Facadism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
An early example of facadism. The Old Commerce building at the University of Melbourne is the relocated facade of a Collins Street bank which was superimposed to the front of a "new" campus building in the 1930s.
Preservation of a 19th-century façade, Noordereiland, Rotterdam

Façadism (or façadomy[1]) refers to an architectural and construction practice where the facade of a building was designed or constructed separately to the rest of a building. More often it refers to the practice where only the facade of a building is preserved with new buildings erected behind or around it.

There are aesthetic and historical reasons for preserving building facades. Facadism can be the response to the interiors of a building becoming unusable, such as being damaged by fire. In developing areas, however, the practice is sometimed used by property developers seeking to redevelop a site as a compromise to preservationists who wish to preserve buildings of historical or aesthetic interest. It can be regarded as a compromise between historic preservation and demolition and thus has been lauded as well as decried.[citation needed]

There is sometimes a blurred line between renovation, adaptive reuse, reconstruction and facadism. Sometimes buildings renovated to such an extent that they are "skinned", preserving the exterior shell and additionally used for purposes other than what they were originally intended. While this is equivalent to facadism, the difference is typically retention of roof and or floor structures, maintaining a credible link to the original building. In contrast, facadism typically involves retaining only one or two street facing walls for purely aesthetic and decorative purposes.[2] Facadomy is a popular practice in postmodern architecture reaching its peak in the latter half of the 20th century. The setback or podium architecture technique gives an illusion of integrity to the original building by visually separating the old from the new, helping to mitigate farcical effects such as the floors and windows not lining up or a dramatic clash of styles.

Critics label the practice as architectural sham, claiming that it sometimes results in part of the building becoming a folly.

Distribution and control measures[edit]

Despite being highly controversial and denounced by many preservationists as vandalism, facadism is used as the demand for new development is overwhelming community desires for preservation. Facadism appears often in cities where there is a strong pressure for new development.

While the controversial practice of facadism is encouraged by governments in some cities (such as Toronto, Sydney and Brisbane), it is actively discouraged in others (such as Paris and Melbourne).

Architectural podiums are often seen by some architects as a solution to this problem and these are allowed for as part of planning frameworks in urban heritage areas.

International policies[edit]

The practice of facadism conflicts with ICOMOS international charters. The Venice Charter, article 7, states that: A monument is inseparable from the history to which it bears witness and from the setting in which it occurs. The moving of all or part of a monument cannot be allowed except where the safeguarding of that monument demands it or where it is justified by national or international interest of paramount importance.

By country[edit]

Australia[edit]

In Australia, the Burra Charter has some policies which deal with facadism.

Melbourne[edit]
The Olderfleet buildings on Collins Street, Melbourne were preserved up to 10 metres with a new heritage-sensitive tower design rising behind.

In the rapidly growing city of Melbourne, facadism has existed as early as the 1930s.[citation needed] The Old Commerce building at the University of Melbourne is a prominent example of a building which has been relocated and "stuck on" a newer building.[citation needed]

With the introduction of heritage controls in the later twentieth century, several large buildings have been completely "skinned".[citation needed] These include the T&G buildings on Collins Street and the Savoy Hotel on Spencer Street.[citation needed]

However, implementation applied only to heritage registered buildings and it was relaxed in subsequent years,[citation needed] which allowed several poor examples of facadism to appear particularly with heritage buildings of only local significance.[citation needed] For example, the heritage registered Carlton & United Breweries site is a large site on Swanston Street, Melbourne which has contained hollow suspended facades for almost three decades.[citation needed] That led the Melbourne City Council to rethink the policy.[citation needed]

In the late 1990s, facadism was discouraged with the introduction of a 10-metre policy, which advocated for the retention of at least 10 metres of the front of a building.[citation needed] This helped to retain context and the integrity of important transitions and relationships such as entrances and complex roof structures.

The Olderfleet group of buildings (which includes the Rialto and Winfield) and the 1 Collins Street development are seen as well-executed examples of this preservation policy.[citation needed]

Brisbane[edit]
An entire Victorian era streetscape in Brisbane is preserved at the Myer Centre

In Brisbane, facadism is encouraged by the Brisbane City Council.[citation needed] A notable example is the Myer Centre which features extensive facadism of several buildings including the Hotel Carlton (1885), New York Hotel (1860) and Newspaper House. Other buildings which are facaded include the final design includes the facade of the Queensland Country Life Building (1888).

Canada[edit]

In Canada, all jurisdictions at the federal, provincial, territorial and municipal level have adopted the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, which does not recommend, though not explicit, facadism as good conservation practice. In general, projects which have approached projects using facadism are considered to have lost their integrity and value.

Gallery[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Notes

  1. ^ Paul Spencer Byard (1 January 1998). The Architecture of Additions: Design and Regulation. W.W. Norton & Company. pp. 105–. ISBN 978-0-393-73021-0. 
  2. ^ Jonathan Richards (12 November 2012). Facadism. Routledge. pp. 7–. ISBN 978-1-134-88952-5. 

Bibliography

External links[edit]

  • Media related to Facadism at Wikimedia Commons