François Victor Alphonse Aulard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

François Victor Alphonse Aulard (19 July 1849 – 23 October 1928) was the first professional French historian of the French Revolution[1] and of Napoleon. He argued:

From the social point of view, the Revolution consisted in the suppression of what was called the feudal system, in the emancipation of the individual, in greater division of landed property, the abolition of the privileges of noble birth, the establishment of equality, the simplification of life.... The French Revolution differed from other revolutions in being not merely national, for it aimed at benefiting all humanity."[2]

Aulard's historiography was based on positivism. The assumption was that methodology was all-important and the historian duty was to present in chronological order the duly verified facts, to analyze relations between facts, and provide the most likely interpretation. Full documentation based on research in the primary sources was essential. He took the lead and publication very important documents, and in training advanced students in the proper use and analysis of primary sources. Aulard's famous four volume history of the Revolution focused on parliamentary debates, not action in the street; in institutions, not insurrections. He emphasized public opinion, elections, parties, parliamentary majorities, and legislation. He recognized the complications that prevented the Revolution from fulfilling all its ideal promises – as when the legislators of 1793 made a suffrage niversal for all men, but also established the dictatorship of the Terror. [3]

Career[edit]

He was born at Montbron in Charente. He entered the École Normale Supérieure in 1867 and obtained the degree of doctor of letters in 1877 with a thesis in Latin on Gaius Asinius Pollio and a French one on Giacomo Leopardi (whose works he subsequently translated into French.) Moving from literature to history, he made a study of parliamentary oratory during the French Revolution, and published two volumes on Les orateurs de la Constituante (1882) and on Les orateurs de la Legislative et de la Convention (1885). With these works he established a reputation as a careful scholar well versed in the primary sources of the French Revolution.

Applying to the study of the French Revolution the rules of historical criticism which had produced such rich results in the study of ancient and medieval history, Aulard devoted himself to profound research in the archives, and to the publication of numerous important contributions to the political, administrative and moral history of that period. His masterwork was a Histoire politique de la Revolution française (4 vol, 3rd ed. 1901). He championed Georges Danton, as opposed to Maximilien Robespierre, seeing in Danton the true spirit of the embattled Revolution, and the inspiration of the national defense against foreign enemies.[4]

Appointed professor of the history of the French Revolution at the Sorbonne in 1885, he formed the minds of students who in their turn did valuable work.

Editor[edit]

To him we owe the Recueil des actes du Comité de salut public (27 vols. 1889-1923); La Société des Jacobins: Recueil de documents sur l'histoire des club des Jacobins de Paris (6 vols., 1889-1897); Paris pendant la reaction thermidorienne et sous le directoire: Recueil de documents pour l'histoire de l'esprit public a Paris (5 vols., 1898-1902), which was followed by a collection on Paris sous le consulat (2 vols., 1903-1904).

For the Société de l'Histoire de la Revolution Française, which brought under his editorship the important periodical entitled La Revolution française. He produced the Registre des libérations du consulat provisoire (1894), and L'Etat de la France en l'an VIII et en l'an IX, with the reports of the effects (1897), besides editing various works or memoirs written by men of the Revolution, such as JC Bailleul, Chaumette, Fournier (called the American), Hérault de Séchelles, and Louvet de Couvrai.

These large collections of documents were a fraction of his output. He wrote a number of articles which were collected in volumes under the title Etudes et leçons sur la Révolution française (9 vols., 1893-1924). In a volume entitled Taine, historien de la Révolution française (1908), Aulard attacked the method of the eminent philosopher in criticism that was severe, perhaps unjust, but certainly well-informed. This was, as it were, the "manifesto" of the new school of criticism applied to the political and social history of the Revolution (see Les Annales révolutionnaires, June 1908).

Bibliography[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Aulard, Alphonse". The Columbia Encyclopedia (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. 1963. LCCN 6320205 Check |lccn= value (help). 
  2. ^ A. Aulard in Arthur Tilley, ed. (1922). Modern France. A Companion to French Studies. Cambridge UP. p. 115. 
  3. ^ Furet (1789) 882, 887
  4. ^ James Godfrey, "Alphonse Aulard." in S. William Halperin, , ed. Essays in modern European historiography. (University of Chicago Press, 1970) pp 22-42

Further reading[edit]

  • Furet, François; and Mona Ozouf (1989). A Critical Dictionary of the French Revolution. Harvard UP. pp. 881–89. 
  • *Godfrey, James. "Alphonse Aulard." in S. William Halperin, , ed. Essays in modern European historiography (University of Chicago Press, 1970) pp 22-42
  • Tendler, Joseph. "Alphonse Aulard Revisited," European Review of History (2013) 20#4 pp 649-669.

External links[edit]