Wikipedia:Files for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Files for deletion)
Jump to: navigation, search

Files for deletion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which are unneeded. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for deletion if either a consensus to do so has been reached or no objections to deletion have been raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.

Examples of what you may request here


  • Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
  • Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
  • Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
  • Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.

What not to list here[edit]

  1. For speedy deletion candidates, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
  2. Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
    1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated
    2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information
    3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but isn't used in any articles
    4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file
    5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
    6. {{subst:frn}} if a file has no non-free use rationale
    If the source or licensing information of an image marked as being freely licensed is disputed, please list the file on Possibly unfree files
  3. Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
    1. {{isd|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
    2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
  4. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}
  5. Suspected copyright violations shouldn't be listed here.
    1. If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
    2. For other suspected copyright infringements or licensing issues, use Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
  6. Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
  7. Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
    1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
    2. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2; use {{db-nofile}}.
    3. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
    4. Any other deletion of a description page with no local file should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
  8. If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
  9. If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for deletion

To list a file:

1
Edit the file page.

Add {{ffd|log=2014 April 17}} to the file page.

2
Create its FfD subsection.

Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:ffd2|File_name.ext|Uploader= |Reason= }} ~~~~

Leave the subject heading blank.

If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons.

For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use {{subst:ffd2a|File_name.ext|Uploader= }}

3
Give due notice.

Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw|File_name.ext}}

  • Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
  • For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:fdw-multi|First_file.ext|Second_file.ext|Third_file.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)

If the image is in use, also consider adding {{ifdc|File_name.ext|log=2014 April 17}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted. Some common reasons are:

  • Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name (often abbreviated OB)
  • Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} . (often abbreviated OR, not to be confused with original research which generally doesn't apply to images)
  • Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos). (often abbreviated UE)
  • Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns. (often abbreviated LQ)
  • Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright. (often abbreviated CV)

These are not the only "valid" reasons to delete a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

Since abbreviated deletion reasons will not be familiar to most Wikipedians, especially newbies, please consider using full words. A few extra keystrokes now can save paragraphs of explanation to a panicked uploader wondering what's wrong with their image.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

Administrator instructions

Instructions for discussion participation[edit]

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions[edit]

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions[edit]

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

  • (None at this time)

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Recent nominations[edit]

April 11[edit]

File:JohnFHill.jpg[edit]

File:JohnFHill.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ai.kefu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orphan image with poor source information. we just know what some blog says about it. damiens.rf 03:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

File:FrankHarrisHitchcock.jpg[edit]

File:FrankHarrisHitchcock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ai.kefu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orpahn image of a unknown man with a deadlink as a source. damiens.rf 03:28, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

File:FrankHHitchock.jpg[edit]

File:FrankHHitchock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ai.kefu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

orpahn image of a unknown man with a deadlink as a source. damiens.rf 03:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Dead Draw Aerial View looking South, August 1992.jpg[edit]

File:Dead Draw Aerial View looking South, August 1992.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by I am One of Many (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free photograph of a protected historic area in the US, used to show a certain topographical feature (the presence of wagon ruts stemming from the time of an 1870s gold rush). Replaceable with a new photograph. Uploader has argued that new photographs would no longer show the wagon ruts as clearly as on this 1992 photo. However, he has provided no proof of this assertion – the only information we have is that those (apparently few) free photographs he happens to have found (and which were apparently all taken from the ground) did not show them as clearly, not that they have objectively gone and could no longer be photographed. Uploader has admitted that a new aerial photograph might well still show them. There also seems to be no objective grounds for the supposition that they are gone – they survived a hundred years without being protected, so why should they suddently have vanished in the twenty years after measures were taken explicitly to protect them? To demonstrate that this is irreplaceable, we'd need to show proof that somebody at least tried to replace it, i.e. a new comparable photograph taken from a similar angle under similar lighting conditions (this one was evidently taken in the early morning to increase the effects of shadows on the ground).

Replaceable-speedy was declined, so taking it here. Fut.Perf. 07:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Update: It appears the wagon ruts are still visible even on Google Earth [1], so they are definitely still there. Fut.Perf. 07:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree. I was just looking over Deadwood Draw and north of the windmill, the ruts are amazing. Indeed, the area I zoomed in on in Google maps would be better than the 1992 photo. However, the four 1992 arial photos in the NRHP application and the Satellite images from Google maps are all the known images we have of the ruts from above. I don't think it is reasonable to believe that someone in the future will take some arial photos of Deadwood Draw with the wagon trails and upload them with a free licence (I know I'm not going to hire someone to do it, and that is the only way it would get done I believe--I also live in California, so it's not feasible for me to check the situation out). So, I think that this image falls under the exception that it is not reasonable to expect an equivalent image to become freely available https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy. I am One of Many (talk) 08:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, no, the threshold for such an exception is much higher. It is not required that something should be effortless or easy or cheap to replace, or that it should be equally easy for anybody no matter where they live. What counts is that it is possible. There are people out in Nebraska, and if it really should be necessary to have an aerial shot, there are still people who have access to recreational gliders, or toy drones, or who can afford renting a half-hour ride in a helicopter. Fut.Perf. 08:43, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't disagree with your interpretation of effortless, easy, or cheap. There are a number of people around the US who take photos of places in NRHP at considerable effort and I imagine some expense the themselves (I deeply appreciate their efforts). But, don't you think that the wording: "An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals. Any content used under an EDP must be replaced with a freely licensed work whenever one is available which will serve the same educational purpose."[my emphasis][2] implies some non-zero probability that a free file will be uploaded? If we look at aerial photographs of Nebraska at commons, we see that 22 photos have been uploaded [3]. None of which are close to the quality needed to show the ruts at Deadwood Draw. Also, there have been a number of aerial photographs on Nebraska airports uploaded but they also lack the detail necessary [4]. On the other hand, there are many good-quality pictures of buildings in Nebraska. So, my argument is this: while it is reasonable to expect that someone could upload a free file of a building (that still exists) in Nebraska, it is not reasonable to expect that someone will upload a free file of Deadwood Draw because, to the best of my knowledge, no similar aerial free file of any geographical location with the requisite detail has every been uploaded. I am One of Many (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Further Comment @Fut.Perf. I spent a couple of hours going through the archives in Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. FUC #1 has been discussed a lot over the years and especially since https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Licensing_policy. The most recent discussion of substance I could find was here, which attempted to reconcile the language of the Wikimedia Licensing policy with FUC #1. However, there was clearly no consensus to do so and Wikipedia can adopt its own policy so long as it is not weaker than Wikimedia's. So, it looks to me as though the phrase "no free equivalent could be created" is interpreted very strictly on Wikipedia. There are a number of editors on either side of the fence on this, but there has been no consensus to change it (I would be on the side of changing it to "could reasonably"), but I also realize that this is a very complex issue. Therefore, I believe your interpretation does accurately reflect current policy on a very difficult subject. I'm going to go ahead an remove the photo from Deadwood Draw, so you can go ahead and delete it. I am One of Many (talk) 00:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Professor Hickey and Jeff Winger.jpg[edit]

File:Professor Hickey and Jeff Winger.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Drywater2k (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Simply shows two characters standing next to each other, no significant contribution to understanding the article, clear NFCC#8 failure. Fut.Perf. 08:24, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Not even a screenshot, but a promotional photograph that does fail NFCC8 by a mile; doesn't add any understanding to the episode linked outside of 'old guy and younger man with lunch tray' for those who don't watch the show. Nate (chatter) 21:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Old Timey Photo Club 2014.jpg[edit]

File:Old Timey Photo Club 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Drywater2k (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. The topic this ostensibly illustrates (the "photo club") is not even mentioned anywhere else in the article and has no relation to the rest of the plot that I can identify, while two analytical claims made about it in the caption (that it somehow references The Shining, and that it features some of the show's creators) are also not linked to the rest of the article, and moreover appear to be unsourced and possibly OR. It is also not clear how and why these points would be in need of visible illustration to be understood, even if they could be linked to legitimately sourced material in the article. Fut.Perf. 08:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Unless a fan of the show understands it from the start, it's just an oddball sepia-toned false old-style photograph to most. As someone who doesn't watch the show I'd look at this and wonder why it was in the article; text explains much better than the image in this place, which is also a promotional photo, not even a screencap from the episode, so there's that COPYVIO buzzsaw we're running into also. Nate (chatter) 21:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:KekePalmer1.jpg[edit]

File:KekePalmer1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 25stash (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unused image, personal photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Judging from uploader's other uploads, Keke Palmer didn't come here to upload it. This has all the makings of a picture ripped from her Instagram, and we have free-use pictures of the subject already. Nate (chatter) 21:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

April 12[edit]

File:Run shoot at Saputara,shootatSaputarawithCharit.jpg[edit]

File:Run shoot at Saputara,shootatSaputarawithCharit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Csuccess21 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Charitarth Unagar). MER-C 12:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Run shoot at Saputara,shootatSaputarawithCharit.jpg[edit]

File:Run shoot at Saputara,shootatSaputarawithCharit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Csuccess21 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, unencyclopedic. MER-C 12:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Signature of Charitarth Unagar , SignatureofCharitarth.png[edit]

File:Signature of Charitarth Unagar , SignatureofCharitarth.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Csuccess21 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, unencyclopedic. MER-C 12:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Plague.jpg[edit]

File:Plague.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Supercooldude40 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A plaque was uploaded to this title in 2006. In 2009, another user uploaded the current image without specifying any source or license information. We have no basis for believing that this image was created by the uploader and, in fact, their talk page is filled with image deletion warnings. B (talk) 12:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Opening of Cancer Treatment Centre Nov 1984.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G4 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC) Repost of the same image previously deleted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 February 19#File:Opening of Cancer Treatment Centre, Nov 1984.jpg, without any new information to resolve the reasons why it was deleted the first time. It's a copyrighted magazine cover which is not critical to a complete understanding the subject. It depicts one particular moment in a 35-year career and the magazine cover was not, in and of itself, a defining incident in that career — the subject may have personally been proud of that moment, certainly, but the magazine cover doesn't add anything contextually to an understanding of the matter which the text of the article is not already adequately conveying. As well, it fails fair use since the magazine cover is not itself the subject of the article; the subject is one of several people depicted in the image, but the magazine cover itself is not a subject of discussion in the article text (which would be the bottom line requirement for a legitimate fair use claim here). Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sudbury Mayor Jim Gordon.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Sudbury Mayor Jim Gordon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Doris Hawrelluk (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Reup of an image that was previously speedied as a violation of Wikipedia's fair use policies for images, as a non-free image of a person for whom a GFDL-compliant image could potentially be located. File description contains the copyright permission statement that "Al Gilbert, on behalf of Gilbert Studios, hereby gives permission for James (Jim) Gordon to use the portrait that I took of him for whatever purpose is required, e.g. his Wikipedia page; various self promotional purposes etc. I can be reached at the studio at 416 923 1995 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely -Al Gilbert, CM" — which, in addition to implying a WP:COI issue, falls significantly short of Wikipedia's requirements for copyright permission on non-free content, which require us to have an explicit WP:OTRS permission in our files rather than just an assertion that the article subject has permission to use it. Delete; due to the repeated reuploads, I think we need a documented discussion rather than just speedying again. Bearcat (talk) 16:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Polymerization PolyDADMAC.jpg[edit]

File:Polymerization PolyDADMAC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Langbein Rise (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality, orphaned, SVG version exists. Leyo 19:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Peripheral Attack.jpeg[edit]

File:Peripheral Attack.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smbanik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality, orphaned, SVG version exists. Leyo 19:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Pimtreaction.JPG[edit]

File:Pimtreaction.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rkoz24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality, orphaned, SVG version exists. Leyo 19:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

April 13[edit]

April 14[edit]

File:Creatures backcover 1982.jpg[edit]

File:Creatures backcover 1982.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Darwin's Bulldog (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There's a slim rationale for using this in Creatures of the Night but it's flimsy to say that non-free media really explain anything critically that text doesn't. Otherwise, it's used decoratively in two articles. —Justin (koavf)TCM 07:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Zillatron Innerhythmic.jpg[edit]

File:Zillatron Innerhythmic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HexaChord (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file fails WP:NFCC#3a because the article (Lord of the Harvest) has another unfree file (File:ZILLATRON LORD OF THE HARVEST.jpg) in the infobox. This file also fails WP:NFCC#8 because the article does not contain any critical commentary which depends on the presence of this image. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 18:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Jodi Arias.jpg[edit]

File:Jodi Arias.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gourami Watcher (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image fails WP:NFCC#8 in the article as it is not necessary to the understanding. The subject is not notable enough to have her own article, and there is nothing in the article that requires the use of a non-free image. Image also fails WP:NFC#UUI #7 & WP:NFCC#2 as the image is from a press agency. TLSuda (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Due to the fact that I am rather inexperienced with uploading fair use images, I may not have been able to give a suitable rational for the image. However, I do believe it would be valuable to the article due to the fact that her trial received widespread media attention and many would recognize the case if her image appeared on the article. Thanks. --GouramiWatcher(?) 01:11, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
For Non-free files to be used, they must meet all of the criteria of WP:NFCC. This image fails WP:NFCC#8 because there is no contextual significance of the image, as it is used purely for identification purposes. This image is not required to the understanding of the article about the Murder of Travis Alexander, nor is it required to see a photo of the person who was convicted. As a press agency photo it fails WP:NFCC#2. Also, as she is still alive, and is likely to appear in court again soon for her sentencing, a free photo could be made, therefore also causing the image to be replaceable and failing WP:NFCC#1. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 01:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

April 15[edit]

File:NSA GENESIS.jpg[edit]

File:NSA GENESIS.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BlindWanderer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A move to commons has been proposed but the same file is on commons at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Nsa-ant-genesis.jpg&action=history. We don't need both. Elvey (talk) 08:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ansel Elgort.jpg[edit]

File:Ansel Elgort.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Meganknudsen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

straight form an ARR website, image even has the website logo on it LADY LOTUSTALK 11:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

April 16[edit]

File:Capture.png[edit]

File:Capture.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kaepora (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image lacks a description, and it's use beyond Wikipedia seems limited. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Scott Tenorman Must Die screenshot.jpg[edit]

File:Scott Tenorman Must Die screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mo Money, Mo Things Happening (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Life of Brian screenshot.png[edit]

File:Life of Brian screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mo Money, Mo Things Happening (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. Used as decoration. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Indian Toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus.jpg[edit]

File:Indian Toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ashaharkhan786 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file is an exact copy of this image, from calphotos.berkeley.edu, which says that the copyright belongs to Krishna Khan, not Ashahar Khan. Maybe both names belong to the same person but we need absolute clarity. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

April 17[edit]

File:GU Energy Labs logo.png[edit]

File:GU Energy Labs logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Another Believer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

uploaded to commons as not copyrightable (still trademark protected, as allowed by commons rules). now at File:Gu Energy logo.png Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:40, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Footer[edit]

Today is April 17 2014. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 April 17 -- (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===April 17===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for deletion page (the one you're on now) work.