Formal epistemology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. (Consider using more specific cleanup instructions.) Please help improve this article if you can. The talk page may contain suggestions. (August 2011) |
Formal epistemology uses formal methods from decision theory, logic, probability theory and computability theory to elucidate epistemic problems. Work in this area spans several academic fields, including philosophy, computer science, economics, and statistics. The focus of formal epistemology has tended to differ somewhat from that of traditional epistemology, with topics like uncertainty, induction, and belief revision garnering more attention than the analysis of knowledge, skepticism, and issues with justification.
Contents |
[edit] History
Though formally oriented epistemologists have been laboring since the emergence of formal logic and probability theory (if not earlier), only recently have they been organized under a common disciplinary title. This gain in popularity may be attributed to the organization of yearly Formal Epistemology Workshops by Branden Fitelson and Sahotra Sarkar, starting in 2004, and the PHILOG-conferences starting in 2002 (The Network for Philosophical Logic and Its Applications) organized by Vincent F. Hendricks. Carnegie Mellon University's Philosophy Department hosts an annual summer school in logic and formal epistemology. In 2010, the department founded the Center for Formal Epistemology.
[edit] Topics
Some of the topics that come under the heading of formal epistemology include:
- Ampliative inference (including inductive logic);
- Game theory and decision theory;
- Algorithmic learning theory (computational epistemology);
- Formal approaches to paradoxes of belief and/or action;
- Formal models of epistemic states, like belief and uncertainty;
- Formal models of rationality constraints on belief and changes in belief;
- Formal theories of coherentism and confirmation;
- Foundations of probability and statistics.
[edit] List of contemporary formal epistemologists
- Horacio Arló-Costa, Carnegie Mellon, Philosophy (Bayesian epistemology, epistemic logic, belief revision, conditionals, rational choice, normative and behavioral decision theory)
- Luc Bovens (Bayesian epistemology, probability, etc.)
- Samir Chopra (belief revision, physics, etc.)
- Jake Chandler (Bayesian epistemology, belief revision, etc.)
- John Collins Columbia, Philosophy (belief revision, causal decision theory)
- Franz Dietrich (collective decision-making, etc.)
- Trent Dougherty (Jeffrey's radical probabilism, semantics for modals, theories of probability)
- Igor Douven (Bayesian epistemology, etc.)
- Ellery Eells (confirmation, probability)
- Adam Elga (probabilistic reasoning, laws, etc.)
- Branden Fitelson (confirmation, logic, etc.)
- Malcolm Forster (confirmation, simplicity, causation)
- Haim Gaifman Columbia, Philosophy (foundations of probability, mathematical logic)
- Anthony Gillies (belief revision, formal semantics)
- Mario Gómez-Torrente
- Alan Hájek (foundations of probability, decision theory, etc.)
- Joseph Halpern (reasoning about knowledge and uncertainty)
- Sven Ove Hansson (risk, decision theory, belief revision, deontic logic)
- Gilbert Harman (epistemology, statistical learning theory, mind and language)
- Stephan Hartmann (Bayesian epistemology, probability, collective decision-making, etc.)
- James Hawthorne (confirmation theory, inductive logic, belief revision, nonmonotonic logic)
- Jeff Helzner Columbia, Philosophy (decision theory, rational choice)
- Vincent F. Hendricks Copenhagen and Columbia, Philosophy (epistemic logic, formal learning theory, information processing and analysis of democracy)
- Franz Huber (formal epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophical logic)
- Richard Jeffrey (probabilistic reasoning)
- James Joyce (decision theory)
- Kevin T. Kelly, Carnegie Mellon, Philosophy (computational epistemology, belief revision, etc.)
- Matthew Kotzen (formal epistemology, philosophy of science)
- Marion Ledwig (Newcomb's problem)
- Hannes Leitgeb (belief revision, probability, Bayesianism, etc.)
- Isaac Levi Columbia, Philosophy (belief revision, decision theory, probability)
- Patrick Maher (confirmation, inductive logic)
- David Miller (probability, induction, logic, Popper)
- Luca Moretti (confirmation, coherence, transmission of warrant, epistemic truth)
- Daniel Osherson (inductive logic, reasoning, vagueness)
- Rohit Parikh CUNY, Computer Science (epistemic logic, common knowledge)
- Gabriella Pigozzi (belief revision, decision theory)
- John Pollock (decision theory, reasoning, AI)
- Darrell Rowbottom (foundations of probability, confirmation, philosophy of science, etc.)
- Nick Rugai (computational epistemology)
- Teddy Seidenfeld Carnegie Mellon, Philosophy (statistical decision theory, probability theory, game theory)
- Wolfgang Spohn (reasoning, probability, causation, philosophy of science, etc.)
- Paul Thorn (direct inference, defeasible reasoning, induction, etc.)
- Peter Vranas (confirmation, deontic logic, time travel, ethics, etc.)
- Gregory Wheeler (probability, logic)
- Roger White (confirmation, cosmology)
- Jon Williamson (Bayesianism, probability, causation)
- Timothy Williamson (knowledge, modality, logic, vagueness, etc.)
- David Wolpert (No Free Lunch theorems, i.e., Hume done rigorously; physics and inference, i.e., monotheism theorems, Chomsky hierarchy of inference devices, etc.)
[edit] See also
- Algorithmic learning theory
- Belief revision
- Computability theory
- Computational learning theory
- Game theory
- Inductive logic
 |
This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2011) |
[edit] Notes
[edit] References
- Arlo-Costa, H, van Benthem, J. and Hendricks, V. F. (eds.) (2012). Readings in Formal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hendricks, V. F. (2001). The Convergence of Scientific Knowledge: A View from The Limit. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Hendricks, V. F. (2006). Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hendricks, V. F. (ed.) (2006). Special issue on “8 Bridges Between Mainstream and Formal Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies.
- Hendricks, V. F. (ed.) (2006). Special issue on “Ways of Worlds I-II”, Studia Logica.
- Hendricks, V.F. and Pritchard, D. (eds.) (2006). New Waves in Epistemology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Hendricks, V. F. and Symons, J. (eds.) (2005). Formal Philosophy. New York: Automatic Press / VIP. [1]
- Hendricks, V. F. and Symons, J. (eds.) (2006). Masses of Formal Philosophy. New York: Automatic Press / VIP. [2]
- Hendricks, V. F. and Hansen, P.G. (eds.) (2007). Game Theory: 5 Questions. New York: Automatic Press / VIP. [3]
- Hendricks, V.F. and Symons, J. (2006). Epistemic Logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford. CA: USA.
- Wolpert, D.H., (1996) The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms, Neural Computation, pp. 1341–1390.
- Wolpert, D.H., (1996) The existence of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms, Neural Computation, pp. 1391–1420.
- Wolpert, D.H., (2001) Computational capabilities of physical systems. Physical Review E, 65(016128).
- Zhu, H.Y. and R. Rohwer, (1996) No free lunch for cross-validation, pp. 1421– 1426.
[edit] External links
- Formal Epistemology Workshop
- Formal Epistemology Meets Experimental Philosophy Workshop
- Formal Epistemology Archive
- Carnegie Mellon Summer School in Logic and Formal Epistemology
- Formal Philosophy
- Formal Epistemology, a free online journal.
- The Reasoner
- Formal Epistemology Project
- Carnegie Mellon Center for Formal Epistemology
