In mathematics, the Ext functors of homological algebra are derived functors of Hom functors. They were first used in algebraic topology, but are common in many areas of mathematics. The name "Ext" comes from the connection between the functors and extensions in abelian categories.
Definition and computation
Let R be a ring and let ModR be the category of modules over R. Let B be in ModR and set T(B) = HomR(A,B), for fixed A in ModR. This is a left exact functor and thus has right derived functors RnT. The Ext functor is defined by
This can be calculated by taking any injective resolution
Then (RnT)(B) is the homology of this complex. Note that HomR(A,B) is excluded from the complex.
This can be calculated by choosing any projective resolution
and proceeding dually by computing
Then (RnG)(A) is the homology of this complex. Again note that HomR(A,B) is excluded.
These two constructions turn out to yield isomorphic results, and so both may be used to calculate the Ext functor.
Ext and extensions
Equivalence of extensions
Ext functors derive their name from the relationship to extensions of modules. Given R-modules A and B, an extension of A by B is a short exact sequence of R-modules
are said to be equivalent (as extensions of A by B) if there is a commutative diagram
Note that the Five Lemma implies that the middle arrow is an isomorphism. An extension of A by B is called split if it is equivalent to the trivial extension
There is a bijective correspondence between equivalence classes of extensions
of A by B and elements of
The Baer sum of extensions
Given two extensions
we can construct the Baer sum, by forming the pullback over ,
We form the quotient
that is, we mod out by the relation . The extension
where the first arrow is and the second thus formed is called the Baer sum of the extensions E and E'.
Up to equivalence of extensions, the Baer sum is commutative and has the trivial extension as identity element. The extension 0 → B → E → A → 0 has for opposite the same extension with exactly one of the central arrows turned to their opposite eg the morphism g is replaced by -g.
The set of extensions up to equivalence is an abelian group that is a realization of the functor Ext1
Construction of Ext in abelian categories
The above identification enables us to define Ext1
Ab(A, B) even for abelian categories Ab without reference to projectives and injectives (even if the category has no projectives or injectives). We simply take Ext1
Ab(A, B) to be the set of equivalence classes of extensions of A by B, forming an abelian group under the Baer sum. Similarly, we can define higher Ext groups Extn
Ab(A, B) as equivalence classes of n-extensions, which are exact sequences
under the equivalence relation generated by the relation that identifies two extensions
The Baer sum of the two n-extensions above is formed by letting X′′
1 be the pullback of X1 and X′
1 over A, and X′′
n be the pushout of Xn and X′
n under B quotiented by the skew diagonal copy of B; see Weibel, §3.4. Then we define the Baer sum of the extensions to be
Further properties of Ext
The Ext functor exhibits some convenient properties, useful in computations.
- A converse also holds: if Ext1
R(A, B) = 0 for all A, then Exti
R(A, B) = 0 for all A, and B is injective; if Ext1
R(A, B) = 0 for all B, then Exti
R(A, B) = 0 for all B, and A is projective.
Ring structure and module structure on specific Exts
One more very useful way to view the Ext functor is this: when an element of Extn
R(A, B) = 0 is considered as an equivalence class of maps f: Pn → B for a projective resolution P* of A ; so, then we can pick a long exact sequence Q* ending with B and lift the map f using the projectivity of the modules Pm to a chain map f*: P* → Q* of degree -n. It turns out that homotopy classes of such chain maps correspond precisely to the equivalence classes in the definition of Ext above.
Under sufficiently nice circumstances, such as when the ring R is a group ring over a field k, or an augmented k-algebra, we can impose a ring structure on Ext*
R(k, k). The multiplication has quite a few equivalent interpretations, corresponding to different interpretations of the elements of Ext*
One interpretation is in terms of these homotopy classes of chain maps. Then the product of two elements is represented by the composition of the corresponding representatives. We can choose a single resolution of k, and do all the calculations inside HomR(P*,P*), which is a differential graded algebra, with cohomology precisely ExtR(k,k).
The Ext groups can also be interpreted in terms of exact sequences; this has the advantage that it does not rely on the existence of projective or injective modules. Then we take the viewpoint above that an element of Extn
R(A, B) is a class, under a certain equivalence relation, of exact sequences of length n + 2 starting with B and ending with A. This can then be spliced with an element in Extm
R(C, A), by replacing ... → X1 → A → 0 and 0 → A → Yn → ... with:
where the middle arrow is the composition of the functions X1 → A and A → Yn. This product is called the Yoneda splice.
These viewpoints turn out to be equivalent whenever both make sense.
Using similar interpretations, we find that Ext*
R(k, M) is a module over Ext*
R(k, k), again for sufficiently nice situations.
For Fp the finite field on p elements, we also have that H*(G,M) = Ext*
Fp[G](Fp, M), and it turns out that the group cohomology doesn't depend on the base ring chosen.
- Tor functor
- The Grothendieck group is a construction centered on extensions
- The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology is one notable use of the Ext functor
- Gelfand, Sergei I.; Manin, Yuri Ivanovich (1999), Homological algebra, Berlin: Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-65378-3
- Weibel, Charles A. (1994), An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 38, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-55987-4, OCLC 36131259, MR 1269324