François de Laval

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Blessed François de Laval, M.E.P.
Bishop of Québec
François de Laval - Project Gutenberg eText 17174.jpg
Diocese Quebec
Appointed 1 October 1674
Reign ended 24 January 1688
Successor Jean-Baptiste de La Croix de Chevrières de Saint-Vallier
Orders
Ordination 1 May 1647
Consecration 8 December 1658
by Celio Piccolomini
Personal details
Born (1623-04-30)30 April 1623
Montigny-sur-Avre, Perche, Kingdom of France
Died 6 May 1708(1708-05-06) (aged 85)
Quebec City, Canada, Viceroyalty of New France, French colonial empire
Denomination Roman Catholic
Previous post
  • Vicar Apostolic of New France (1658-1674)
  • Titular Bishop of Petra in Palaestina (1658-1674)
Signature
Coat of arms
Sainthood
Feast day 6 May
Venerated in Roman Catholic Church
(Canada)
Title as Saint Missionary and bishop
Beatified 22 June 1980
Vatican City
by Pope John Paul II
Shrines Notre-Dame de Québec Cathedral, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Ordination history of François de Laval
Priestly ordination
Date of ordination 1 May 1647
Episcopal consecration
Principal consecrator Celio Piccolomini
Co-consecrator Hardouin de Péréfixe de Beaumont
Co-consecrator André du Saussay
Date of consecration 8 December 1658
Coat of arms of the House of Montmorency-Laval et Candié-Châteaubriant

The Blessed Francis-Xavier de Montmorency-Laval, M.E.P., commonly referred to as François de Laval (30 April 1623 – 6 May 1708), was the first Roman Catholic bishop of Quebec, appointed when he was 36 years old by Pope Alexander VII. He was a member of the Montmorency family and was one of the most influential men of his day. He is currently a candidate for canonization by the Catholic Church.

Contents

Early life [edit]

Laval was born on April 30th 1623 at Montigny-sur-Avre in the ancient Province of Perche (Perché), now the Department of Eure-et-Loir.[1] His father, Hugues de Laval, a member of the House of Laval, was the Seigneur of Montigny, Montbaudry, Alaincourt and Revercourt.[2] His mother, Michelle de Péricard was from a family of hereditary officers of the Crown in Normandy.[3] Despite his noble descent, his parents were not considered to be wealthy. Montigny was considered equivalent to a good-sized market-town.[4] Laval had five other brothers and two sisters, and like himself, two of this siblings would also pursue religious paths in life. His youngest brother, Henri, entered the Benedictine Order and his sister, Anne Charlotte, entered the Congregation of Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament.[5]

Throughout his life, Laval’s mother continuously served as an example of piety and encouraged him to be charitable to those who were less fortunate.[6] It is clear that Laval must have taken his mother’s encouragement to heart as his life works clearly illustrate the compassionate and charitable man he became. Often described as destined for an ecclesiastical lifestyle, Laval was quickly recognized as a clear-sighted and intelligent boy. As a result, he was admitted into the “privileged ranks of those who comprised the Congregation of the Holy Virgin.”[7] This was a society founded by the sons of Loyola who aimed to inspire young people to adopt religious lifestyles, and encouraged regulatory prayer and holy practices. At the age of eight, Laval received the tonsure and took minor holy orders which then allowed him to enter the congregation of the college of La Flèche in 1631.[8] This institution was attended by the sons of the elite families in France; hence, Laval was guaranteed a good education. Moreover, it was during this period that Laval came into contact with reports of the Jesuit missions amongst the Huron in Canada, which influenced his desire to become a missionary, like his patron saint, Francois Xavier.[9] In 1637, Laval was appointed the canon of the cathedral of Évreux by the Bishop of Évreux.[10]

This position proved to be of key importance after the death of his father in September 1636, which left his family in a precarious financial situation.[11] Luckily, it allowed him to receive revenue from the prebend, without which he would have been unable to continue his education.[12] Once he completed his classical education at the age of nineteen, Laval left La Flèche to further pursue his education in philosophy and theology at the college de Clermont in Paris.[13]

Unfortunately, Laval’s plans were put on hold due to the death of his two eldest brothers; one having fallen at Freiburg and the other at Nordlingen, which effectively made him the head of the family.[14] At this point, Laval was faced with the decision of abandoning his ecclesiastical career to take over his father’s estate: “bringing him […] together with a great name, a brilliant future.”[15] In fact, his mother, the Bishop of Evreux, and his cousin all attempted to convince him to leave Paris and return home.[16] Nonetheless, Laval would not succumb to his family’s pressure. As a man who had always fantasized of travelling to preach the divine word of God, agreeing to his mother’s wishes would have meant submitting himself to her dreams rather than pursuing his own. As a result, Laval helped his mother set the family’s affairs in order and arranged for a full renunciation of his rights of primogeniture, which would then be transferred to his brother Jean-Louis.[17]

Once this was complete, Laval returned to Paris where he delved into his studies and began the process of preparing himself to receive his holy orders. His hard work paid off and on May 1, 1647, at the age of twenty four, Laval was finally ordained a priest.[18] Soon after this, the Bishop of Evreux began to feel remorse for his previous attempt to convince Laval to abandon his ecclesial path; hence, he decided to appoint him as the archdeacon of his cathedral in December of 1647.[19] This post required Laval to oversee the affairs of 155 parishes and four chapels. Laval was said to approach this onerous task with fervor and enthusiasm.[20] In the following years, he devoted himself to establishing order in the parishes, providing relief for the poor, caring for the sick and engaging in different kinds of charitable activities. His service to the church demonstrated that, though he was not bishop yet, he had the capability and dedication to take on such a position. Furthermore, this same behavior would be seen later on in his life, on a completely different continent.

As was mentioned previously, Laval had dreamt of becoming a missionary to travel and preach the divine word of God. As a result, when he was presented with the possibility of serving as a missionary in Asia, he resigned from his post as archdeacon in 1654.[21] Indeed, Father Alexander of Rhodes was looking for the Pope’s permission to appoint candidates as vicars apostolic in Tonkin and Indochina.[22] As a result, he was sent to Rome where he remained for fifteen months.[23] Unfortunately, the opposition by the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, which oversaw the missionary work of the Catholic Church, and the Portuguese court jeopardized the mission which led to the project being discarded in 1654.[24]

Laval was now freed from all responsibility, and thus made the decision to prepare himself “by prayer, for the designs which God might have for him.”[25] As a result, he travelled to Caen to stay at M. de Bernières’ religious retreat in the small sheltered town of Hermitage.[26] He remained here for three years where he devoted himself to prayer and charitable organizations. It is also during this time that he took on the responsibility of reforming a monastery whose morals were thought to be too lax, as well as becoming the administrator of two communities of nuns.[27] His dedication to these projects earned him commendation from Bishop François de Servien, who described him “as a priest “of great piety, prudent and of unusually great competence in business matters, [who had set] fine examples of virtue.”[28] Laval was now well known in the religious community and ready to take the next step in his life.

Father of the Canadian Church [edit]

Laval’s Appointment in New France [edit]

Laval’s nomination as Bishop of New France was the result of increasing tensions regarding the ecclesiastical state of the colony. New France had been left without a bishop for the first 50 years of its settlement. During this time, spiritual matters were often left up to the colony religious officials to regulate, with authority moving from the Recollects, and the Jesuits. Only in 1646, due to pressures from Rome, did the archbishop of Rouen become officially recognized as holding authority over the Church of New France.[29] Even with this recognition, the archbishop’s authority continued to extend only so far as granting faculties to clergy travelling to the colony.[30] By this time it had already become clear that New France was in need of a more direct ecclesiastical presence.[31]

Appointing a bishop proved difficult; it was a contentious issue, particularly between the Jesuits and the newly arrived Sulpicians.[32] The Jesuits, who by this time were quite accustomed to working independently, feared being controlled by a Sulpician bishop.[33] Their uneasiness stemmed from beliefs that a Sulpician bishop would undermine their control, and eventually lead to the subordination of the church to the state.[34] While the Sulpicians were busy proposing Gabriel de Thubières de Levy de Queylus as bishop, the Jesuits turned their support onto Laval. With the assistance of the queen mother, Anne of Austria, obtaining royal approval provided little challenges.[35]

What remained an obstacle for the Jesuits and Laval was procuring a papal confirmation.[36] The Holy See remained reserved regarding Laval’s nomination. Much of Rome’s delay in coming to a decision involved the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith.[37] They agreed with the Jesuits that a Bishop was needed, however, they feared that Laval as bishop would enable the Jesuits to once again hold a monopoly over the colony. In a compromise between the Jesuits and the Catholic Church, Laval would be appointed the apostolic vicar of New France.[38] Making New France into an apostolic vicariate, rather than a diocese, guaranteed that the head, in this case Laval, answered to the pope rather than the leaders of the Church of France, giving the pope some jurisdiction in the colony.[39] Along with being made apostolic vicar, Laval would be ordained a bishop in partibus, giving him the power he needed to build the church in Canada.[40]

On June 1658 in Rome, the papal bulls appointing Laval as vicar apostolic were signed. Laval became the Bishop of Petraea in partibus infidelium.[41] On December 8 1658, in the church of the Abbey of Saint-Germain-des-Prés in Paris, Laval was consecrated the Vicar Apostolic of Quebec by the papal nuncio, Cardinal Celio Piccolomini.[42] Laval took an oath of loyalty to the King and sailed from La Rochelle for New France on 13 April 1659.[43] On the 16th of June of that year he arrived at Quebec.[44] Immediately upon his arrival Laval began his work; on the same day his ship docked, he baptized a young Huron and gave a dying man his last sacraments. Laval was serious about his appointment in New France and had a vision for the colony. While its size was small, the colony still provided a number of challenges to Laval.[45] He found himself having to make concessions where he never thought to before to a population that, while scarce, was spread out, and was less inclined to continue under strict church discipline.[46]

In 1674, thirteen years after his arrival to New France, Laval asked for his position to be promoted. His request was granted, and he was given a diocese as Bishop of Quebec.[47]

Laval and State Relations [edit]

Laval struggled a great deal throughout his career to defend the church’s power against state intrusion. Upon his arrival, Laval was adamant in asserting his primacy over the governor.[48] He was immediately in opposition with Governor d’Argenson, particularly regarding ceremony and protocol.[49] Also, the issue of selling alcohol to the natives furthered fueled their feud. Laval believed that intoxicated natives were an embarrassment to the colony and endangered the lives of those around them.[50] He quickly imposed the threat of excommunication on those who continued to deal in this trade. Governor D’Argenson abhorred this action, deeming it an intrusion of church into state affairs.[51] D’Argenson soon resigned and was replaced by d’Avaugour, who, in order to avoid any conflict with Laval, decreed harsh penalties against anyone caught selling alcohol to the natives.[52] Again, Laval was unpleased, believing that excommunication was a far more humane consequence. When alcohol was again being sold freely to natives, in a moment of despair over the state of New France, Laval departed for France in August in 1662 to consult with Louis XIV on the matter.[53] Laval succeeded in bringing about d’Avaugour’s recall the following year.[54]

When Laval returned to New France he had increased powers. Louis XIV had assured Laval that he would have a future appointment as bishop, requested that he establish a Sovereign Council in Quebec, and even asked Laval to choose New France’s next governor.[55] For governor, Laval chose Chevalier de Mézy, a friend from his time at the Hermitage of Caen.[56] In the developing Sovereign Council, which held its first session September 18, 1663, Mézy represented the first figure of authority, followed by Laval, and Gaudais-Dupon, commissioner.[57] Laval appointed Mézy hoping to have an ally among high-ranking state official. In the trade of alcohol to the natives he did find in Mézy an ally; together the two forbade the trading of alcohol.[58] However, constituting the Sovereign Council revealed that the two represented conflicting interests in matters of church and state. Soon, another conflict between Laval and governor ensued, leading Laval to take to the streets with drums to tell his version of the feud.[59]

Upon Mézy’s death, the Sovereign council was reorganized. Intendant Jean Talon was added, and immediately assumed the functions previously exercised by Laval.[60] With this change in the council Laval began to attend the council’s meetings less frequently; from then on Laval retreated somewhat from state affairs and focused purely on ecclesiastical matters.[61]

The one issue Laval never relented with, however, was the trade of alcohol to the natives. Once he was appointed bishop, he revisited his original cause. In 1675, Laval, despite Governor Frontenac’s resistance on the matter, proceeded to excommunicate all who sold alcohol to the natives.[62] On May 24, 1679 Laval succeeded in obtaining a royal decree banning the trade.[63]

The Séminaire de Québec [edit]

As bishop, Laval was arguably one of the ultimate sources of authority in New France. However, his dream was not only to expand the church of New France, but to train and teach those who were to follow the way of God as well.[64] On March 26th, 1663, the Grand Séminaire was opened in Quebec and thus the Séminaire de Quebec was born. Its main goal was to train missionary priests and it was affiliated with Laval’s own institution, the Séminaire des Missions-étrangères, in Paris.[65] A few years later, in October 1668, Laval also attached a petit séminaire to this institution. It was meant to train boys, amongst which would be chosen those with vocations to priesthood[66] and it appears that even Natives were welcome.[67] When it opened, only eight French students and six Huron were present, due to a lack of teachers. However, shortly after its opening, a considerable number of French missionaries arrived in the colony.[68] Laval wanted these teachers to spread the word that his institution was to establish a sense of charity and love for religion in the colony and not another source of law or authority.[69]

Laval’s view of the Grand Séminaire was greater than a mere teaching academy. He hoped that it would become a home for all parochial priests. Laval encouraged them to see it as their true home and as a place to which they may turn to in sickness or old age.[70] Furthermore, he wanted the seminary to become a paymaster for all priests and parishes, which meant that it had to be well funded. In order to accomplish this feat, Laval donated most of his own fortunes to the seminary since it had now become his home as well.[71] He also convinced the king, Louis XIV, to give him the income of three different abbeys in France. Moreover, since his institution was expected to pay off all priests, Laval thought it would be normal to receive the incomes levied by their parishes. This idea was however met with a lot of resistance from the population, which was not accustomed to contributing to the upkeep of religious institutions. His original goal of demanding a tax worth one-thirteenth of the produce of farms was met with violent resistance, which forced him to reduce it to one-twenty-sixth.[72]

After firmly establishing his seminary, Laval did share a large part of his administrative work with other religious figures, thus slowly developing the church. He placed Henri de Bernières, the cure of Quebec, at the head of the seminary, thus closely linking it with the Parish of Quebec. Furthermore, he also appointed five other directors who would form the bishop`s advisory body.[73] Laval also took interest in practical education for craftsmen and farmers, founding a school of arts and crafts at Saint-Joachim.[74]

Late years [edit]

Since his arrival in the colony of New France, Laval insisted on establishing and organizing a parochial system, on top of training priests in the colony itself. In 1678, he had obtained an edict from the king stating that permanent curacies will be set up in the colony. A few years later, in 1681, Laval drew up the boundaries of parishes in an attempt to permanently solidify the Church’s position. Often visiting each parish, Laval eventually realised that his health was declining and that he could no longer run his large diocese, which extended from Acadia to Lake Michigan. As a result, in 1688, he passed on his responsibilities as a bishop to Jean Baptiste de Saint-Vallier.[75]

He continued to collaborate with the colony’s high religious authorities, until his very last days. Laval helped the poor with his presence and his gifts of charity. He never missed a mass or a fasting day, despite his ever declining health. By 1707, he had developed an ulcer which eventually took his life on May 6th, 1708.[76] His body was placed in a coffin in the Cathedral; however his heart was kept in the chapel of the seminary to which he had dedicated most of his life and fortunes.[77]

Veneration [edit]

The remains of Bishop Laval have been entombed in a shrine for public veneration in the Cathedral of Notre-Dame de Quebec, which he had founded. He was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1980.

Laval University, founded 1852, was named in his honor.

The city of Laval, Quebec, in the southern part of the province, is named for him.[78]

Notes [edit]

François de Laval
  1. ^ Émile Bégin, François de Laval. (Quebec: Presses Universitaires, 1959), 11.
  2. ^ Adrien, Leblond de Brumath, Bishop Laval. (Toronto: Morang &Co., Limited, 1906), 17.
  3. ^ Idem
  4. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon, accessed Feb 2, 2013, http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=890.
  5. ^ Idem.
  6. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 17.
  7. ^ Ibid, 20.
  8. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon, accessed Feb 2, 2013, http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=890.
  9. ^ Idem.
  10. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 20.
  11. ^ Bégin, 15.
  12. ^ Idem.
  13. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  14. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 21.
  15. ^ Idem.
  16. ^ Idem.
  17. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 22.
  18. ^ Bégin, 19.
  19. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  20. ^ Idem.
  21. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 23.
  22. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  23. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 23.
  24. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  25. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 23.
  26. ^ Ibid, 24.
  27. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  28. ^ Idem.
  29. ^ Robert Choquette, “The Development of the Catholic Church,” Canada’s Religions (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2004), 105.
  30. ^ Idem.
  31. ^ Henry Horace Walsh, The Church in the French era from colonization to the British conquest (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1966), 102.
  32. ^ Idem.
  33. ^ Choquette, 106.
  34. ^ Walsh, 102.
  35. ^ Ibid., 104-5.
  36. ^ Walsh, 105.
  37. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  38. ^ Robert 108; Leblond de Brumath, 26.
  39. ^ Choquette, 108.
  40. ^ Idem.
  41. ^ Walsh, 105.
  42. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 26.
  43. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  44. ^ Idem.
  45. ^ Idem.
  46. ^ Walsh, 133.
  47. ^ Choquette, 109.
  48. ^ Idem.
  49. ^ Idem.
  50. ^ Walsh, 134.
  51. ^ Idem.
  52. ^ Idem.
  53. ^ Idem.
  54. ^ Walsh, 134-135.
  55. ^ Ibid., 135.
  56. ^ Idem.
  57. ^ Lucien Campeau, “Mgr de Laval et le Conseil souverain 1659-1684,” Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française 27, n° 3 (1973): p. 327.
  58. ^ Idem.
  59. ^ Walsh, 136.
  60. ^ Idem.
  61. ^ Idem.
  62. ^ Walsh, 150.
  63. ^ The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon.
  64. ^ Walsh, 137.
  65. ^ The Canadian Encyclopedia, “Séminaire de Québec,” by Hélène Plouffe, accessed Feb 2, 2013, http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/emc/seminaire-de-quebec.
  66. ^ Walsh,137.
  67. ^ The Canadian Encyclopedia, “Séminaire de Québec,” by Hélène Plouffe.
  68. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 105.
  69. ^ Campeau, Lucien. “Le Séminaire de Québec dans le plan de Monseigneur de Laval.” Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique Française 17, no. 3 (1963): 323.
  70. ^ Walsh, 137.
  71. ^ Campeau, Lucien. “Le Séminaire de Québec dans le plan de Monseigneur de Laval.” Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique Française 17, no. 3 (1963): 319.
  72. ^ Walsh, 138.
  73. ^ Idem.
  74. ^ Idem.
  75. ^ Walsh, 151-152.
  76. ^ Leblond de Brumath, 261.
  77. ^ Ibid., 265.
  78. ^ Laval (city) at Britannica

References [edit]

Bégin, Émile. François de Laval. Quebec: Presses Universitaires, 1959.

Campeau, Lucien. “Mgr de Laval et le Conseil souverain 1659-1684.” Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française 27, n° 3 (1973): p. 323-359.

Choquette, Robert. “The Development of the Catholic Church.” Canada’s Religions. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2004.

Leblond de Brumath, Adrien. Bishop Laval. Toronto: Morang & Co., 1906.

The Canadian Encyclopedia, “Séminaire de Québec,” by Hélène Plouffe, accessed Feb 2, 2013, http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/emc/seminaire-de-quebec

The Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online, “LAVAL, FRANÇOIS DE,” by André Vachon, accessed Feb 2, 2013, http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=890.

Walsh, Henry Horace. The Church in the French era from colonization to the British conquest. Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1966.

External links [edit]

Catholic Church titles
Preceded by
Vicariate Apostolic of Quebec
elevated to a diocese 1 October 1674
Bishop of Quebec
1674–1688
Succeeded by
Jean-Baptiste de la Croix de Chevrières de Saint-Vallier