Ethnopsychopharmacology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For original text please see,[1] published under public domain SAMHSA.

Sociocultural, genetic, and environmental factors have long been known to play a role in everything from how people express their emotions to the kind of foods they eat. More recently, a growing body of research has begun to highlight differences in the way racial and ethnic groups respond to psychiatric medication.

Noted researcher Keh-Ming Lin, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, reports "dramatic cross-ethnic and cross-national variations in the dosing practices and side-effect profiles in response to practically all classes of psychotropics."[2] Though results vary depending on the research design, a number of recent studies indicate that many Asians, African Americans, and, to a lesser extent, Hispanics, respond to lower doses of many psychiatric medications, and they may have greater side effects even at the lower doses. The mechanisms that explain these differences are discussed in brief below.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics[edit]

Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted from an individual's body.[2] Drug metabolism is controlled by a number of specific enzymes, and the action of these enzymes varies among individuals. For example, most individuals show normal activity of the IID6 isoenzyme that is responsible for the metabolism of many tricyclic antidepressant medications and most antipsychotic drugs. However, studies have found that one-third of Asian Americans and one-third of African Americans have a genetic alteration that decreases the metabolic rate of the IID6 isoenzyme, leading to a greater risk of side effects and toxicity.[3]

Though enzyme activity is genetically determined, it can be altered by such cultural and environmental factors as diet, the use of other medications, alcohol use, and disease states. In fact, Dr. Lin notes that as immigrants are exposed to these factors, their metabolism may change.[2]

Pharmacodynamics refers to the role that specific receptors or site of action play in mediating the effect of the drug. According to David Henderson, M.D., a psychopharmacologist and Senior Associate with the Multicultural Mental Health Research Center at Boston University Medical Center, this action is more difficult to study because it takes place at the cellular level.

However, when everything else is equal—i.e., two individuals have the same blood level of a medication and they clear it at the same rate—pharmacodynamic differences may explain why one individual may experience a greater number of side effects than another, or may experience side effects at a lower dose. Pharmacodynamic responses may also be influenced by racial and cultural factors.

In addition to biology and environment, culturally determined attitudes toward illness may affect how an individual responds to psychiatric medication. Such cultural differences may have an effect on adherence to medication regimes as well as influence the placebo effect.[4]

Cultural factors[edit]

In addition to biology and environment, culturally determined attitudes toward illness and its treatment may affect how an individual responds to psychiatric medication. Some cultures see suffering and illness as unavoidable and not amenable to medication,[5] while others treat symptoms with polypharmacy, often mixing medications with herbal drugs.[6] The practitioner who is not aware of these beliefs runs the risk of having patients disregard the recommended treatment plan, according to Dr. Henderson.

Further, the way an individual expresses and reacts to the symptoms of psychiatric illness, and the cultural expectations of the physician, may affect the diagnosis a patient receives. For example, according to Dr. Henderson, bipolar disorder often is misdiagnosed as schizophrenia in people of color. "An African American man who is agitated is assumed to be violent, is given a more serious diagnosis, and is more heavily medicated," Dr. Henderson says, though this response is at odds with the patient's genetic makeup. Formal diagnostic instruments, such as the SCID-DSMIV, generally yield more accurate diagnoses for minority patients, he adds.

Recommendations for research and practice[edit]

The differential response of many ethnic minorities to certain psychiatric medications raises important concerns for both research and practice.

Include Ethnic Groups. Most studies of psychiatric medications have white male subjects, notes Dr. Henderson. "We need to include different populations in these studies to determine whether they respond at different doses, whether they metabolize at different rates, and whether they become toxic at different levels," he says.

A number of methodological concerns must be addressed. Because there is often a greater difference within racial and ethnic groups than between them, researchers must be certain they choose prototypical representatives of these groups, or use a larger random sample.[7]

Further, because broad racial and ethnic groups have many different subgroups, it may not be enough to characterize individuals as Asian, Hispanic, Native American, or African American.[7] Even within the same ethnic group, there are no reliable measures to determine important cultural differences.[8]

"Start Low and Go Slow." Individuals who receive a higher dose of psychiatric medication than needed may discontinue treatment because of side effects, or they may develop toxic levels that lead to serious complications. A reasonable approach to prescribing medication to any psychiatric patient, regardless of race or culture, is to "start low and go slow," Dr. Henderson says. Doctors need to be receptive to hearing about side effects, and be open to lowering medication doses or trying a different class of drugs, he adds.

Looking forward[edit]

As scientific understanding advances, Dr. Henderson is hopeful that someday there may be a simple blood test to predict how an individual will respond to a specific class of drugs. In the meantime, he believes, practitioners should follow some simple advice.

"Physicians must take the time to understand how the patient, the family, and the culture interpret mental health problems and what they expect from treatment," Dr. Henderson says. This allows the provider to integrate Western medications with appropriate cultural interpretations.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Wells, S. M. "Research shows ethnicity a factor in medication response," in Psychopharmacology across cultures: The science and practice of ethnopsychopharmacology. the Evaluation Center@HSRI 23 Oct. 1998; 1(3). HSRI
  2. ^ a b c Lin, K.; Anderson, D.; Poland, R. (1995). "Ethnicity and Psychopharmacology: Bridging the Gap". The Psychiatric Clinics of North America 18 (3): 635–647. PMID 8545272. 
  3. ^ Risby, E. (1996). "Ethnic Considerations in the Pharmacotherapy of Mood Disorders". Psychopharmacology Bulletin 32 (2): 231–234. PMID 8783892. 
  4. ^ The United States Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. "Chapter 2: The Fundamentals of Mental Health and Mental Illness." pp 88[1] Retrieved May 21, 2012
  5. ^ Keitel, M., Kopala, M., and Georgiades, I. (1995). "Factors Influencing Multicultural Health". In J. Ponterotto, et al. (eds.), Handbook of Multicultural Counseling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  6. ^ Chien, C. (1993). "Ethnopsychopharmacology". In A. Gaw (ed.), Culture, Ethnicity, and Mental Illness. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  7. ^ a b Turner, S.; Cooley-Quille, M. (1996). "Socioecological and Sociocultural Variables" in Psychopharmacological Research: Methodological Considerations". Psychopharmacology Bulletin 32 (2): 183–192. PMID 8783887. 
  8. ^ Phinney, J. (1996). "When We Talk About American Ethnic Groups, What Do We Mean?". American Psychologist 51 (9): 918–927. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.9.918. 

External links[edit]