Fat acceptance movement
|Rights by claimant|
|Other groups of rights|
The fat acceptance movement (also known as the size acceptance, fat liberation, fat activism, or fat power movement) is a social movement seeking to change the anti-fat bias in social attitudes. The movement grew out of the various identity politics of the 1960s and campaigns for the rights of fat people to be treated equally both on a social basis and on a legal one. Areas of contention include the aesthetic, legal and medical approaches to people whose bodies are larger than the social norm.
Besides its political role, the fat acceptance movement also constitutes a subculture that acts as a social group for its members. Activities include conferences, fashion and arts events, shopping, swimming and other sports clubs.
Campaigning themes 
The fat acceptance movement argues that overweight people are targets of hatred and discrimination. In particular, obese women are subjected to more social pressure than obese men. The movement argues that these attitudes comprise a fat phobic entrenched societal norm, evident in many social institutions, including the mass media; where fat people are often ridiculed or held up as objects of pity. Discriminatcomedians include lack of equal access to transportation and employment. Members of the fat acceptance movement perceive negative societal attitudes as persistent, and as being based on the presumption that fatness reflects negatively on a person's character. Fat activists continue to strive for change in societal, personal, and medical attitudes toward fat people. Fat acceptance organisations engage in public education about what they describe as myths concerning fat people.
Fat activists argue that anti-fat stigma and aggressive diet promotion have led to an increase in psychological and physiological problems among fat people. Diet critics cite the high failure rate of permanent weight loss attempts, and the dangers of "yo-yo" weight fluctuations and weight loss surgeries. Since Louderback's seminal work on the subject was published in 1970, many books have been published challenging the standard medical model that fat produces ill health, and highlighting instances of weight-based discrimination experienced by fat people from both medical professionals and society at large. The position of the fat acceptance movement is supported by authors such as Sandy Szwarc and law professor Paul Campos who, in his book The Diet Myth reviewed research he believed brought into question the link between obesity and mortality. Fat activists argue that the health issues of obesity and being overweight have been exaggerated or misrepresented, and used as a cover for cultural and aesthetic prejudices against fat.
Proponents of fat acceptance maintain that people of all shapes and sizes can strive for fitness and physical health. They believe health to be independent of body weight. Informed by this approach, medical professionals who were unhappy with the treatment of fat people in the medical world initiated the Health at Every Size movement. It has five basic tenets: 1. Enhancing health, 2. Size and self-acceptance, 3. The pleasure of eating well, 4. The joy of movement, and 5. An end to weight bias. The health at any size movement was influenced by studies that show high BMI may not be linked to mortality.
In addition to fat acceptance movement campaigns on the theme of health at any size, there have been a surge in studies both for and against the concept in scientific journals. For instance, one study found that fat acceptance and 'intuitive eating' (i.e., when hungry) resulted in both better health and better weight loss for chronic overweight female dieters than for a dieting control group.
Fat women 
|Wikinews has related news: Obesity and the Fat Acceptance Movement: Kira Nerusskaya speaks|
The issues faced by fat women in society have been a central theme of the fat acceptance movement since its inception. Although the first organisation, NAAFA, and the first book, Fat Power (1970), were both created by men, in each case they were responses to weight discrimination experienced by their wives. Women soon started campaigning on their own behalf with the first feminist group, 'The Fat Underground', being formed in 1973. Issues addressed regarding women have included body image, and in particular The Thin Ideal and its effect on women.
Nomy Lamm writes about the social expectations of women's appearance:
I may be the girliest girl on the block when I'm at a party in Olympia, but when I get into totally non-queer normal-person space, it becomes so obvious that I'm not a normal woman in the way the rest of the world expects ... Surrounded by "real" women, I seem like an exaggeration – bigger than other women, louder, hairier, my make-up too thick, my clothes like costumes. I feel like a parody – not even a parody of a real woman, but a parody of a drag queen.
Fat men 
The fat acceptance movement has primarily focused on a feminist model of patriarchal oppression of fat women, most clearly represented by the encouragement of women to diet. However, Sander L. Gilman argues that, until the 20th century, dieting has historically been a man's activity. He continues, "Obesity eats away at the idealised image of the masculine just as surely as it does the idealised image of the feminine." William Banting, a man, was the author of a 1863 booklet called Letter On Corpulence which modern diets have used as a model. Men respond differently to being overweight, (i.e., a Body Mass Index of 25 or more), being half as likely as women to diet, a quarter as likely to undergo weightloss surgery and only a fifth as likely to report feeling shame about their weight. Irmgard Tischner identifies this behaviour as rooted in notions of masculinity that require a disregard for healthcare: "Men do not have to care about their size or health, as they have women to care about those things for them".
Some gay men have moved beyond disregard for size to fat acceptance and fat activism with movements like the chub culture, which started as Mirth & Girth clubs in San Francisco in 1976 and the bear culture which fetishises big, hairy men. Ganapati Durgadas argues that fat bisexual and gay men "are reminders of the feminine stigma with which heterosexism still tars queer men". In a comparison of queer fat positive zines, the lesbian-produced Fat Girl was found to have political debate content absent from gay male orientated zines such as Bulk Male and Big Ad. Joel Barraquiel Tan comments: "If fat is a feminist issue, then fat or heft is a fetishised one for gay men. Gay men have a tendency to sexualise difference, where lesbians have historically politicised it."
A fat heterosexual man is known as a 'Big Handsome Man', in counterpart to a Big Beautiful Woman. Like gay men, BHM have sexualised their difference and receive validation of this identity from BBWs or from women known as 'Female Fat Admirers'.
In the 1980s fat people in the United States began seeking legal redress for discrimination on the basis of weight, primarily in the workplace but also for being denied access to, or treated differently in regards to, services or entertainment. The results of these cases has varied considerably, although in some instances the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has been successfully used to argue cases of discrimination against fat people. Roth and Solovay argue that, as with transgender people, a major cause for the variation in success is the extent to which litigants are apologetic for their size:
What is the difference between a million-dollar weight case award and a losing case? Like the difference between many winning and losing transgender cases, it's all about the attitude. Does the claimant's attitude and experience about weight/gender reinforce or challenge dominant stereotypes? Winning cases generally adopt a legal posture that reinforces social prejudices. Cases that challenge societal prejudices generally lose.
The ADA act continues to be used as there is no USA federal law against weight discrimination however the state of Michigan has passed a law against weight discrimination. The cities of Washington D.C., San Francisco (2000), Santa Cruz, Binghamton, Urbana (1990s) and Madison (1970s) have also passed laws prohibiting weight discrimination. In the cities that have a weight discrimination law it is rare for more than 1 case a year to be brought, except for San Francisco which may have as many as 6. Opinions amongst city enforcement workers vary as to why the prosecution numbers are so low, although they all suggested that both overweight people and employers were unaware of the protective legislation and it was also noted that the cities with weight discrimination laws tended to be liberal college towns.
However, not all legal changes have protected the rights of fat people. Despite recommendations from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to the contrary, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has decided that fat people will only qualify as disabled if it can be proved that their weight is caused by an underlying condition, making them the only class of disabled people who have to prove that they haven't contributed to their own disability.
Other countries besides the United States have considered legislation to protect the rights of fat people. In the UK an All Party Parliamentary Group published a report in 2012 called Reflections on Body Image that found that 1 in 5 British people had been victimised because of their weight. The report recommended that Members of Parliament Investigated putting "appearance-based discrimination" under the same legal basis as sexual or racial discrimination via the Equalities Act 2010 which makes it illegal to harass, victimise or discriminate against anyone on the basis of a number of named categories. As of Dec 3 2012, Iceland's Senate is considering proposed legislation to make it illegal to discriminate against others on the basis of their body weight as part if its new constitution. Areas the proposed keg isolation could affect include the workplace, education and medical environments.
Fat Studies 
There has also been an emerging body of academic studies with a fat activist agenda. Marilyn Wann argues that fat studies moved beyond being an individual endeavour to being a field of study with the 2004 conference Fat Attitudes: An Examination of an American Subculture and the Representation of the Female Body The American Popular Culture Association regularly includes panels on the subject. In a number of colleges, student groups with a fat activist agenda have emerged, including Hampshire, Smith, and Antioch. Fat studies is now available as an interdisciplinary course of study at some colleges, taking a similar approach to other identity studies such as women's studies, queer studies and African American studies. As of 2011, there were 2 Australian courses and 10 American courses that were primarily focussed on fat studies or on health at any size, and numerous other courses that had some fat acceptance content. Taylor & Francis publish an online Fat Studies journal. In the UK, the first national Fat Studies seminar was held at York in May 2008, leading to the 2009 publication Fat Studies in the UK, edited by Corinna Tomrley and Ann Kalosky Naylor.
Debates within the movement 
||This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. (July 2012)|
One point of contention in the movement is found between those fat people who are attempting to lose weight and those who are not. Some fat activists define fat acceptance as fighting for equal rights and opportunities, and freedom from social stigma, whilst remaining open to the pursuit of a reduction in a person's body mass index. Other fat activists define fat acceptance more strictly, applying that phrase only to fat people who are not pursuing a reduction in their body mass. This form of "fat activism" requires active opposition to the concept of weight-loss. In this case, the acronym of the movement, "FA" (Fat Acceptance), may also be interpreted to encompass "Fat Appreciation", which seeks to find beauty in fatness.
Since the 2011 amendment by Congress to the ADA to extend workplace discrimination protection to people 100% or more above the recommended BMI range of weight for their height, the fat acceptance movement has been divided in its response to the legislation defining morbidly obese people as disabled. NAAFA board member Peggy Howell says: "There's a lot of conflict in the size acceptance community over this. I don't consider myself disabled, and some people don't like 'fat' being considered a disability."
Another common division in the fat acceptance community is the differing attitudes towards general society, specifically thin people. The fat acceptance community generally divides into two categories. One is those who feel discrimination towards thin people hinders their cause. The other side views thin people as at least a partial cause of their social stigma; some cater to this group with mockery of thin people.. An example of a positive perspective on wider society is noted by one researcher: "She makes a point to tell me how impressed she is with the way many do make quite and polite accommodations for her."
Eating disorders is another issue that divides opinions within the fat acceptance movement. One time member Lily-Rygh Glen wrote an article about the difficulties in discussing eating disorders in the movement and how isolated that made her feel as a long-time member of the movement with an eating disorder. She further stated her belief that, despite the risks of its opponents using the information against them, the fat acceptance movement would benefit from acknowledging the presence of people with eating disorders amongst its members. Within the article she reports being advised to change her phone number and leave town if she published the article. An update on the article notes that she no longer sees herself as a member of the fat acceptance movement as a result of the backlash to the article.
Women are particularly active within the fat acceptance movement and membership of fat acceptance organisations is dominated by middle-class women in the heaviest 1–2% of the population. Some men in the movement argue that the movement excludes the issues and perspectives of fat men whilst privileging those of women. William of the blog 'Fat Like Us' comments: "Fat acceptance will always be more of a social club than a social activist movement until its mission statement goes beyond 'fat women are hot and sexy'".
Sociologist Charlotte Cooper has argued that the history of the fat activist movement is best understood in waves, similar to the feminist movement, with which she believes it is closely tied. Cooper believes that fat activists have suffered similar waves of activism followed by burnout, with activists in a following wave often unaware of the history of the movement, resulting in a lack of continuity.
First wave 
First wave activities consisted of isolated activists drawing attention to the dominant model of obesity and challenging it as only one of a number of possible models.
A "fat-in" was staged by 500 in New York's Central Park in 1967, called by radio personality Steve Post.
In 1967, Lew Louderback wrote an article in the Saturday Evening Post called "More People Should be FAT" in response to discrimination against his wife. The article led to a meeting between Louderback and William Fabrey, who went on to found the first organisation for fat people and their supporters, originally named the 'National Association to Aid Fat Americans' and currently called NAAFA ('National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance'), in America, in 1969. In 1973 the feminist group The Fat Underground was formed. It began as a radical chapter of NAAFA and spun off to become independent when NAAFA expressed concerns about its promotion of a stronger activist philosophy. In the UK The London Fat Women's Group was formed, the first British fat activist group, and was active between approximately 1985 and 1989.
In 1979 Carole Shaw coins the term Big Beautiful Woman and launched a fashion and lifestyle magazine of the same name aimed at plus-sized women. The original print magazine closed in the late 1990s but the term BBW has become widely used to refer to any fat woman. Other first wave activities included the productions of zines such as Figure 8 and Fat!So?, by Marilyn Wann which later became a book of the same name.
The second wave 
In the second wave, the fat acceptance movement became more widespread in the USA and started to spread to other countries. Ideas from the movement began to appear in the mainstream. Publishers became more willing to publish fat acceptance themed literature.
By the 1990s, input from the fat acceptance movement began to be incorporated into research papers by some members of the medical professions such as new anti-dieting programs and models of obesity management.
The 1980s witnessed an increase in activist organizations, publications, and conferences. This wave also saw the rise to influence of the fat blogs. In 2009 Kate Harding of the blog 'Shapely Prose' and Marianne Kirby of 'Fatshionista' compiled themes from the fat activist bloggers into a book entitled Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere.
In 1989 a group of people including actress Anne Zamberlan formed the first French organisation for fat acceptance, Allegro fortissimo.
Third wave 
The fat acceptance movement has seen a diversification of projects during the third wave. Activities have addressed issues of both fat and race, class, sexuality and other issues. The individual blogs of the second wave have mainly been overtaken by larger scale social networking sites such as PeopleOfSize.com Whilst several websites have sprung up to help connect fat people with fat-friendly service providers and products, such as fatshionista. Size discrimination has been increasingly addressed in the arts, as well. Performance art groups such as The Padded Lilies and its touring show the Fat Bottom Revue, among others, intentionally feature fat people in their shows.
The fat acceptance movement has been criticised from a number of perspectives. Primarily there has been a conflict over the medicalisation of fat and health professionals have criticised proponents of fat acceptance for ignoring health issues that some studies have shown to be linked to obesity. Fat acceptance has also been challenged from a moral perspective and finally the movement has been criticised for being out of touch with the mainstream. Fat activism remains a marginal movement in that, according to one activist in 2008, "this movement Is just now gaining real momentum" Organizations such as the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance (NAAFA) and the International Size Acceptance Association (ISAA) have relatively[weasel words] low memberships, and people interested in the movement tend to be clustered in larger cities and spread across medium- to small-sized web communities.
Medical criticism 
The fat acceptance movement has been criticized for adding no value to the debate over human health, with some critics accusing the movement of "promoting a lifestyle that can have dire health consequences". In response, proponents of fat acceptance have pointed to studies which show that being fat in and of itself is not a health problem and that long-term weight-loss is not possible in the majority of cases. They also argue that current approaches constitute fat-shaming which, rather than leading to weight loss, results in psychological issues like eating disorders. Fat acceptance campaigners also raise concerns that modern culture's concern with weight loss may not have a foundation in scientific research, but instead is an example of using science as an means to control deviance, as a part of society's attempt to deal with something that it finds disturbing.
More serious critiques have come from medical professionals who are otherwise sympathetic to the civil rights activism of the movement. Dr Arya Sharma, a Canadian obesity specialist, has accused fat acceptance advocates of using bad science tactics – of the kind previously used by the tobacco industry to promote denial of the health risks of smoking – to suggest that there is no such thing as an obesity epidemic, or that being overweight is completely health neutral. Marilyn Wann, a prominent member of the fat acceptance movement, has labelled the Center for Disease Control's 2012 Weight of the Nation report "pseudoscientific sensationalism".
Moral criticism 
Indulging in pleasurable eating has been an object of social criticism dating back at least to 109-106 BC, when gluttony was included amongst the seven deadly sins listed in the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs. Stanford M. Lyman summarises the socio-ethical argument against fat acceptance: "The glutton has so greatly distorted the appropriate allocation of his duties towards his ego and his society that, for the benefit of society and its needs for his services, he must be persuaded or coerced to desist in his indulgence. Gluttony in this sense becomes a sin against society. If the glutton is a "criminal", he can be charged not only with injuring himself and lowering his social esteem but also with insulting society by withdrawing from it."
- Rothblum and Sondra Solovay, Esther D. (2009). The Fat Studies Reader. NYU Press. p. xi. ISBN 9780814776407.
- Jaffa, Karen (2008). Forming Fat Identities. ProQuest. pp. 169–70. ISBN 9780549889717.
- B. E., Robinson; Bacon, J. G. (1996). "The "If Only I Were Thin..." Treatment Program: Decreasing the Stigmatizing Effects of Fatness". Professional psychology, research and practice (Arlington, Virginia, United States: American Psychological Association) 27 (2): 175–183. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.27.2.175. ISSN 0735-7028. OCLC 8996897.
- "Council on Size and Weight Discrimination – Weight Discrimination on Television". Cswd.org. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
- Greenberg BS, Eastin M, Hofschire L, Lachlan K, Brownell KD (2003). "Portrayals of overweight and obese individuals on commercial television." Am J Public Health. Aug;93(8):1342-8.
- Jennings, Laura Lynn (2008). Place Settings: Social Aspects of the Body Image/Eating Relationship. ProQuest. p. 9. ISBN 0549641262.
- Maranto, C. L.; Stenoien, A. F. (2000). Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 12: 9–1. doi:10.1023/A:1007712500496.
- Murray, S (2005). "(Un/Be)Coming Out? Rethinking Fat Politics" Social Semiotics Vol. 15 No. 2
- Puhl, R.; Brownell, D. (Dec 2001). "Bias, discrimination, and obesity". Obesity research 9 (12): 788–805. doi:10.1038/oby.2001.108. ISSN 1071-7323. PMID 11743063.
- Hemmenway, Carrie. "Dispelling common myths about fat persons.". NAAFA. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Coon, Dennis (2008). Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and Behaviour. Cengage Learning. p. 328. ISBN 0495599115.
- Kelly, Evelyn B. Obesity. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 138. ISBN 0313334609.
- Louderback's, Llewellyn (1970). Fat Power: Whatever You Weigh is Right. Hawthorn Books.
- Smith, Dinitia. Demonizing the Fat in the War on Weight, May 1, 2004. New York Times.
- Ikeda JP, Hayes D, Satter E, Parham ES, Kratina K, Woolsey M, Lowey M, Tribole E (1999). "A commentary on the new obesity guidelines from NIH." J Am Diet Assoc. Aug;99(8):918-9.
- "ISAA's Respect | Fitness | Health Initiative". Size-acceptance.org. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
- "Physical Fitness". NAAFA. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Burgard, Deb (2009), "What Is "Health at Every Size"?", in Solovay, Sandra; Wann, Marilyn, The Fat Studies Reader, New York University Press, pp. 42–49, ISBN 0–8147–7630–2
- Bacon, L.; JS Stern, Van Loan MD, Keim NL (June 2005). "Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, chronic women dieters". Journal American Diet Association 105 (6): 929–36.
- Lamm, Nomy (2004). Fishnets, Feather Boas and Fat in Body Outlaws: Rewriting the Rules of Beauty and Body Image. Seal Press. p. 82. ISBN 1580051081.
- Gilman, Sander L. (2004). Fat Boys: A Slim Book. University of Nebraska. pp. 1–10. ISBN 0803221835.
- Oliver, J. Eric (2005). Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind America's Obesity Epidemic. Oxford University Press. p. 80. ISBN 0195347021.
- Tischner, Irmgard (2912). Fat Lives: A Feminist Psychological Exploration. Routledge. pp. 105–6. ISBN 0415680948.
- CiscoRobco. "Girth & Mirth San Francisco 1976, Boston 1977, New York City 1978". Back in the Gays. Retrieved Mar 2013.
- LeBesco, Kathleen (2004). Revolting Bodies? The Struggle To Redefine Fat Identity. University of Massachusetts Press. p. 89. ISBN 1558494294.
- LeBesco, Kathleen (2004). Revolting Bodies? The Struggle To Redefine Fat Identity. University of Massachusetts Press. p. 90. ISBN 1558494294.
- Monaghan, Lee F. (2908). Men and the War on Obesity: A Sociological Study. Routledge. p. 53. ISBN 0415407125.
- Theran, Elizabeth E. (2005). Legal Theory on Weight Discriminationin Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, And Remedies. Guildford Press. p. 195. ISBN 1593851995.
- Dylan Roth and, Sandra Solovay (2009). No Apology: Shared Struggles in Fat and Transgender Law in Fat Studies Reader. NYU Press. p. 170. ISBN 9780814776407.
- "Weight Discrimination Laws". NAAFA Online. NAAFA. Retrieved 5 July 2011.
- "Weight Bias Laws: Tipping the Scales Against Prejudice?". Minnesota Dept. Human Rights. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Adams, Stephen (May 30, 2012). "Calling someone 'fatty' could become a hate crime". The Telegraph. Retrieved Mar 2013.
- "'Fat Studies' Go to College".
- Watkins, Patti Lou. "Teaching Fat Studies From Conception to Reception". Oregan State University. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- "Fat Studies". Taylor & Francis. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- "Fat Studies in the UK". Raw Nerve. Books. Retrieved Mar 2013.
- "The Failure of Size Acceptance". The Largest of All. Retrieved Feb 2913.
- Wilkie, Christina (10/4/2012). "Obesity Discrimination on the Job Provokes Dispute Over Best Remedy". Huffing ton Post. Retrieved Mar 2013.
- Erdman Farrell, Amy (2011). Fat Shame:!Stigma and the Fat Body in American Culture. NYU Press. p. 165. ISBN 0814727689.
- Glen, Lily-Rygh (2008). "Big Trouble: Are eating disorders the Lavender Menace of the fat acceptance movement". Bitch Magazine. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Saguy, Abigail (2013). What's Wrong with Fat?. Oxford University Press. p. 63. ISBN 0199857083.
- "Fat Acceptance & Gender". Fat Like Us. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Cooper, Charlotte. "What's Fat Activism?". University of Limerick. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Fletcher, Dan (2009-07-31). "The Fat-Acceptance Movement". Time.
- "Life In The Fat Underground by Sara Fishman". Radiancemagazine.com. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
- Cooper, Charlotte. What’s Fat Activism?.
- "BBW Past and Present". Big Beautiful Woman Magazine. Retrieved mar 2013.
- Harding and Marianne Kirby, Kate (2009). Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce With Your Body. Perigee Books. ISBN 0399534970.
- "Allegro Fortissimo Historique". Allegro Fortissimo. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- What part of the new website do you like the most? (2012-10-17). "PeopleOfSize.com". PeopleOfSize.com. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
- "Fatshionista". Marianne Kirby. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Glen, Lily-Rygh (2008). "Big Trouble: Are eating disorders the Lavendar Menace of the fat acceptance movement?". Bitch Magazine. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- "Fat Acceptance: 'Young, Fat and Fabulous' Say No to Yo-Yo Diets". ABC. Retrieved July 23, 2012.
- "In the Fatosphere, Big Is In, or at Least Accepted". The New York Times. Retrieved July 22, 2012.
- "Is the fat acceptance movement bad for our health?". CNN. Retrieved July 23, 2012.
- Kate Harding. "Don’t You Realize Fat Is Unhealthy?". Retrieved July 23, 2012.
- Ragen Chastain. "Deeply Disappointed in Disney". Retrieved August 8, 2012.
- "[http://jezebel.com/5815206/disney-fatphobia--the-pooh-sized-debate Disney, Fatphobia, & The "Pooh Sized" Debate]". Jezebel.com. June 24, 2011. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
- Abigail B. Hulme (1998). Fat as Deviance: Fat Phobia and the Social Control of Women's Bodies. Books.google.com. Retrieved 2012-11-02.
- Sharma, Arya M. "What Obesity and Nicotine Addiction Do Have in Common". Arya Sharma. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Wann, Marilyn (May 14, 2012). "Weight of the Nation Serves Up More Fat Shaming". SF Weekly. Retrieved Feb 2013.
- Lyman, Stanford M. (1989). Society and Evil. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 214. ISBN 0930390814.
- Lyman, Stanford M. (1989). Society and Evil. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 220–21. ISBN 0930390814.
See also 
- Anti-fat bias
- Fat Phobia Scale
- Fat tax
- Hanne Blank
- Health at every size
- I'm Happy to be Fat
- International Size Acceptance Association
- National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance
- Obesity paradox
- Saguy, A. C.; Riley, K. W. (Oct 2005). "Weighing both sides: morality, mortality, and framing contests over obesity" (PDF). Journal of health politics, policy and law 30 (5): 869–921. doi:10.1215/03616878-30-5-869. ISSN 0361-6878. PMID 16477791.
- Neumark-Sztainer, D. (Mar 1999). "The weight dilemma: a range of philosophical perspectives". International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 23 Suppl 2: S31–S37. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0800857. ISSN 0307-0565. PMID 10340803.
- Stürmer, S.; Simon, B.; Loewy, M.; Jörger, H. (1 March 2003). "The Dual-Pathway Model of Social Movement Participation: the Case of the Fat Acceptance Movement". Social Psychology Quarterly 66 (1): 71–82. doi:10.2307/3090142. ISSN 01902725.
- Jankowski, M.; Gozansky, S.; Van Pelt, E.; Schenkman, L.; Wolfe, P.; Schwartz, S.; Kohrt, M. (May 2008). "Relative contributions of adiposity and muscularity to physical function in community-dwelling older adults". Obesity 16 (5): 1039–1044. doi:10.1038/oby.2007.84. ISSN 1930-7381. PMID 18292753.
- Finkelstein, L. M.; Frautschy Demuth, R. L.; Sweeney, D. L. (2007). "Bias against overweight job applicants: Further explorations of when and why". Human Resource Management 46: 203–222. doi:10.1002/hrm.20157.
- King, E. B.; Shapiro, J. R.; Hebl, M. R.; Singletary, S. L.; Turner, S. (May 2006). "The stigma of obesity in customer service: a mechanism for remediation and bottom-line consequences of interpersonal discrimination". The Journal of applied psychology 91 (3): 579–593. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.579. ISSN 0021-9010. PMID 16737356.
- Schwartz, B.; Chambliss, O.; Brownell, D.; Blair, N.; Billington, C. (Sep 2003). "Weight bias among health professionals specializing in obesity". Obesity research 11 (9): 1033–1039. doi:10.1038/oby.2003.142. ISSN 1071-7323. PMID 12972672.
- Murray, S. . (2005). "Doing Politics or Selling Out? Living the Fat Body". Women s Studies 34 (3): 265–226. doi:10.1080/00497870590964165.
- "Fat Pride World Wide: The growing movement for avoirdupois acceptance". Reason Magazine. Reason Foundation. October 23, 2007. Retrieved 2009-08-17.
- (A) Medical Practitioners' Guide to Benefits of Adapting Environments for the Obese, Michigan State University study by Angela Berg MD and Joyce Burke MD, MSU.edu
- What's Fat Activism? History of fat activism from a UK perspective.
- Fat Acceptance at the Open Directory Project