Freedom-class littoral combat ship
Freedom shows off her new camouflage scheme on sea trials in February 2013 before her first deployment
|Operators:||United States Navy|
|Type:||Littoral combat ship|
|Displacement:||3,000 t (3,000 t) (full load)|
|Length:||378 ft (115 m)|
|Beam:||57.4 ft (17.5 m)|
|Draft:||12.8 ft (3.9 m)|
|Installed power:||Electrical: 4 Isotta Fraschini V1708 diesel engines, Hitzinger generator units, 800 kW each|
|Propulsion:||2 Rolls-Royce MT30 36 MW gas turbines, 2 Colt-Pielstick diesel engines, 4 Rolls-Royce waterjets|
|Speed:||47 knots (87 km/h; 54 mph) (sea state 3)|
|Range:||3,500 nmi (6,500 km; 4,000 mi) at 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph)|
|Endurance:||21 days (336 hours)|
|Boats and landing
|11 m (36 ft) RHIB, 40 ft (12 m) high-speed boats|
|Complement:||50 core crew, 65 with mission crew (Blue and Gold crews)|
|EADS North America TRS-3D air and surface search radar|
|Argon ST WBR-2000 ESM system
Terma A/S SKWS decoy system
|Armament:||1 × BAE Systems Mk 110 57 mm gun, 400 rounds in turret and two ready service magazines with 240 rounds each.
One Mk 49 launcher with 21 × RIM-116 Rolling Airframe Missile Surface-to-Air Missiles
|Aircraft carried:||1 × MH-60R/S Seahawk
2 × MQ-8B Fire Scouts or 1 × MQ-8C Fire Scout
The Freedom class was proposed by Lockheed Martin as a contender for USN plans to build a fleet of small, multipurpose warships to operate in the littoral zone. Two ships were approved, to compete with the Independence-class design offered by General Dynamics and Austal for a construction contract of up to 55 vessels.
As of 2013[update], two ships are active and a third is under construction. Despite initial plans to only accept one of the Freedom and Independence variants, the USN has requested that Congress order ten ships of each variant.
Planning and construction
Planning for a class of small, multipurpose warships to operate in the littoral zone began in the early 2000s. The construction contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin's LCS team (Lockheed Martin, Gibbs & Cox, Marinette Marine, Bollinger Shipyards) in May 2004 for two vessels. These would then be compared to two ships built by Austal USA to determine which design would be taken up by the Navy for a production run of up to 55 ships.
The keel of the lead ship USS Freedom was laid down in June 2005, by Marinette Marine in Marinette, Wisconsin. She was christened in September 2006, delivered to the Navy in September 2008, and commissioned that November. During INSURV trials, 2,600 discrepancies were discovered, including 21 considered high-priority. Not all of these were rectified before the ship entered service, as moving the ship away from Milwaukee before the winter freeze was considered a higher priority.
Cost overruns during Freedom 's construction combined with projected future overruns led the government to issue a "Stop-work" in January 2007 and ultimately led to the cancellation of construction of LCS-3 (the second Lockheed Martin ship) on April 13, 2007. This ship was later re-ordered.
The ship is a semi-planing steel monohull with an aluminum superstructure. It is 377 feet (115 m) in length, displaces 2,950 metric tons, and can go faster than 45 knots (83 km/h; 52 mph). The design incorporates a large reconfigurable seaframe to allow rapidly interchangeable mission modules, a flight deck with integrated helicopter launch, recovery and handling system and the capability to launch and recover boats (manned and unmanned) from both the stern and side.
The flight deck is 1.5 times the size of that of a standard surface ship, and uses a Trigon traversing system to move helicopters in and out of the hangar. The ship has two ways to launch and recover various mission packages: a stern ramp and a starboard side door near the waterline. The mission module bay has a 3-axis crane for positioning modules or cargo. Problems with the electrical systems are the most serious problems with the Freedom class.
The fore deck has a modular weapons zone which can be used for a 57 mm gun turret or missile launcher. A Rolling Airframe Missile launcher is mounted above the hangar for short-range defense against aircraft and cruise missiles, and .50-caliber gun mounts are provided topside. The Fleet-class unmanned surface vessel is designed for operations from Freedom variant ships.
The core crew will be 40 sailors, usually joined by a mission package crew and an aviation detachment for a total crew of about 75. Automation allows a reduced crew, which greatly reduces operating costs, but workload can still be "gruelling". During testing of the class lead, two ship's companies will rotate on four-month assignments.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that fuel will account for only "8 percent to 18 percent" of the total life-cycle costs for Freedom. Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama has called the report into question and has suggested that Independence, built in his state, would be more fuel efficient and that less frequent refuelings would have an impact on military operations beyond the cost of fuel.
Survivability has been a criticism of both Littoral Combat Ship classes, rated at level one by the Navy, compared to level two for the Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided-missile frigates (FFG) they are designed to replace. Lockheed claims the Freedom class is actually more survivable than the FFGs because Navy requirements of various survivability levels have changed since the FFGs were assessed, and that the Freedoms ' hull is made of high-strength, low-weight steel that was not previously around.
USS Milwaukee was the first Freedom-class LCS to be fitted with cavitation performance waterjets. The jets create partial vacuums in liquid using an improved impeller blade design. Cavitation jets do not increase the ship's top speed, but deliver 10 percent greater fuel efficiency with less noise and vibration, reduced life-cycle costs, improved maintainability, increased availability, and potentially improved efficiency at lower speeds. The Navy plans to add the new waterjets to every Freedom variant that is produced, including LCS 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13. The mixed flow design was changed to an axial design to push water parallel to the shaft of the impeller.
The first ships of both LCS classes were delivered before the designs were mature so that improvements could be built into future ships. Many improvements to the Freedom class came from the problems experienced by USS Freedom on its first deployment including power outages, corroded equipment, a faulty air compressor. To prevent water being taken into the anchor windlass room, the anchor winch, hydraulic unit, and mooring capstan were replaced with a single electric chain winch on the main deck, and the existing towing chain was replaced with a lighter chain. Corrosion resistance was also improved by the Impressed Current Cathodic Protection system being modified by adding protections to the water jet inlet tunnel. Starting with LCS-3, the stern transom was lengthened and buoyancy tanks were added to the stern to increase weight service and enhance stability. A significantly less complex gas turbine electric start system will be added on LCS-5 to reduce costs and lower ship weight.
Starting with LCS-17, the Freedom-class ships will be equipped with the TRS-4D naval radar. The TRS-4D is an AESA radar built by Airbus Defense and Space that is also going on German F125-class frigates, a difference being the LCS will have a rotating version. It combines advanced surveillance, target acquisition, self-defense, gunfire support, and aircraft control capabilities in a single radar to detect and track small targets to increase ship reaction time.
Lockheed submitted a variety of upgrade options for Freedom-class ships to the Small Surface Combatant Task Force, aimed at transforming the Littoral Combat Ship from "niche" platforms into ships with more protection and firepower beyond Flight 0 to survive against more advanced military adversaries. With 180 metric tons of space available for mission packages, there is room for added capabilities. Anti-aircraft warfare was suggested with the installation of a SPY-1F air defense radar and permanently installed vertical launch systems (VLS). Current 118-meter length versions could house 4 to 32 VLS cells, each holding four RIM-162D Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles or one SM-2 missile. For surface warfare, the Mk 110 cannon could be replaced with a larger gun up to the Mk 45 5-inch cannon; integration of the AGM-114L Hellfire missile for defense against fast attack craft (FAC) was also factored in. Lockheed's approach was to integrate mission systems into the hull so that the ships could perform anti-submarine, anti-surface, and anti-aircraft duties without needing to swap out mission packages. Weight would be increased from 3,400 tons to 3,600 tons and the hull could be stretched an additional 7–10 m (23–33 ft). In addition to adding vertical launch tubes and a sonar, the main gun would be integrated with the stronger and more sophisticated radar.
The Navy's recommendation to base the Small Surface Combatant on upgraded versions of both Freedom and Independence LCSs was accepted in December 2014. Although Lockheed submitted improvements including vertical launch systems, 76 mm guns, and advanced combat systems and sensors, the Navy opted to keep the 57 mm gun, not add a VLS, and chose to add an upgraded 3-D radar. Other changes included installation of an unspecified over-the-horizon missile, Mark 38 25 mm guns, a torpedo countermeasures system, a multifunction towed array system, installation the SeaRAM launcher, an upgraded countermeasures decoy system, an upgraded electronic warfare system, armor added to vital spaces, and improved signature management. The SSC will focus in SUW and ASW with these additions, as well as retaining all other features of their mission packages; the SSC is not required to perform MCM, which will continue to be handled by the LCS. The vessels will retain a degree of modularity to concentrate on one mission set and will still have mission bays, although they may be reduced. SSC vessels are planned to begin procurement by 2019, and it is being investigated if the enhancements can be added to existing LCS hulls.
Two Freedom-class LCS ships have been commissioned. Four more are under construction by Lockheed Martin. Four more are on order. An additional two ships are planned.
As of November 2014[update], the latest order for Freedom-class LCS ships was for LCS-17 and LCS-19. On March 10, 2014, the Navy awarded contract options to fund construction of LCS-17 and LCS-19, the seventh and eighth ships in a 10-ship contract.
|Ship||Hull Number||Laid down||Launched||Commissioned||Fate|
|Freedom||LCS-1||2 June 2005||23 September 2006||8 November 2008||Active in service|
|Fort Worth||LCS-3||11 July 2009||7 December 2010||22 September 2012||Active in service|
|Milwaukee||LCS-5||27 October 2011||18 December 2013||Fitting out|
|Detroit||LCS-7||11 August 2012||18 October 2014||Under construction|
|Little Rock||LCS-9||27 June 2013||Under construction|
|Sioux City||LCS-11||18 February 2014||Under construction|
Surface Combat Ship
The Surface Combat Ship was offered to Saudi Arabia as part of a 2011 arms deal. The total cost for the eight ships was reported to be as much as $5 billion. The Saudi Naval Expansion Program II calls for some $20 billion for new warships, which can include up to 12 Freedom-class ships; the Saudis have not looked to purchase Austal's Independence-class ship. The Saudis, as well as other potential foreign buyers, want permanent weapons capabilities built into the ship rather than interchangeable mission packages. Another potential ship under evaluation is the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer; the Freedom class would be outfitted with vertical missile launchers and the SPY-1F radar, a smaller and lighter but shorter range version of Arleigh Burke 's SPY-1D. A decision between the ships would be based on the desire for a large-hulled ship with a large missile defense system or a larger number of small-hulled multi-mission ships.
In 2012, Lockheed renamed the SCS to match GD's Multi-Mission Combatant term and revealed that the full capabilities, such as Aegis, would only be available on a stretched 3,500 ton hull.
Lockheed has also been working on a trimmed down version of the Freedom combat system to offer on the international market for smaller patrol vessels. This Multi-Mission Combat Ship adds in phased-array radar and a vertical launch system on a smaller hull with a smaller crew size, at the cost of removing the high speed gas turbines and one third of the mission module area.
- Fabey, Michael (9 May 2012). "What Price Freedom? Cost Concerns Continue To Bedevil LCS". Aviation Week. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Littoral Combat Ship datasheet[dead link]
- "LCS Littoral Combat Ship". Retrieved 2008-09-20.[dead link]
- Cavas, Christopher P. (6 January 2014). "Next LCS Deployment To Last 16 Months". defensenews.com. Gannett Government Media Corporation. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "AN/SQR-20". deagel.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Littoral Combat Ship at the Joint Meeting INTERNATIONAL HYDROFOIL SOCIETY SNAME Panel SD-5[dead link]
- "Littoral Combat Ship". Navsea - NSWC Dahlgren Division. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Q & A with the U.S. Navy on Lockheed Martin Hellfire missiles for Littoral Combat Ships". navyrecognition.com. 17 July 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Freedburg Jr., Sydney J. (17 December 2014). "Fire Scout Grows Up: Drone Getting Radar, Rockets, 2016 IOC". Breakingdefense.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "US Navy Fact File: LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP CLASS - LCS". US Navy. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Ross, Ken (15 April 2003). "Lockheed Martin LCS Team Introduces Sea Blade Concept for Navy's LCS Program". Lockheed Martin.[dead link]
- "LCS Brochure"[dead link]
- Onley, Dawn. "Lockheed Martin to build advanced Navy ship". Government Computer News. Retrieved September 23, 2006.[dead link]
- "Lockheed Martin Team Delivers Nation's First Littoral Combat Ship to U.S. Navy". Retrieved 2008-09-20.[dead link]
- Ewing, Philip (9 December 2009). "Navy: InSurv recommends accepting LCS 2". Military Times. Retrieved 14 March 2015. (subscription required)
- GAO-09-326SP "Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs". United States Government Accountability Office. March 2009. p. 106. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Cost Growth Leads To Stop-Work On Team Lockheed LCS-3 Construction". Defense Industry Daily. 16 April 2007. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Sessions, Jeff (3 November 2010). "Sessions comments today regarding the Navy's proposal to purchase additional Littoral Combat Ship". Office of Jeff Sessions. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "US Navy said to buy LCS warships from both bidders". Reuters. 3 November 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (4 November 2010). "Navy asks Congress to buy both LCS designs". NavyTimes. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Nation’s First Littoral Combat Ship Demonstrates Key Mission Package Launch And Recovery System". Lockheed Martin. 2007-10-11.[dead link]
- Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. (17 January 2014). "Littoral Combat Ship Cut Plan Reopens Navy Riff: Build ‘Em Fast Or Rugged". Breakingdefense.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Sobie, Brendan (24 August 2010). "AUVSI: Making a splash". Flightglobal. Reed Business Information. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Jean, Grace V. (September 2010). "Duty Aboard the Littoral Combat Ship: ‘Grueling but Manageable’". National Defense. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Jones, Meg (5 November 2008). "Navy's Vessel Of Versatility". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Howard, Courtenay E. (1 April 2008). "USS Freedom demonstrates its power plant can handle vessel’s sensors and electronics". Military & Aerospace Electronics. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Life-Cycle Costs of Selected Navy Ships". Congressional Budget Office. 28 April 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "CBO Report Calls into Question Navy’s LCS Evaluation". Bignews.biz. 29 April 2010. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Capaccio, Tony (23 April 2013). "Littoral Combat Ship Network Can Be Hacked, Navy Finds". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Lawlor, Maryann (December 2005). "Littoral Combat Ship Launches Change". SIGNAL Online. AFCEA International. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. (10 June 2014). "Lockheed Says It Can ‘Easily’ Improve LCS". Breakingdefense.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Osborn, Kris (15 May 2014). "LCS5 Gets New Waterjets". Defensetech.org. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Osborn, Kris (27 June 2014). "Navy Engineers LCS Changes". DoDBuzz.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "TRS-4D radar to equip Freedom Variant LCS". Shephardmedia.com. 30 October 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- LeGrone, Sam (10 June 2014). "Lockheed Outlines Post Littoral Combat Ship Pitch". News.USNI.org. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Osborn, Kris (3 September 2014). "Lockheed Offers Navy New LCS Variant". Defensetech.org. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (11 December 2014). "Split Decision on New US Navy Ship". Defensenews.com. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "On Your Mark… Get Set… Go! LCS 17, 19 at the Starting Line". Lockheed Martin. 10 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Lockheed Martin pitches light warship concept for Gulf radar picket[dead link]
- LCS International brochure[dead link]
- Wolf, Jim (8 April 2011). "Saudis ask U.S. for price quotes for warships". Reuters. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Surface Combat Ship Designed as a Multi-mission Ship."[dead link]
- "Lockheed proposes $5bn Aegis ships sale to Saudi Arabia". Arabian Business.com. Bloomberg News. 26 May 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Shalal-Esa, Andrea (21 November 2013). "BIW could get $20 billion contract as Saudi Arabia looks to expand Navy". Bangor Daily News. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Lockheed Martin offers LCS-derived Multi-Mission Combatant."[dead link]
- Wall, Robert (26 October 2012). "BAE and Thales plot course for smaller warships to fight pirates". The Independent. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (17 February 2013). "China Shipbuilder Calls for Greater Cooperation with U.S. Firms". DefenseNews. Retrieved 14 March 2015.