications to the Original Proposal" (pdf). CARB. 2003-04-23. Retrieved 2009-04-30.
- "Another Inconvenient Truth" (PDF). Oxfam. 2008-06-28. Retrieved 2008-08-06.Oxfam Briefing Paper 114, figure 2 pp.8
- Fargione et al. (2008). "Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt". Science 319 (5867): 1235–8. doi:10.1126/science.1152747. PMID 18258862.. There are rebuttals to these findings for assuming a worst-case scenario.
- "Anúario da Industria Automobilistica Brasileira 2011: Tabela 2.3 Produção por combustível - 1957/2010" (in Portuguese). ANFAVEA - Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (Brasil). Retrieved 2012-01-22. pp. 62-63.
- Renavam/Denatran (January 2012). "Licenciamento total de automóveis e comerciais leves por combustível" [Total automobiles and light-trucks registered by fuel] (in Portuguese). ANFAVEA. Retrieved 2012-01-21. Carta de ANFAVEA 308 pp. 4.
- Jim Motavalli (2012-03-01). "Flex-Fuel Amendment Makes for Strange Bedfellows". The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-03-18.
- "Produção Motocicletas 2011" [2011 Motorcycle Production] (in Portuguese). ABRACICLO. Retrieved 2012-01-21.
- Stacy C. Davis, Susan W. Diegel, and Robert G. Boundy (June 2011). "Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 30". Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 2011-08-28. See Table 6.1 pp. 6-3.
- "Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis" (in Portuguese). Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis. 2008. Retrieved 2009-07-10. See Table 3.17, pp. 138.
- Growth Energy (2010-08-02). "New E85 and Blender Pump Stations". NEVC FYI Newsletter (Vol 1 Issue 16). Retrieved 2010-08-10.
- Marcela Sanchez (2007-02-23). "Latin America -- the 'Persian Gulf' of Biofuels?". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-05-03.
- Ben Lilliston (June 2005). "CAFTA's Impact on U.S. Ethanol Market". The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
- Tomas Piccinini (2008-05-21). "Latin American Ethanol Exports Exploit U.S. Legislative Loopholes". Frost & Sullivan. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
- Lauren Etter and Joel Millman (2007-03-09). "Ethanol Tariff Loophole Sparks a Boom in Caribbean". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2008-11-26. Originally published by the WSJ page A1
- "Senators urge action to close ethanol import loophole". High Plains Journal. 2004-07-20. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
- Edmund L. Andrews and Larry Rother (2007-03-03). "U.S. and Brazil Seek to Promote Ethanol in West". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Diana Renée (2007-08-10). "Diplomacia de biocombustibles" de Lula no genera entusiasmo" (in Spanish). La Nación. Retrieved 2008-04-28.[dead link]
- Alan M. Wright (June 2008). "Brazil-U.S. Biofuels Cooperation: One Year Later" (PDF). Brazil Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Center. Retrieved 2008-08-15.
- Francho Barón (2008-11-25). "El desembarco africano de Brasil" (in Spanish). El País. Retrieved 2008-11-27. The fifteen countries are: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Côte d'Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo.
- "Brazilian President to begin four country African tour; will promote biofuels". Biofuels Digest. 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2008-11-27.[dead link]
- "Angola-based Biocom to launch in 2010, reach full ethanol capacity in 2012". Biofuels Digest. 2007-10-30. Retrieved 2008-11-27.[dead link]
- Kaburu Mugambi (2008-08-25). "Kenya: Country, Brazil Partner On Ethanol". The Nation (Nairobi). Retrieved 2008-11-27.
- Rothkopf (2007), Chapter IV, see Table 5.c, pp. 557
- Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2008-11-19). "Building on the B in BRIC". The Economist. Retrieved 2008-11-26.From The World in 2009 print edition
- Deepak Rajagopal and David Zilberman (September 2007). "Review of environmental, economic and policy aspects of biofuels" (PDF). The World Bank. Retrieved 2008-11-30. Policy Research Working Paper 4341. See Chapter 2.
- "Carbon and Sustainability Reporting Within the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation" (PDF). Department of Transport (UK). January 2008. Archived from the original on June 25, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-30.This graph assumes that all bioethanols are burnt in their country of origin and that previously existing cropland is used to grow the feedstock.
- "Reduction of Greenhouse gases". BioEthanol for Sustainable Transport. Retrieved 2008-11-30.
- Michael Grunwald (2008-03-27). "The Clean Energy Scam". Time Magazine. Retrieved 2008-12-04.
- "EPA Proposes New Regulations for Renewable Fuel Standard to Implement Requirements of EISA; GHG Reduction and Indirect Land Use Change Effects Included". Green Car Congress. 2009-05-05. Retrieved 2009-06-16.
- Wyatt Buchanan (2009-04-24). "Air Resources Board moves to cut carbon use". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
- The Associated Press (2009-04-24). "California: Low-Carbon-Fuels Mandate". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
- Jeff St. John (2009-04-23). "California Adopts Low Carbon Fuel Standard". GreenMedia. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
- Dale Kasler (2009-04-25). "California's low-carbon fuel standard has oil companies anxious". The Sacramento Bee. Archived from the original on 2009-04-30. Retrieved 2009-05-04.
- UNICA Press release (2009-04-24). "Sugarcane Ethanol Passes Critical Test in California". World-Wire. Retrieved 2009-04-25.
- Joanna Schroeder (2010-02-04). "EPA Deems Sugarcane Ethanol an Advanced Biofuel". Domesticfuel.com. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- "Brazilian mills register to export "advanced" ethanol to the US". UNICA. 2010-09-16. Retrieved 2010-10-02.
- Sheila McNulty (2010-09-27). "Brazil’s ethanol producers take a big bet on biofuels". Financial Times. Retrieved 2010-10-02.
- "Biofuels - New Report Brings Greater Clarity to Burning Issue". United Nations Environment Programme. 2009-10-16. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- "Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels". United Nations Environment Programme. 2009-10-16. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
- "Biofuels and global trade study goes online". European Commission Chief Economist. March 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI) (2010-03-25). "Global Trade and Environmental Impact Study of the EU Biofuels Mandate". Directorate General for Trade of the European Commission. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- "Analysis Finds That First-Generation Biofuel Use of Up to 5.6% in EU Road Transport Fuels Delivers Net GHG Emissions Benefits After Factoring in Indirect Land Use Change". Green Car Congress. 2010-03-26. Retrieved 2010-03-29.
- Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (June 2010). "Low Carbon Development for Brazil". World Bank. Retrieved 2010-06-17.[dead link] Briefing Note 005/10 pp. 13–15.
- Pacca, Sergio; Sergio, José R. (November 2009). "Historical carbon budget of the brazilian ethanol program". Energy Policy 37 (11): 4863–4873. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.072.
- "Carros flex: uso de etanol já evitou emissão de mais de 83 milhões de toneladas de CO2". UNICA, Brazil. Retrieved 2010-06-20. See the tool developed to keep track of emissions avoided here
- Macedo (2007) Chapter 3, pp. 79–90
- "Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges". The Royal Society. January 2008. Policy Document 01/08, pp. 35–36
- Emma Marris (2006-12-07). "Drink the best and drive the rest". Nature 444 (7120): 670–2. doi:10.1038/444670a. PMID 17151627. pdf version is available here
- Donald Sawyer (2008). "Climate change, biofuels and eco-social impacts in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 363 (1498): 1747–52. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0030. PMC 2373893. PMID 18267903.
- Reuters (2008-09-04). "Brazil SP cane growers to ban burning by 2017". UK Yahoo News. Retrieved 2008-09-14.[dead link]
- "Câmara de Ribeirão rejeita lei inconstitucional pelo final da queima nos canaviais" (in Portuguese). UNICA. 2008-09-12. Retrieved 2008-09-14.
- Manoel Schlindwein (2008-03-10). "Antecipado prazo para fim das queimadas nos canaviais" (in Portuguese). São Paulo State Government. Retrieved 2008-09-14.
- James Matthews (2010-08-20). "From machete to machine in Brazil's cane fields". Reuters. Retrieved 2010-08-24.
- Macedo (2007) Chapter 6, 131-138, see Table 5.
- Macedo (2007) Chapter 6, pp. 121–126 and 131-139.
- Lapola et al. (2010-02-08). "Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (8): 3388–93. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907318107. PMC 2840431. PMID 20142492. Retrieved 2010-02-09.. Published online before print.
- Rhett A. Butler (2010-02-08). "Amazon rainforest will bear cost of biofuel policies in Brazil". Mongabay.com. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- Philip Brasher (2010-02-08). "Brazil biofuels’ land-use issue". Des Moines Register. Retrieved 2010-02-09.
- Does Sugarcane Threaten the Amazon?, UNICA satellite map. 2010-6-22. Retrieved 2010-8-24
- Luiz Alvez (2009-10-02). "Enfim foi aprovado o Zoneamento Ecológico" (in Portuguese). HSM. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Government of Brazil. "Sugarcane Agroecological Zoning". UNICA. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- "Lula aprova por decreto zoneamento da cana-de-açúcar" (in Portuguese). Veja (magazine). 2009-09-18. Retrieved 2010-04-09.
- Macedo (2007) Chapter 12, pp. 203–231.
- George Monbiot (2004-11-23). "Feeding Cars, Not People". Monbiot.com. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- European Environmental Bureau (2006-02-08). "Biofuels no panacea" (PDF). Archived from the original on April 10, 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Planet Ark (2005-09-26). "Food Security Worries Could Limit China Biofuels". Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Greenpeace UK (2007-05-09). "Biofuels: green dream or climate change nightmare". Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- "ONU diz que biocombustíveis são crime contra a humanidade" (in Portuguese). Folha de Sao Pãulo Online. 2008-04-14. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Emilio San Pedro (2008-04-17). "Brazil president defends biofuels". BBC News. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Lederer, Edith (2007-10-27). "Production of biofuels 'is a crime'". London: The Independent. Retrieved 2008-04-22.
- "UN rapporteur calls for biofuel moratorium". Swissinfo. 2007-10-11. Retrieved 2008-05-01.
- Larry Elliott and Heather Stewart (2008-04-11). "Poor go hungry while rich fill their tanks". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
- Steven Mufson (2008-04-30). "Siphoning Off Corn to Fuel Our Cars". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
- "FMI e Bird pedem ação urgente contra alta alimentar" (in Portuguese). Folha de Sao Pãulo Online. 2008-04-13. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Raymond Colitt (2008-04-16). "Brazil Lula defends biofuels from growing criticism". Reuters UK. Retrieved 2008-04-28.
- Oxfam (2008-06-25). "Another Inconvenient Truth: Biofuels are not the answer to climate or fuel crisis". Oxfam. Retrieved 2008-07-30.Report in pdf format[dead link]
- Oxfam (2008-06-26). "Another Inconvenient Truth: Biofuels are not the answer to climate or fuel crisis". Oxfam web site. Retrieved 2008-07-30.
- "ONG diz que etanol brasileiro é melhor opção entre biocombustíveis" (in Portuguese). BBCBrasil. 2008-06-25. Retrieved 2008-07-30.
- Donald Mitchell (July 2008). "A note on Rising Food Crisis". The World Bank. Retrieved 2008-07-29.Policy Research Working Paper No. 4682. Disclaimer: This paper reflects the findings, interpretation, and conclusions of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank
- Veja Magazine (2008-07-28). "Etanol não influenciou nos preços dos alimentos" (in Portuguese). Editora Abril. Retrieved 2008-07-29.
- "Biofuels major driver of food price rise-World Bank". Reuters. 2008-07-28. Retrieved 2008-07-29.
- Directorate for Trade and Agriculture, OECD (2008-07-16). "Economic Assessment of Biofuel Support Policies" (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 2008-11-01. Disclaimer: This work was published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The views expressed and conclusions reached do not necessarily correspond to those of the governments of OECD member countries.
- Directorate for Trade and Agriculture, OECD (2008-07-16). "Biofuel policies in OECD countries costly and ineffective, says report". OECD. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
- FGV Projetos (November 2008). "Fatores Determinantes dos Preços dos Alimentos: O Impacto dos Biocombustíveis" (PDF) (in Portuguese). Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Retrieved 2008-12-04. Most of the text, graphs and tables included in the report are presented in Portuguese and English.
- BBC News video segment on ethanol in Brazil
- Biofuels: The Promise and the Risks. The World Bank's World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development
- Biofuelwatch on Ethanol in Brazil
- Brazil Institute: Biofuels Central.WWICS
- Brazil priming ethanol initiative to supply fuel-thirsty Japan
- Brazilian Ethanol Policy: Lessons for the United States
- The Brazilian biofuels industry (2008 status)
- "Carbonômetro" - Tool to estimate how much CO2 emissions have been avoided by ethanol used by flex-fuel cars in Brazil since March 2003.
- CDM Potential in Brazil, by S. Meyers, J. Sathaye et al.
- CNBC's Yergin: What the U.S. Can Learn From Brazil About Ethanol By CNBC.com|07 Jun 2007|12:33 PM ET
- Cogeneration in Ethanol Plants by P. M. Nastari
- Corporate Sustainability in the Brazilian Sugar-Ethanol Sector, conducted by the Brazilian Foundation for Sustainable Development in a partnership with CSM/IMD
- Ethical Sugar
- From Alcohol to Ethanol: A winning trajectory History of ethanol fuel use in Brazil (English and Portuguese)
- Global Trade and Environmental Impact Study of the EU Biofuels Mandate by the International Food Policy Institute (IFPRI) March 2010
- Sugarcane Agroecological Zoning - Brazilian Federal Government
- Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels, United Nations Environment Programme, October 2009