Following

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Following
Following film poster.jpg
Film poster
Directed by Christopher Nolan
Produced by Christopher Nolan
Emma Thomas
Jeremy Theobald
Written by Christopher Nolan
Starring Jeremy Theobald
Alex Haw
Lucy Russell
John Nolan
Music by David Julyan
Cinematography Christopher Nolan
Editing by Gareth Heal
Christopher Nolan
Studio Next Wave Films
Overseas Filmgroup
Syncopy Inc.
Distributed by Zeitgeist Films (US)
Momentum Pictures (UK)
Release dates 12 September 1998 (Toronto International Film Festival)
2 April 1999 (New York City)
5 November 1999 (UK)
Running time 70 minutes
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Budget $6,000[1]
Box office $240 thousand[2]

Following is a 1998 British neo-noir drama thriller film written and directed by Christopher Nolan. It tells the story of a young man who follows strangers around the streets of London and is drawn into a criminal underworld when he fails to keep his distance.

As Christopher Nolan's debut feature, it was designed to be as inexpensive as possible to make: scenes were heavily rehearsed so that just one or two takes were needed, thus economising on 16 mm film stock, the production's greatest expense, and for which Nolan was paying from his salary. Without expensive professional lighting equipment, Nolan mostly used available light. Apart from writing, directing, and photographing the film, Nolan also helped in editing and production. These efforts have made the film one of the least expensive films in history.

Plot[edit]

A struggling, unemployed young writer (credited as "The Young Man") takes to following strangers around the streets of London, ostensibly to find inspiration for his first novel. Initially, he sets strict rules for himself regarding whom he should follow and for how long, but he soon discards them as he focuses on a well-groomed, handsome man in a dark suit. The man in the suit, having noticed he is being followed, quickly confronts the Young Man and introduces himself as "Cobb". Cobb reveals that he is a serial burglar and invites the Young Man (who tells Cobb his name is "Bill") to accompany him on various burglaries. The material gains from these crimes seem to be of secondary importance to Cobb. He takes pleasure in rifling through the personal items in his targets' flats and drinking their wine. He explains that his true passion is using the shock of robbery and violation of property to make his victims re-examine their lives. He sums up his attitude thus: "You take it away, and show them what they had."

The Young Man is thrilled by Cobb's lifestyle. He attempts break-ins of his own, as Cobb encourages and guides him. At Cobb's suggestion, he alters his appearance, cutting his hair short and wearing a dark suit. He assumes the name "Daniel Lloyd" based on the credit card Cobb gives to him and begins to pursue a relationship with a blonde woman whose flat he and Cobb burgled. The Blonde turns out to be the girlfriend of a small-time gangster (known only as the "Bald Guy") whom she broke up with after he murdered a man in her flat. Soon, the Blonde confides that the Bald Guy is blackmailing her with incriminating photographs. The Young Man breaks into the Bald Guy's safe, but is caught in the act by an unidentified man. He then bludgeons the man with a claw hammer and flees with the Bald Guy's money and photos. Upon returning to his flat, he finds that the photos are innocuous modeling shots.

Confronting the Blonde, the Young Man learns that she and Cobb have been working together to manipulate him into mimicking Cobb's burglary methods. She tells him that Cobb had recently discovered a murdered woman's body during one of his burglaries and is attempting to deflect suspicion from himself by making it appear as though multiple burglars share his MO.

The Young Man leaves to turn himself in to the police. The Blonde reports her success to Cobb, who then reveals that he actually works for the Bald Guy. The story about the murdered woman was part of a plot to deceive both the Blonde and the Young Man: The Blonde has been blackmailing the Bald Guy with evidence from the murder he committed in her flat, and he wants her murdered in such a way that it cannot be connected to him. Cobb bludgeons the Blonde to death with the same claw hammer that the Young Man used during the burglary of the Bald Guy's safe and leaves it at the scene. The police, checking out the Young Man's story, find the Blonde murdered and the claw hammer with his fingerprints on it. The Young Man is thus implicated for the murder of the blonde woman. Cobb, meanwhile, vanishes into a crowd.

Cast[edit]

  • Jeremy Theobald as The Young Man [Bill / Daniel ("Danny") Lloyd]
  • Alex Haw as Cobb
  • Lucy Russell as The Blonde
  • John Nolan as The Policeman
  • Dick Bradsell as The Bald Guy
  • Gillian El-Kadi as Home Owner
  • Jennifer Angel as Waitress
  • Nicolas Carlotti as Barman
  • Darren Ormandy as Accountant
  • Guy Greenway as Heavy #1
  • Tassos Stevens as Heavy #2
  • Tristan Martin as Man at Bar
  • Rebecca James as Woman at Bar
  • Paul Mason as Home Owner's Friend
  • David Bovill as Home Owner's Husband

Production[edit]

Following was written, directed, filmed, and co-produced by Christopher Nolan.[3] It was filmed in London, on black-and-white 16mm film stock. Nolan used a non-linear plot structure for the film, a device he again used in Memento, Batman Begins and The Prestige. This type of storytelling, he says, reflected the audience's inherent uncertainty about characters in film noir:

In a compelling story of this genre we are continually being asked to rethink our assessment of the relationship between the various characters, and I decided to structure my story in such a way as to emphasize the audience's incomplete understanding of each new scene as it is first presented.[3]

Following was written and planned to be as inexpensive to produce as possible, but Nolan has described the production of Following as "extreme", even for a low-budget shoot.[3] With little money, limited equipment, and a cast and crew who were all in full-time employment on weekdays, the production took a full year to complete.[3]

To conserve expensive film stock, every scene in the film was rehearsed extensively to ensure that the first or second take could be used in the final edit.[3] Filming took place on Saturdays for three or four months, Nolan shot about fifteen minutes of footage each day. This time frame also moderated the cost of film-stock and allowed him to pay for it out of his salary.[4] For the most part, Nolan filmed without professional film lighting equipment, largely employing available light. This was made easier by the decision to use 16 mm black and white film.[4] He also used the homes of his friends and family as locations.[3]

Reception[edit]

Following received generally positive reviews. Its aggregate review score from Rotten Tomatoes is 79%.[5]

Los Angeles Times reviewer Kevin Thomas was particularly impressed with the film, saying that it was a "taut and ingenious neo-noir" and that "as a psychological mystery it plays persuasively if not profoundly. Nolan relishes the sheer nastiness he keeps stirred up, unabated for 70 minutes."[6] The New Yorker wrote that Following echoed Hitchcock classics, but was "leaner and meaner".[7]TV Guide called it "short, sharp and tough as nails",[8] praising its fast-paced storytelling and 'tricky, triple-tiered flashback structure'.[8] David Thompson of Sight and Sound commented that "Nolan shows a natural talent for a fluent handheld aesthetic."[9]

However, Tony Rayns felt that the film's climax was uninspired, saying that "the generic pay off is a little disappointing after the edgy, character based scenes of exposition".[10] Empire's Trevor Lewis questioned the skill of the film's inexperienced cast, saying that they "lack the dramatic ballast to compensate for [Nolan's] erratic plot elisions."[11] In contrast, David Thompson was of the opinion that the "unfamiliar cast acquit themselves well in a simple naturalistic style."[9]

Following has since been recognized as one of the most notable no-budget films of its time.[12][13]

Accolades[edit]

Following won several awards during its festival run, including the Tiger Award at the Rotterdam International Film Festival[14] and the "Best First Feature" prize at the San Francisco International Film Festival, among others.[15]

Release[edit]

A Blu-ray restoration of the film with a new 5.1 sound mix was released by Criterion on 11 December 2012.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Following (1999)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 19 July 2009. 
  2. ^ "Following - Box Office Data, DVD Sales, Movie News, Cast Information". The Numbers. Retrieved 2014-04-22. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f Duncker, Johannes (2002-06-06). "The Making of Following". christophernolan.net. Retrieved 2008-05-19. 
  4. ^ a b Tobias, S. Interview:Christopher Nolan, avclub.com, 5 June 2002. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  5. ^ "Rotten Tomatoes". Retrieved 2013-01-27. 
  6. ^ Thomas, Kevin (4 June 1999). "Following: 'Following' the Twisting Path of Sinister, Neo Noir Intrigue". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 19 July 2009. 
  7. ^ Timberg, Scott (15 March 2001). "Indie Angst". New Times Los Angeles. Retrieved 4 June 2013. 
  8. ^ a b Fox, Ken. "Following: Review". TVGuide.com. Retrieved 2008-05-19. 
  9. ^ a b Thompson, David (December 1999). "Following (1998)". Sight and Sound. Retrieved 19 July 2009. 
  10. ^ Rayns, Tony. "Following". Time Out. Retrieved 19 July 2009. 
  11. ^ Lewis, Trevor. "Empire Reviews Central - Review of Following". Empire. Retrieved 19 July 2009. 
  12. ^ Grove, Elliot. "Top Ten No Budget Films". Raindance. Retrieved 24 July 2012. 
  13. ^ Henderson, Scott. "Top ten films made on a shoestring budget". TheVine. Retrieved 24 July 2012. 
  14. ^ "Tiger Awards Competition: previous winners". International Film Festival Rotterdam. Retrieved 2013-02-12. 
  15. ^ "Awards for Following". IMDB. Retrieved June 25, 2013.

External links[edit]