In graph theory, a mathematical discipline, a factor-critical graph (or hypomatchable graph) is a graph with n vertices in which every subgraph of n − 1 vertices has a perfect matching. (A perfect matching in a graph is a subset of its edges with the property that each of its vertices is the endpoint of exactly one of the edges in the subset.)
A matching that covers all but one vertex of a graph is called a near-perfect matching. So equivalently, a factor-critical graph is a graph in which there are near-perfect matchings that avoid every possible vertex.
Any odd-length cycle graph is factor-critical, as is any complete graph with an odd number of vertices. More generally, every Hamiltonian graph with an odd number of vertices is factor-critical. The friendship graphs (graphs formed by connecting a collection of triangles at a single common vertex) provide examples of graphs that are factor-critical but not Hamiltonian.
Every 2-vertex-connected claw-free graph with an odd number of vertices is factor-critical. For instance, the 11-vertex graph formed by removing a vertex from the regular icosahedron (the graph of the gyroelongated pentagonal pyramid) is both 2-connected and claw-free, so it is factor-critical. This result follows directly from the more fundamental theorem that every connected claw-free graph with an even number of vertices has a perfect matching.
Factor-critical graphs may be characterized in several different ways, other than their definition as graphs in which each vertex deletion allows for a perfect matching:
- Tibor Gallai proved that a graph is factor-critical if and only if it is connected and, for each node v of the graph, there exists a maximum matching that does not include v. It follows from these properties that the graph must have an odd number of vertices and that every maximum matching must match all but one vertex.
- László Lovász proved that a graph is factor-critical if and only if it has an odd ear decomposition, a partition of its edges into a sequence of subgraphs, each of which is an odd-length path or cycle, with the first in the sequence being a cycle, each path in the sequence having both endpoints but no interior points on vertices in previous subgraphs, and each cycle other than the first in the sequence having exactly one vertex in previous subgraphs. For instance, the graph in the illustration may be partitioned in this way into a cycle of five edges and a path of three edges. In the case that a near-perfect matching of the factor-critical graph is also given, the ear decomposition can be chosen in such a way that each ear alternates between matched and unmatched edges.
- A graph is also factor-critical if and only if it can be reduced to a single graph by a sequence of contractions of odd-length cycles. Moreover, in this characterization, it is possible to choose each cycle in the sequence so that it contains the vertex formed by the contraction of the previous cycle. For instance, if one contracts the ears of an ear decomposition, in the order given by the decomposition, then at the time each ear is contracted it forms an odd cycle, so the ear decomposition characterization may be used to find a sequence of odd cycles to contract. Conversely from a sequence of odd cycle contractions, each containing the vertex formed from the previous contraction, one may form an ear decomposition in which the ears are the sets of edges contracted in each step.
- Suppose that a graph G is given together with a choice of a vertex v and a matching M that covers all vertices other than v. Then G is factor-critical if and only if there is a set of paths in G, alternating between matched and unmatched edges, that connect v to each of the other vertices in G. Based on this property, it is possible to determine in linear time whether a graph G with a given near-perfect matching is factor-critical.
Factor-critical graphs must always have an odd number of vertices, and must be 2-edge-connected (that is, they cannot have any bridges). However, they are not necessarily 2-vertex-connected; the friendship graphs provide a counterexample. It is not possible for a factor-critical graph to be bipartite, because in a bipartite graph with a near-perfect matching, the only vertices that can be deleted to produce a perfectly matchable graph are the ones on the larger side of the bipartition.
Every 2-vertex-connected factor-critical graph with m edges has at least m different near-perfect matchings, and more generally every factor-critical graph with m edges and c blocks (2-vertex-connected components) has at least m − c + 1 different near-perfect matchings. The graphs for which these bounds are tight may be characterized by having odd ear decompositions of a specific form.
Any connected graph may be transformed into a factor-critical graph by contracting sufficiently many of its edges. The minimal sets of edges that need to be contracted to make a given graph G factor-critical form the bases of a matroid, a fact that implies that a greedy algorithm may be used to find the minimum weight set of edges to contract to make a graph factor-critical, in polynomial time.
A graph is said to be k-factor-critical if every subset of n − k vertices has a perfect matching. Under this definition, a hypomatchable graph is 1-factor-critical. Even more generally, a graph is (a,b)-factor-critical if every subset of n − k vertices has an r-factor, that is, it is the vertex set of an r-regular subgraph of the given graph.
A critical graph (without qualification) is usually assumed to mean a graph for which removing each of its vertices reduces the number of colors it needs in a graph coloring. The concept of criticality has been used much more generally in graph theory to refer to graphs for which removing each possible vertex changes or does not change some relevant property of the graph. A matching-critical graph is a graph for which the removal of any vertex does not change the size of a maximum matching; by Gallai's characterization, the matching-critical graphs are exactly the graphs in which every connected component is factor-critical. The complement graph of a critical graph is necessarily matching-critical, a fact that was used by Gallai to prove lower bounds on the number of vertices in a critical graph.
Beyond graph theory, the concept of factor-criticality has been extended to matroids by defining a type of ear decomposition on matroids and defining a matroid to be factor-critical if it has an ear decomposition in which all ears are odd.
- Pulleyblank, W. R.; Edmonds, J. (1974), "Facets of 1-matching polyhedra", in Berge, C.; Ray-Chaudhuri, D. K., Hypergraph Seminar, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 411, Springer-Verlag, pp. 214–242, doi:10.1007/BFb0066196, ISBN 978-3-540-06846-4.
- Cornuéjols, G.; Pulleyblank, W. R. (1983), Critical graphs, matchings and tours or a hierarchy of relaxations for the travelling salesman problem, Combinatorica 3 (1): 35–52, doi:10.1007/BF02579340, MR 716420.
- Liu, Yan; Hao, Jianxiu (2002), The enumeration of near-perfect matchings of factor-critical graphs, Discrete Mathematics 243 (1–3): 259–266, doi:10.1016/S0012-365X(01)00204-7, MR 1874747.
- Došlić, Tomislav (2005), Mycielskians and matchings, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 25 (3): 261–266, MR 2232992.
- Favaron, Odile; Flandrin, Evelyne; Ryjáček, Zdeněk (1997), Factor-criticality and matching extension in DCT-graphs, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 17 (2): 271–278, MR 1627955.
- Gallai, T. (1963), Neuer Beweis eines Tutte'schen Satzes, Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl. 8: 135–139, MR 0166777. As cited by Frank, András; Szegő, László (2002), Note on the path-matching formula, Journal of Graph Theory 41 (2): 110–119, doi:10.1002/jgt.10055, MR 1926313.
- Lovász, L. (1972), A note on factor-critical graphs, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 7: 279–280, MR 0335371.
- Korte, Bernhard H.; Vygen, Jens (2008), "10.4 Ear-Decompositions of Factor-Critical Graphs", Combinatorial Optimization: Theory and Algorithms, Algorithms and Combinatorics 21 (4th ed.), Springer-Verlag, pp. 235–241, ISBN 978-3-540-71843-7.
- Lou, Dingjun; Rao, Dongning (2004), Characterizing factor critical graphs and an algorithm, The Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 30: 51–56, MR 2080453.
- Seyffarth, Karen (1993), Packings and perfect path double covers of maximal planar graphs, Discrete Mathematics 117 (1–3): 183–195, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(93)90334-P, MR 1226141.
- Szigeti, Zoltán (1996), On a matroid defined by ear-decompositions of graphs, Combinatorica 16 (2): 233–241, doi:10.1007/BF01844849, MR 1401896. For an earlier algorithm for contracting the minimum number of (unweighted) edges to reach a factor-critical graph, see Frank, András (1993), Conservative weightings and ear-decompositions of graphs, Combinatorica 13 (1): 65–81, doi:10.1007/BF01202790, MR 1221177.
- Edmonds, Jack (1965), Paths, Trees and Flowers, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 17: 449–467, doi:10.4153/CJM-1965-045-4, MR 0177907.
- Favaron, Odile (1996), On k-factor-critical graphs, Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 16 (1): 41–51, MR 1429805.
- Erdős, P.; Füredi, Z.; Gould, R. J.; Gunderson, D. S. (1995), Extremal graphs for intersecting triangles, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 64 (1): 89–100, doi:10.1006/jctb.1995.1026, MR 1328293.
- Gallai, T. (1963b), Kritische Graphen II, Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 8: 373–395. As cited by Stehlík, Matěj (2003), Critical graphs with connected complements, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 89 (2): 189–194, doi:10.1016/S0095-8956(03)00069-8, MR 2017723.
- Szegedy, Balázs; Szegedy, Christian (2006), Symplectic spaces and ear-decomposition of matroids, Combinatorica 26 (3): 353–377, doi:10.1007/s00493-006-0020-3, MR 2246153.