Firehose instability

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Fig. 1. The firehose instability in an N-body simulation of a prolate elliptical galaxy. Time progresses top–down, from upper left to lower right. Initially, the long-to-short axis ratio of the galaxy is 10:1. After the instability has run its course, the axis ratio is approximately 3:1. Note the boxy shape of the final galaxy, similar to the shapes of bars observed in many spiral galaxies.

The firehose instability (or hose-pipe instability) is a dynamical instability of thin or elongated galaxies. The instability causes the galaxy to buckle or bend in a direction perpendicular to its long axis. After the instability has run its course, the galaxy is less elongated (i.e. rounder) than before. Any sufficiently thin stellar system, in which some component of the internal velocity is in the form of random or counter-streaming motions (as opposed to rotation), is subject to the instability.

The firehose instability is probably responsible for the fact that elliptical galaxies and dark matter haloes never have axis ratios more extreme than about 3:1, since this is roughly the axis ratio at which the instability sets in.[1] It may also play a role in the formation of barred spiral galaxies, by causing the bar to thicken in the direction perpendicular to the galaxy disk.[2]

The firehose instability derives its name from a similar instability in magnetized plasmas.[3] However, from a dynamical point of view, a better analogy is with the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability,[4] or with beads sliding along an oscillating string.[5]

Stability analysis: sheets and wires[edit]

The firehose instability can be analyzed exactly in the case of an infinitely thin, self-gravitating sheet of stars.[4] If the sheet experiences a small displacement h(x,t) in the z direction, the vertical acceleration for stars of x velocity u as they move around the bend is


a_z = \left({\partial\over\partial t} + u{\partial\over\partial x}\right)^2h = 
{\partial^2h\over\partial t^2} + 2u {\partial^2h\over\partial t \partial x} + u^2 {\partial^2h\over\partial x^2},\,

provided the bend is small enough that the horizontal velocity is unaffected. Averaged over all stars at x, this acceleration must equal the gravitational restoring force per unit mass F_x. In a frame chosen such that the mean streaming motions are zero, this relation becomes


{\partial^2h\over\partial t^2} + \sigma_u^2 {\partial^2h\over\partial x^2} - F_z(x,t) =0,\,

where \sigma_u is the horizontal velocity dispersion in that frame.

For a perturbation of the form


h(x,t)=H\exp\left[i\left(kx-\omega t\right)\right]

the gravitational restoring force is


F_z(x,t) = -G\Sigma\int_{-\infty}^\infty dy' \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}
{\left[ h(x,t) - h(x',t)\right]\over \left[(x-x')^2+(y-y')^2\right]^{3/2}}dx'
= -2\pi G\Sigma k h(x,t)

where \Sigma is the surface mass density. The dispersion relation for a thin self-gravitating sheet is then[4]


\omega^2 = 2\pi G\Sigma k - \sigma_u^2 k^2.

The first term, which arises from the perturbed gravity, is stabilizing, while the second term, due to the centrifugal force that the stars exert on the sheet, is destabilizing.

For sufficiently long wavelengths:


\lambda =2\pi/k > \lambda_J = \sigma_u^2/G\Sigma

the gravitational restoring force dominates, and the sheet is stable; while at short wavelengths the sheet is unstable. The firehose instability is precisely complementary, in this sense, to the Jeans instability in the plane, which is stabilized at short wavelengths, \lambda < \lambda_J.[6]

Fig. 2. Unstable eigenmodes of a one-dimensional (prolate) galaxy. Growth rates are given at the left.

A similar analysis can be carried out for a galaxy that is idealized as a one-dimensional wire, with density that varies along the axis.[7] This is a simple model of a (prolate) elliptical galaxy. Some unstable eigenmodes are shown in Figure 2 at left.

Stability analysis: finite-thickness galaxies[edit]

At wavelengths shorter than the actual vertical thickness of a galaxy, the bending is stabilized. The reason is that stars in a finite-thickness galaxy oscillate vertically with an unperturbed frequency \kappa_z; like any oscillator, the phase of the star's response to the imposed bending depends entirely on whether the forcing frequency ku is greater than or less than its natural frequency. If ku>\kappa_z for most stars, the overall density response to the perturbation will produce a gravitational potential opposite to that imposed by the bend and the disturbance will be damped.[8] These arguments imply that a sufficiently thick galaxy (with low \kappa_z) will be stable to bending at all wavelengths, both short and long.

Analysis of the linear normal modes of a finite-thickness slab shows that bending is indeed stabilized when the ratio of vertical to horizontal velocity dispersions exceeds about 0.3.[4][9] Since the elongation of a stellar system with this anisotropy is approximately 15:1 — much more extreme than observed in real galaxies — bending instabilities were believed for many years to be of little importance. However, Fridman & Polyachenko showed [1] that the critical axis ratio for stability of homogeneous (constant-density) oblate and prolate spheroids was roughly 3:1, not 15:1 as implied by the infinite slab, and Merritt & Hernquist[7] found a similar result in an N-body study of inhomogeneous prolate spheroids (Fig. 1).

The discrepancy was resolved in 1994.[8] The gravitational restoring force from a bend is substantially weaker in finite or inhomogeneous galaxies than in infinite sheets and slabs, since there is less matter at large distances to contribute to the restoring force. As a result, the long-wavelength modes are not stabilized by gravity, as implied by the dispersion relation derived above. In these more realistic models, a typical star feels a vertical forcing frequency from a long-wavelength bend that is roughly twice the frequency \Omega_z of its unperturbed orbital motion along the long axis. Stability to global bending modes then requires that this forcing frequency be greater than \Omega_z, the frequency of orbital motion parallel to the short axis. The resulting (approximate) condition


2\Omega_x > \Omega_z\,

predicts stability for homogeneous prolate spheroids rounder than 2.94:1, in excellent agreement with the normal-mode calculations of Fridman & Polyachenko[1] and with N-body simulations of homogeneous oblate[10] and inhomogeneous prolate [7] galaxies.

The situation for disk galaxies is more complicated, since the shapes of the dominant modes depend on whether the internal velocities are azimuthally or radially biased. In oblate galaxies with radially-elongated velocity ellipsoids, arguments similar to those given above suggest that an axis ratio of roughly 3:1 is again close to critical, in agreement with N-body simulations for thickened disks.[11] If the stellar velocities are azimuthally biased, the orbits are approximately circular and so othe dominant modes are angular (corrugation) modes, \delta z \propto e^{im\phi}. The approximate condition for stability becomes


m\Omega>\kappa_z\,

with \Omega the circular orbital frequency.

Importance[edit]

The firehose instability is believed to play an important role in determining the structure of both spiral and elliptical galaxies and of dark matter haloes.

  • As noted by Edwin Hubble and others, elliptical galaxies are rarely if ever observed to be more elongated than E6 or E7, corresponding to a maximum axis ratio of about 3:1. The firehose instability is probably responsible for this fact, since an elliptical galaxy that formed with an initially more elongated shape would be unstable to bending modes, causing it to become rounder.
  • Simulated dark matter haloes, like elliptical galaxies, never have elongations greater than about 3:1. This is probably also a consequence of the firehose instability.[12]
  • N-body simulations reveal that the bars of barred spiral galaxies often "puff up" spontaneously, converting the initially thin bar into a bulge or thick disk subsystem.[13] The bending instability is sometimes violent enough to weaken the bar.[2] Bulges formed in this way are very "boxy" in appearance, similar to what is often observed.[13]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Fridman, A. M.; Polyachenko, V. L. (1984), Physics of Gravitating Systems. II — Nonlinear collective processes: Nonlinear waves, solitons, collisionless shocks, turbulence. Astrophysical applications, Berlin: Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-13103-0 
  2. ^ a b Raha, N.; Sellwood, J. A.; James, R. A.; Kahn, F. A. (1991), "A dynamical instability of bars in disk galaxies", Nature 352 (6334): 411–412, Bibcode:1991Natur.352..411R, doi:10.1038/352411a0 
  3. ^ Parker, E. N. (1958), "Dynamical Instability in an Anisotropic Ionized Gas of Low Density", Physical Review 109: 1874–1876, Bibcode:1958PhRv..109.1874P, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.1874 
  4. ^ a b c d Toomre, A. (1966), "A Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability", Notes from the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Summer Study Program, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst.: 111–114 
  5. ^ In spite of its name, the firehose instability is not related dynamically to the oscillatory motion of a hose spewing water from its nozzle.
  6. ^ Kulsrud, R. M.; Mark, J. W. K.; Caruso, A. (1971), "The Hose-Pipe Instability in Stellar Systems", Astrophysics and Space Science 14: 52–55, Bibcode:1971Ap&SS..14...52K, doi:10.1007/BF00649194. 
  7. ^ a b c Merritt, D.; Hernquist, L. (1991), "Stability of Nonrotating Stellar Systems", The Astrophysical Journal 376: 439–457, Bibcode:1991ApJ...376..439M, doi:10.1086/170293. 
  8. ^ a b Merritt, D.; Sellwood, J. (1994), "Bending Instabilities of Stellar Systems", The Astrophysical Journal 425: 551–567, Bibcode:1994ApJ...425..551M, doi:10.1086/174005 
  9. ^ Araki, S. (1985). A Theoretical Study of the Stability of Disk Galaxies and Planetary Rings. PhD Thesis, MIT. OCLC 13915550. 
  10. ^ Jessop, C. M.; Duncan, M. J.; Levison, H. F. (1997), "Bending Instabilities in Homogenous Oblate Spheroidal Galaxy Models", The Astrophysical Journal 489: 49–62, Bibcode:1997ApJ...489...49J, doi:10.1086/304751 
  11. ^ Sellwood, J.; Merritt, D. (1994), "Instabilities of counterrotating stellar disks", The Astrophysical Journal 425: 530–550, Bibcode:1994ApJ...425..530S, doi:10.1086/174004 
  12. ^ Bett, P. et al. (2007), "The spin and shape of dark matter haloes in the Millennium simulation of a Λ cold dark matter universe", Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 376: 215–232, arXiv:astro-ph/0608607, Bibcode:2007MNRAS.376..215B, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11432.x 
  13. ^ a b Combes, F. et al. (1990), "Box and peanut shapes generated by stellar bars", Astronomy and Astrophysics 233: 82–95, Bibcode:1990A&A...233...82C 
  14. ^ Revaz, Y.; Pfenniger, D. (2004), "Bending instabilities at the origin of persistent warps: A new constraint on dark matter halos", Astronomy and Astrophysics 425: 67–76, arXiv:astro-ph/0406339, Bibcode:2004A&A...425...67R, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041386